TECHNICAL FIELDOF THE INVENTION

This invention relates in general to the field of computer systems and more particularly to the field of computer database systems.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Often, data and information maintained on a number of remote database systems must be transferred to and consolidated on a central database. Each remote database may contain information and data for a unique geographic or business sector, andeach remote database may operate on a database platform different from the database platform of the central database.

In order for the content of a central database to be synchronized with the content of one or more remote databases, an initial update must transfer all the data in each of the remote databases to the central database. For this instant at least,the central database is synchronized with each of the remote databases. As the remote databases are updated, however, the central database falls out of synchronization with the remote databases. In the case of a nationwide system for compiling customerdata for cable television, credit card, or mail order companies, the centralized database will often quickly fall out of synchronization as the content of each of the remote databases is changed by updates, additions, or deletions to the customerdatabases located at one or more remote sites.

In the cable television context, each of the remote databases may contain customer and residence information. The remote databases may be accessed by, for example, one or more remote computers, or remote database servers. The remote computersmay be Tandem computers, which comprise a business application platform of fault tolerant, multi processor computers often used for transaction processing. The central database may be accessed by a central database computer, which may, for example,operate on a Unix platform.

In order to transfer changes from each of the remote databases to the central database, it is often necessary to read the audit trail files of each of the remote databases to recognize updates, additions, and deletions to the remote databases. The changes to the remote databases are then processed and placed in a database of change. However, during the period that the database of change is being sent over to the central database, the remote computers continue to create audit trail files asadditional changes are made to the remote databases. Because of the delay caused by the transfer of updates to the central database, the audit trail files created by the remote databases are purged as new audit trail files are created. Thus, as thedatabase of change is being transferred to the central database, subsequent updates to the remote database may not be recognized during subsequent reads of the audit trail files, and changes to the remote databases may not be transferred to the centraldatabase.

Further, if the connection between the remote databases and the central database fails during the transfer of the database of change to the central database, the data in the database of change could be lost entirely. Also, the central databasemay not receive the updated information from the remote databases if a CPU on one of the remote database computers fails during the transfer of the database changes to the central database.

Therefore, a need has arisen for a computer system that is able to synchronize the content of a central database with one or more remote databases.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, a database synchronization system and method is provided that substantially eliminates or reduces the disadvantages and problems associated with previous database synchronization systems. It is thereforean object of the present invention to provide a database synchronization system capable of efficiently synchronizing a central database with one or more remote databases during periods of heavy transaction activity on the remote databases and on thecentral database. It is a further object of the present invention to provide a database synchronization system capable of robust error detection and error avoidance and correction.

The database synchronization system and method of the present invention comprises a system and method for synchronizing one or more remote databases with a central database. The remote database and the central database may reside on computerswith different database platforms. In the cable television context, for example, the remote computers may comprise computers suitable for transaction processing applications.

The database synchronization system and method of the present invention includes a data extract and transfer application stored on one or more remote computers. The audit trail files, which are generated by the remote computers are first readand processed by a migrator application. The migrator application creates a database of change from the updates, additions, and deletions recorded in the audit trail files. When the database of change reaches a size threshold, the data extract andtransfer application shuts down the migrator application and renames the database of change. The data extract and transfer application restarts the migrator application so that the migrator application can create another database of change while therenamed database of change is being processed by the data extract and transfer application.

The data extract and transfer application creates a series of flat files from the renamed database of change. The task of creating these files is distributed across the CPUs and storage devices of the remote computers. Because each remotecomputer has a plurality of CPUs and associated storage devices, the task of creating the flat files from the database of change can be distributed across these available resources. Before assigning a CPU the task of building a flat file on a particularstorage device, the data extract and transfer application first determines whether the CPU is operational and whether the associated storage device has available storage space.

The flat files created by the data extract and transfer application are transferred according to a predetermined file transfer protocol across a communications line to the central computer. If the communications line fails during the transferoperation, the data extract and transfer application attempts to repeat the transfer of the flat files until the communications line becomes operational. Once the flat files have been transferred to the central computer, the data extract and transferapplication drops the renamed database of change and purges the flat files. The database synchronization system of the present invention allows the migrator application to continue processing the audit trail files of the remote computers while theinformation contained in the renamed database of change is transferred to the central computer.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages associated therewith may be acquired by referring to the accompanying drawings in which like reference numbers indicate like features and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of the database system of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of a remote computer according to the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a data flow diagram of the data extract and transfer application of the present invention; and

FIG. 4 is a flow chart of the data extract and transfer application of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of a database synchronization system indicated generally at 10. A plurality of remote database systems 12 is connected via a communications line 14 to a central database stored on a central computer 16. Inone embodiment of the present invention, communications line 14 may comprise an Ethernet connection, although other transmission mediums may be employed. Each remote database system 12 may include one or more remote computers 18. Remote computers 18may comprise, for example, Tandem computers of Tandem Computers Inc. of Cupertino, Calif. Tandem computers are fault tolerant, multi processor computers often employed for transaction processing. Other computers, however, may easily be substituted byone of ordinary skill in the art.

Associated with each of remote computers 18 of remote database systems 12 are a plurality of CPUs or central processors 17 and data storage devices 15. Each remote database system 12 may be organized such that data or information for aparticular geographic or business sector is located on a particular data storage device 15 or a group of data storage devices.

For a cable television application, an database associated with a remote computer 18 may contain customer and marketing data for those customers of a particular geographic region. For example, a database system in Atlanta may contain thecustomer and residence information for those customers and residences located in the Atlantic and southern states, while a database system in Sacramento may contain the customer and residence information for those customers and residences in the Pacificstates. Central computer 16 may store a central database on a Unix platform.

A data extraction and transfer application 20 is stored on each of remote computers 18. Each remote computer 18, shown in FIG. 2, is able to create and maintain a user-configurable number of audit trail files 24 stored on the remote data storagedevices 15. Each remote computer 18 will typically create between five and ten audit trail files 24. Each remote computer 18 can, however, create more than ten audit trails depending on the size of the audit trail files. The audit trail files 24 ofeach remote computer 18 provide a record of the database transactions for each of the databases stored on the data storage devices 15. Remote computers 18 create the audit trail files 24 in order to maintain the integrity of the databases of the remotecomputers. If a database on a remote computer 18 is corrupted during a database transaction, the remote computer 18 can access the audit trail files 24 to roll the database back to a stable point free of corruption.

The size of each audit trail file 24 is configurable and can range in size from 50-200 megabytes. In the case of a remote computer 18 having a user-configurable limit of five audit trail files 24, the remote computer 18 writes to and fills thememory of the first of the five audit trail files. After the remote computer 18 has written to and filled the first audit trail file, the remote computer 18 creates and writes to a second audit trail file. After the remote computer 18 writes to andfills the second audit trail file, the remote computer 18 creates and writes to a third audit trail file, and so on. After the remote computer 18 has written to and filled the fifth audit trail file, the remote computer 18 purges the first audit trailfile upon the creation of the sixth audit trail file so that only five audit trail files exist at any one time. While changes are being made to the databases on the data storage devices 15, the remote computer 18 continues to purge successive audittrail files 24 as new audit trail files 24 are created to store a record of database transactions.

A migrator application 26, which in one embodiment is TMF Migrator, developed by Unlimited Software Associates of Malvern, Pa., reads and processes the information contained in audit trail files 24. Migrator application 26 is a set ofcommercially available programs and tools able to synthesize information from the audit trail files 24 to produce a database of change 28. Database of change 28 is a record of all the updates, additions, or deletions made to the databases on the datastorage devices 15 during the time period covered by the audit trail files 24 processed by the migrator application 26. To maintain the synchronization of the central database in central computer 16, database of change 28 of each of remote computers 18must be transmitted periodically to central computer 16.

In the cable television context, the databases associated with remote computer 18 may include a customer database, which contains data on each cable customer, such as subscription and payment information; and a residence database, which containsdata for each residence in the cable franchise's service area. Configuration file 30 contains a listing of the categories of database changes to be extracted from the databases and placed in database of change 28. Migrator application 26 readsconfiguration file 30 and monitors audit trail files 24 for updates, additions, or deletions according to the categories specified in configuration file 30. Thus, configuration file 30 can be defined so that only certain data located in the databasessuch as particular tables and columns in the databases stored on the data storage devices 15 are extracted and transferred to the central database on central computer 16. For example, in the cable television example, if the central database is amarketing database, then configuration file 30 may be altered so that central computer 16 is synchronized only with the marketing-related data in the databases stored on each of the data storage devices 15, even though other data may be availablethereon. As a result, the central database associated with central computer 16 contains marketing-related data and information on the customers and potential customers in the area of operation of the cable television provider.

From audit trail files 24, migrator application 26 extracts updates, additions, and deletions to the particular categories of data specified in configuration file 30 and places this information in database of change 28. Database of change 28includes five Structured Query Language (SQL) tables. The five tables of database of change 28 contain information on the updates, additions, or deletions to the tables and columns specified in configuration file 30.

Of the five tables in the database of change, the table having the least amount of detail is the Tables Table 32. The fields of Tables Table 32 contain the name and identification number for the tables in the databases associated with remotecomputers 18 that have experienced updates, additions, or deletions. Columns Table 34 is more detailed than Tables Table 32. The fields of Columns Table 34 contain the name and number of the columns in the tables in the databases that have experiencedupdates, additions, or deletions during the time period covered by the audit trail files 24 processed by migrator application 26.

The Transaction Table 36 of database of change 28 contains information on each transaction made to the databases stored on the data storage devices 15. The fields of Transaction Table 36 include the transaction identification number, start time,end time, and completion code for each database transaction made to the databases associated with remote computers 18 during the time period covered by the audit trail files 24 processed by migrator application 26. The Event Table 38 containsinformation on each operation, or event, within each database transaction identified in Transaction Table 36. A single database transaction may have one or more operations. For example, a single database transaction may both add and delete an entry tothe customer database. The fields of Event Table 38 include the transaction identification number, table number, event time, and event type.

The Image Table 40 is the most detailed of the five tables in database of change 28 and consequently grows the fastest of the five tables in database of change 28. The fields of Image Table 40 contain the before and after image of each operationwithin each database transaction. Other fields of Image Table 40 contain information concerning the time of the operation, column number, image type, and text type.

Controller module 22 of data extraction and transfer application 20 starts migrator application 26 and Audit Trail Open module 42. Audit Trail Open Module 42 opens audit trail files 24 prior to the processing of audit trail files 24 by migratorapplication 26 and keeps audit trail files 24 open during the processing of these files by migrator application 26. So long as a particular audit trail file is open, it cannot be purged by remote computer 18. Once migrator application 26 completes itsprocessing of an audit trail file, Audit Trail Open module 42 releases the processed audit trail file so that it can be purged by remote computer 18, if necessary.

Controller module 22 monitors the growth of database of change 28. Once Image Table 40 reaches a user-configurable size limitation, controller module 22 shuts down migrator application 26. The size limitation of Image Table 40 may preferablyrange between eight and twenty megabytes. Upon the shutdown of migrator application 26, any audit trail file 24 that is currently being processed by migrator application 26 is kept open by Audit Trail Open module 42 so that migrator application 26 cancontinue processing the open audit trail file when migrator application 26 is restarted.

During the period that migrator application 26 is shut down, controller module 22 starts Table Move module 44. Table Move module 44 moves database of change 28 by executing an SQL rename command to rename each of the five tables in the databaseof change. The renamed database of change 46 is now available to be processed by the remainder of data extraction and transfer application 20. Controller module 22 restarts migrator application 26 so that migrator application 26 can resume processingaudit trail files 24 to continue extracting updates, additions, and deletions to the databases. The three steps of (1) halting migrator application 26, (2) renaming database of change 28 into renamed database of change 46, and (3) restarting migratorapplication 26 so that migrator application 26 can begin creating another database of change 28 insure that migrator application 26 is shut down for only a brief period, thereby allowing migrator application 26 to keep up with the extraction of changesfrom audit trail files 24 and the placement of these changes in database of change 28. Thus, while the remainder of data extraction and transfer application 20 is processing the database changes located in renamed database of change 46, migratorapplication 26 is able to continue writing a record of the updates, additions, and deletions to the databases stored on the data storage devices 15 to database of change 28.

The data in the tables in renamed database of change 46 are converted to a series of flat files 48 by Build Flat Files module 50. Build Flat Files module 50 builds unstructured flat files 48 from the information contained in renamed database ofchange 46. Build Flat Files module 50 names flat files 48 in the FDDHHMMI format (where F is the file type, DD is the day of the month, HH and MM are the time, and I is a unique file identifier) . The flat files are unstructured and are compatiblebetween otherwise noncompatible computer systems. Once Build Flat Files module 50 has completed the preparation of flat files 48 from renamed database of change 46, Build Flat Files module 50 sends a completion signal to Table Drop module 51. TableDrop module 51 drops renamed database of change 46 once database of change 28 reaches its predetermined size threshold. Thus, renamed database of change 46 is not dropped until database of change 28 reaches its predetermined size threshold to triggerTable Move module 44 to rename database of change 28 to renamed database of change 46 and replace the renamed database of change 46 whose content has already been transferred to central computer 16.

Build Flat Files module 50 distributes the task of building flat files 48 across the processors 17 of each of remote computers 18. As specified above, each remote computer 18 may have a plurality of processors 17. Build Flat Files module 50first determines whether a particular processor 17 is operational before attempting to build a flat file 48 with that processor. If a processor 17 is found to be nonoperational, Build Flat Files module 50 queries another processor. After a selectedprocessor completes the build of a flat file 48, Build Flat Files module 50 posts a message to controller module 22 that the build of the flat file was successful. If a processor 17 fails during a build of a flat file 48, Build Flat Files module 50 willroute the task of building the flat file to another processor.

Each processor 17 is associated with one or more data storage devices 15. In one embodiment of present invention, data storage devices 15 comprise disk drives, but data storage devices may comprise other storage mediums such as tape storagedevices, optical storage devices. Build Flat Files module 50 determines whether the data storage device 15 associated with the processor 17 selected by Build Flat Files module 50 has available space. If the data storage device 15 has inadequate space,Build Flat Files module 50 selects another processor 17 and data storage device 15.

After Build Flat Files module 50 has constructed a flat file 48, File Transfer module 52 transfers to central computer 16 a copy of the flat file 48. File Transfer module 52 continuously scans the data storage devices 15 of each of the remotecomputers 18 for completed flat files. File Transfer module 52 determines whether communications line 14 is available for transfer of flat files 48 to central computer 16. If communications line 14 is not operational, File Transfer module 52 attemptsto transfer flat files 48 until communications line 14 becomes operational. File Transfer module 52 transfers the flat files 48 to central computer 16 according to a standard predetermined file transfer protocol. File Transfer module 52 waits for thereceipt of a successful transfer signal from the central computer 16 before purging copies of the flat files 48 that have been transferred to central computer 16. If communications line 14 fails during the transfer of flat files 52, flat files 52 aresaved on the remote computers 18 and are resent by the remote computers once data line 14 is restored.

Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood the various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

* * * * *