Register or Login To Download This Patent As A PDF
| United States Patent Application |
20010047527
|
| Kind Code
|
A1
|
|
Larkins, James R.
|
November 29, 2001
|
Inbred corn plant 16IUL6 and seeds thereof
Abstract
According to the invention, there is provided an inbred corn plant
designated 16IUL6. This invention thus relates to the plants, seeds and
tissue cultures of the inbred corn plant 16IUL6, and to methods for
producing a corn plant produced by crossing the inbred corn plant 16IUL6
with itself or with another corn plant, such as another inbred. This
invention further relates to corn seeds and plants produced by crossing
the inbred plant 16IUL6 with another corn plant, such as another inbred,
and to crosses with related species. This invention further relates to
the inbred and hybrid genetic complements of the inbred corn plant
16IUL6, and also to the SSR and genetic isozyme typing profiles of inbred
corn plant 16IUL6.
| Inventors: |
Larkins, James R.; (Troy, OH)
|
| Correspondence Address:
|
Robert E. Hanson
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
Suite 2400
600 Congress Avenue
Austin
TX
78701
US
|
| Assignee: |
DEKALB GENETICS CORPORATION
|
| Serial No.:
|
756466 |
| Series Code:
|
09
|
| Filed:
|
January 8, 2001 |
| Current U.S. Class: |
800/320.1; 800/275 |
| Class at Publication: |
800/320.1; 800/275 |
| International Class: |
A01H 005/00 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. Inbred corn seed of the corn plant 16IUL6, sample of said seed having
been deposited under ATCC Accession No. ______.
2. The inbred corn seed of claim 1, further defined as an essentially
homogeneous population of inbred corn seed.
3. The inbred corn seed of claim 1, further defined as essentially free
from hybrid seed.
4. An inbred corn plant produced by growing the seed of the inbred corn
plant 16IUL6, a sample of said seed having been deposited under ATCC
Accession No. ______.
5. Pollen of the plant of claim 4.
6. An ovule of the plant of claim 4.
7. An essentially homogeneous population of corn plants produced by
growing the seed of the inbred corn plant 16IUL6, a sample of said seed
having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. _______.
8. A corn plant capable of expressing all the physiological and
morphological characteristics of the inbred corn plant 16IUL6, a sample
of the seed of said inbred corn plant 16IUL6 having been deposited under
ATCC Accession No. ______.
9. The corn plant of claim 8, further comprising a factor conferring male
sterility.
10. A tissue culture of regenerable cells of inbred corn plant 16IUL6,
wherein the tissue regenerates plants capable of expressing all the
physiological and morphological characteristics of the inbred corn plant
16IUL6, a sample of the seed of said inbred corn plant 16IUL6 having been
deposited under ATCC Accession No. ______.
11. The tissue culture of claim 10, wherein the regenerable cells comprise
cells derived from embryos, immature embryos, meristematic cells,
immature tassels, microspores, pollen, leaves, anthers, roots, root tips,
silk, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, husks, or stalks.
12. The tissue culture of claim 11, wherein the regenerable cells comprise
protoplasts or callus.
13. A corn plant regenerated from the tissue culture of claim 10, wherein
said corn plant is capable of expressing all of the physiological and
morphological characteristics of the inbred corn plant designated 16IUL6,
a sample of the seed of said inbred corn plant designated 16IUL6 having
been deposited under ATCC Accession No. ______.
14. An inbred corn plant cell of the corn plant of claim 8, said cell
comprising: (a) an SSR genetic marker profile in accordance with the
profile shown in Table 6; or (b) a genetic isozyme typing profile in
accordance with the profile shown in Table 7.
15. A corn seed comprising the inbred corn plant cell of claim 14.
16. A tissue culture comprising the inbred corn plant cell of claim 14.
17. The inbred corn plant of claim 8, comprising: (a) an SSR genetic
marker profile in accordance with the profile shown in Table 6; or (b) a
genetic isozyme typing profile in accordance with the profile shown in
Table 7.
18. A process of producing corn seed, comprising crossing a first parent
corn plant with a second parent corn plant, wherein said first or second
corn plant is the inbred corn plant 16IUL6, a sample of the seed of said
inbred corn plant 16IUL6 having been deposited under ATCC Accession No.
______, wherein seed is allowed to form.
19. The process of claim 18, further defined as a process of producing
hybrid corn seed, comprising crossing a first inbred corn plant with a
second, distinct inbred corn plant, wherein said first or second inbred
corn plant is the inbred corn plant 16IUL6, a sample of the seed of said
inbred corn plant 16IUL6 having been deposited under ATCC Accession No.
______.
20. The process of claim 19, wherein crossing comprises the steps of: (a)
planting in pollinating proximity seeds of said first and second inbred
corn plants; (b) cultivating the seeds of said first and second inbred
corn plants into plants that bear flowers; (c) emasculating the male
flowers of said first or second inbred corn plant to produce an
emasculated corn plant; (d) allowing cross-pollination to occur between
said first and second inbred corn plants; and (e) harvesting seeds
produced on said emasculated corn plant.
21. The process of claim 20, further comprising growing said harvested
seed to produce a hybrid corn plant.
22. Hybrid corn seed produced by the process of claim 20.
23. A hybrid corn plant produced by the process of claim 21.
24. The hybrid corn plant of claim 23, wherein the plant is a first
generation (F.sub.1) hybrid corn plant.
25. The corn plant of claim 4, further comprising a single locus
conversion.
26. The corn plant of claim 25, wherein the single locus was stably
inserted into a corn genome by transformation.
27. The corn plant of claim 25, wherein the locus is selected from the
group consisting of a dominant allele and a recessive allele.
28. The corn plant of claim 25, wherein the locus confers a trait selected
from the group consisting of herbicide resistance, insect resistance,
resistance to bacterial, fungal, nematode or viral disease, yield
enhancement, waxy starch, improved nutritional quality, enhanced yield
stability, male sterility and restoration of male fertility.
Description
[0001] This application claims the priority of U.S. Provisional
Application No. 60/183,385, filed Feb. 18, 2000, the disclosure of which
is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] The present invention relates generally to the field of corn
breeding. In particular, the invention relates to inbred corn seed and
plants designated 16IUL6, and derivatives and tissue cultures thereof
[0004] 2. Description of Related Art
[0005] The goal of field crop breeding is to combine various desirable
traits in a single variety/hybrid. Such desirable traits include greater
yield, better stalks, better roots, resistance to insecticides,
herbicides, pests, and disease, tolerance to heat and drought, reduced
time to crop maturity, better agronomic quality, higher nutritional
value, and uniformity in germination times, stand establishment, growth
rate, maturity, and fruit size.
[0006] Breeding techniques take advantage of a plant's method of
pollination. There are two general methods of pollination: a plant
self-pollinates if pollen from one flower is transferred to the same or
another flower of the same plant. A plant cross-pollinates if pollen
comes to it from a flower on a different plant.
[0007] Corn plants (Zea mays L.) can be bred by both self-pollination and
cross-pollination. Both types of pollination involve the corn plant's
flowers. Corn has separate male and female flowers on the same plant,
located on the tassel and the ear, respectively. Natural pollination
occurs in corn when wind blows pollen from the tassels to the silks that
protrude from the tops of the ear shoot.
[0008] Plants that have been self-pollinated and selected for type over
many generations become homozygous at almost all gene loci and produce a
uniform population of true breeding progeny, a homozygous plant. A cross
between two such homozygous plants produces a uniform population of
hybrid plants that are heterozygous for many gene loci. Conversely, a
cross of two plants each heterozygous at a number of loci produces a
population of hybrid plants that differ genetically and are not uniform.
The resulting non-uniformity makes performance unpredictable.
[0009] The development of uniform corn plant hybrids requires the
development of homozygous inbred plants, the crossing of these inbred
plants, and the evaluation of the crosses. Pedigree breeding and
recurrent selection are examples of breeding methods used to develop
inbred plants from breeding populations. Those breeding methods combine
the genetic backgrounds from two or more inbred plants or various other
broad-based sources into breeding pools from which new inbred plants are
developed by selfing and selection of desired phenotypes. The new inbreds
are crossed with other inbred plants and the hybrids from these crosses
are evaluated to determine which of those have commercial potential.
[0010] The pedigree breeding method involves crossing two genotypes. Each
genotype can have one or more desirable characteristics lacking in the
other; or, each genotype can complement the other. If the two original
parental genotypes do not provide all of the desired characteristics,
other genotypes can be included in the breeding population. Superior
plants that are the products of these crosses are selfed and selected in
successive generations. Each succeeding generation becomes more
homogeneous as a result of self-pollination and selection. Typically,
this method of breeding involves five or more generations of selfing and
selection: S.sub.1.fwdarw.S.sub.2; S.sub.2.fwdarw.S.sub.3;
S.sub.3.fwdarw.S.sub.4; S.sub.4.fwdarw.S.sub.5, etc. After at least five
generations, the inbred plant is considered genetically pure.
[0011] Backcrossing can also be used to improve an inbred plant.
Backcrossing transfers a specific desirable trait from one inbred or
non-inbred source to an inbred that lacks that trait. This can be
accomplished, for example, by first crossing a superior inbred (A)
(recurrent parent) to a donor inbred (non-recurrent parent), which
carries the appropriate locus or loci for the trait in question. The
progeny of this cross are then mated back to the superior recurrent
parent (A) followed by selection in the resultant progeny for the desired
trait to be transferred from the non-recurrent parent. After five or more
backcross generations with selection for the desired trait, the progeny
are heterozygous for loci controlling the characteristic being
transferred, but are like the superior parent for most or almost all
other loci. The last backcross generation would be selfed to give pure
breeding progeny for the trait being transferred.
[0012] A single cross hybrid corn variety is the cross of two inbred
plants, each of which has a genotype which complements the genotype of
the other. The hybrid progeny of the first generation is designated
F.sub.1. Typically, F.sub.1 hybrids are more vigorous than their inbred
parents. This hybrid vigor, or heterosis, is manifested in many polygenic
traits, including markedly improved yields, better stalks, better roots,
better uniformity and better insect and disease resistance. In the
development of hybrids only the F.sub.1 hybrid plants are typically
sought. An F.sub.1 single cross hybrid is produced when two inbred plants
are crossed. A double cross hybrid is produced from four inbred plants
crossed in pairs (A.times.B and C.times.D) and then the two F.sub.1
hybrids are crossed again (A.times.B).times.(C.times.D).
[0013] The development of a hybrid corn variety involves three steps: (1)
the selection of plants from various germplasm pools; (2) the selfing of
the selected plants for several generations to produce a series of inbred
plants, which, although different from each other, each breed true and
are highly uniform; and (3) crossing the selected inbred plants with
unrelated inbred plants to produce the hybrid progeny (F.sub.1). During
the inbreeding process in corn, the vigor of the plants decreases. Vigor
is restored when two unrelated inbred plants are crossed to produce the
hybrid progeny (F.sub.1). An important consequence of the homozygosity
and homogeneity of the inbred plants is that the hybrid between any two
inbreds is always the same. Once the inbreds that give a superior hybrid
have been identified, hybrid seed can be reproduced indefinitely as long
as the homogeneity of the inbred parents is maintained. Conversely, much
of the hybrid vigor exhibited by F.sub.1 hybrids is lost in the next
generation (F.sub.2). Consequently, seed from hybrid varieties is not
used for planting stock. It is not generally beneficial for farmers to
save seed of F.sub.1 hybrids. Rather, farmers purchase F.sub.1 hybrid
seed for planting every year.
[0014] North American farmers plant tens of millions of acres of corn at
the present time and there are extensive national and international
commercial corn breeding programs. A continuing goal of these corn
breeding programs is to develop corn hybrids that are based on stable
inbred plants and have one or more desirable characteristics. To
accomplish this goal, the corn breeder must select and develop superior
inbred parental plants.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0015] In one aspect, the present invention provides a corn plant
designated 16IUL6. Also provided are corn plants having all the
physiological and morphological characteristics of corn plant 16IUL6. The
inbred corn plant of the invention may further comprise, or have, a
cytoplasmic or nuclear factor that is capable of conferring male
sterility. Parts of the corn plant of the present invention are also
provided, for example, pollen obtained from an inbred plant and an ovule
of the inbred plant.
[0016] The invention also concerns seed of the corn plant 16IUL6. A sample
of this seed has been deposited under ATCC Accession No. ______. The
inbred corn seed of the invention may be provided as an essentially
homogeneous population of inbred corn seed of the corn plant designated
16IUL6. Essentially homogeneous populations of inbred seed are those that
consist essentially of the particular inbred seed, and are generally free
from substantial numbers of other seed, so that the inbred seed forms
between about 90% and about 100% of the total seed, and preferably,
between about 95% and about 100% of the total seed. Most preferably, an
essentially homogeneous population of inbred corn seed will contain
between about 98.5%, 99%, 99.5% and about 99.9% of inbred seed, as
measured by seed grow outs.
[0017] Therefore, in the practice of the present invention, inbred seed
generally forms at least about 97% of the total seed. However, even if a
population of inbred corn seed was found, for some reason, to contain
about 50%, or even about 20% or 15% of inbred seed, this would still be
distinguished from the small fraction of inbred seed that may be found
within a population of hybrid seed, e.g., within a bag of hybrid seed. In
such a bag of hybrid seed offered for sale, the Governmental regulations
require that the hybrid seed be at least about 95% of the total seed. In
the most preferred practice of the invention, the female inbred seed that
may be found within a bag of hybrid seed will be about 1% of the total
seed, or less, and the male inbred seed that may be found within a bag of
hybrid seed will be negligible, i.e., will be on the order of about a
maximum of 1 per 100,000, and usually less than this value.
[0018] The population of inbred corn seed of the invention can further be
particularly defined as being essentially free from hybrid seed. The
inbred seed population may be separately grown to provide an essentially
homogeneous population of inbred corn plants designated 16IUL6.
[0019] In another aspect of the invention, single locus converted plants
of 16IUL6 are provided. The single transferred locus may preferably be a
dominant or recessive allele. Preferably, the single transferred locus
will confer such traits as male sterility, yield stability, waxy starch,
yield enhancement, industrial usage, herbicide resistance, insect
resistance, resistance to bacterial, fungal, nematode or viral disease,
male fertility, and enhanced nutritional quality. The single locus may be
a naturally occurring maize gene or a transgene introduced through
genetic transformation techniques. When introduced through
transformation, a single locus may comprise one or more transgenes
integrated at a single chromosomal location.
[0020] In yet another aspect of the invention, an inbred corn plant
designated 16IUL6 is provided, wherein a cytoplasmically-inherited trait
has been introduced into said inbred plant. Such cytoplasmically-inherite-
d traits are passed to progeny through the female parent in a particular
cross. An exemplary cytoplasmically-inherited trait is the male sterility
trait. A cytoplasmically inherited trait may be a naturally occurring
maize trait or a trait introduced through genetic transformation
techniques.
[0021] In another aspect of the invention, a tissue culture of regenerable
cells of inbred corn plant 16IUL6 is provided. The tissue culture will
preferably be capable of regenerating plants capable of expressing all of
the physiological and morphological characteristics of the foregoing
inbred corn plant, and of regenerating plants having substantially the
same genotype as the foregoing inbred corn plant. Examples of some of the
physiological and morphological characteristics of the inbred corn plant
16IUL6 include characteristics related to yield, maturity, and kernel
quality, each of which are specifically disclosed herein. The regenerable
cells in such tissue cultures will preferably be derived from embryos,
meristematic cells, immature tassels, microspores, pollen, leaves,
anthers, roots, root tips, silk, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, husks, or
stalks, or callus or protoplasts derived from these tissues. Still
further, the present invention provides corn plants regenerated from the
tissue cultures of the invention, the plants having all the physiological
and morphological characteristics of corn plant 1 61UL6.
[0022] In yet another aspect of the invention, processes are provided for
producing corn seeds or plants, which processes generally comprise
crossing a first parent corn plant with a second parent corn plant,
wherein at least one of the first or second parent corn plants is the
inbred corn plant designated 16IUL6. These processes may be further
exemplified as processes for preparing hybrid corn seed or plants,
wherein a first inbred corn plant is crossed with a second, distinct
inbred corn plant to provide a hybrid that has, as one of its parents,
the inbred corn plant 16IUL6. In these processes, the step of crossing
will result in the production of seed. The seed production occurs
regardless of whether the seed is collected or not.
[0023] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, crossing comprises
planting in pollinating proximity seeds of a first and second parent corn
plant, and preferably, seeds of a first inbred corn plant and a second,
distinct inbred corn plant; cultivating or growing the seeds of said
first and second parent corn plants into plants that bear flowers;
emasculating the male flowers of the first or second parent corn plant,
(i.e., treating or manipulating the flowers so as to prevent pollen
production, in order to produce an emasculated parent corn plant)
allowing natural cross-pollination to occur between the first and second
parent corn plants; and harvesting the seeds from the emasculated parent
corn plant. Where desired, the harvested seed is grown to produce a corn
plant or hybrid corn plant.
[0024] The present invention also provides corn seed and plants produced
by a process that comprises crossing a first parent corn plant with a
second parent corn plant, wherein at least one of the first or second
parent corn plants is the inbred corn plant designated 16IUL6. In one
embodiment of the invention, corn plants produced by the process are
first generation (F.sub.1) hybrid corn plants produced by crossing an
inbred in accordance with the invention with another, distinct inbred.
The present invention further contemplates seed of an F.sub.1 hybrid corn
plant. Therefore, certain exemplary embodiments of the invention provide
an F.sub.1 hybrid corn plant and seed thereof An example of such a hybrid
which can be produced with the inbred designated 16IUL6 is the hybrid
corn plant designated 8012471.
[0025] In still yet another aspect of the invention, an inbred genetic
complement of the corn plant designated 16IUL6 is provided. The phrase
"genetic complement" is used to refer to the aggregate of nucleotide
sequences, the expression of which sequences defines the phenotype of, in
the present case, a corn plant, or a cell or tissue of that plant. An
inbred genetic complement thus represents the genetic make up of an
inbred cell, tissue or plant, and a hybrid genetic complement represents
the genetic make up of a hybrid cell, tissue or plant. The invention thus
provides corn plant cells that have a genetic complement in accordance
with the inbred corn plant cells disclosed herein, and plants, seeds and
diploid plants containing such cells.
[0026] Plant genetic complements may be assessed by genetic marker
profiles, and by the expression of phenotypic traits that are
characteristic of the expression of the genetic complement, e.g., isozyme
typing profiles. Thus, such corn plant cells may be defined as having an
SSR genetic marker profile in accordance with the profile shown in Table
6, or a genetic isozyme typing profile in accordance with the profile
shown in Table 7, or having both an SSR genetic marker profile and a
genetic isozyme typing profile in accordance with the profiles shown in
Table 6 and Table 7. It is understood that 16IUL6 could also be
identified by other types of genetic markers such as, for example, Simple
Sequence Length Polymorphisms (SSLPs) (Williams et al., 1990), Randomly
Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting
(DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), Arbitrary Primed
Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), Amplified Fragment Length
Polymorphisms (AFLPs) (EP 534 858, specifically incorporated herein by
reference in its entirety), and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs)
(Wang et al., 1998).
[0027] In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides hybrid
genetic complements, as represented by corn plant cells, tissues, plants,
and seeds, formed by the combination of a haploid genetic complement of
an inbred corn plant of the invention with a haploid genetic complement
of a second corn plant, preferably, another, distinct inbred corn plant.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a corn plant
regenerated from a tissue culture that comprises a hybrid genetic
complement of this invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0028] I. Definitions of Plant Characteristics
[0029] Barren Plants: Plants that are barren, i.e., lack an ear with
grain, or have an ear with only a few scattered kernels.
[0030] Cg: Colletotrichum graminicola rating. Rating times 10 is
approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
[0031] CLN: Corn Lethal Necrosis (combination of Maize Chlorotic Mottle
Virus and Maize Dwarf Mosaic virus) rating: numerical ratings are based
on a severity scale where 1=most resistant to 9=susceptible.
[0032] Cn: Corynebacterium nebraskense rating. Rating times 10 is
approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
[0033] Cz: Cercospora zeae-maydis rating. Rating times 10 is approximately
equal to percent total plant infection.
[0034] Dgg: Diatraea grandiosella girdling rating (values are percent
plants girdled and stalk lodged).
[0035] Dropped Ears: Ears that have fallen from the plant to the ground
[0036] Dsp: Diabrotica species root ratings (1=least affected to 9=severe
pruning).
[0037] Ear-Attitude: The attitude or position of the ear at harvest scored
as upright, horizontal, or pendant.
[0038] Ear-Cob Color: The color of the cob, scored as white, pink, red, or
brown.
[0039] Ear-Cob Diameter: The average diameter of the cob measured at the
midpoint.
[0040] Ear-Cob Strength: A measure of mechanical strength of the cobs to
breakage, scored as strong or weak.
[0041] Ear-Diameter: The average diameter of the ear at its midpoint.
[0042] Ear-Dry Husk Color: The color of the husks at harvest scored as
buff, red, or purple.
[0043] Ear-Fresh Husk Color: The color of the husks 1 to 2 weeks after
pollination scored as green, red, or purple.
[0044] Ear-Husk Bract: The length of an average husk leaf scored as short,
medium, or long.
[0045] Ear-Husk Cover: The average distance from the tip of the ear to the
tip of the husks. Minimum value no less than zero.
[0046] Ear-Husk Opening: An evaluation of husk tightness at harvest scored
as tight, intermediate, or open.
[0047] Ear-Length: The average length of the ear.
[0048] Ear-Number Per Stalk: The average number of ears per plant.
[0049] Ear-Shank Internodes: The average number of internodes on the ear
shank.
[0050] Ear-Shank Length: The average length of the ear shank.
[0051] Ear-Shelling Percent: The average of the shelled grain weight
divided by the sum of the shelled grain weight and cob weight for a
single ear.
[0052] Ear-Silk Color: The color of the silk observed 2 to 3 days after
silk emergence scored as green-yellow, yellow, pink, red, or purple.
[0053] Ear-Taper (Shape): The taper or shape of the ear scored as conical,
semi-conical, or cylindrical.
[0054] Ear-Weight: The average weight of an ear.
[0055] Early Stand: The percent of plants that emerge from the ground as
determined in the early spring.
[0056] ER: Ear rot rating (values approximate percent ear rotted).
[0057] Final Stand Count: The number of plants just prior to harvest.
[0058] GDUs: Growing degree units which are calculated by the Barger
Method, where the heat units for a 24-h period are calculated as GDUs
=[(Maximum daily temperature+Minimum daily temperature)/2]-50. The
highest maximum daily temperature used is 86.degree. F. and the lowest
minimum temperature used is 50.degree. F.
[0059] GDUs to Shed: The number of growing degree units (GDUs) or heat
units required for an inbred line or hybrid to have approximately 50% of
the plants shedding pollen as measured from time of planting. GDUs to
shed is determined by summing the individual GDU daily values from
planting date to the date of 50% pollen shed.
[0060] GDUs to Silk: The number of growing degree units for an inbred line
or hybrid to have approximately 50% of the plants with silk emergence as
measured from time of planting. GDUs to silk is determined by summing the
individual GDU daily values from planting date to the date of 50%
silking.
[0061] Hc2: Helminthosporium carbonum race 2 rating. Rating times 10 is
approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
[0062] Hc3: Helminthosporium carbonum race 3 rating. Rating times 10 is
approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
[0063] Hm: Helminthosporium maydis race 0 rating. Rating times 10 is
approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
[0064] Ht1: Helminthosporium turcicum race 1 rating. Rating times 10 is
approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
[0065] Ht2: Helminthosporium turcicum race 2 rating. Rating times 10 is
approximately equal to percent total plant infection.
[0066] HtG: Chlorotic-lesion type resistance. +=indicates the presence of
Ht chlorotic-lesion type resistance; -=indicates absence of Ht
chlorotic-lesion type resistance; and .+-.=indicates segregation of Ht
chlorotic-lesion type resistance. Rating times 10 is approximately equal
to percent total plant infection.
[0067] Kernel-Aleurone Color: The color of the aleurone scored as white,
pink, tan, brown, bronze, red, purple, pale purple, colorless, or
variegated.
[0068] Kernel-Cap Color: The color of the kernel cap observed at dry
stage, scored as white, lemon-yellow, yellow, or orange.
[0069] Kernel-Endosperm Color: The color of the endosperm scored as white,
pale yellow, or yellow.
[0070] Kernel-Endosperm Type: The type of endosperm scored as normal,
waxy, or opaque.
[0071] Kernel-Grade: The percent of kernels that are classified as rounds.
[0072] Kernel-Length: The average distance from the cap of the kernel to
the pedicel.
[0073] Kernel-Number Per Row: The average number of kernels in a single
row.
[0074] Kernel-Pericarp Color: The color of the pericarp scored as
colorless, red-white crown, tan, bronze, brown, light red, cherry red, or
variegated.
[0075] Kernel-Row Direction: The direction of the kernel rows on the ear
scored as straight, slightly curved, spiral, or indistinct (scattered).
[0076] Kernel-Row Number: The average number of rows of kernels on a
single ear.
[0077] Kernel-Side Color: The color of the kernel side observed at the dry
stage, scored as white, pale yellow, yellow, orange, red, or brown.
[0078] Kernel-Thickness: The distance across the narrow side of the
kernel.
[0079] Kernel-Type: The type of kernel scored as dent, flint, or
intermediate.
[0080] Kernel-Weight: The average weight of a predetermined number of
kernels.
[0081] Kernel-Width: The distance across the flat side of the kernel.
[0082] Kz: Kabatiella zeae rating. Rating times 10 is approximately equal
to percent total plant infection.
[0083] Leaf-Angle: Angle of the upper leaves to the stalk scored as
upright (0 to 30 degrees), intermediate (30 to 60 degrees), or lax (60 to
90 degrees).
[0084] Leaf-Color: The color of the leaves 1 to 2 weeks after pollination
scored as light green, medium green, dark green, or very dark green.
[0085] Leaf-Length: The average length of the primary ear leaf
Leaf-Longitudinal Creases: A rating of the number of longitudinal creases
on the leaf surface 1 to 2 weeks after pollination. Creases are scored as
absent, few, or many.
[0086] Leaf-Marginal Waves: A rating of the waviness of the leaf margin 1
to 2 weeks after pollination. Rated as none, few, or many.
[0087] Leaf-Number: The average number of leaves of a mature plant.
Counting begins with the cotyledonary leaf and ends with the flag leaf.
[0088] Leaf-Sheath Anthocyanin: A rating of the level of anthocyanin in
the leaf sheath 1 to 2 weeks after pollination, scored as absent,
basal-weak, basal-strong, weak or strong.
[0089] Leaf-Sheath Pubescence: A rating of the pubescence of the leaf
sheath. Ratings are taken 1 to 2 weeks after pollination and scored as
light, medium, or heavy.
[0090] Leaf-Width: The average width of the primary ear leaf measured at
its widest point.
[0091] LSS: Late season standability (values times 10 approximate percent
plants lodged in disease evaluation plots).
[0092] Moisture: The moisture of the grain at harvest.
[0093] On1: Ostrinia nubilalis 1st brood rating (1=resistant to
9=susceptible).
[0094] On2: Ostrinia nubilalis 2nd brood rating (1=resistant to
9=susceptible).
[0095] Relative Maturity: A maturity rating based on regression analysis.
The regression analysis is developed by utilizing check hybrids and their
previously established day rating versus actual harvest moistures.
Harvest moisture on the hybrid in question is determined and that
moisture value is inserted into the regression equation to yield a
relative maturity.
[0096] Root Lodging: Root lodging is the percentage of plants that root
lodge. A plant is counted as root lodged if a portion of the plant leans
from the vertical axis by approximately 30 degrees or more.
[0097] Seedling Color: Color of leaves at the 6 to 8 leaf stage.
[0098] Seedling Height: Plant height at the 6 to 8 leaf stage.
[0099] Seedling Vigor: A visual rating of the amount of vegetative growth
on a 1 to 9 scale, where 1 equals best. The score is taken when the
average entry in a trial is at the fifth leaf stage.
[0100] Selection Index: The selection index gives a single measure of
hybrid's worth based on information from multiple traits. One of the
traits that is almost always included is yield. Traits may be weighted
according to the level of importance assigned to them.
[0101] Sr: Sphacelotheca reiliana rating is actual percent infection.
[0102] Stalk-Anthocyanin: A rating of the amount of anthocyanin
pigmentation in the stalk. The stalk is rated 1 to 2 weeks after
pollination as absent, basal-weak, basal-strong, weak, or strong.
[0103] Stalk-Brace Root Color: The color of the brace roots observed 1 to
2 weeks after pollination as green, red, or purple.
[0104] Stalk-Diameter: The average diameter of the lowest visible
internode of the stalk.
[0105] Stalk-Ear Height: The average height of the ear measured from the
ground to the point of attachment of the ear shank of the top developed
ear to the stalk.
[0106] Stalk-Internode Direction: The direction of the stalk internode
observed after pollination as straight or zigzag.
[0107] Stalk-Internode Length: The average length of the internode above
the primary ear.
[0108] Stalk Lodging: The percentage of plants that did stalk lodge.
Plants are counted as stalk lodged if the plant is broken over or off
below the ear.
[0109] Stalk-Nodes With Brace Roots: The average number of nodes having
brace roots per plant.
[0110] Stalk-Plant Height: The average height of the plant as measured
from the
soil to the tip of the tassel.
[0111] Stalk-Tillers: The percent of plants that have tillers. A tiller is
defined as a secondary shoot that has developed as a tassel capable of
shedding pollen.
[0112] Staygreen: Staygreen is a measure of general plant health near the
time of black layer formation (physiological maturity). It is usually
recorded at the time the ear husks of most entries within a trial have
turned a mature color. Scoring is on a 1 to 9 basis where 1 equals best.
[0113] STR: Stalk rot rating (values represent severity rating of 1=25% of
inoculated internode rotted to 9=entire stalk rotted and collapsed).
[0114] SVC: Southeastern Virus Complex (combination of Maize Chlorotic
Dwarf Virus and Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus) rating; numerical ratings are
based on a severity scale where 1=most resistant to 9=susceptible (1988
reactions are largely Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus reactions).
[0115] Tassel-Anther Color: The color of the anthers at 50% pollen shed
scored as green-yellow, yellow, pink, red, or purple.
[0116] Tassel-Attitude: The attitude of the tassel after pollination
scored as open or compact.
[0117] Tassel-Branch Angle: The angle of an average tassel branch to the
main stem of the tassel scored as upright (less than 30 degrees),
intermediate (30 to 45 degrees), or lax (greater than 45 degrees).
[0118] Tassel-Branch Number: The average number of primary tassel
branches.
[0119] Tassel-Glume Band: The closed anthocyanin band at the base of the
glume scored as present or absent.
[0120] Tassel-Glume Color: The color of the glumes at 50% shed scored as
green, red, or purple.
[0121] Tassel-Length: The length of the tassel measured from the base of
the bottom tassel branch to the tassel tip.
[0122] Tassel-Peduncle Length: The average length of the tassel peduncle,
measured from the base of the flag leaf to the base of the bottom tassel
branch.
[0123] Tassel-Pollen Shed: A visual rating of pollen shed determined by
tapping the tassel and observing the pollen flow of approximately five
plants per entry. Rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 9=sterile, 1=most pollen.
[0124] Tassel-Spike Length: The length of the spike measured from the base
of the top tassel branch to the tassel tip.
[0125] Test Weight: Weight of the grain in pounds for a given volume
(bushel) adjusted to 15.5% moisture.
[0126] Yield: Yield of grain at harvest adjusted to 15.5% moisture.
[0127] II. Other Definitions
[0128] Allele: Any of one or more alternative forms of a gene locus, all
of which alleles relate to one trait or characteristic. In a diploid cell
or organism, the two alleles of a given gene occupy corresponding loci on
a pair of homologous chromosomes.
[0129] Backcrossing: A process in which a breeder repeatedly crosses
hybrid progeny back to one of the parents, for example, a first
generation hybrid (F.sub.1) with one of the parental genotypes of the
F.sub.1 hybrid.
[0130] Chromatography: A technique wherein a mixture of dissolved
substances are bound to a solid support followed by passing a column of
fluid across the solid support and varying the composition of the fluid.
The components of the mixture are separated by selective elution.
[0131] Crossing: The pollination of a female flower of a corn plant,
thereby resulting in the production of seed from the flower.
[0132] Cross-pollination: Fertilization by the union of two gametes from
different plants.
[0133] Diploid: A cell or organism having two sets of chromosomes.
[0134] Electrophoresis: A process by which particles suspended in a fluid
or a gel matrix are moved under the action of an electrical field, and
thereby separated according to their charge and molecular weight. This
method of separation is well known to those skilled in the art and is
typically applied to separating various forms of enzymes and of DNA
fragments produced by restriction endonucleases.
[0135] Emasculate: The removal of plant male sex organs or the
inactivation of the organs with a chemical agent or a cytoplasmic or
nuclear genetic factor conferring male sterility.
[0136] Enzymes: Molecules which can act as catalysts in biological
reactions.
[0137] F.sub.1 Hybrid: The first generation progeny of the cross of two
plants.
[0138] Genetic Complement: An aggregate of nucleotide sequences, the
expression of which sequences defines the phenotype in corn plants, or
components of plants including cells or tissue.
[0139] Genotype: The genetic constitution of a cell or organism.
[0140] Haploid: A cell or organism having one set of the two sets of
chromosomes in a diploid.
[0141] Isozymes: Detectable variants of an enzyme, the variants catalyzing
the same reaction(s) but differing from each other, e.g., in primary
structure and/or electrophoretic mobility. The differences between
isozymes are under single gene, codominant control. Consequently,
electrophoretic separation to produce band patterns can be equated to
different alleles at the DNA level. Structural differences that do not
alter charge cannot be detected by this method.
[0142] Isozyme typing profile: A profile of band patterns of isozymes
separated by electrophoresis that can be equated to different alleles at
the DNA level.
[0143] Linkage: A phenomenon wherein alleles on the same chromosome tend
to segregate together more often than expected by chance if their
transmission was independent.
[0144] Marker: A readily detectable phenotype, preferably inherited in
codominant fashion (both alleles at a locus in a diploid heterozygote are
readily detectable), with no environmental variance component, i.e.,
heritability of 1.
[0145] 16IUL6: The corn plant from which seeds having ATCC Accession No.
______ were obtained, as well as plants grown from those seeds.
[0146] Phenotype: The detectable characteristics of a cell or organism,
which characteristics are the manifestation of gene expression.
[0147] Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL): Genetic loci that contribute, at
least in part, certain numerically representable traits that are usually
continuously distributed.
[0148] Regeneration: The development of a plant from tissue culture.
[0149] SSR genetic marker profile: A profile of simple sequence repeats
scored by gel electrophoresis following PCR.TM. amplification using
flanking oligonucleotide primers.
[0150] Self-pollination: The transfer of pollen from the anther to the
stigma of the same plant.
[0151] Single Locus Converted (Conversion) Plant: Plants which are
developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing wherein
essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological
characteristics of an inbred are recovered in addition to the
characteristics conferred by the single locus transferred into the inbred
via the backcrossing technique. A single locus may comprise one gene, or
in the case of transgenic plants, one or more transgenes integrated into
the host genome at a single site (locus).
[0152] Tissue Culture: A composition comprising isolated cells of the same
or a different type or a collection of such cells organized into parts of
a plant.
[0153] Transgene: A genetic sequence which has been introduced into the
nuclear or chloroplast genome of a maize plant by a genetic
transformation technique.
[0154] The following examples are included to demonstrate preferred
embodiments of the invention. It should be appreciated by those of skill
in the art that the techniques disclosed in the examples that follow
represent techniques discovered by the inventor to function well in the
practice of the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute
preferred modes for its practice. However, those of skill in the art
should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes
can be made in the specific embodiments that are disclosed and still
obtain a like or similar result without departing from the spirit and
scope of the invention.
[0155] III. Inbred Corn Plant 16IUL6
[0156] In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is
provided a novel inbred corn plant, designated 16IUL6. Inbred corn plant
16IUL6 can be compared to other inbred corn plants. 16IUL6 differs
significantly (at the 1%, 5%, or 10% level) from these inbred lines in a
number of aspects (Table 1 and Table 2).
1TABLE 1
Comparison of 16IUL6 with MM402A
16IUL6 MM402A DIFF P VALUE
EHT INCH 25.9 24.2 1.7 0.307
FINAL 63.2 48.0 15.2 0.00**
MST % 24.8 23.3 1.5 0.197
PHT INCH 71.8 64.9 6.9 0.250
RTL % 2.8 3.5 -0.7 0.037*
SHED GDU 1474.9 1534.6 59.7 0.251
STL % 0.1 2.7 -2.6 0.00**
YLD BU/A 78.0 60.2 17.8 0.830
Significance Levels are
indicated as: + = 10%, * = 5%, ** = 1%.
Legend Abbreviations:
EHT INCH = Ear Height (inches)
FINAL = Final Stand
MST % = Moisture (percent)
PHT INCH = Plant Height (inches)
RTL % = Root Lodging (percent)
SHED GDU = GDUs to Shed
STL % = Stalk Lodging (percent)
YLD BU/A = Yield
(bushels/acre)
[0157]
2TABLE 2
Comparison of 16IUL6 with 01IBH2
16IUL6 01IBH2 DIFF P VALUE
BARREN % 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.000
EHT INCH 29.2 30.2 -1.0 0.071+
FINAL 59.8 62.0 -2.2 0.877
MST % 17.5 19.3 -1.8 0.505
PHT INCH 77.6 67.0 10.6 0.012*
RTL % 5.1 2.5 2.6 0.069+
SHED GDU 1460.7 1455.8 4.9 0.214
SILK GKU 1478.9 1476.3 2.6 0.464
STL % 2.3 4.0 -1.7 0.002*
YLD BU/A 65.0 79.3 -14.3 0.414
Significance Levels
are indicated as: + = 10%, * = 5%, ** = 1%.
Legend
Abbreviations:
BARREN % = Barren Plants (percent)
EHT
INCH = Ear Height (inches)
FINAL = Final Stand
MST % =
Moisture (percent)
PHT INCH = Plant Height (inches)
RTL
% = Root Lodging (percent)
SHED GDU = GDUs to Shed
SILK
GDU = GDUs to Silk
STL % = Stalk Lodging (percent)
YLD
BU/A = Yield (bushels/acre)
[0158] A. Origin and Breeding History
[0159] Inbred plant 16IUL6 was derived from the three way cross between a
line derived from MM402A and MM501D and the line 01IBH2. The origin and
breeding history of inbred plant 16IUL6 can be summarized as follows:
[0160] Summer 1991 The cross between MM402A and MM501D (both proprietary
DEKALB lines) was made between nursery rows MR205:15.times.MR205:19.
[0161] Winter 1991-92 The 3-way cross to 01IBH2 (a DEKALB proprietary
line) was made in paired rows S26:45-46.
[0162] Summer 1992 The S0 was selfed as a segregating population in rows
267:21-268:21. Ear number 65 was selected.
[0163] Summer 1993 The S1 ear was grown in row 126:86 and row Ear 7 was
selected.
[0164] Winter 1993-94 The S2 was grown in nursery row 8N-4032. Ear 2 was
selected.
[0165] Winter 1994-95 The S4 was grown in row 6U-847. Three ears were
selected.
[0166] Summer 1994 The S3 was grown in row MR128:2. Ear 2 was selected.
Summer 1995 The S5 was grown in row 144:67. Three ears were selected.
Winter 1995-96 The S6 was grown in row AA28:17-19.
[0167] Summer 1996 Two S7 rows 161:86 and 161:89 were bulked and named
16IUL6.
[0168] 16IUL6 shows uniformity and stability within the limits of
environmental influence for the traits described hereinafter in Table 3.
16IUL6 has been self-pollinated and ear-rowed a sufficient number of
generations with carefuil attention paid to uniformity of plant type to
ensure homozygosity and phenotypic stability. No variant traits have been
observed or are expected in 16IUL6.
[0169] Inbred corn plants can be reproduced by planting the seeds of the
inbred corn plant 16IUL6, growing the resulting corn plants under
self-pollinating or sib-pollinating conditions with adequate isolation
using standard techniques well known to an artisan skilled in the
agricultural arts. Seeds can be harvested from such a plant using
standard, well known procedures.
[0170] B. Phenotypic Description
[0171] In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there
is provided a corn plant having the physiological and morphological
characteristics of corn plant 16IUL6. A description of the physiological
and morphological characteristics of corn plant 16IUL6 is presented in
Table 3.
3TABLE 3
Physiological and Morphological
Characteristics Traits for the 16IUL6
Phenotype
VALUE
CHARACTERISTIC 16IUL6 MM402A 01IBH2
1. STALK
Diameter (width) cm 2.1 2.5 2.2
Anthocyanin Absent Absent Absent
Brace Root Color Dark Moderate Absent to Faint
Nodes With
Brace Roots 1.0 1.7 1.0
Internode Direction Straight Straight
Straight
Internode Length cm. 12.6 12.7 13.8
2. LEAF
Color Green Dark Green Green
Length cm. 70.3 37.8 33.5
Width cm. 9.6 4.3 4.2
Sheath Anthocyanin Absent Absent Absent
Sheath Pubescence Heavy Moderate Moderate
Marginal Waves Few
Few Few
Longitudinal Creases Few Few Few
3. TASSEL
Length cm. 38.7 32.7 35.9
Spike Length cm. 23.5 24.2 22.4
Peduncle Length cm. 6.6 7.1 7.9
Branch Number 4.1 1.8 7.9
Anther Color Green- Green- Green-Yellow
Yellow Yellow
Glume Color Green Green Green
Glume Band Absent Absent Absent
4. EAR
Silk Color Green Green- Green-Yellow
Yellow
Number Per Stalk 2.0 1.0 1.2
Position (attitude) Pendant
Upright --
Length cm. 14.2 17.0 14.2
Shape Cylindri-
Semi- Semi-Conical
cal Conical
Diameter cm. 3.8 4.2 4.1
Weight gm. -- 132.4 110.2
Shank Length cm. 7.1 9.4 9.2
Hush Bract Short Short Short
Husk Cover cm. 4.6 6.0 4.5
Husk Opening Loose Very Loose Intermediate
Husk Color Fresh
Green Green Green
Husk Color Dry Buff Buff Buff
Cob
Diameter cm. 1.9 2.4 2.4
Cob Color Red White Red
Shelling
Percent 90.0 88.7 89.3
5. KERNEL
Row Number 14.4 17.4 16.8
Number Per Row 30.4 31.7 28.9
Row Direction Straight
Slightly Slightly Curved
Curved
Type Dent Dent Dent
Cap Color Orange Yellow Yellow
Side Color Orange Orange
Orange
Length (depth) mm. 10.2 10.8 11.2
Width mm. 7.0
7.7 7.4
Thickness 3.8 4.5 4.1
Weight of 1000 K gm. 267.0
278.5 239.7
Endosperm Type Normal Normal Normal
Endosperm
Color Yellow Yellow Yellow
*These are typical values.
Values may vary due to environment. Other values that are substantially
equivalent are also within the scope of the invention. Substantially
equivalent refers to quantitative traits that when compared do not show
statistical differences of their means.
[0172] C. Deposit Information
[0173] A deposit of 2500 seeds of the inbred corn plant designated 16IUL6
has been made with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801
University Blvd., Manassas, Va. on (______,______ ). Those deposited
seeds have been assigned ATCC Accession No. ______. The deposit was made
in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Budapest Treaty
relating to deposit of microorganisms and was made for a term of at least
thirty (30) years and at least five (05) years after the most recent
request for the furnishing of a sample of the deposit is received by the
depository, or for the effective term of the patent, whichever is longer,
and will be replaced if it becomes non-viable during that period.
[0174] IV. Single Locus Conversions
[0175] When the term inbred corn plant is used in the context of the
present invention, this also includes any single locus conversions of
that inbred. The term single locus converted plant as used herein refers
to those corn plants which are developed by a plant breeding technique
called backcrossing wherein essentially all of the desired morphological
and physiological characteristics of an inbred are recovered in addition
to the single locus transferred into the inbred via the backcrossing
technique. Backcrossing methods can be used with the present invention to
improve or introduce a characteristic into the inbred. The term
backcrossing as used herein refers to the repeated crossing of a hybrid
progeny back to one of the parental corn plants for that inbred. The
parental corn plant which contributes the locus or loci for the desired
characteristic is termed the nonrecurrent or donor parent. This
terminology refers to the fact that the nonrecurrent parent is used one
time in the backcross protocol and therefore does not recur. The parental
corn plant to which the locus or loci from the nonrecurrent parent are
transferred is known as the recurrent parent as it is used for several
rounds in the backcrossing protocol (Poehlman et al., 1995; Fehr, 1987;
Sprague and Dudley, 1988). In a typical backcross protocol, the original
inbred of interest (recurrent parent) is crossed to a second inbred
(nonrecurrent parent) that carries the single locus of interest to be
transferred. The resulting progeny from this cross are then crossed again
to the recurrent parent and the process is repeated until a corn plant is
obtained wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and
physiological characteristics of the recurrent parent are recovered in
the converted plant, in addition to the single transferred locus from the
nonrecurrent parent. The backcross process may be accelerated by the use
of genetic markers, such as SSR, RFLP, SNP or AFLP markers to identify
plants with the greatest genetic complement from the recurrent parent.
[0176] The selection of a suitable recurrent parent is an important step
for a successful backcrossing procedure. The goal of a backcross protocol
is to alter or substitute a single trait or characteristic in the
original inbred. To accomplish this, a single locus of the recurrent
inbred is modified or substituted with the desired locus from the
nonrecurrent parent, while retaining essentially all of the rest of the
desired genetic, and therefore the desired physiological and
morphological constitution of the original inbred. The choice of the
particular nonrecurrent parent will depend on the purpose of the
backcross; one of the major purposes is to add some commercially
desirable, agronomically important trait to the plant. The exact
backcrossing protocol will depend on the characteristic or trait being
altered to determine an appropriate testing protocol. Although
backcrossing methods are simplified when the characteristic being
transferred is a dominant allele, a recessive allele may also be
transferred. In this instance it may be necessary to introduce a test of
the progeny to determine if the desired characteristic has been
successfully transferred.
[0177] Many single locus traits have been identified that are not
regularly selected for in the development of a new inbred but that can be
improved by backcrossing techniques. Single locus traits may or may not
be transgenic; examples of these traits include, but are not limited to,
male sterility, waxy starch, herbicide resistance, resistance for
bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, insect resistance, male fertility,
enhanced nutritional quality, industrial usage, yield stability, and
yield enhancement. These genes are generally inherited through the
nucleus, but may be inherited through the cytoplasm. Some known
exceptions to this are genes for male sterility, some of which are
inherited cytoplasmically, but still act as single locus traits. A number
of exemplary single locus traits are described in, for example, PCT
Application WO 95/06128, the disclosure of which is specifically
incorporated herein by reference.
[0178] Examples of genes conferring male sterility include those disclosed
in U.S. Pat. No. 3,861,709, U.S. Pat. No. 3,710,511, U.S. Pat. No.
4,654,465, U.S. Pat. No 5,625,132, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,727,219, each of
the disclosures of which are specifically incorporated herein by
reference in their entirety. A particularly useful type of male sterility
gene is one which can be induced by exposure to a chemical agent, for
example, a herbicide (U.S. Pat. Ser. No. 08/927,368, filed Sep. 11, 1997,
the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated herein by reference
in its entirety). Both inducible and non-inducible male sterility genes
can increase the efficiency with which hybrids are made, in that they
eliminate the need to physically emasculate the corn plant used as a
female in a given cross.
[0179] Where one desires to employ male-sterility systems with a corn
plant in accordance with the invention, it may be beneficial to also
utilize one or more male-fertility restorer genes. For example, where
cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) is used, hybrid seed production requires
three inbred lines: (1) a cytoplasmically male-sterile line having a CMS
cytoplasm; (2) a fertile inbred with normal cytoplasm, which is isogenic
with the CMS line for nuclear genes ("maintainer line"); and (3) a
distinct, fertile inbred with normal cytoplasm, carrying a fertility
restoring gene ("restorer" line). The CMS line is propagated by
pollination with the maintainer line, with all of the progeny being male
sterile, as the CMS cytoplasm is derived from the female parent. These
male sterile plants can then be efficiently employed as the female parent
in hybrid crosses with the restorer line, without the need for physical
emasculation of the male reproductive parts of the female parent.
[0180] The presence of a male-fertility restorer gene results in the
production of fully fertile F.sub.1 hybrid progeny. If no restorer gene
is present in the male parent, male-sterile hybrids are obtained. Such
hybrids are useful where the vegetative tissue of the corn plant is
utilized, e.g., for silage, but in most cases, the seeds will be deemed
the most valuable portion of the crop, so fertility of the hybrids in
these crops must be restored. Therefore, one aspect of the current
invention concerns the inbred corn plant 16IUL6 comprising a single gene
capable of restoring male fertility in an otherwise male-sterile inbred
or hybrid plant. Examples of male-sterility genes and corresponding
restorers which could be employed with the inbred of the invention are
well known to those of skill in the art of plant breeding and are
disclosed in, for instance, U.S. Pat. No. 5,530,191; U.S. Pat. No.
5,689,041; U.S. Pat. No. 5,741,684; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,684,242, the
disclosures of which are each specifically incorporated herein by
reference in their entirety.
[0181] Direct selection may be applied where a single locus acts as a
dominant trait. An example of a dominant trait is the herbicide
resistance trait. For this selection process, the progeny of the initial
cross are sprayed with the herbicide prior to the backcrossing. The
spraying eliminates any plants which do not have the desired herbicide
resistance characteristic, and only those plants which have the herbicide
resistance gene are used in the subsequent backcross. This process is
then repeated for all additional backcross generations.
[0182] Many useful single locus traits are those which are introduced by
genetic transformation techniques. Methods for the genetic transformation
of maize are known to those of skill in the art. For example, methods
which have been described for the genetic transformation of maize include
electroporation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,253), electrotransformation (U.S.
Pat. No. 5,371,003), microprojectile bombardment (U.S. Pat. No.
5,550,318; U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,369, U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,880; and PCT
Publication WO 95/06128), A grobacterium-mediated transformation (U.S.
Pat. No. 5,591,616 and E.P. Publication EP672752), direct DNA uptake
transformation of protoplasts (Omirulleh et al., 1993) and silicon
carbide fiber-mediated transformation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,532 and U.S.
Pat. No. 5,464,765).
[0183] A type of single locus trait which can be introduced by genetic
transformation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,554,798) and has particular utility is a
gene which confers resistance to the herbicide glyphosate. Glyphosate
inhibits the action of the enzyme EPSPS, which is active in the
biosynthetic pathway of aromatic amino acids. Inhibition of this enzyme
leads to starvation for the amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine, and
tryptophan and secondary metabolites derived therefrom. Mutants of this
enzyme are available which are resistant to glyphosate. For example, U.S.
Pat. No. 4,535,060 describes the isolation of EPSPS mutations which
confer glyphosate resistance upon organisms having the Salmonella
typhimurium gene for EPSPS, aroA. A mutant EPSPS gene having similar
mutations has also been cloned from Zea mays. The mutant gene encodes a
protein with amino acid changes at residues 102 and 106 (PCT Publication
WO 97/04103). When a plant comprises such a gene, a herbicide resistant
phenotype results.
[0184] Plants having inherited a transgene comprising a mutated EPSPS gene
may, therefore, be directly treated with the herbicide glyphosate without
the result of significant damage to the plant. This phenotype provides
farmers with the benefit of controlling weed growth in a field of plants
having the herbicide resistance trait by application of the broad
spectrum herbicide glyphosate. For example, one could apply the herbicide
ROUNDUP.TM., a commercial formulation of glyphosate manufactured and sold
by the Monsanto Company, over the top in fields where glyphosate
resistant corn plants are grown. The herbicide application rates may
typically range from 4 ounces of ROUNDUP.TM. to 256 ounces ROUNDUP.TM.
per acre. More preferably, about 16 ounces to about 64 ounces per acre of
ROUNDUP.TM. may be applied to the field. However, the application rate
may be increased or decreased as needed, based on the abundance and/or
type of weeds being treated. Additionally, depending on the location of
the field and weather conditions, which will influence weed growth and
the type of weed infestation, it may be desirable to conduct further
glyphosate treatments. The second glyphosate application will also
typically comprise an application rate of about 16 ounces to about 64
ounces of ROUNDUP.TM. per acre treated. Again, the treatment rate may be
adjusted based on field conditions. Such methods of application of
herbicides to agricultural crops are well known in the art and are
summarized in general in Anderson (1983).
[0185] Alternatively, more than one single locus trait may be introgressed
into an elite inbred by the method of backcross conversion. A selectable
marker gene and a gene encoding a protein which confers a trait of
interest may be simultaneously introduced into a maize plant as a result
of genetic transformation. Usually one or more introduced genes will
integrate into a single chromosome site in the host cell's genome. For
example, a selectable marker gene encoding phosphinothricin acetyl
transferase (PPT) (e.g., a bar gene) and conferring resistance to the
active ingredient in some herbicides by inhibiting glutamine synthetase,
and a gene encoding an endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and
conferring resistance to particular classes of insects, e.g.,
lepidopteran insects, in particular the European Corn Borer, may be
simultaneously introduced into a host genome. Furthermore, through the
process of backcross conversion more than one transgenic trait may be
transferred into an elite inbred.
[0186] The waxy characteristic is an example of a recessive trait. In this
example, the progeny resulting from the first backcross generation (BC1)
must be grown and selfed. A test is then run on the selfed seed from the
BC1 plant to determine which BC1 plants carried the recessive gene for
the waxy trait. In other recessive traits additional progeny testing, for
example growing additional generations such as the BC1S1, may be required
to determine which plants carry the recessive gene.
[0187] V. Origin and Breeding History of an Exemplary Single Locus
Converted Plant
[0188] 85DGD1 MLms is a single locus conversion of 85DGD1 to cytoplasmic
male sterility. 85DGD1 MLms was derived using backcross methods. 85DGD1
(a proprietary inbred of DEKALB Genetics Corporation) was used as the
recurrent parent and MLms, a germplasm source carrying ML cytoplasmic
sterility, was used as the nonrecurrent parent. The breeding history of
the single locus converted inbred 85DGD1 MLms can be summarized as
follows:
[0189] Hawaii Nurseries Planting Date Apr. 2, 1992 Made up S--O: Female
row 585 male row 500
[0190] Hawaii Nurseries Planting Date Jul. 15, 1992 S--O was grown and
plants were backcrossed times 85DGD1 (rows 444' 443)
[0191] Hawaii Nurseries Planting Date Nov. 18, 1992 Bulked seed of the BC1
was grown and backcrossed times 85DGD1 (rows V3-27' V3-26)
[0192] Hawaii Nurseries Planting Date Apr. 2, 1993 Bulked seed of the BC2
was grown and backcrossed times 85DGD1 (rows 37' 36)
[0193] Hawaii Nurseries Planting Date Jul. 14, 1993 Bulked seed of the BC3
was grown and backcrossed times 85DGD1 (rows 99' 98)
[0194] Hawaii Nurseries Planting Date Oct. 28, 1993 Bulked seed of BC4 was
grown and backcrossed times 85DGD 1 (rows KS-63' KS-62)
[0195] Summer 1994 A single ear of the BC5 was grown and backcrossed times
85DGDI (MC94-822' MC94-822-7)
[0196] Winter 1994 Bulked seed of the BC6 was grown and backcrossed times
85DGD1 (3Q-1 ' 3Q-2)
[0197] Summer 1995 Seed of the BC7 was bulked and named 85DGD1 MLms.
[0198] VI. Tissue Cultures and in vitro Regeneration of Corn Plants
[0199] A further aspect of the invention relates to tissue cultures of the
corn plant designated 16IUL6. As used herein, the term "tissue culture"
indicates a composition comprising isolated cells of the same or a
different type or a collection of such cells organized into parts of a
plant. Exemplary types of tissue cultures are protoplasts, calli and
plant cells that are intact in plants or parts of plants, such as
embryos, pollen, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, leaves, husks, stalks,
roots, root tips, anthers, silk, and the like. In a preferred embodiment,
the tissue culture comprises embryos, protoplasts, meristematic cells,
pollen, leaves or anthers derived from immature tissues of these plant
parts. Means for preparing and maintaining plant tissue cultures are well
known in the art (U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,880; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,318,
each incorporated herein by reference in their entirety). By way of
example, a tissue culture comprising organs such as tassels or anthers
has been used to produce regenerated plants (U.S. Pat. No. 5,445,961 and
U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,789; the disclosures of which are incorporated herein
by reference).
[0200] VII. Tassel/Anther Culture
[0201] Tassels contain anthers which in turn enclose microspores.
Microspores develop into pollen. For anther/microspore culture, if
tassels are the plant composition, they are preferably selected at a
stage when the microspores are uninucleate, that is, include only one,
rather than 2 or 3 nuclei. Methods to determine the correct stage are
well known to those skilled in the art and include mitramycin fluorescent
staining (Pace et al., 1987), trypan blue (preferred) and acetocarmine
squashing. The mid-uninucleate microspore stage has been found to be the
developmental stage most responsive to the subsequent methods disclosed
to ultimately produce plants.
[0202] Although microspore-containing plant organs such as tassels can
generally be pretreated at any cold temperature below about 25.degree.
C., a range of 4 to 25.degree. C. is preferred, and a range of 8 to
14.degree. C. is particularly preferred. Although other temperatures
yield embryoids and regenerated plants, cold temperatures produce optimum
response rates compared to pretreatment at temperatures outside the
preferred range. Response rate is measured as either the number of
embryoids or the number of regenerated plants per number of microspores
initiated in culture. Exemplary methods of microspore culture are
disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,789 and U.S. Pat. No
5,445,961, the disclosures of which are specifically incorporated herein
by reference.
[0203] Although not required, when tassels are employed as the plant
organ, it is generally preferred to sterilize their surface. Following
surface sterilization of the tassels, for example, with a solution of
calcium hypochloride, the anthers are removed from about 70 to 150
spikelets (small portions of the tassels) and placed in a preculture or
pretreatment medium. Larger or smaller amounts can be used depending on
the number of anthers.
[0204] When one elects to employ tassels directly, tassels are preferably
pretreated at a cold temperature for a predefined time, preferably at
10.degree. C. for about 4 days. After pretreatment of a whole tassel at a
cold temperature, dissected anthers are further pretreated in an
environment that diverts microspores from their developmental pathway.
The function of the preculture medium is to switch the developmental
program from one of pollen development to that of embryoid/callus
development. An embodiment of such an environment in the form of a
preculture medium includes a sugar alcohol, for example mannitol or
sorbitol, inositol or the like. An exemplary synergistic combination is
the use of mannitol at a temperature of about 10.degree. C. for a period
ranging from about 10 to 14 days. In a preferred embodiment, 3 ml of 0.3
M mannitol combined with 50 mg/l of ascorbic acid, silver nitrate, and
colchicine is used for incubation of anthers at 10.degree. C. for between
10 and 14 days. Another embodiment is to substitute sorbitol for
mannitol. The colchicine produces chromosome doubling at this early
stage. The chromosome doubling agent is preferably only present at the
preculture stage.
[0205] It is believed that the mannitol or other similar carbon structure
or environmental stress induces starvation and functions to force
microspores to focus their energies on entering developmental stages. The
cells are unable to use, for example, mannitol as a carbon source at this
stage. It is believed that these treatments confuse the cells causing
them to develop as embryoids and plants from microspores. Dramatic
increases in development from these haploid cells, as high as 25
embryoids in 10.sup.4 microspores, have resulted from using these
methods.
[0206] In embodiments where microspores are obtained from anthers,
microspores can be released from the anthers into an isolation medium
following the mannitol preculture step. One method of release is by
disruption of the anthers, for example, by chopping the anthers into
pieces with a sharp instrument, such as a razor blade, scalpel, or Waring
blender. The resulting mixture of released microspores, anther fragments,
and isolation medium are then passed through a filter to separate
microspores from anther wall fragments. An embodiment of a filter is a
mesh, more specifically, a nylon mesh of about 112 mm pore size. The
filtrate which results from filtering the microspore-containing solution
is preferably relatively free of anther fragments, cell walls, and other
debris.
[0207] In a preferred embodiment, isolation of microspores is accomplished
at a temperature below about 25.degree. C. and preferably, at a
temperature of less than about 15.degree. C. Preferably, the isolation
media, dispersing tool (e.g., razor blade), funnels, centrifuge tubes,
and dispersing container (e.g., petri dish) are all maintained at the
reduced temperature during isolation. The use of a precooled dispersing
tool to isolate maize microspores has been reported (Gaillard et al.,
1991).
[0208] Where appropriate and desired, the anther filtrate is then washed
several times in isolation medium. The purpose of the washing and
centrifugation is to eliminate any toxic compounds which are contained in
the non-microspore part of the filtrate and are created by the chopping
process. The centrifugation is usually done at decreasing spin speeds,
for example, 1000, 750, and finally 500 rpms. The result of the foregoing
steps is the preparation of a relatively pure tissue culture suspension
of microspores that are relatively free of debris and anther remnants.
[0209] To isolate microspores, an isolation media is preferred. An
isolation media is used to separate microspores from the anther walls
while maintaining their viability and embryogenic potential. An
illustrative embodiment of an isolation media includes a 6% sucrose or
maltose solution combined with an antioxidant such as 50 mg/l of ascorbic
acid, 0.1 mg/l biotin, and 400 mg/l of proline, combined with 10 mg/l of
nicotinic acid and 0.5 mg/l AgNO.sub.3. In another embodiment, the biotin
and proline are omitted.
[0210] An isolation media preferably has a higher antioxidant level where
it is used to isolate microspores from a donor plant (a plant from which
a plant composition containing a microspore is obtained) that is field
grown in contrast to greenhouse grown. A preferred level of ascorbic acid
in an isolation medium is from about 50 mg/l to about 125 mg/l and, more
preferably, from about 50 mg/l to about 100 mg/l.
[0211] One can find particular benefit in employing a support for the
microspores during culturing and subculturing. Any support that maintains
the cells near the surface can be used. The microspore suspension is
layered onto a support, for example by pipetting. There are several types
of supports which are suitable and are within the scope of the invention.
An illustrative embodiment of a solid support is a TRANSWELL.RTM. culture
dish. Another embodiment of a solid support for development of the
microspores is a bilayer plate wherein liquid media is on top of a solid
base. Other embodiments include a mesh or a millipore filter. Preferably,
a solid support is a nylon mesh in the shape of a raft. A raft is defined
as an approximately circular support material which is capable of
floating slightly above the bottom of a tissue culture vessel, for
example, a petri dish, of about a 60 or 100 mm size, although any other
laboratory tissue culture vessel will suffice. In an illustrative
embodiment, a raft is about 55 mm in diameter.
[0212] Culturing isolated microspores on a solid support, for example, on
a 10 mm pore nylon raft floating on 2.2 ml of medium in a 60 mm petri
dish, prevents microspores from sinking into the liquid medium and thus
avoiding low oxygen tension. These types of cell supports enable the
serial transfer of the nylon raft with its associated
microspore/embryoids ultimately to full strength medium containing
activated charcoal and solidified with, for example, GELRITE.TM.
(solidifying agent). The charcoal is believed to absorb toxic wastes and
intermediaries. The solid medium allows embryoids to mature.
[0213] The liquid medium passes through the mesh while the microspores are
retained and supported at the medium-air interface. The surface tension
of the liquid medium in the petri dish causes the raft to float. The
liquid is able to pass through the mesh; consequently, the microspores
stay on top. The mesh remains on top of the total volume of liquid
medium. An advantage of the raft is to permit diffusion of nutrients to
the microspores. Use of a raft also permits transfer of the microspores
from dish to dish during subsequent subculture with minimal loss,
disruption, or disturbance of the induced embryoids that are developing.
The rafts represent an advantage over the multi-welled TRANSWELL.RTM.
plates, which are commercially available from COSTAR, in that the
commercial plates are expensive. Another disadvantage of these plates is
that to achieve the serial transfer of microspores to subsequent media,
the membrane support with cells must be peeled off the insert in the
wells. This procedure does not produce as good a yield nor as efficient
transfers, as when a mesh is used as a vehicle for cell transfer.
[0214] The culture vessels can be further defined as either (1) a bilayer
60 mm petri plate wherein the bottom 2 ml of medium are solidified with
0.7% agarose overlaid with 1 mm of liquid containing the microspores; (2)
a nylon mesh raft wherein a wafer of nylon is floated on 1.2 ml of medium
and 1 ml of isolated microspores is pipetted on top; or (3)
TRANSWELL.RTM. plates wherein isolated microspores are pipetted onto
membrane inserts which support the microspores at the surface of 2 ml of
medium.
[0215] After the microspores have been isolated, they are cultured in a
low strength anther culture medium until about the 50 cell stage when
they are subcultured onto an embryoid/callus maturation medium. Medium is
defined at this stage as any combination of nutrients that permit the
microspores to develop into embryoids or callus. Many examples of
suitable embryoid/callus promoting media are well known to those skilled
in the art. These media will typically comprise mineral salts, a carbon
source, vitamins, and growth regulators. A solidifying agent is optional.
A preferred embodiment of such a media is referred to as "D medium,"
which typically includes 6N1 salts, AgNO.sub.3 and sucrose or maltose.
[0216] In an illustrative embodiment, 1 ml of isolated microspores are
pipetted onto a 10 mm nylon raft and the raft is floated on 1.2 ml of
medium "D," containing sucrose or preferably maltose. Both calli and
embryoids can develop. Calli are undifferentiated aggregates of cells.
Type I is a relatively compact, organized, and slow growing callus. Type
II is a soft, friable, and fast-growing one. Embryoids are aggregates
exhibiting some embryo-like structures. The embryoids are preferred for
subsequent steps to regenerating plants. Culture medium "D" is an
embodiment of medium that follows the isolation medium and replaces it.
Medium "D" promotes growth to an embryoid/callus. This medium comprises
6N1 salts at {fraction (1/8)} the strength of a basic stock solution
(major components) and minor components, plus 12% sucrose, or preferably
12% maltose, 0.1 mg/l B1, 0.5 mg/l nicotinic acid, 400 mg/l proline and
0.5 mg/l silver nitrate. Silver nitrate is believed to act as an
inhibitor to the action of ethylene. Multi-cellular structures of
approximately 50 cells each generally arise during a period of 12 days to
3 weeks. Serial transfer after a two week incubation period is preferred.
[0217] After the petri dish has been incubated for an appropriate period
of time, preferably two weeks in the dark at a predefined temperature, a
raft bearing the dividing microspores is transferred serially to solid
based media which promote embryo maturation. In an illustrative
embodiment, the incubation temperature is 30.degree. C. and the mesh raft
supporting the embryoids is transferred to a 100 mm petri dish containing
the 6N1-TGR-4P medium, an "anther culture medium." This medium contains
6N1 salts, supplemented with 0.1 mg/l TIBA, 12% sugar (sucrose, maltose,
or a combination thereof), 0.5% activated charcoal, 400 mg/l proline, 0.5
mg/l B, 0.5 mg/l nicotinic acid, and 0.2 percent GELRITE.TM. (solidifying
agent) and is capable of promoting the maturation of the embryoids.
Higher quality embryoids, that is, embryoids which exhibit more organized
development, such as better shoot meristem formation without precocious
germination, were typically obtained with the transfer to full strength
medium compared to those resulting from continuous culture using only,
for example, the isolated microspore culture (IMC) Medium "D." The
maturation process permits the pollen embryoids to develop further in
route toward the eventual regeneration of plants. Serial transfer occurs
to full strength solidified 6N1 medium using either the nylon raft, the
TRANSWELL.RTM. membrane, or bilayer plates, each one requiring the
movement of developing embryoids to permit further development into
physiologically more mature structures. In an especially preferred
embodiment, microspores are isolated in an isolation media comprising
about 6% maltose, cultured for about two weeks in an embryoid/calli
induction medium comprising about 12% maltose and then transferred to a
solid medium comprising about 12% sucrose.
[0218] At the point of transfer of the raft, after about two weeks of
incubation, embryoids exist on a nylon support. The purpose of
transferring the raft with the embryoids to a solidified medium after the
incubation is to facilitate embryo maturation. Mature embryoids at this
point are selected by visual inspection indicated by zygotic embryo-like
dimensions and structures and are transferred to the shoot initiation
medium. It is preferred that shoots develop before roots, or that shoots
and roots develop concurrently. If roots develop before shoots, plant
regeneration can be impaired. To produce solidified media, the bottom of
a petri dish of approximately 100 mm is covered with about 30 ml of 0.2%
GELRITE.TM. solidified medium. A sequence of regeneration media are used
for whole plant formation from the embryoids.
[0219] During the regeneration process, individual embryoids are induced
to form plantlets. The number of different media in the sequence can vary
depending on the specific protocol used. Finally, a rooting medium is
used as a prelude to transplanting to
soil. When plantlets reach a height
of about 5 cm, they are then transferred to pots for further growth into
flowering plants in a greenhouse by methods well known to those skilled
in the art.
[0220] Plants have been produced from isolated microspore cultures by the
methods disclosed herein, including self-pollinated plants. The rate of
embryoid induction was much higher with the synergistic preculture
treatment consisting of a combination of stress factors, including a
carbon source which can be capable of inducing starvation, a cold
temperature, and colchicine, than has previously been reported. An
illustrative embodiment of the synergistic combination of treatments
leading to the dramatically improved response rate compared to prior
methods, is a temperature of about 10.degree. C., mannitol as a carbon
source, and 0.05% colchicine.
[0221] The inclusion of ascorbic acid, an anti-oxidant, in the isolation
medium is preferred for maintaining good microspore viability. However,
there seems to be no advantage to including mineral salts in the
isolation medium. The osmotic potential of the isolation medium was
maintained optimally with about 6% sucrose, although a range of 2% to 12%
is within the scope of this invention.
[0222] In an embodiment of the embryoid/callus organizing media, mineral
salts concentration in IMC Culture Media "D" is ({fraction
(1/8)}.times.), the concentration which is used also in anther culture
medium. The 6N1 salts major components have been modified to remove
ammonium nitrogen. Osmotic potential in the culture medium is maintained
with about 12% sucrose and about 400 mg/l proline. Silver nitrate (0.5
mg/1) was included in the medium to modify ethylene activity. The
preculture media is further characterized by having a pH of about 5.7 to
6.0. Silver nitrate and vitamins do not appear to be crucial to this
medium but do improve the efficiency of the response.
[0223] Whole anther cultures can also be used in the production of
monocotyledonous plants from a plant culture system. There are some basic
similarities of anther culture methods and microspore culture methods
with regard to the media used. A difference from isolated microspore
cultures is that undisrupted anthers are cultured, so that a support,
e.g., a nylon mesh support, is not needed. The first step in developing
the anther cultures is to incubate tassels at a cold temperature. A cold
temperature is defined as less than about 25.degree. C. More
specifically, the incubation of the tassels is preferably performed at
about 10.degree. C. A range of 8 to 14.degree. C. is also within the
scope of the invention. The anthers are then dissected from the tassels,
preferably after surface sterilization using forceps, and placed on
solidified medium. An example of such a medium is designated 6N1-TGR-P4.
[0224] The anthers are then treated with environmental conditions that are
combinations of stresses that are capable of diverting microspores from
gametogenesis to embryogenesis. It is believed that the stress effect of
sugar alcohols in the preculture medium, for example, mannitol, is
produced by inducing starvation at the predefined temperature. In one
embodiment, the incubation pretreatment is for about 14 days at
10.degree. C. It was found that treating the anthers in addition with a
carbon structure, an illustrative embodiment being a sugar alcohol,
preferably mannitol, produces dramatically higher anther culture response
rates as measured by the number of eventually regenerated plants, than by
treatment with either cold treatment or mannitol alone. These results are
particularly surprising in light of teachings that cold is better than
mannitol for these purposes, and that warmer temperatures interact with
mannitol better.
[0225] To incubate the anthers, they are floated on a preculture medium
which diverts the microspores from gametogenesis, preferably on a
mannitol carbon structure, more specifically, 0.3 M of mannitol plus 50
mg/l of ascorbic acid. Three milliliters is about the total amount in a
dish, for example, a tissue culture dish, more specifically, a 60 mm
petri dish. Anthers are isolated from about 120 spikelets for one dish
yields about 360 anthers.
[0226] Chromosome doubling agents can be used in the preculture media for
anther cultures. Several techniques for doubling chromosome number
(Jensen, 1974; Wan et al., 1989) have been described. Colchicine is one
of the doubling agents. However, developmental abnormalities arising from
in vitro cloning are further enhanced by colchicine treatments, and
previous reports indicated that colchicine is toxic to microspores. The
addition of colchicine in increasing concentrations during mannitol
pretreatment prior to anther culture and microspore culture has achieved
improved percentages.
[0227] An illustrative embodiment of the combination of a chromosome
doubling agent and preculture medium is one which contains colchicine. In
a specific embodiment, the colchicine level is preferably about 0.05%.
The anthers remain in the mannitol preculture medium with the additives
for about 10 days at 10.degree. C. Anthers are then placed on maturation
media, for example, that designated 6N1-TGR-P4, for 3 to 6 weeks to
induce embryoids. If the plants are to be regenerated from the embryoids,
shoot regeneration medium is employed, as in the isolated microspore
procedure described in the previous sections. Other regeneration media
can be used sequentially to complete regeneration of whole plants.
[0228] The anthers are then exposed to embryoid/callus promoting medium,
for example, that designated 6N1-TGR-P4, to obtain callus or embryoids.
The embryoids are recognized visually by identification of embryonic-like
structures. At this stage, the embryoids are transferred progressively
through a series of regeneration media. In an illustrative embodiment,
the shoot initiation medium comprises BAP (6-benzyl-amino-purine) and NAA
(naphthalene acetic acid). Regeneration protocols for isolated microspore
cultures and anther cultures are similar.
[0229] VIII. Additional Tissue Cultures and Regeneration
[0230] The present invention contemplates a corn plant regenerated from a
tissue culture of the inbred maize plant 16IUL6, or of a hybrid maize
plant produced by crossing 16IUL6. As is well known in the art, tissue
culture of corn can be used for the in vitro regeneration of a corn
plant. By way of example, a process of tissue culturing and regeneration
of corn is described in European Patent Application 0 160 390, the
disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Corn tissue
culture procedures are also described in Green and Rhodes (1982) and
Duncan et al. (1985). The study by Duncan et al. (1985) indicates that 97
percent of cultured plants produced calli capable of regenerating plants.
Subsequent studies have shown that both inbreds and hybrids produced 91%
regenerable calli that produced plants.
[0231] Other studies indicate that non-traditional tissues are capable of
producing somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration (Songstad et al.,
1988; Rao et al., 1986; Conger et al., 1987; the disclosures of which are
incorporated herein by reference). Regenerable cultures, including Type I
and Type II cultures, may be initiated from immature embryos using
methods described in, for example, PCT Application WO 95/06128, the
disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0232] Briefly, by way of example, to regenerate a plant of this
invention, cells are selected following growth in culture. Where
employed, cultured cells are preferably grown either on solid supports or
in the form of liquid suspensions as set forth above. In either instance,
nutrients are provided to the cells in the form of media, and
environmental conditions are controlled. There are many types of tissue
culture media comprising amino acids, salts, sugars, hormones, and
vitamins. Most of the media employed to regenerate inbred and hybrid
plants have some similar components; the media differ in the composition
and proportions of their ingredients depending on the particular
application envisioned. For example, various cell types usually grow in
more than one type of media, but exhibit different growth rates and
different morphologies, depending on the growth media. In some media,
cells survive but do not divide. Various types of media suitable for
culture of plant cells have been previously described and discussed
above.
[0233] An exemplary embodiment for culturing recipient corn cells in
suspension cultures includes using embryogenic cells in Type II
(Armstrong and Green, 1985; Gordon-Kamm et al., 1990) callus, selecting
for small (10 to 30 mm) isodiametric, cytoplasmically dense cells,
growing the cells in suspension cultures with hormone containing media,
subculturing into a progression of media to facilitate development of
shoots and roots, and finally, hardening the plant and readying it
metabolically for growth in
soil.
[0234] Meristematic cells (i.e., plant cells capable of continual cell
division and characterized by an undifferentiated cytological appearance,
normally found at growing points or tissues in plants such as root tips,
stem apices, lateral buds, etc.) can be cultured (U.S. Pat. No.
5,736,369, the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated herein by
reference).
[0235] Embryogenic calli are produced essentially as described in PCT
Application WO 95/06128. Specifically, inbred plants or plants from
hybrids produced from crossing an inbred of the present invention with
another inbred are grown to flowering in a greenhouse. Explants from at
least one of the following F.sub.1 tissues: the immature tassel tissue,
intercalary meristems and leaf bases, apical meristems, immature ears and
immature embryos are placed in an initiation medium which contain MS
salts, supplemented with thiamine, agar, and sucrose. Cultures are
incubated in the dark at about 23.degree. C. All culture manipulations
and selections are performed with the aid of a dissecting microscope.
[0236] After about 5 to 7 days, cellular outgrowths are observed from the
surface of the explants. After about 7 to 21 days, the outgrowths are
subcultured by placing them into fresh medium of the same composition.
Some of the intact immature embryo explants are placed on fresh medium.
Several subcultures later (after about 2 to 3 months) enough material is
present from explants for subdivision of these embryogenic calli into two
or more pieces.
[0237] Callus pieces from different explants are not mixed. After further
growth and subculture (about 6 months after embryogenic callus
initiation), there are usually between 1 and 100 pieces derived
ultimately from each selected explant. During this time of culture
expansion, a characteristic embryogenic culture morphology develops as a
result of careful selection at each subculture. Any organized structures
resembling roots or root primordia are discarded. Material known from
experience to lack the capacity for sustained growth is also discarded
(translucent, watery, embryogenic structures). Structures with a firm
consistency resembling at least in part the scutelum of the in vivo
embryo are selected.
[0238] The callus is maintained on agar-solidified MS or N6-type media. A
preferred hormone is 2,4-D. A second preferred hormone is dicamba. Visual
selection of embryo-like structures is done to obtain subcultures.
Transfer of material other than that displaying embryogenic morphology
results in loss of the ability to recover whole plants from the callus.
[0239] Cell suspensions are prepared from the calli by selecting cell
populations that appear homogeneous macroscopically. A portion of the
friable, rapidly growing embryogenic calli is inoculated into MS or N6
Medium containing 2,4-D or dicamba. The calli in medium are incubated at
about 27.degree. C. on a gyrotary shaker in the dark or in the presence
of low light. The resultant suspension culture is transferred about once
every three to seven days, preferably every three to four days, by taking
about 5 to 10 ml of the culture and introducing this inoculum into fresh
medium of the composition listed above (PCT Application WO 95/06128).
[0240] For regeneration of type I or type II callus, callus is transferred
to a solidified culture medium which includes a lower concentration of
2,4-D or other auxins than is present in culture medium used for callus
maintenance (PCT Application WO 95/06128, specifically incorporated
herein by reference). Other hormones which can be used in regeneration
media include dicamba, NAA, ABA, BAP, and 2-NCA. Regeneration of plants
is completed by the transfer of mature and germinating embryos to a
hormone-free medium, followed by the transfer of developed plantlets to
soil and growth to maturity. Plant regeneration is described in PCT
Application WO 95/06128.
[0241] Cells from the meristem or cells fated to contribute to the
meristem of a cereal plant embryo at the early proembryo, mid proembryo,
late proembryo, transitional or early coleoptilar stage may be cultured
so as to produce a proliferation of shoots or multiple meristems from
which fertile plants may be regenerated. Alternatively, cells from the
meristem or cells fated to contribute to the meristem of a cereal plant
immature ear or tassel may be cultured so as to produce a proliferation
of shoots or multiple meristems from which fertile plants may be
regenerated (U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,369).
[0242] Progeny of any generation are produced by taking pollen and
selfing, backcrossing, or sibling crossing regenerated plants by methods
well known to those skilled in the arts. Seeds are collected from the
regenerated plants. Alternatively, progeny of any generation may be
produced by pollinating a regenerated plant with its own pollen or pollen
of a second maize plant. Using the methods described herein, tissue
cultures and immature or mature plant tissues may be used as recipient
cell cultures for the process of genetic transformation.
[0243] IX. Processes of Preparing Corn Plants and the Corn Plants Produced
by such Crosses
[0244] The present invention also provides a process of preparing a novel
corn plant and a corn plant produced by such a process. In accordance
with such a process, a first parent corn plant is crossed with a second
parent corn plant wherein at least one of the first and second corn
plants is the inbred corn plant 16IUL6. An important aspect of this
process is that it can be used for the development of novel inbred lines.
For example, the inbred corn plant 16IUL6 could be crossed to any second
plant, and the resulting hybrid progeny each selfed for about 5 to 7 or
more generations, thereby providing a large number of distinct,
pure-breeding inbred lines. These inbred lines could then be crossed with
other inbred or non-inbred lines and the resulting hybrid progeny
analyzed for beneficial characteristics. In this way, novel inbred lines
conferring desirable characteristics could be identified.
[0245] In selecting a second plant to cross with 16IUL6 for the purpose of
developing novel inbred lines, it will typically be desired choose those
plants which either themselves exhibit one or more selected desirable
characteristics or which exhibit the desired characteristic(s) when in
hybrid combination. Examples of potentially desired characteristics
include greater yield, better stalks, better roots, resistance to
insecticides, herbicides, pests, and disease, tolerance to heat and
drought, reduced time to crop maturity, better agronomic quality, higher
nutritional value, and uniformity in germination times, stand
establishment, growth rate, maturity, and fruit size. Alternatively, the
inbred 16IUL6 may be crossed with a second, different inbred plant for
the purpose of producing hybrid seed which is sold to farmers for
planting in commercial production fields. In this case, a second inbred
variety is selected which confers desirable characteristics when in
hybrid combination with the first inbred line.
[0246] Corn plants (Zea mays L.) can be crossed by either natural or
mechanical techniques. Natural pollination occurs in corn when wind blows
pollen from the tassels to the silks that protrude from the tops of the
recipient ears. Mechanical pollination can be effected either by
controlling the types of pollen that can blow onto the silks or by
pollinating by hand.
[0247] In a preferred embodiment, crossing comprises the steps of:
[0248] (a) planting in pollinating proximity seeds of a first and a second
parent corn plant, and preferably, seeds of a first inbred corn plant and
a second, distinct inbred corn plant;
[0249] (b) cultivating or growing the seeds of the first and second parent
corn plants into plants that bear flowers;
[0250] (c) emasculating flowers of either the first or second parent corn
plant, i.e., treating the flowers so as to prevent pollen production, or
alternatively, using as the female parent a male sterile plant, thereby
providing an emasculated parent corn plant;
[0251] (d) allowing natural cross-pollination to occur between the first
and second parent corn plants;
[0252] (e) harvesting seeds produced on the emasculated parent corn plant;
and, where desired,
[0253] (f) growing the harvested seed into a corn plant, preferably, a
hybrid corn plant.
[0254] Parental plants are typically planted in pollinating proximity to
each other by planting the parental plants in alternating rows, in blocks
or in any other convenient planting pattern. Where the parental plants
differ in timing of sexual maturity, it may be desired to plant the
slower maturing plant first, thereby ensuring the availability of pollen
from the male parent during the time at which silks on the female parent
are receptive to pollen. Plants of both parental parents are cultivated
and allowed to grow until the time of flowering. Advantageously, during
this growth stage, plants are in general treated with fertilizer and/or
other agricultural chemicals as considered appropriate by the grower.
[0255] At the time of flowering, in the event that plant 16IUL6 is
employed as the male parent, the tassels of the other parental plant are
removed from all plants employed as the female parental plant to avoid
self-pollination. The detasseling can be achieved manually but also can
be done by machine, if desired. Alternatively, when the female parent
corn plant comprises a cytoplasmic or nuclear gene conferring male
sterility, detasseling may not be required. Additionally, a chemical
gametocide may be used to sterilize the male flowers of the female plant.
In this case, the parent plants used as the male may either not be
treated with the chemical agent or may comprise a genetic factor which
causes resistance to the emasculating effects of the chemical agent.
Gametocides affect processes or cells involved in the development,
maturation or release of pollen. Plants treated with such gametocides are
rendered male sterile, but typically remain female fertile. The use of
chemical gametocides is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No.
4,936,904, the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated herein by
reference in its entirety. Furthermore, the use of Roundup herbicide in
combination with glyphosate tolerant maize plants to produce male sterile
corn plants is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/927,368
and PCT Publication WO 98/44140.
[0256] Following emasculation, the plants are then typically allowed to
continue to grow and natural cross-pollination occurs as a result of the
action of wind, which is normal in the pollination of grasses, including
corn. As a result of the emasculation of the female parent plant, all the
pollen from the male parent plant is available for pollination because
tassels, and thereby pollen bearing flowering parts, have been previously
removed from all plants of the inbred plant being used as the female in
the hybridization. Of course, during this hybridization procedure, the
parental varieties are grown such that they are isolated from other corn
fields to minimize or prevent any accidental contamination of pollen from
foreign sources. These isolation techniques are well within the skill of
those skilled in this art.
[0257] Both parental inbred plants of corn may be allowed to continue to
grow until maturity or the male rows may be destroyed after flowering is
complete. Only the ears from the female inbred parental plants are
harvested to obtain seeds of a novel F.sub.1 hybrid. The novel F.sub.1
hybrid seed produced can then be planted in a subsequent growing season
in commercial fields or, alternatively, advanced in breeding protocols
for purposes of developing novel inbred lines.
[0258] Alternatively, in another embodiment of the invention, both first
and second parent corn plants can come from the same inbred corn plant,
i.e., from the inbred designated 16IUL6. Thus, any corn plant produced
using a process of the present invention and inbred corn plant 16IUL6, is
contemplated by the current inventor. As used herein, crossing can mean
selfing, backcrossing, crossing to another or the same inbred, crossing
to populations, and the like. All corn plants produced using the inbred
corn plant 16IUL6 as a parent are, therefore, within the scope of this
invention.
[0259] The utility of the inbred plant 16IUL6 also extends to crosses with
other species. Commonly, suitable species will be of the family
Graminaceae, and especially of the genera Zea, Tripsacum, Coix,
Schlerachne, Polytoca, Chionachne, and Trilobachne, of the tribe Maydeae.
Of these, Zea and Tripsacum, are most preferred. Potentially suitable for
crosses with 16IUL6 can also be the various varieties of grain sorghum,
Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.
[0260] A. F.sub.1 Hybrid Corn Plant and Seed Production
[0261] Any time the inbred corn plant 16IUL6 is crossed with another,
different, corn inbred, a first generation (F.sub.1) corn hybrid plant is
produced. As such, an F.sub.1 hybrid corn plant may be produced by
crossing 16IUL6 with any second inbred maize plant. Therefore, any
F.sub.1 hybrid corn plant or corn seed which is produced with 16IUL6 as a
parent is part of the present invention. An example of such an F.sub.1
hybrid which has been produced with 16IUL6 as a parent is the hybrid
8012471.
[0262] The goal of the process of producing an F.sub.1 hybrid is to
manipulate the genetic complement of corn to generate new combinations of
genes which interact to yield new or improved traits (phenotypic
characteristics). A process of producing an F.sub.1 hybrid typically
begins with the production of one or more inbred plants. Those plants are
produced by repeated crossing of ancestrally related corn plants to try
to combine certain genes within the inbred plants.
[0263] Corn has a diploid phase which means two conditions of a gene (two
alleles) occupy each locus (position on a chromosome). If the alleles are
the same at a locus, there is said to be homozygosity. If they are
different, there is said to be heterozygosity. In a completely inbred
plant, all loci are homozygous. Because many loci when homozygous are
deleterious to the plant, in particular leading to reduced vigor, less
kernels, weak and/or poor growth, production of inbred plants is an
unpredictable and arduous process. Under some conditions, heterozygous
advantage at some loci effectively bars perpetuation of homozygosity.
[0264] Inbreeding requires sophisticated manipulation by human breeders.
Even in the extremely unlikely event inbreeding rather than crossbreeding
occurred in natural corn, achievement of complete inbreeding cannot be
expected in nature due to well known deleterious effects of homozygosity
and the large number of generations the plant would have to breed in
isolation. The reason for the breeder to create inbred plants is to have
a known reservoir of genes whose gametic transmission is predictable.
[0265] The development of inbred plants generally requires at least about
5 to 7 generations of selfing. Inbred plants are then cross-bred in an
attempt to develop improved F.sub.1 hybrids. Hybrids are then screened
and evaluated in small scale field trials. Typically, about 10 to 15
phenotypic traits, selected for their potential commercial value, are
measured. A selection index of the most commercially important traits is
used to help evaluate hybrids. FACT, an acronym for Field Analysis
Comparison Trial (strip trials), is an on-farm experimental testing
program employed by DEKALB Genetics Corporation to perform the final
evaluation of the commercial potential of a product.
[0266] During the next several years, a progressive elimination of hybrids
occurs based on more detailed evaluation of their phenotype. Eventually,
strip trials (FACT) are conducted to formally compare the experimental
hybrids being developed with other hybrids, some of which were previously
developed and generally are commercially successful. That is, comparisons
of experimental hybrids are made to competitive hybrids to determine if
there was any advantage to further development of the experimental
hybrids. Examples of such comparisons are presented hereinbelow. After
FACT testing is complete, determinations may be made whether commercial
development should proceed for a given hybrid.
[0267] When the inbred corn plant 16IUL6 is crossed with another inbred
plant to yield a hybrid, the original inbred can serve as either the
maternal or paternal plant. For many crosses, the outcome is the same
regardless of the assigned sex of the parental plants.
[0268] However, there is often one of the parental plants that is
preferred as the maternal plant because of increased seed yield and
production characteristics. Some plants produce tighter ear husks leading
to more loss, for example due to rot. There can be delays in silk
formation which deleteriously affect timing of the reproductive cycle for
a pair of parental inbreds. Seed coat characteristics can be preferable
in one plant. Pollen can be shed better by one plant. Other variables can
also affect preferred sexual assignment of a particular cross. In the
case of the instant inbred, it was preferable to use 16IUL6 as the male
parent.
[0269] B. F.sub.1 Hybrid Comparisons
[0270] As mentioned above, hybrids are progressively eliminated following
detailed evaluations of their phenotype, including formal comparisons
with other commercially successful hybrids. Strip trials are used to
compare the phenotypes of hybrids grown in as many environments as
possible. They are performed in many environments to assess overall
performance of the new hybrids and to select optimum growing conditions.
Because the corn is grown in close proximity, environmental factors that
affect gene expression, such as moisture, temperature, sunlight, and
pests, are minimized. For a decision to be made to commercialize a
hybrid, it is not necessary that the hybrid be better than all other
hybrids. Rather, significant improvements must be shown in at least some
traits that would create improvements in some niches.
[0271] Examples of such comparative data are set forth hereinbelow in
Table 4, which presents a comparison of performance data for the hybrid
8012471, a hybrid made with 16IUL6 as one parent, versus selected hybrids
of commercial value.
[0272] All the data in Table 4 represents results across years and
locations for research and/or strip trials. The "NTEST" represents the
number of paired observations in designated tests at locations around the
United States.
4TABLE 4
26/39 Comparative Data of 8012471
SI YLD MST STL RTL DRP FLSTD SV ELSTD PHT EHT BAR SG TST ESTR
HYBRID NTEST %C BU PTS % % % %M RAT %M INCH INCH % RAT LBS FGDU DAYS
8012471 R 56 101.8 185.5 17.1 1.7 2.8 0.0 100.9 3.3 100.1 95.1
39.5 0.0 6.7 58.0 1310 104.2
DK551 109.7 195.2 17.4 2.4 1.3 0.0
100.1 3.5 101.1 95.7 44.9 0.6 6.2 57.2 1334 105.1
DIFF -7.9 -9.6
-0.3 -0.8 1.5 0.0 0.8 -0.2 -1.0 -0.6 -5.4 -0.6 0.5 0.9 -24 -0.8
SIG ** ** + ** + ** ** **
8012471 F 21 104.4 165.1 17.4
1.4 1.3 0.0 101.4 4.6 101.4 90.4 42.1 2.1 5.9 58.8 1283 106.1
DK551 103.7 162.9 16.3 3.4 0.0 0.0 101.3 4.5 103.8 89.1 44.3 4.4 7.6
58.1 1283 104.7
DIFF 0.7 2.2 1.1 -1.9 1.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 -2.4 1.3
-2.2 -2.3 -1.7 0.7 0 1.3
SIG * ** *
Significance levels are indicated as: + = 10%, * = 5%, ** = 1%
LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS:
HYBD = Hybrid
NTEST = Research/FACT
SI%C = Selection Index (percent of check)
YLD BU/A =
Yield (bushels/acre)
MST PTS = Moisture
STL % = Stalk
Lodging (percent)
RTL % = Root Lodging (percent)
DRP% =
Dropped Ears (percent)
FLSTD %M = Final Stand (percent of test
mean)
SVRAT = Seedling Vigor Rating
ELSTD %M = Early
Stand (percent of test mean)
PHT INCH = Plant Height (inches)
EHT INCH = Ear Height (inches)
BAR % = Barren Plants
(percent)
SG RAT = Staygreen Rating
TST LBS = Test Weight
(pounds)
FGDU = GDUs to Shed
ESTR DAYS = Estimated
Relative Maturity (days)
[0273] C. Physical Description of F.sub.1 Hybrids
[0274] The present invention provides F.sub.1 hybrid corn plants derived
from the corn plant 16IUL6. The physical characteristics of an exemplary
hybrid produced using 16IUL6 as one inbred parent are set forth in Table
5, which concerns hybrid 8012471. An explanation of terms used in Table 5
can be found in the Definitions, set forth hereinabove.
5TABLE 5
Morphological Traits for the 8012471
Phenotype
CHARACTERISTIC VALUE
1. STALK
Diameter (width) cm. 2.4
Anthocyanin Absent
Nodes With
Brace Roots 1.9
Brace Root Color Moderate
Internode
Direction Straight
Internode Length cm. 17.4
2. LEAF
Color Green
Length cm. 89.1
Width cm. 10.5
Sheath Anthocyanin Absent
Marginal Waves Moderate
Longitudinal Creases Few
3. TASSEL
Length cm. 46.5
Spike Length cm. 26.2
Peduncle Length cm. 10.5
Branch
Number 6.3
Anther Color Yellow
Glume Color Green
Glume Band Absent
4. EAR
Silk Color Yellow
Number
Per Stalk 1.1
Position (attitude) Pendant
Length cm. 18.5
Shape Semi-Conical
Diameter cm. 4.9
Husk Bract
Short
Husk Cover cm. 1.6
Husk Opening Loose
Husk
Color Fresh Green
Cob Diameter cm. 2.5
Cob Color Red
Shelling Percent 86.2
5. KERNEL
Row Number 17.4
Number Per Row 41.5
Row Direction Straight
Type Dent
Cap Color Yellow
Side Color Deep-Yellow
Length (depth)
mm. 12.9
Width mm. 7.9
Thickness 4.2
Endosperm
Type Normal
Endosperm Color Yellow
*These are
typical values. Values may vary due to environment. Other values that are
substantially equivalent are also within the scope of the invention.
Substantially equivalent refers to quantitative traits that when compared
do not show statistical differences of their means.
[0275] X. Genetic Complements
[0276] The present invention provides a genetic complement of the inbred
corn plant designated 16IUL6. Further provided by the invention is a
hybrid genetic complement, wherein the complement is formed by the
combination of a haploid genetic complement from 16IUL6 and another
haploid genetic complement. Means for determining such a genetic
complement are well-known in the art.
[0277] As used herein, the phrase "genetic complement" means an aggregate
of nucleotide sequences, the expression of which defines the phenotype of
a corn plant or a cell or tissue of that plant. By way of example, a corn
plant is genotyped to determine a representative sample of the inherited
markers it possesses. Markers are alleles at a single locus. They are
preferably inherited in codominant fashion so that the presence of both
alleles at a diploid locus is readily detectable, and they are free of
environmental variation, i.e., their heritability is 1. This genotyping
is preferably performed on at least one generation of the descendant
plant for which the numerical value of the quantitative trait or traits
of interest are also determined. The array of single locus genotypes is
expressed as a profile of marker alleles, two at each locus. The marker
allelic composition of each locus can be either homozygous or
heterozygous. Homozygosity is a condition where both alleles at a locus
are characterized by the same nucleotide sequence or size of a repeated
sequence. Heterozygosity refers to different conditions of the gene at a
locus. A preferred type of genetic marker for use with the invention is
simple sequence repeats (SSRs), although potentially any other type of
genetic marker could be used, for example, restriction fragment length
polymorphisms (RFLPs), amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs),
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and isozymes.
[0278] A genetic marker profile of an inbred may be predictive of the
agronomic traits of a hybrid produced using that inbred. For example, if
an inbred of known genetic marker profile and phenotype is crossed with a
second inbred of known genetic marker profile and phenotype it is
possible to predict the phenotype of the F.sub.1 hybrid based on the
combined genetic marker profiles of the parent inbreds. Methods for
prediction of hybrid performance from genetic marker data is disclosed in
U.S. Pat. No. 5,492,547, the disclosure of which is specifically
incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Such predictions may be
made using any suitable genetic marker, for example, SSRs, RFLPs, AFLPs,
SNPs, or isozymes.
[0279] SSRs are genetic markers based on polymorphisms in repeated
nucleotide sequences, such as microsatellites. A marker system based on
SSRs can be highly informative in linkage analysis relative to other
marker systems in that multiple alleles may be present. Another advantage
of this type of marker is that, through use of flanking primers,
detection of SSRs can be achieved, for example, by the polymerase chain
reaction (PCR.TM.), thereby eliminating the need for labor-intensive
Southern hybridization. The PCR.TM. detection is done by use of two
oligonucleotide primers flanking the polymorphic segment of repetitive
DNA. Repeated cycles of heat denaturation of the DNA followed by
annealing of the primers to their complementary sequences at low
temperatures, and extension of the annealed primers with DNA polymerase,
comprise the major part of the methodology. Following amplification,
markers can be scored by gel electrophoresis of the amplification
products. Scoring of marker genotype is based on the size (number of base
pairs) of the amplified segment.
[0280] Means for performing genetic analyses using SSR polymorphisms are
well known in the art. The SSR analyses reported herein were conducted by
Celera AgGen in Davis, Calif. This service is available to the public on
a contractual basis. This analysis was carried out by amplification of
simple repeats followed by detection of marker genotypes using gel
electrophoresis. Markers were scored based on the size of the amplified
fragment.
[0281] The SSR genetic marker profile of the parental inbreds and
exemplary resultant hybrid described herein were determined. Because an
inbred is essentially homozygous at all relevant loci, an inbred should,
in almost all cases, have only one allele at each locus. In contrast, a
diploid genetic marker profile of a hybrid should be the sum of those
parents, e.g., if one inbred parent had the allele 168 (base pairs) at a
particular locus, and the other inbred parent had 172, the hybrid is
168.172 by inference. Subsequent generations of progeny produced by
selection and breeding are expected to be of genotype 168, 172, or
168.172 for that locus position. When the F.sub.1 plant is used to
produce an inbred, the locus should be either 168 or 172 for that
position. Surprisingly, it has been observed that in certain instances,
novel SSR genotypes arise during the breeding process. For example, a
genotype of 170 may be observed at a particular locus position from the
cross of parental inbreds with 168 and 172 at that locus. Such a novel
SSR genotype may further define an inbred from the parental inbreds from
which it was derived. An SSR genetic marker profile of 16IUL6 is
presented in Table 6.
6TABLE 6
SSR Profile of 16IUL6 and Comparative
Inbreds
LOCUS 16IUL6 MM402A 01IBH2
BNGL105 92
106 92
BNGL118 125 110 110
BNGL149 183 -- --
BNGL426 119 -- --
BNGL589 175 156 175
BNGL615 194 194 231
BNGL619 275 269 --
DUP28 131 123 --
MC1014 163
169 163
MC1017 194 198 196
MC1018 140 140 --
MC1022 116 116 --
MC1028 159 -- --
MC1043 189 165 --
MC1046 206 220 198
MC1065 230 219 219
MC1070 239 239
--
MC1074 164 180 --
MC1079 173 182 173
MC1094
172 170 --
MC1108 144 144 --
MC1131 111 111 --
MC1138 188 188 --
MC1176 254 248 220
MC1182 82 82 --
MC1189 227 225 227
MC1191 213 207 213
MC1194 143 143
143
MC1208 111 115 111
MC1209 184 180 184
MC1237
161 159 159
MC1257 179 179 --
MC1265 244 244 --
MC1287 158 158 160
MC1288 113 120 113
MC1302 157 155 147
MC1305 160 160 160
MC1325 171 171 171
MC1329 93
93 --
MC1360 119 119 119
MC1371 95 95 134
MC1429 191 212 191
MC1449 152 95 95
MC1456 187 176 187
MC1484 124 124 124
MC1520 283 299 275
MC1523 199
199 199
MC1526 124 114 124
MC1538 213 213 --
MC1605 110 110 --
MC1662 137 167 161
MC1720 245 239 --
MC1732 100 100 108
MC1784 254 252 254
MC1808 131 131
--
MC1831 182 -- 184
MC1834 208 208 --
MC1839 186
186 186
MC1866 123 119 123
MC1890 142 142 --
MC1904 191 170 --
MC1931 169 170 174
MC1940 218 212 --
MC2047 144 153 144
MC2086 240 240 --
MC2132 254 254
223
MC2238 195 212 195
MC2259 181 177 --
MC2305
190 -- --
NC004 170 170 --
PHI0I7 110 110 --
PHI024 171 171 --
PHI031 198 198 198
PHI033 257 257 257
PHI037 161 137 --
PHI050 92 86 92
PHI051 149 149
149
PHI061 93 93 85
PHI064 90 86 --
PHI065
153 158 138
PHI072 149 149 149
PHI078 133 133 133
PHI089 100 93 100
PHI093 292 293 292
PHI096 109 109 --
PHI101 103 99 103
PHI116 182 177 --
PHI119 168 168
176
PHI120 76 75 --
Primers used to detect
SSRs are from Celera AgGen, Inc., 1756 Picasso Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616
[0282] Another aspect of this invention is a plant genetic complement
characterized by a genetic isozyme typing profile. Isozymes are forms of
proteins that are distinguishable, for example, on starch gel
electrophoresis, usually by charge and/or molecular weight. The
techniques and nomenclature for isozyme analysis are described in, for
example, Stuber et al. (1988), which is incorporated by reference.
[0283] A standard set of loci can be used as a reference set. Comparative
analysis of these loci is used to compare the purity of hybrid seeds, to
assess the increased variability in hybrids compared to inbreds, and to
determine the identity of seeds, plants, and plant parts. In this
respect, an isozyme reference set can be used to develop genotypic
"fingerprints."
[0284] Table 7 lists the identifying numbers of the alleles at isozyme
loci types, and represents the exemplary genetic isozyme typing profile
for 16IUL6.
7TABLE 7
Isozyme Profile of 16IUL6 and Comparative
Inbreds
ISOZYME ALLELE
LOCUS 16IUL6 MM402A 01IBH2
Acph1 2 4 2
Adh1 4 4 4
Cat3 9 9 9
Got3
4 4 4
Got2 4 4 4
Got1 4 4 4
Idh1 4 4 4
Idh2 4 6 4
Mdh1 6 6 6
Mdh2 3.5 6 3
Mdh3 16 16 16
Mdh4 12 12 12
Mdh5 12 12 12
Pgm1 9 9 9
Pgm2 4 4 4
6Pgd1 2 2 3.8
6Pgd2 5 5 5
Phi1 4 4 4
[0285] The present invention also provides a hybrid genetic complement
formed by the combination of a haploid genetic complement of the corn
plant 16IUL6 with a haploid genetic complement of a second corn plant.
Means for combining a haploid genetic complement from the foregoing
inbred with another haploid genetic complement can comprise any method
for producing a hybrid plant from 16IUL6. It is contemplated that such a
hybrid genetic complement can be prepared using in vitro regeneration of
a tissue culture of a hybrid plant of this invention.
[0286] A hybrid genetic complement contained in the seed of a hybrid
derived from 16IUL6 is a further aspect of this invention. An exemplary
hybrid genetic complement is that of the hybrid 8012471.
[0287] Table 8 shows the identifying numbers of the alleles for the hybrid
8012471, which constitutes an exemplary SSR genetic marker profile for
hybrids derived from the inbred of the present invention. Table 8
concerns 8012471, which has 16IUL6 as one inbred parent.
8TABLE 8
SSR Profile of 8012471
LOCUS
Hybrid 8012471
BNGL105 92.92
BNGL118 125.110
BNGL149 183.187
BNGL426 119.119
BNGL589 175.175
BNGL6l5 194.227
BNGL6I9 275.265
DUP28 131.123
MC1014 163.161
MC1017 194.196
MC1018 140.130
MC1022 116.67
MC1043 189.175
MC1065 230.230
MC1079 173.177
MC1094 172.178
MC1108 144.122
MC1131 111.109
MC1138 189.186
MC1176 254.220
MC1182 82.106
MC1189 227.219
MC1191 213.206
MC1194 143.143
MC1208 111.127
MC1209 184.184
MC1237 161.161
MC1257 179.187
MC1265 244.204
MC1287 158.160
MC1302 157.149
MC1305 160.160
MC1325 171.177
MC1329 93.93
MC1360 119.141
MC1371
95.124
MC1429 191.191
MC1449 152.95
MC1456
187.187
MC1484 124.124
MC1520 283.275
MC1523
199.199
MC1526 124.124
MC1538 213.237
MC1662
137.161
MC1720 245.241
MC1732 100.100
MC1784
254.250
MC1808 131.137
MC1831 182.186
MC1834
208.216
MC1839 186.186
MC1866 123.119
MC1890
142.136
MC1904 191.183
MC1931 169.170
MC1940
218.222
MC2047 144.144
MC2086 240.242
MC2132
254.223
MC2305 190.218
NC004 170.156
PHI017
11.1100
PHI024 171.171
PHI031 198.194
PHI033
257.257
PHI037 161.137
PHI050 92.92
PHI051
149.149
PHI064 90.104
PHI065 153.158
PHI072
149.149
PHI089 100.92
PHI093 292.293
PHI101
103.102
PHI116 182.177
PHI119 168.176
PHI120
76.73
Primers used to detct SSRs are form Celera AgGen,
Inc., 2411 South 1070 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
[0288] The exemplary hybrid genetic complements of hybrid 8012471 may also
be assessed by genetic isozyme typing profiles using a standard set of
loci as a reference set, using, e.g., the same, or a different, set of
loci to those described above. Table 9 lists the identifying numbers of
the alleles at isozyme loci types and presents the exemplary genetic
isozyme typing profile for the hybrid 8012471, which is an exemplary
hybrid derived from the inbred of the present invention. Table 9 concerns
8012471, which has 16IUL6 as one inbred parent.
9TABLE 9
Isozyme Profile for Hybrid 8012471
Loci Isozyme Allele
Acph1 2/2
Adh1 4/4
Cat3 9/9
Idh1 4/4
Idh2 4/4
Mdh1 6/6
Mdh2
3.5/3.5
Mdh3 16/16
Mdh4 12/12
Mdh5 12/12
Pgm1 9/9
Pgm2 4/4
6-Pgd1 2/3.8
6-Pgd2 5/5
Phi1 4/4
[0289] All of the compositions and methods disclosed and claimed herein
can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the
present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention
have been described in terms of the foregoing illustrative embodiments,
it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations,
changes, modifications, and alterations may be applied to the
composition, methods, and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the
methods described herein, without departing from the true concept,
spirit, and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be
apparent that certain agents that are both chemically and physiologically
related may be substituted for the agents described herein while the same
or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and
modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be
within the spirit, scope, and concept of the invention as defined by the
appended claims.
REFERENCES
[0290] The following references, to the extent that they provide exemplary
procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein, are
specifically incorporated herein by reference.
[0291] Anderson, W. P., Weed Science Principles, West Publishing Company,
1983.
[0292] Armstrong and Green, "Establishment and maintenance of friable,
embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline,"Planta,
164:207-214, 1985.
[0293] Conger, Novak, Afza, Erdelsky, "Somatic Embryogenesis from Cultured
Leaf Segments of Zea Mays," Plant Cell Reports, 6:345-347, 1987.
[0294] Duncan et al., "The Production of Callus Capable of Plant
Regeneration from Immature Embryos of Numerous Zea Mays Genotypes,"
Planta, 165:322-332, 1985.
[0295] Fehr, "Theory and Technique," In: Principles of Cultivar
Development, 1:360-376, 1987.
[0296] Gaillard et al., "Optimization of Maize Microspore Isolation and
Culture Condition for Reliable Plant Regeneration," Plant Cell Reports,
10(2):55, 1991.
[0297] Gordon-Kamm et al., "Transformation of Maize Cells and Regeneration
of Fertile Transgenic Plants," The Plant Cell, 2:603-618, 1990.
[0298] Green and Rhodes, "Plant Regeneration in Tissue Cultures of Maize:
Callus Formation from Stem Protoplasts of Corn (Zea Mays L.)," In: Maize
for Biological Research, 367-372, 1982.
[0299] Jensen, "Chromosome Doubling Techniques in Haploids," Haploids and
Higher Plants--Advances and Potentials, Proceedings of the First
International Symposium, 1974.
[0300] Nienhuis et al, "Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis
of Loci Associated with Insect Resistance in Tomato," Crop Science,
27(4):797-803, 1987.
[0301] Omirulleh et al., "Activity of a chimeric promoter with the doubled
CAMV 35S enhancer element in protoplast-derived cells and transgenic
plants in maize," Plant Mol. Biol., 21(3):415-428, 1993.
[0302] Pace et al., "Anther Culture of Maize and the Visualization of
Embryogenic Microspores by Fluorescent Microscopy," Theoretical and
Applied Genetics, 73:863-869, 1987.
[0303] Poehlman et al., "Breeding Field Crops," 4th Ed., Iowa State
University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp 132-155 and 321-344, 1995.
[0304] Rao et al., "Somatic Embryogenesis in Glume Callus Cultures," Maize
Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 60, 1986.
[0305] Songstad et al., "Effect of 1-Aminocyclopropate-1-Carboxylic Acid,
Silver Nitrate, and Norbornadiene on Plant Regeneration from Maize Callus
Cultures," Plant Cell Reports, 7:262-265, 1988.
[0306] Sprague and Dudley (eds.), "Corn and Corn Improvement," 3rd Ed.,
Crop Science of America, Inc., and Soil Science of America, Inc., Madison
Wis. pp 881-883 and pp 901-918, 1988.
[0307] Stuber et al, "Techniques and scoring procedures for starch gel
electrophoresis of enzymes of maize C. Zea mays, L.," Tech. Bull., 286,
1988.
[0308] Wan et al., "Efficient Production of Doubled Haploid Plants Through
Colchicine Treatment of Anther-Derived Maize Callus," Theoretical and
Applied Genetics, 77:889-892, 1989.
[0309] Wang et al., "Large-Scale Identification, Mapping, and Genotyping
of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Human Genome," Science,
80:1077-1082, 1998.
[0310] Williams et al., "Oligonucleotide Primers of Arbitrary Sequence
Amplify DNA Polymorphisms which Are Useful as Genetic Markers," Nucleic
Acids Res., 18:6531-6535, 1990.
* * * * *