Register or Login To Download This Patent As A PDF
| United States Patent Application |
20020108895
|
| Kind Code
|
A1
|
|
KERFOOT, WILLIAM B.
|
August 15, 2002
|
LAMINATED MICROPOROUS DIFFUSER
Abstract
A microporous diffuser includes a first elongated member including at
least one sidewall having a plurality of microscopic openings. The
sidewall defines an interior hollow portion of the member. The diffuser
has a second elongated member having a second sidewall having a plurality
of microscopic openings, the second member being disposed through the
hollow region of the first member. The diffuser includes an end cap to
seal a first end of the microporous diffuser and an inlet cap disposed at
a second end of microporous diffuser for receiving inlet fittings.
| Inventors: |
KERFOOT, WILLIAM B.; (FALMOUTH, MA)
|
| Correspondence Address:
|
DENIS G MALONEY
FISH AND RICHARDSON PC
225 FRANKLIN STREET
BOSTON
MA
021102804
|
| Serial No.:
|
470167 |
| Series Code:
|
09
|
| Filed:
|
December 22, 1999 |
| Current U.S. Class: |
210/199 |
| Class at Publication: |
210/199 |
| International Class: |
B01D 015/00 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A microporous diffuser comprising: a first elongated member including
at least one sidewall having a plurality of microscopic openings, said
sidewall defining an interior hollow portion of said member; a second
elongated member having a second sidewall having a plurality of
microscopic openings, said second member being disposed through the
hollow region of said first member; an end cap to seal a first end of the
microporous diffuser; and an inlet cap disposed at a second end of
microporous diffuser for receiving inlet fittings.
2. The microporous diffuser of claim 1 wherein a region defined between
the first and second elongated members of the microporous diffuser is
filled with a catalyst suspension material.
3. The microporous diffuser of claim 1 wherein the first and second
elongated members are cylinders and the second elongated member is
disposed concentric to the first elongated member.
4. The microporous diffuser of claim 3 wherein a region defined between
the first and second elongated members of the microporous diffuser is
filled with a catalyst suspension material.
5. The microporous diffuser of claim 1 wherein the end cap seals first
ends of the first and second elongated members.
6. The microporous diffuser of claim 1 wherein the second elongated member
is one of a plurality of second elongated members disposed through the
first elongated member.
7. The microporous diffuser of claim 6 wherein the plurality of second
elongated members are disposed through a substantial portion of a length
of the first elongated member.
8. The microporous diffuser of claim 7 further comprising: a plurality of
caps to terminate ends of the second elongated members which are disposed
in the hollow portion of the first elongated member.
9. The microporous diffuser of claim 6 wherein a region defined between
the first and second elongated members of the microporous diffuser is
filled with a catalyst suspension material.
10. A microporous diffuser comprising: a first hollow cylindrical tube
having a sidewall comprising a plurality of microscopic openings; a
second hollow tube having a sidewall having a plurality of microscopic
openings, said second tube being disposed through said first tube; an end
cap to seal ends of said tubes; and an inlet cap disposed to provide
inlets to interior portions formed by sidewalls of said tubes.
11. The diffuser of claim 10 wherein the inlet cap includes a first
fitting disposed at a central portion thereof that permits a gas to be
injected through the second tube in the microporous diffuser.
12. The microporous diffuser of claim 10 wherein the inlet cap has a
fitting disposed to permit a liquid to be injected through a region
defined between the first and second tubes of the microporous diffuser.
13. The microporous diffuser of claim 12 wherein the region defined
between the first and second tubes of the microporous diffuser is filled
with a catalyst suspension material.
14. The microporous diffuser of claim 13 wherein the catalyst suspension
material is glass beads or silica particles.
15. The microporous diffuser of claim 14 wherein a catalyst is disposed in
the glass beads or silica, said catalyst containing iron.
16. The microporous diffuser of claim 15 wherein the iron is in the form
of iron silicates.
17. The microporous diffuser of claim 10 wherein the first and second
tubes are comprised of heat fused microscopic plastic particles.
18. The microporous diffuser of claim 17 wherein the first and second
tubes are further comprised of a support material including a cylinder of
a metal having a plurality of openings to which the heat fused
microporous plastic particles are adhered to.
19. The microporous diffuser of claim 17 wherein the first and second
tubes are comprised of heat fused microporous plastic particles.
20. The microporous diffuser of claim 19 wherein the heat fused
microporous plastic particles are comprised of a plastic selected from
the group consisting of polyvinylchloride, polypropylene, polyethylene,
polytetrafluoroethylene, high density polyethylene (HDPE) and ABS.
21. The microporous diffuser of claim 18 wherein the support is comprised
of plastic or metal having a plurality of openings.
22. A microporous diffuser comprising: a first hollow cylindrical tube
coupled to a first inlet and adapted to be fed by a gas, the tube having
a sidewall comprising a plurality of microscopic openings the openings
having a diameter in a range of 1 to 200 microns; and a second hollow
tube coupled to a second inlet and adapted to be fed by a liquid, the
tube having a sidewall with a plurality of microscopic openings, the
openings having a diameter in a range of 1 to 200 microns, with said
first tube being disposed through said second tube and arranged such that
gas injected into the first tube travels towards the sidewall of the
second tube forming microfine bubbles laminated with the liquid; an end
cap to seal first ends of said tubes; and an inlet cap disposed to seal
second ends of said tubes and to support the first and second inlets to
the interior portions formed between said tubes.
Description
BACKGROUND
[0001] This invention relates generally to water remediation systems.
[0002] There is a well recognized need to clean-up contaminants that exist
in ground and surface water. In particular, there is one type of
contamination problem which widely exists, that is, the contamination of
surface waters or subsurface waters which find their way to the surface
such as, for example, in a contaminated spring. Such surface waters may
be contaminated with various constituents including volatile
hydrocarbons, such as chlorinated hydrocarbons including trichloroethene
(TCE), tetrachloroethene (PCE).
SUMMARY
[0003] According to an additional aspect of the present invention, a
microporous diffuser includes a first elongated member including at least
one sidewall having a plurality of microscopic openings, said sidewall
defining an interior hollow portion of said member and a second elongated
member having a second sidewall having a plurality of microscopic
openings, said second member being disposed through the hollow region of
said first member. The diffuser includes an end cap to seal a first end
of the microporous diffuser and an inlet cap disposed at a second end of
microporous diffuser for receiving inlet fittings.
[0004] According to an additional aspect of the present invention, a
microporous diffuser includes a first hollow cylindrical tube having a
sidewall comprising a plurality of microscopic openings and a second
hollow tube having a sidewall having a plurality of microscopic openings,
said second tube being disposed through said first tube. The diffuser
also includes an end cap to seal ends of said tubes and an inlet cap
disposed to provide inlets to interior portions formed by sidewalls of
said tubes.
[0005] According to a still further aspect of the invention, a microporous
diffuser includes a first hollow cylindrical tube coupled to a first
inlet and adapted to be fed by a gas, the tube having a sidewall
comprising a plurality of microscopic openings the openings having a
diameter in a range of 1 to 200 microns and a second hollow tube coupled
to a second inlet and adapted to be fed by a liquid, the tube having a
sidewall with a plurality of microscopic openings, the openings having a
diameter in a range of 1 to 200 microns, with the first tube being
disposed through the second tube and arranged such that gas injected into
the first tube travels towards the sidewall of the second tube forming
microfine bubbles laminated with the liquid. The diffuser also includes
an end cap to seal first ends of the tubes and an inlet cap disposed to
seal second ends of said tubes and to support the first and second inlets
to the interior portions formed between the tubes.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0006] FIG. 1 is a diagrammatical view of a typical surface water
treatment example.
[0007] FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an apparatus used in the treatment
process.
[0008] FIGS. 3A and 3B are respectively plan and elevational views
somewhat schematic, of a spring box used in the apparatus of FIG. 2.
[0009] FIGS. 3C and 3D are plan and elevational views of still alternate
spring box arrangements.
[0010] FIGS. 4A and 4B are longitudinal cross-section and plan
cross-sectional views of a microporous diffuser useful in the spring box
of FIGS. 3A and 3B;
[0011] FIGS. 5A, 5B are longitudinal cross-section and plan
cross-sectional views, respectively, of an alternative microporous
diffuser useful in the spring box of FIGS. 3A and 3B.
[0012] FIGS. 6A and 6B are cross-sectional view of sidewalls of the
microporous diffusers of either FIGS. 4A, 4B or 5A, 5B showing exemplary
construction details.
[0013] FIGS. 7A, 7B are longitudinal cross-section and plan
cross-sectional views, respectively, of a still alternative microporous
diffuser useful in the spring box of FIGS. 3A-3D.
[0014] FIGS. 8A and 8B are respectively plan and elevational views
somewhat schematic, of a circular spring box arrangement with a mixing
feature also useful in the apparatus of FIG. 2.
[0015] FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view showing an alternative treatment
example.
[0016] FIG. 10 is a plot of removal rate of PCE for an aqueous solution
equivalent to 120 ppb, over differing bubble sizes.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017] Referring now to FIG. 1, an example 10 of the use of an apparatus
for treatment of surface water or in-situ removal of contaminants from
water is shown. Illustrated in FIG. 1 is a site 11, having a subsurface
aquifer 14 that produces surface waters 12 such as by a spring. A
spring-box treatment system 20 disposed on the site 11. The spring box
treatment system 20 is disposed to intercept the surface water 12 and to
divert the surface water into the spring box treatment system 20 to
remove contaminants such as volatile hydrocarbons and, in particular,
chlorinated hydrocarbons which may exist in the water in the aquifer 14.
The spring box treatment system 20 outputs a water stream 16 which is
substantially free of the contaminants.
[0018] Contaminants which can be treated or removed by use of the spring
box treatment system 20 include hydrocarbons and, in particular, volatile
chlorinated hydrocarbons such as tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene,
cisdichloroethene, transdichloroethene, 1-1-dichloroethene and vinyl
chloride. In particular, other materials can also be removed from the
stream including chloroalkanes, including 1,1,1 trichloroethane, 1,1,
dichloroethane, methylene chloride, and chloroform; benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, O-xylene, P-xylene, naphthalene and methyltetrabutylether
(MTBE). It should be understood that the use of the spring-box treatment
system 20 is not limited to flowing surface water but could be used to
treat pumped or stored water.
[0019] Referring now to FIG. 2, the spring box treatment system 20
includes a spring box 30, and an air compressor 22, a compressor/pump
control mechanism 24, and an ozone (O.sub.3) generator 26. The air
compressor 24 can feed a stream of air into the spring box 30 whereas,
the compressor pump control 24 feeds a stream of air mixed with ozone
(O.sub.3) from the ozone generator 26 into the spring box 30 to affect
substantial removal of the above-mentioned or similar types of
contaminants. Optionally, or in addition thereto, the apparatus 20 can
also include a pump 28 that supplies a liquid decontamination agent such
as hydrogen peroxide or such as catalyst agents including iron containing
compounds such as iron silicates or palladium or palladized carbon. To
promote biodegradation reactions, the liquid introduced can be a nutrient
mixture of nitrogen (ammonium or nitrate), phosphorus, and potassium
along with oxygen as a gas to promote oxic reactions or carbon dioxide
and hydrogen sulfide to promote reduction reactions.
[0020] The spring box 30 uses primarily a gas-gas reaction between
contaminant vapors and ozone (described below). This reaction can be
supplemented with a liquid phase reaction. A liquid decontaminator such
as hydrogen peroxide can also be used. The use of hydrogen peroxide as a
thin film coating on the bubbles promotes the decomposition rate by
adding a secondary liquid phase reactive interface as volatile compounds
enter the gaseous phase. It also expands the types of compounds that can
be effectively removed. Alternatively, the pump control 28 can simply
feed water.
[0021] Referring now to FIGS. 3A and 3B, an arrangement of a spring box 30
is shown. The spring box includes a container 31 comprised of a sidewall
32 of a durable material such as concrete over which is disposed or
attached a water tight lid 33 also comprised of concrete. Within the
spring box 30 is provided an inlet port 42 to receive the water from the
spring, as well as a plurality of partially closed chambers 40a-40d which
are formed within the interior of the spring box by walls or partitions
38a-38c. Within each of the chambers 40a-40d are disposed a plurality of
microporous diffusers such as those shown in conjunction with my issued
U.S. Pat. No. 5,855,775 which is incorporated herein by reference.
Alternatively, microporous diffusers 50, 70, as described below in
conjunction with FIGS. 4A and 4B or FIGS. 5A and 5B may be used.
[0022] In the arrangement shown in FIG. 3A, a first pair of microporous
diffusers 50a, 50b or 70a, 70b are coupled to a common gas/liquid feed
arrangement 36a which can be fed, for example, from compressor/pump 24
and compressor 28 (FIG. 2). The spring box 30 also includes a second feed
arrangement 38b which in this embodiment has one of the microporous
diffusers 50c, 70c being fed with a combination of air, ozone and air,
ozone and liquid as above, and with the second microporous diffuser 50d,
70d being fed only by air to provide air stripping of any residual ozone
before exiting of the treated water.
[0023] As shown in FIG. 3B, the microporous diffusers are arranged in
elevation above the bottom of the spring box 30 within a pool 39 of water
provided from the spring or other surface water source.
[0024] FIGS. 3C and 3D show still alternate spring box arrangements. In
the arrangement 301 of FIG. 3C, the diffusers 50 or 70 are coupled in
series whereas FIG. 3D shows diffusers 50, 70 arranged to be staggered in
elevation over the height of the spring box.
[0025] The spring box 30 is an ozone reactor vessel in which ozone is
pumped into the pool of water through the use of the microporous
diffusers. The microporous diffusers are disposed in the water under
treatment and transfer ozone into the water in the form of microfine or
fine bubbles which promote rapid gas/gas/water reactions with volatile
organic compounds particularly in the presence of a catalyst or enhancer
which may participate in the gaseous phase of the reaction, instead of
solely enhancing dissolved aqueous disassociation and reactions. In
addition, with the optional use of the liquid port to the apparatus, the
gas/gas reactions are optimized to include gas/gas reactions within the
gaseous phase as well as inducing water aqueous phased reactions to
achieve an overall decomposition rate within the gaseous phase and the
aqueous phase from second water reactions. For example, the use of
hydrogen peroxide as a laminate coating on the bubbles can enhance
decomposition rates as mentioned below. The micron plastic bubblers may
also be coated with or have sintered into construction an outer layer of
activated carbon or activated carbon with palladium to simultaneously
accumulate and promote decomposition of the chloroethenes.
[0026] The production of microbubbles and selection of appropriate size
distribution are selected for optimized gas exchange through high surface
area to volume ratio and long residence time within the liquid to be
treated. The microbubbles are generated by using microporous materials in
the microporous diffuser 50 that acts as a bubble chamber, as shown in
the embodiment 50 (FIGS. 4A-4B) or, alternatively, through the embodiment
70 of the microporous diffuser of FIGS. 5A-5B. The apparatus 20 promotes
the continuous production of microbubbles minimizing coalescing or
adhesion. The injected air/liquid combination moves as a fluid into the
water to be treated; whereas, microencapsulated ozone within the
microfine bubbles enhances and promoted in-situ stripping of volatile
organics and simultaneously terminates normal reversible Henry's
reaction.
[0027] Referring now to FIGS. 4A-4B, a microporous diffuser 50 is shown.
The microporous diffuser 50 includes a first cylindrical member 56
comprised of a hydrophobic material which provides an outer cylindrical
shell for the microporous diffuser 50. The cylindrical member 56 has a
sidewall 56a which is comprised of a large plurality of micropores. A
second cylindrical member 60 is coaxially disposed within the first
cylindrical member 56. The second cylindrical member 60 is comprised of a
hydrophobic material and has a sidewall 60a which is comprised of a large
plurality of micropores. Also disposed within the confines of the first
cylindrical member 56 are a plurality of cylindrical members 58, here
four, which have sidewalls 58a having a large plurality of micropores and
also comprised of a hydrophobic material.
[0028] A proximate end of central cylindrical member 60 is coupled to a
first inlet port 52a which is provided from a first inlet cap 52 and
proximate ends of the plurality of cylindrical members 58 are coupled to
second inlet ports generally denoted as 52b. At the opposite end of the
microporous diffuser 50 an end cap 54 covers distal ends of cylindrical
members 56 and 60. Here distal ends of the plurality of cylindrical
members 58 are sealed by separate caps 59 but could be terminated by the
end cap 54. The end cap 54 in conjunction with cap 52 seals the distal
ends of the microporous diffuser. Each of the cylindrical members 56, 58
and 60 are here cylindrical in shape and have a plurality of microscopic
openings constructed through sidewalls 56a, 58a and 60a, respectively,
thereof having pore sizes matched to or to create a pore size effective
for inducing gas/gas reactions in the spring box 30. Sidewalls of each of
the cylindrical members can have a pore diameter in a range of 1-200
microns, preferably 1-50 microns and more preferably 5-20 microns. The
combination of the inlet cap 52 and end cap 54 seals the microporus
diffuser 50 permitting liquid and gas to escape by the porous
construction of sidewalls of the microporous diffusers.
[0029] The microporous diffuser 50 can be filled with a microporous
material such as microbeads with mesh sizes from 20 to 200 mesh or sand
pack or porous hydrophilic plastic to allow introducing a liquid into the
pore spaces where liquid is exiting.
[0030] Referring now to FIGS. 5A and 5B, an alternate embodiment 70 of a
microporous diffuser is shown. The microporous diffuser 70 includes an
outer cylindrical member 76 having a sidewall 76a within which is
disposed an inner cylindrical member 78 having a sidewall 78a. The inner
cylindrical member 78 is spaced from the sidewall of the outer
cylindrical member. The space 77 between the inner and outer cylindrical
members 76, 78 is filled with a packing material comprised of glass beads
or silica particles (silicon dioxide) or porous plastic which, in
general, are hydrophilic in nature. This space is coupled to an input
port 72b which receives liquid, and catalysts, and/or nutrients from pump
39 (FIG. 2). The microporous diffuser 70 has the inner cylindrical member
78 disposed coaxial or concentric to cylindrical member 78. Sidewalls of
each of the cylindrical members can have a pore diameter in a range of
1-200 microns, preferably 1-50 microns and more preferably 5-20 microns.
A proximate end of the inner cylindrical member is coupled to an inlet
port 72a which is fed an air ozone mixture from pump 36. The microporous
diffuser also includes an end cap 74 which in combination secures distal
ends of the cylinders 76 and 78. The combination of the inlet cap 72 and
end cap 74 seals the microporus diffuser permitting liquid and gas to
escape by the porous construction of sidewalls of the microporous
diffusers.
[0031] Referring now to FIGS. 6A, 6B, construction details for the
elongated cylindrical members for the microporous diffusers 50, 70 are
shown. As shown in FIG. 6A, sidewalls of the members can be constructed
from a metal or a plastic support layer 91 having large (as shown) or
fine perforations 91a over which is disposed a layer of a sintered i.e.,
heat fused microscopic particles of plastic. The plastic can be any
hydrophobic material such as polyvinylchloride, polypropylene,
polyethylene, polytetrafluoroethylene, high density polyethylene (HDPE)
and ABS. The support layer 91 can have fine or coarse openings and can be
of other types of materials. FIG. 6B shows an alternative arrangement 94
in which sidewalls of the members are formed of a sintered i.e., heat
fused microscopic particles of plastic. The plastic can be any
hydrophobic material such as polyvinylchloride, polypropylene,
polyethylene, polytetrafluoroethylene, high density polyethylene (HDPE)
and alkylbenzylsulfonate (ABS).
[0032] The fittings (i.e., the inlets in FIGS. 4A, 5A can be threaded and
are attached to the inlet cap members by epoxy, heat fusion, solvent or
welding with heat treatment to remove volatile solvents or other
approaches. Standard threading can be used for example NPT (national pipe
thread) or box thread e.g., (F480). The fittings thus are securely
attached to the microporous diffusers in a manner that insures that the
microporous diffusers can handle pressures that are encountered with
injecting of the air/ozone and liquid.
[0033] Referring to FIGS. 7A-7B, an alternate microporous diffuser 90 is
shown. The microporous diffuser 90 includes a first cylindrical member 96
comprised of a hydrophobic material which provides an outer cylindrical
shell for the microporous diffuser 90. The cylindrical member 96 has a
sidewall 96a that is comprised of a large plurality of micro pores. A
proximate end of cylindrical member 96 is coupled to a first inlet port
92a provided from a first inlet cap 92 and a distal end of the
cylindrical member 96 is coupled to an end cap 94 The end cap 94 in
conjunction with cap 92 seals the ends of the microporous diffuser 90.
Sidewalls of the cylindrical members 96 is provided with a film of a
catalysts or reaction promoter or and absorbing material. Examples
include a layer 93 of activated carbon that is abraded into the surface
or sintered into the surface. Additionally palladized activated carbon
could also be used. As explained above the layer 93 can aid in
decomposition of the contaminants in the water. Sidewalls of each of the
cylindrical members can have a pore diameter in a range of 1-200 microns,
preferably 1-50 microns and more preferably 5-20 microns.
[0034] The use of catalysts supported by absorptive materials such as
palladized activated carbon can be particularly effective for compounds
that have an absorptive affinity to activated carbon. The compounds such
as TCE are concentrated near the release location of the ozone micro
bubbles, allowing more efficient reaction for water containing lower
concentrations of TCE as explained above. The layer 93 can also be
provided on the other embodiments 50, 70 above, e.g., on either or both
cylindrical members but preferably on the members that deliver the ozone
to the water.
[0035] Referring now to FIGS. 8A and 8B, an alternate arrangement of a
spring box 110 is shown. The spring box 110 includes a circular container
111 comprised of a sidewall 112 of a durable material such as concrete
over which is disposed or attached a water tight lid 113 also comprised
of concrete. Within the spring box 110 is provided an inlet port 115a to
receive the water from the spring. Within the circular container are
disposed a plurality of microporous diffusers such as those shown in
conjunction with my issued U.S. Pat. No. 5,855,775 which is incorporated
herein by reference. Alternatively, microporous diffusers 50, 70, 90, as
described above in conjunction with FIGS. 4A and 4B, FIGS. 5A and 5B, or
FIGS. 7A-7B may be used.
[0036] In the arrangement shown in FIG. 8A, the microporous diffusers 116
are coupled to a common rotary joint 117 that can provides a gas/ozone
feed arrangement 86a which can be fed, for example, from compressor/pump
24 and compressor 28 (FIG. 2).
[0037] As shown in FIG. 8B, the microporous diffusers are arranged in
elevation above the bottom of the spring box 110 within a pool 119 of
water provided from the spring or other surface water source. The rotary
joint 117 enables the microporous diffusers to be rotated in the water
enabling the ozone to more effectively mix with the water. The spring box
110 can include a sand or other matrix 120 containing a reaction promoter
e.g., catalyst as mentioned.
[0038] The spring box 110 is an ozone reactor vessel in which ozone is,
pumped into the pool of water through the use of the microporous
diffusers. The microporous diffusers 116 are disposed in the water under
treatment and transfer ozone into the water in the form of micro fine or
fine bubbles which promote rapid gas/gas/water reactions with volatile
organic compounds particularly in the presence of a catalyst or enhancer
which may participate in the gaseous phase of the reaction, instead of
solely enhancing dissolved aqueous disassociation and reactions.
[0039] In addition, an optional liquid port (not shown) to the rotary
joint can be provided to include gas/gas reactions within the gaseous
phase as well as inducing water aqueous phased reactions to achieve an
overall decomposition rate within the gaseous phase and the aqueous phase
from second water reactions. For example, the use of hydrogen peroxide as
a laminate coating on the bubbles can enhance decomposition rates as
mentioned above.
[0040] Referring now to FIG. 9, an alternative example of the use of the
microporous diffusers 50, 70 is shown. The example shows an injection
well to treat subsurface waters of an aquifer. The arrangement includes a
well having a casing with an inlet screen and outlet screen to promote a
recirculation of water into the casing and through the surrounding ground
area. The casing supports the ground about the well. Disposed through the
casing is microporous diffusers e.g., 50 or 70. The injection well
treatment system 120 also includes an air compressor 132, a
compressor/pump control mechanism 134, and an ozone (O.sub.3) generator
136. The air compressor 134 can feed a stream of air into the microporous
diffuser 50 whereas, the compressor pump control 134 feeds a stream of
air mixed with ozone (O.sub.3) from the ozone generator 136 into
microporous diffuser to affect substantial removal of the above-mentioned
or similar types of contaminants. Optionally, or in addition thereto, the
treatment system 120 can also include a pump 138 that supplies a liquid
decontamination agent such as hydrogen peroxide as well as nutrients such
as catalyst agents including iron containing compounds such as iron
silicates or palladium containing compounds such as palladized carbon. In
addition, other materials such as platinum may also be used.
[0041] The treatment system 120 makes use of a gas-gas reaction of
contaminant vapors and ozone (described below) that can be supplemented
with a liquid phase reaction. The use of hydrogen peroxide as a thin film
coating on the bubbles promotes the decomposition rate by adding a
secondary liquid phase reactive interface as volatile compounds enter the
gaseous phase. It also expands the types of compounds that can be
effectively removed. Alternatively, the pump control 138 can simply feed
water.
[0042] In particular, with the microporous diffusers 50 and 70 and use of
the optional port to introduce a liquid such as hydrogen peroxide or
water into the chamber, the microbubbles are produced in the microporous
diffuser by bubbling air/ozone through the central cylinder of the
microporous diffusers and into the surrounding outer regions of the
microporous diffusers. At the same time, a liquid is introduced into the
microporous diffusers 50, 70 and laminates an outer surface of bubbles
formed by the gas. The liquid forms a liquid barrier between the water to
be treated and the inside gas containing air/ozone. This arrangement thus
can be injected into a slurry containing a catalyst such as silicate,
iron silicate, palladium, palladized carbon or titanium dioxide to
produce rapid reactions to decompose contaminants within the pool of
water contained in the spring box 30. The reactions can proceed as set
out below.
[0043] The process uses microfine bubble injection to produce simultaneous
extraction/decomposition reactions as opposed to simply creating smaller
and smaller sized bubbles for the purpose of injecting into free water.
The process involves generation of fine bubbles which can promote rapid
gas/gas/water reactions with volatile organic compounds which a substrate
(catalyst or enhancer) participates in, instead of solely enhancing
dissolved (aqueous) disassociation and reactions. The production of
microbubbles and selection of appropriate size distribution is provided
by using microporous material and a bubble chamber for optimizing gaseous
exchange through high surface area to volume ratio and long residence
time within the liquid to be treated. The equipment promotes the
continuous production of microbubbles while minimizing coalescing or
adhesion.
[0044] The injected air/liquid combination moves as a fluid into the water
to be treated. The use of microencapsulated ozone enhances and promotes
in-situ stripping of volatile organics and simultaneously terminates the
normal reversible Henry's reaction. The process involves promoting
simultaneous volatile organic compounds (VOC) in-situ stripping and
gaseous decomposition, with moisture (water) and substrate (catalyst or
enhancer). The reaction mechanism is not a dissolved aqueous reaction. In
some cases, with cis- or trans-DCE, the aqueous phase reaction may assist
the predominantly gas-phase reaction.
[0045] The remote process controller and monitor allows for the capability
for sensor feedback and remote communication to the pump control 24 and
ozone (or oxygen or both) generator 26 to achieve a certain level of
gaseous content (e.g., dissolved oxygen, ozone, or other gas) and rate of
mixing to promote efficient reactions. This is done by sensors 39 (FIGS.
3A, 3B) placed in the bubble chambers at certain distances from the
microporous diffusers 50, 70. Oxygen content, redox potential, and
dissolved VOC concentration of the water can be monitored within the
treatment system. The operator can access the information, modify
operations and diagnose the condition of the unit by telephone
modem or
satellite cell phone. This provides on-site process evaluation and
adjustment without the need of on-site operator presence.
[0046] Appropriately sized microfine bubbles can be generated in a
continuous or pulsing manner which allows alternating
water/bubble/water/bubble fluid flow. The microfine bubbles substantially
accelerate the transfer rate of volatile organic compounds like PCE from
aqueous to gaseous state. Reducing the size of the bubbles to microfine
sizes, e.g., 5 to 50 microns, can boost extraction rates. These sizes
boost exchange rates and do not tend to retard rise time by too small a
size. When an oxidizing gas (ozone) is added into the microbubbles, the
rate of extraction is enhanced further by maintaining a low interior
(intrabubble) concentration of PCE, while simultaneously degrading the
PCE by a gas/gas/water reaction. The combination of both processes acting
simultaneously provides a unique rapid removal system which is identified
by a logarithmic rate of removal of PCE, and a characteristic ratio of
efficiency quite different from dissolved (aqueous) ozone reactions. The
compounds commonly treated are HVOCs (halogenated volatile organic
compounds), PCE, TCE, DCE, vinyl chloride (VC), petroleum compounds
(BTEX: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes).
[0047] An analysis of the reaction mechanism is set out. Gaseous exchange
is proportional to available surface area. With partial pressures and
mixtures of volatile gases being held constant, a halving of the radius
of bubbles would quadruple (i.e., times) the exchange rate. If, in the
best case, a standard well screen creates air bubbles 200 times the size
of a medium sand porosity, a microporous diffuser of 5 to 20 micron size
creates a bubble {fraction (1/10)} the diameter and six to ten times the
volume/surface ratio as shown in Table 1.
1 TABLE 1
Diameter Surface Area Volume
(microns) 4.pi. 4/3.pi. Surface Area/Volume
200
124600 4186666 0.03
20 1256 4186 0.3
[0048] Theoretically, the microporous bubbles exhibit an exchange rate of
ten times the rate of a comparable bubble from a standard ten slot well
screen.
2TABLE 2
Surface to Volume (A/V) Ratio Changes As
Function
of Bubble Size As Bubble Volume Increases
D (i.e., 2r) 0.1 0.25 0.5 1 2 5 10 20
or h as
Fraction of
Pore Size
Sphere SPHEROID
Area =
47.pi.r.sup.2 0.0314 0.19625 0.785 3.14 18.8 37.7 69 131
Vol =
4/3.pi..sup.3 0.0005 0.00817 0.065 0.53 6.3 15.7 31 62
Ratio 62 24
12 5.9 3 2.4 2.2 2.1
[0049] In wastewater treatment, the rate of transfer between gas and
liquid phases is generally proportional to the surface area of contact
and the difference between the existing concentration and the equilibrium
concentration of the gas in solution. Simply stated, if the surface to
volume ratio of contact is increased, the rate of exchange also increases
as illustrated in Table 2. If, the gas (VOC) entering the bubble (or
micropore space bounded by a liquid film), is consumed, the difference is
maintained at a higher entry rate than if the VOC is allowed to reach
saturation equilibrium. In the case of a halogenated volatile organic
carbon compound (HVOC), PCE, gas/gas reaction of PCE to by-products of
HCl, CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2O accomplishes this. In the case of petroleum
products like BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes), the
benzene entering the bubbles reacts to decompose to CO.sub.2 and
H.sub.2O. The normal equation for the two-film theory of gas transfer is:
r.sub.m=K.sub.gA(C.sub.g-C) where:
[0050] rm=rate of mass transfer
[0051] K.sub.g=coefficient of diffusion for gas
[0052] A=area through which gas is diffusing
[0053] C.sub.g=saturation concentration of gas in solution
[0054] C=concentration of gas in solution.
[0055] The restatement of the equation to consider the inward transfer of
phase change from dissolved HVOC to gaseous HVOC in the inside of the
bubble would be:
[0056] C.sub.s=Saturation concentration of gas phase of HVOC or VOC in
bubble.
[0057] C=Initial concentration of gaseous phase of HVOC or VOC in bubble
volume.
[0058] Soil vapor concentrations are related to two governing systems:
water phase and (non-aqueous) product phase. Henry's and Raoult's Laws
are commonly used to understand equilibrium-vapor concentrations
governing volatilisation from liquids. When
soils are moist, the relative
volatility is dependent upon Henry's Law. Under normal conditions (free
from product) where volatile organic carbons (VOCs) are relatively low,
an equilibrium of
soil, water, and air is assumed to exist. The compound
tetrachloroethene (PCE) has a high exchange capacity from dissolved form
to gaseous form. If the surface/volume ratio is modified at least ten
fold, the rate of removal should be accelerated substantially.
[0059] FIG. 10 shows a plot of removal rate of PCE for an aqueous solution
equivalent to 120 ppb, over differing bubble sizes. The air volume and
water volume is held constant. The only change is the diameter of bubbles
passed through the liquid from air released from a diffuser.
[0060] Ozone is an effective oxidant used for the breakdown of organic
compounds in water treatment. The major problem in effectiveness is that
ozone has a short lifetime. If ozone is mixed with sewage containing
water above ground, the half-life is normally minutes. Ozone reacts
quantitatively with PCE to yield breakdown products of hydrochloric acid,
carbon dioxide, and water.
[0061] To offset the short life span, the ozone is injected with
microporous diffusers, enhancing the selectiveness of action of the
ozone. By encapsulating the ozone in fine bubbles, the bubbles would
preferentially extract volatile compounds like PCE from the mixtures of
soluble organic compounds they encountered. With this process, volatile
organics are selectively pulled into the fine air bubbles. Gas entering a
small bubble of volume (4.pi.r.sup.3) increases until reaching an
asymptotic value of saturation. If we consider the surface of the bubble
to be a membrane, a first order equation can be written for the
monomolecular reaction of the first order. The reaction can be 1 x
t = K ( Q - X )
[0062] written as follows:
[0063] where X is the time varying concentration of the substance in the
bubble, Q is the external concentration of the substance, and K is the
absorption constant.
X=Q(l-e.sup.Kt)
[0064] If at time t=0, X=0, then: 2 K = x / t Q - X
[0065] The constant K is found to be:
[0066] By multiplying both numerator and denominator by V, the 3 K = v
x / t v ( Q - X )
[0067] volume of the bubble, we obtain
[0068] which is the ratio between the amount of substance entering the
given volume per unit time and quantity V(Q-X) needed to reach the
asymptotic value. By analyzing the concentration change within the fine
bubbles sent through a porous matrix with saturated (water filled)
solution interacting with the matrix (sand), and determining the rate of
decomposition of the products (TCE+ozone=CO.sub.2+HCl) and
(Benzene+ozone=CO.sub.2+HOH), the kinetic rates of reaction can be
characterized.
[0069] The rate which the quantity k.sub.1QV of the substance flows in one
unit of time from aqueous solution into the bubble is proportional to
Henry's Constant. This second rate of decomposition within the bubble can
be considered as k.sub.1, a second 4 x t = k 1 Q - k 2
X
[0070] rate of reaction (-k.sub.2X), where 5 X = k 1 k 2 Q
[0071] and, at equilibrium, as dx/dt=0, gives
[0072] However, if the reaction to decompose is very rapid, so -k.sub.2X
goes to zero, the rate of reaction would maximize k.sub.1Q, i.e., be
proportional to Henry's Constant and maximize the rate of extraction
since VOC saturation is not occurring within the bubbles.
[0073] The combination of microbubble extraction and ozone degradation can
be generalized to predict the volatile organic compounds amenable to
rapid removal. The efficiency of extraction is directly proportional to
Henry's Constant. Multiplying the Henry's Constant (the partitioning of
VOCs from water to gas phase) times the reactivity rate constant of ozone
for a particular VOC yields the rate of decomposition expected by the
microbubble process.
[0074] The concentration of HVOC expected in the bubble is a consequence
of rate of invasion and rate of removal. In practice, the ozone
concentration is adjusted to yield 0
r.sub.voc=-K.sub.La.sub.voc(C-C.sub.L)
[0075] concentration at the time of arrival at the surface.
[0076] where:
[0077] f.sub.voc=rate of VOC mass transfer, (.mu.g/ft.sup.3.multidot.h)
[0078] (K.sub.la).sub.voc=overall VOC mass transfer coefficient, (1/h)
[0079] C=concentration of VOC in liquid
[0080] C.sub.L=saturation concentration of VOC in liquid .mu.g/ft.sup.3
(.mu.g/m.sup.3)
[0081] The saturation concentration of a VOC in wastewater is a function
of the partial pressure of the VOC in the atmosphere in contact with the
wastewater. 6 c g C L = H c thus , C g = H C C
L
[0082] C.sub.g=concentration of VOC in gas phase .mu.g/ft.sup.3
(.mu.g/m.sup.3)
[0083] C.sub.L=saturation concentration of VOC in liquid .mu.g/ft.sup.3
(.mu.g/m.sup.3)
[0084] H.sub.c=Henry's Constant
[0085] The rate of decomposition of an organic compound C.sub.g (when
present at a concentration (C) by ozone can be formulated 7 - ( C
g t ) O 3 = K oc ( O 3 ) ( C g )
[0086] by the equation:
[0087] or, after integration for the case of a batch reactor: 8 -
1 n ( C g end C g o ) = K o c ( O 3 ) t
( C g ) end = C o e o c - K ( O 3 ) t
( C g ) end ( C g ) o = e o c ( O 3 ) t
( equation 2 )
[0088] where
[0089] (O.sub.3)=concentration of ozone averaged over the reaction time
(t)
[0090] (C.sub.g).sub.o=halocarbon initial concentration
[0091] (C.sub.g).sub.end=halocarbon final concentration
[0092] Substituting:
3
rm = K.sub.gA (C.sub.g - C) From Henry's Law:
rm =
K.sub.gA ((H.sub.g .multidot. C.sub.g) - C) C.sub.g = H.sub.c .multidot.
C.sub.g (equation 3)
rm = K.sub.gZ ((H.sub.g .multidot. C.sub.g) -
C) With ozone
rm = K.sub.gZ ((H.sub.c .multidot. C.sub.g) - C -
K.sub.o (O.sub.3) (C.sub.g))
(Hg .multidot. C) - K.sub.o
(O.sub.3) (C.sub.g) = 0 (equation 4)
[0093] Rate of decomposition is now adjusted to equal the total HVOC
entering the bubble.
SET: (H.sub.c.multidot.C.sub.g)=Ko(O.sub.3)(C.sub.g) (equation 5)
[0094] therefore surface concentration=0
[0095] This condition speeds up the rate of extraction because the VOC
never reaches equilibrium or saturation in the bubble.
[0096] Table 4 gives the Henry's Constants (H.sub.c) for a selected number
of organic compounds and the second rate constants (R.sub.2) for the
ozone radical rate of reaction in solely aqueous reactions where
superoxide and hydroxide reactions dominate. The third column presents
rates of removal process.
4TABLE 4
REMOVAL RATE COEFFICIENTS
Ozone
Aqueous Rate
Second Order Removal
Rate Constant (a.)
Henry's Coefficient
Organic Compound (M.sup.-1 SEC.sup.-1)
Constant (b.) (.tau.) (c.)
Benzene 2 5.59 .times. 10.sup.3
0.06
Toluene 14 6.37 .times. 10.sup.3 0.07
Chlorobenzene
0.75 3.72 .times. 10.sup.3 0.013
Dichloroethylene 110 7.60 .times.
10.sup.3 0.035
Trichloroethylene 17 9.10 .times. 10.sup.3 0.05
Tetrachloroethylene 0.1 25.9 .times. 10.sup.3 0.06
Ethanol 0.02
.04 .times. 10.sup.3 0.0008
a) From Hoigne and Bader,
1983. "Rate of Constants of Direct Reactions of Ozone with Organic and
Inorganic Compounds in Water-I. Nondissociating Compounds" Water Res/17:
173-184.
b) From EPA 540/1-86/060, Superfund Public Health
Evaluation Manual EPA 540/1-86/060 (OSWER Directive 9285.4-1) Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.
c) See U.S. Pat. No. 5,855,775.
[0097] The rapid removal rate of this process does not follow Hoigne and
Bader (1983) rate constants. However, there is a close correlation to
Henry's Constant as would be expected from equation 5. The presence of
the substrate (sand) and moisture is necessary to complete the reaction.
The active ingredient in the sand matrix appears to be an iron silicate.
The breakdown products include CO.sub.2 and dilute HCl.
[0098] Two sets of equations are involved in the reactions: 1
[0099] Exemplary compounds are normally unsaturated (double bond),
halogenated compounds like PCE, TCE, DCE, Vinyl Chloride, EDB; or
aromatic ring compounds like benzene derivatives (benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, xylenes). Also, pseudo Criegee reactions with the substrate
and ozone appear effective in reducing certain saturated olefins like
trichloro alkanes (1,1,-TCA), carbon tetrachloride (CCl.sub.4),
chloroform and chlorobenzene, for instance.
[0100] The following characteristics of the contaminants appear desirable
for reaction:
5
Henry's Constant: 10.sup.-2 to 10.sup.-4
m.sup.3.atm/mol
Solubility: 10 to 20,000 mg/l
Vapor
pressure: 1 to 3000 mmhg
Saturation concentration: 5 to 9000
g/m.sup.3
Absorption-Destruction
[0101] Absorptive substrates like activated carbon and certain resins
serve to remove disolved volatile organic carbon compounds by absorption
to the surface. The active surface of particles contain sites which the
compounds attach to. The surface absorption is usually mathematically
modeled by use of a Langmuir or Freunlich set of equations for particular
sizes of particles or total surface area if the material is presented in
cylinders or successive plates.
[0102] The derivation of the Langmuir isotherm stipulated a limited number
of absorption sites on the surface of the solid. The absorption of a
solute on the surface necessitates the removal of a solvent molecule. An
equilibrium is then reached between the absorbed fraction and the
remaining concentration in solution. If a continual gas phase of
microbubbles is being released from a porous surface, can remove the
absorbed molecule and decompose it, the reaction would be moved along
much faster 9 Q 1 = K Li C Li 1 + K Li C Li
[0103] than in aqueous phase without the collecting surface.
[0104] Q.sub.1=fractional surface coverage of solute
[0105] K.sub.L1=equilibrium constant
[0106] C.sub.L1=solute concentration
Other Embodiments
[0107] It is to be understood that while the invention has been described
in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the foregoing
description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the
invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other
aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the
following claims.
* * * * *