Register or Login To Download This Patent As A PDF
| United States Patent Application |
20050206041
|
| Kind Code
|
A1
|
|
Temple, Stephen
;   et al.
|
September 22, 2005
|
Method of forming nozzles
Abstract
A nozzle in a nozzle plate for an inkjet printhead is formed by directing
a laser beam at a nozzle plate. Accurate control of the divergence of the
beam is achieved by splitting the beam into sub-beams, each sub-beam
having divergence with an origin lying apart from the point at which the
beam is created by splitting, and thereafter recombining the sub-beams.
Greater accuracy in the taper and inlet shape of the manufactured nozzle
is thereby obtained.
| Inventors: |
Temple, Stephen; (Cambridge, GB)
; Rumsby, Philip Thomas; (Oxford, GB)
|
| Correspondence Address:
|
MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP
233 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 6300
SEARS TOWER
CHICAGO
IL
60606
US
|
| Assignee: |
XAAR TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Cambridge
GB
|
| Serial No.:
|
916316 |
| Series Code:
|
10
|
| Filed:
|
August 11, 2004 |
| Current U.S. Class: |
264/400 |
| Class at Publication: |
264/400 |
| International Class: |
B23K 026/36; H01S 003/00 |
Foreign Application Data
| Date | Code | Application Number |
| Jan 16, 1997 | WO | PCT/GB97/00126 |
| Jan 18, 1996 | GB | 9601049.1 |
Claims
1-31. (canceled)
32. A method of forming a nozzle in a nozzle plate for an inkjet printhead
comprising the steps of forming a nozzle having a nozzle outlet and of
subsequently directing a finishing laser beam at the nozzle to remove
material by ablation and thereby provide an internal finish.
33. A method according to claim 32, wherein the step of forming the nozzle
comprises the step of directing at the nozzle plate a forming laser beam
having a power that is less than that of the finishing laser beam.
34. A method according to claim 32, wherein the nozzle tapers from nozzle
inlet to nozzle outlet and wherein the finishing laser beam impinges on
that face of the nozzle plate in which the nozzle outlet is formed.
35. A method according to claim 32, wherein the step of directing a
finishing laser beam at the nozzle occurs after the nozzle plate has been
secured in an ink jet printhead.
36. A method according to claim 32, wherein an optical element in the path
of the finishing laser beam is rotated to cause a periodically varying
beam intensity in the nozzle.
37. A method according to claim 32, wherein beam splitting optics are
inserted in the path of the finishing laser beam to enable more than one
nozzle to be finished at the same time.
38. A method of finishing a nozzle formed in a nozzle plate for an inkjet
printhead, comprising directing a high power laser beam at the nozzle to
remove material by ablation and thereby provide an internal finish.
39. A method according to claim 38, wherein the nozzle tapers from nozzle
inlet to nozzle outlet and wherein the laser beam impinges on that face
of the nozzle plate in which the nozzle outlet is formed.
40. A method according to claim 38, wherein the step of directing a laser
beam at the nozzle occurs after the nozzle plate has been secured in an
ink jet printhead.
41. A method according to claim 38, wherein an optical element in the path
of the laser beam is rotated to cause a periodically varying beam
intensity in the nozzle.
42. A method according to claim 38, wherein beam splitting optics are
inserted in the path of the laser beam to enable more than one nozzle to
be finished at the same time.
43. A method of providing an internal finish to a nozzle for an ink jet
printer, comprising the steps of providing a nozzle, directing a laser
beam at a surface in which a nozzle outlet is formed and employing high
laser power thereby providing a good internal finish to the nozzle.
44. A method of conditioning an ink jet nozzle comprising: forming an ink
jet nozzle, and directing a laser beam at an outlet side of the ink jet
nozzle to internally finish and shape the ink jet nozzle.
45. A method according to claim 44, wherein the step of forming includes
directing a laser beam having a first power at a side of a nozzle plate
in which the outlet of the ink jet nozzle is formed.
46. A method according to claim 45, wherein the step of directing further
includes the laser beam having a second power higher than the first
power.
47. A method according to claim 44, wherein the step of forming includes
first directing a first laser beam having a first power at a side of a
nozzle plate to form a substantial portion of the ink jet nozzle, and
wherein the step of directing includes directing the first laser beam to
complete formation of the ink jet nozzle.
48. A method according to claim 47, wherein the step of directing includes
increasing the power of the first laser beam to complete, internally
finish, and shape the ink jet nozzle.
49. A method of conditioning an ink jet nozzle comprising: forming an ink
jet nozzle in a nozzle plate, and directing a laser beam at a side of the
nozzle plate having an outlet of the ink jet nozzle to remove material
and internally finish the ink jet nozzle.
50. A method according to claim 49, wherein the step of directing includes
removing material by laser ablation at the outlet of the ink jet nozzle.
51. A method according to claim 49, wherein the step of forming includes
directing a first laser beam a the side of the nozzle plate to
substantially form the ink jet nozzle, and wherein the step of directing
includes increasing the power of the first laser beam.
Description
[0001] The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for forming
a nozzle in a nozzle plate for an ink jet printhead, the nozzle having a
nozzle inlet and a nozzle outlet in respective opposite faces of said
nozzle plate.
[0002] WO93/15911 concerns methods of forming nozzles In a nozzle plate
for an inkjet printhead utilising a high energy beam, in particular the
ablation of nozzles in a polymer nozzle plate using an excimer laser. By
means of a mask having a single aperture, a high energy beam is shaped
prior to being directed by a converging lens onto the surface of a nozzle
plate where a nozzle is formed.
[0003] WO93/15911 recommends increasing the divergence of the beam
incident into the aperture of the mask by passing the beam through a
layer such as a ground or etched surface or a thin film containing a
medium having suitable light-scattering properties such as a colloid or
opalescent material. Such a layer may be placed against a convergent lens
which is itself located upstream of the mask for the purpose of focusing
the beam into the aperture.
[0004] The divergence of the beam will determine the angle of taper of the
nozzle. Furthermore, a second mask can be used to reduce the angle of
divergence in one plane of the beam relative to another (both planes
containing the beam axis), thereby to obtain a nozzle having a greater
nozzle taper in one plane than in another. This will result in a nozzle
inlet that is larger in one direction than in another direction
perpendicular thereto--WO93/15911 points out that this advantageously
allows the nozzle ink inlet to match the (generally rectangular) shape of
an ink channel in the printhead with which the nozzle will communicate,
whilst allowing the nozzle outlet to remain preferably circular.
[0005] The present invention has as its objective improvements to the
processes described in the aforementioned WO93/15911, in particular to
the manner in which the nozzle taper and the shape of the nozzle inlet
and outlet are controlled.
[0006] According to a first aspect, the present invention comprises the
method of forming a nozzle in a nozzle plate for an ink Jet printhead,
the nozzle having a nozzle inlet and a nozzle outlet in respective
opposite faces of said nozzle plate, the method comprising the steps of:
[0007] directing a high energy beam towards said nozzle plate; introducing
divergence into said beam; thereafter directing said beam at a single
aperture of a mask, thereby to shape said beam; and thereafter passing
said beam through beam converging means prior to impingement on the face
of said nozzle plate in which said nozzle outlet is formed, thereby to
form a nozzle, the nozzle outlet being conjugate through said beam
converging means with said single aperture; wherein
[0008] the step of introducing divergence into said beam comprises
splitting said beam into a number of sub-beams, each sub-beam having
divergence, the origin of divergence of each sub-beam lying apart from
the point at which the respective sub-beam is created by splitting; the
sub-beams thereafter being passed through further beam converging means
prior to being recombined and directed through said single aperture of a
mask, wherein the dimensions of the section of said recombined beam
directly prior to impinging the plane of said mask are substantially
equal to the dimensions of the aperture in said mask.
[0009] The present invention includes the step of introducing divergence
into said beam by splitting said beam into a number of sub-beams, each
sub-beam having divergence, the origin of divergence of each sub-beam
lying apart from the point at which the respective sub-beam is created by
splitting, the sub-beams thereafter being passed through further beam
converging means prior to being recombined. This arrangement allows
substantially more accurate control of the angle of divergence of the
beam than has been possible in prior art arrangements: as mentioned,
WO93/15911 proposes increasing the divergence of the high energy beam by
scattering the light using a ground or etched surface or a thin film
containing a medium having suitable light-scattering properties. It has
been recognised in the present invention that divergence can be obtained
in a much more controlled manner by splitting the high energy beam into a
number of sub-beams which are subsequently recombined. Furthermore, the
beam is split such that each sub-beam has divergence having an origin at
a point lying apart from the point at which the respective sub-beam is
created by splitting. It will be appreciated that the divergence obtained
in this manner--which may be achieved using a lens to create each
sub-beam--will be subject to substantially less variation than is
achieved using prior art methods based on scattering. It follows that
less variation in the angle of divergence of the combined beam will
result in less variation in the angle of taper of the manufactured
nozzles--resulting in better ink ejection performance of the final inkjet
printhead.
[0010] Furthermore, by directing the recombined beam through a single
aperture of a mask, with the dimensions of the section of the recombined
beam directly prior to impinging the plane of said mask being
substantially equal to the dimensions of the aperture in said mask, the
high energy beam that finally impinges on the nozzle plate to form a
nozzle does not have its divergence reduced by any significant amount by
the mask. Consequently, the full range of beam divergence is available to
form nozzle bores having a correspondingly high taper angle from outlet
to inlet.
[0011] According to a second aspect, the invention comprises the method of
forming a nozzle in a nozzle plate for an ink jet printhead, the nozzle
having a nozzle inlet and a nozzle outlet in respective opposite faces of
said nozzle plate, the method comprising the steps of:
[0012] directing a high energy beam towards said nozzle plate; introducing
divergence into said beam; and thereafter passing said beam through beam
converging means prior to impingement on said nozzle plate, thereby to
form a nozzle; wherein
[0013] the step of introducing divergence into said beam comprises passing
said beam through an array of optical elements to create an array of
sub-beams, each sub-beam having divergence, the origin of the divergence
of each sub-beam lying apart from the respective optical element; said
array of sub-beams being thereafter directed towards first reflecting
means for reflecting towards second reflecting means, said second
reflecting means reflecting towards said nozzle plate; the positional
relationship of said first and second reflecting means being such that a
parallel beam impinging on said first reflecting means is reflected frbm
said second reflecting means as a converging beam; the arrangement of
said optical elements being such that all incoming sub-beams are directed
by said first reflecting means towards said second reflecting means,
thereafter to impinge on said nozzle plate.
[0014] This second aspect of the invention also utilises the concept of
splitting (by means of an array of optical elements) a high energy beam
into sub-beams having an origin of divergence lying apart from the plane
of beam splitting and thereafter recombining the sub-beams through beam
converging means. It therefore shares with the first aspect of the
invention the advantage that the resulting angle of the beam can be
accurately controlled.
[0015] In addition, the high energy beam is directed at the nozzle plate
by means of first and second reflecting means and the optical elements in
said array--e.g. lenses--are arranged such that all sub-beams impinging
on the first reflecting means are directed towards the second reflecting
means and not elsewhere e.g. back towards the array offenses. This
measure results in less wastage of the beam and furthermore avoids damage
to other elements in the system by stray laser light. Such system
elements may include lenses, turning mirrors and even the laser
itself--located "upstream" of the first and second reflecting means.
[0016] A third aspect of the present invention comprises the method of
forming a nozzle in a nozzle plate for an ink jet printhead, the nozzle
having a nozzle inlet and a nozzle outlet in respective opposite faces of
said nozzle plate and a nozzle bore having an axis; the method comprising
the steps of:
[0017] directing a high energy beam towards said nozzle plate; introducing
divergence into said beam; and thereafter passing said beam through beam
converging means prior to impingement on said nozzle plate, thereby to
form a nozzle; wherein
[0018] the step of introducing divergence into said beam comprises passing
said beam through an array of optical elements to create an array of
sub-beams, each sub-beam having divergence, the origin of divergence of
each sub-beam lying apart from the respective optical element; said array
of sub-beams having a greater width in a first direction than in a second
direction orthogonal to said first direction, said first and second
directions lying perpendicular to the direction of impingement of said
beam on said array; thereafter passing said array of sub-beams through
beam converging means prior to their impingement on the nozzle plate,
thereby to form said nozzle; the angle of taper of the nozzle bore
relative to the nozzle axis in a direction corresponding to said first
direction being greater than the angle of taper of the nozzle bore in a
direction corresponding to said second direction.
[0019] The third aspect of the invention again shares the concept of
splitting a high energy beam into sub-beams having an origin of
divergence lying apart from the plane of beam splitting and thereafter
recombining the sub-beams through beam converging means. This third
aspect also comprises an array of optical elements having a greater width
in a first direction than in a second direction orthogonal to said first
direction, which allows the production in a simple and accurate manner of
nozzles having a greater taper angle in one direction than in another.
This in turn yields a nozzle inlet having a greater dimension in one
direction than in the direction orthogonal thereto--such a configuration
may be particularly desirable where the ink supply channel to which the
nozzle is attached is also non-axi-symmetric.
[0020] A fourth aspect of the present invention comprises a method of
forming a nozzle in a nozzle plate for an ink jet printhead, the nozzle
having a nozzle inlet and a nozzle outlet in respective opposite faces of
said nozzle plate, characterised by the steps of:
[0021] directing a high energy beam having a first axis extending in a
first direction towards said nozzle plate; directing said beam at a first
reflecting surface lying at an angle to said first direction, said
surface being arranged so as to reflect said beam towards a second
reflecting surface so arranged as to both invert said beam and direct
said beam along an axis collinear with said first axis extending in a
first direction; said first and second surfaces being fixedly located
relative to one another, thereby to form an assembly, and rotating said
assembly about said first axis; said beam thereafter impinging on said
nozzle plate, thereby to form a nozzle.
[0022] As explained in greater detail in the description that follows,
this technique results in a high energy beam having a uniform intensity
at a given radius and, when applied to the manufacture of nozzles, yields
nozzle dimensions lying within tighter tolerance bands and consequently a
better quality nozzle.
[0023] A method of forming a nozzle in a nozzle plate for an inkjet
printhead, the nozzle having a nozzle inlet and a nozzle outlet in
respective opposite faces of the nozzle plate according to a fifth aspect
of the invention includes the step of directing a high energy beam at the
face of the nozzle plate in which said nozzle outlet is to be formed,
whereby the power of said high energy beam is initially held low and is
increased with increasing depth of the nozzle formed in said nozzle
plate. As is also explained in greater detail in the description
hereafter, this technique gives a higher quality nozzle outlet, better
internal finish and a more accurate nozzle shape.
[0024] The present invention also comprises apparatus for carrying out the
methods outlined above.
[0025] The invention will now be described by way of example by reference
to the following diagrams, of which:
[0026] FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a first embodiment of the
present invention when viewed in a direction X;
[0027] FIG. 2 is a view of the apparatus of FIG. 1 in a direction Y
orthogonal to direction X;
[0028] FIG. 3 is a further embodiment of the present invention;
[0029] FIG. 4a is a perspective view of yet another embodiment of the
present invention; FIG. 4b is a sectional view through the mirror
arrangement 82, 84 of FIG. 4a;
[0030] FIG. 5a is a sectional view through a beam conditioning device
according to the present invention; FIG. 5b is a schematic diagram of the
beam section following conditioning;
[0031] FIGS. 6a and 6b illustrate the functioning of the device of FIG. 5a
at rotation angles of 0.degree. and 90.degree. respectively.
[0032] FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of apparatus for carrying out the method
according to one aspect of the present invention. Reference FIG. 20
designates a nozzle plate in which a nozzle is to be formed. The
apparatus 10 comprises a source of a high energy beam such as a UV
excimer laser (not shown) which generates a high energy beam 30 which,
after having undergone various beam conditioning processes (e.g.
collimating, shaping of the beam to fit further optical devices located
"downstream"), is directed at an array 40 of optical elements which, in
the present example, are cylindrical lenses 45. Such an array of lenses
is commonly known as a flyseye lens.
[0033] The array 40 splits the beam into a corresponding array of
sub-beams 50, each sub-beam having a focal point 52. As will be clear
from the figure, after passing through the focal point 52, each sub-beam
will be divergent with a divergence angle (Aa, Ab in FIG. 1) and an
origin of divergence at the focal point 52 of the respective lens 45
(note that for the sake of clarity, only outlines of those beams issuing
from the outermost lenses of the array 40 have been shown; the beams from
lenses nearer the centre of the array will fall within these extremes).
It will be appreciated that range Aa, Ab of angles of divergence of each
sub-beam emanating from the lenses 45 will be much narrower than the
range that would be expected from prior art techniques utilising
scattering. As shown in FIG. 1, the array of sub-beams issuing from the
array 40 is passed through a converging lens 60, thereby to recombine the
sub-beams at 56.
[0034] The recombined beam is directed at the aperture 72 of a mask 70,
and to this end, the mask is preferably located at a distance from the
lens 60 equal to the focal length of the lens.
[0035] Although in the example shown the focal point of the sub-beams 52
is located downstream of the array 40, any arrangement where the focal
point of the sub-beams is located before the subsequent mask 70 will
suffice: the lenses in the array 40 may for example diverge the incoming
beam such that the origin of divergence is located "upstream" of the
array 40, for example. The strength of the subsequent converging lens 60
may be chosen such that the sub-beams still recombine.
[0036] As mentioned above and shown in FIGS. 1-3, the dimensions of the
section of the recombined beam directly prior to impinging the plane of
the mask are substantially equal to the dimensions of the aperture in
said mask. The recombined beam passing through the aperture (and
indicated by 74 in FIG. 1) is subsequently guided by means of a further
convergent lens 80 onto the surface 22 of the nozzle plate 20 where it
ablates the material of the nozzle plate, thereby forming a nozzle. The
strength of the lens 80 and the relative positions of the nozzle plate 20
and mask 70 are chosen such that an image of the mask aperture 72,
illuminated by the beam 56, is projected onto the surface 22 of the
nozzle plate. The nozzle section at the surface 22 and the mask aperture
72 can be seen to be conjugate through the lens 80 and consequently, by
changing the size of the aperture 72 the size of the hole formed in the
surface 22 (which forms the outlet orifice of the resulting nozzle) can
be altered.
[0037] As is evident from the figure, the sub-beams 74a, 74b making up
beam 74 strike the surface 22 of the nozzle plate at an angle, with the
result that the section of the hole ablated by the beams increases with
the depth of the ablated hole. The resulting nozzle is therefore tapered,
with the nozzle section at the "front" surface 22 of the nozzle plate 20
being determined by the mask aperture 72 and the section at the "rear"
surface 24 being determined by both the aperture 72 and the angle of the
incident beams.
[0038] The angle of the incident beams is determined both by the strength
of the lens 80 and by the angles of divergence present in the beam 74
passing through the aperture 72. The former preferably lies in the range:
0.4.ltoreq.numerical aperture .ltoreq.0.65 (corresponding to
magnification of .times.25 and .times.52 respectively). The latter is
determined by the strength of the lenses in the array 40 and also the
geometry of the array. As already mentioned, the features whereby
divergence is introduced into the beam by splitting it into a number of
sub-beams, each sub-beam having divergence, allows the angle of
divergence of the nozzle forming beam to be controlled that much more
accurately. This in turn allows accurate control of the three-dimensional
shape of the resulting nozzle, in particular its taper angle and the
sections at the nozzle outlet and inlet.
[0039] Ensuring that the dimensions of the section of the recombined beam
directly prior to impinging the plane of the mask are substantially equal
to the dimensions of the aperture in the mask, as mentioned above,
ensures that the high energy beam that finally impinges on the nozzle
plate to form a nozzle does not suffer any significant reduction in its
divergence--which might result in a corresponding reduction in nozzle
taper. In practice, the section of the recombined beam will have slightly
greater dimensions than the mask aperture: were the recombined beam to be
smaller than the mask aperture, then the mask would no longer play any
masking function and the image projected onto the front of the nozzle
plate being not that of the aperture but that of the flyseye lens. It
will also be evident from FIG. 1 that the matching between the dimensions
of the aperture and the recombined beam also means that the divergence
angles (Ba, Bb in FIG. 1) of the sub-beams 74a, 74b making up the
recombined beam 74 at a position downstream of the mask 70 correspond to
the divergence angles Aa and Ab of the sub-beams 50 upstream of the mask.
[0040] FIG. 2 is a view in a direction Y orthogonal to the direction of
viewing X of FIG. 1 and illustrates the case where the array 40 has a
rectangular geometry, being wider in the X direction than in the Y
direction. It can be seen that the angle of divergence of the beams
leaving the aperture 72 is correspondingly greater than that shown in
FIG. 1, as is the angle of taper of the nozzle in this direction and thus
the dimension of the nozzle at the "rear" surface of the nozzle plate
(indicated by x2 in FIG. 2 and greater than distance x1 in FIG. 1). The
overall shape of the nozzle at the rear surface will be rectangular, in
correspondence with the geometry of the array 40.
[0041] It should be noted that geometry of the array 40 can be altered
either by rearranging the location of the lenses in the array or by
blocking out some of the lenses of an existing array e.g. by means of a
mask placed directly upstream of the array.
[0042] The individual lenses making up the array 40 each Contribute a
bundle of diverging beams, each bundle having a section which may be
circular or some other shape depending whether the optical elements
making up the array are lenses, prisms or otherwise having axi-symmetric
or some other shape respectively. Whilst this feature is instrumental in
obtaining many of the advantages described in the present application, It
nevertheless results in the aforementioned section of the nozzle at the
"rear" surface 24 having a corrugated outline. However, where this "rear"
section is circular, the corrugations can be avoided by rotating the
flyseye lens about its polar axis during the course of the nozzle forming
process.
[0043] An alternative method of influencing the angle of the incident
beams to control nozzle taper is to interpose a further mask between the
mask 70 and the lens 80. Such an arrangement is illustrated in FIG. 3,
the further mask being designated by reference FIG. 110, the
corresponding aperture by 112. It is evident that the mask 110 blocks out
those beams passing through the aperture 72 which have divergence greater
than a certain angle, resulting in a nozzle with reduced inlet size
.times.3. The dimensions and shape of the further aperture can be varied
to control the dimensions and shape of the shape of the nozzle at the
rear surface, as is known from the aforementioned WO-A-93/15911.
[0044] Advantageously, a further converging ("field") lens can be located
directly upstream of the mask aperture 72, as indicated by reference FIG.
76 in FIG. 3. Movement of this lens in its own plane, i.e. parallel to
the mask 70, allows the combined diverging sub-beams to be aligned with
the mask aperture. Nonalignment results in one side of the beam being
obscured more than another which in turn results in one side of the
nozzle having a lesser taper than the other. Such asymmetry is
undesirable in a nozzle.
[0045] According to another preferred embodiment of the invention, there
is located upstream of the flyseye lens a variable beam attenuator (not
shown in the figures). Such devices are generally known in the art and
for this reason their construction will not be discussed here in any
detail. In the present invention, however, such a device is
advantageously employed to control the power of the high energy beam
during the nozzle formation process: at the beginning of the nozzle
formation process, laser power Is held low to minimise damage to the
nozzle outlet from exhaust products of the ablation process. Power is
then increased as the depth (and section) of the forming nozzle
increases. Towards the end of nozzle formation, high laser power is
employed to give the nozzle a good internal finish and to ensure faithful
reproduction of the shape of the nozzle forming beam. The initial rate of
increase of laser power is preferably low, even zero, increasing once the
forming nozzle has attained a certain depth. Measurement of the depth of
the forming nozzle is not necessary: the power of the laser may be
controlled as a function of time, the time necessary for a given process
to reach a certain depth being readily determinable by experiment.
[0046] It will be apparent that many kinds of lens may be used for the
convergent lenses 60, 74 and 80 referred to above. However, it has been
found particularly advantageous to use for the lens 80 a lens comprising
two mirrors of the type generally known as a Cassegrain reflective lens.
An example is shown schematically in FIG. 4a, the mask 70 and convergent
lens 60 having been omitted for the sake of clarity. FIG. 4b shows the
mirrors 82, 84 in section, from which is clear that the mirrors are
axi-symmetric, having reflective surfaces that are surfaces of
revolution. Such a lens arrangement has a high magnification (equivalent
to a high numerical aperture value), allowing a high degree of angling of
the incident beams relative to the axis of the lens (equivalent to a
lower angle of incidence between beam and the surface 22 of the nozzle
plate 20) and the formation of nozzles of significant taper. Such lenses
also exhibit low aberration since the beam does not pass through any lens
material but is simply reflected from one surface to another. Finally, it
will be appreciated from FIG. 4 that the reflecting surfaces of such an
arrangement are generally located away from the surface of the nozzle
plate and are thus less likely to be contaminated by debris generated
during the nozzle formation process.
[0047] The flyseye lens may advantageously be adapted for use with a lens
of the type described above by rendering the central lenses of the array
inoperative e.g. by removing the lenses or blocking them out as shown in
FIG. 4. Blocking may be achieved by means of a mask located directly
upstream or downstream. The sub-beams from these central lenses might
otherwise reflect back into and damage optical elements (even the laser)
located upstream. In the embodiment shown, utilising an 6.times.6 array
of lenses, the centre four lenses of the array are masked out.
[0048] FIG. 5a shows apparatus that is particularly suited for use in the
manufacture of nozzles for inkjet printheads and in particular for use
with arrangements described above. Located upstream of the flyseye lens,
the device 120 comprises an assembly of three reflecting surfaces 121,
122, 123 held fixed relative to one another by means of a housing 124i
the assembly being rotatable together about an axis 125, for example in
bearings 126 by means of a motor (not shown). The incoming beam 30 is
directed along the axis 125, strikes surface 121 and is reflected to
surface 122 and back to surface 123 whence it leaves the device, again
along the axis 125. In the example shown, the reflecting surfaces
121,122,123 are high reflectance dielectric mirrors.
[0049] The paths of top and bottom sections (30u, 301) of the beam at
different rotational angles of the device 120 are illustrated in FIGS. 6a
and 6b. When the device is at 0.degree. rotation, as shown in FIG. 6a,
sections 30u and 301 of the beam strike the reflecting surface 121 at
different locations along the axis 125 with the result that, following
further reflection by surfaces 122 and 123, the initially top and bottom
sections 30u and 301 exit the device at the bottom and top of the beam
respectively. However, with the device oriented at 90.degree. as shown in
FIG. 6b, both bottom and top sections of the beam strike the surface 121
at the same axial location and no in version of beam sections 30u and 301
occurs. At 180.degree. rotation of the device (not shown), sections 30u
and 30l will again strike surface 121 at different locations along the
beam axis with the result that inversion will take place.
[0050] It will therefore be evident that apparatus located downstream of
the rotating device 120 described above will be exposed to a beam 30'
having an intensity at a given point P at a radius r from the beam axis
that varies at a frequency corresponding to twice the angular velocity of
the housing 124 (see FIG. 5b). Were the incoming beam 30 to be totally
homogeneous, at least at a given radius r from the beam axis, the point P
would experience no change in beam intensity. In practice, however, the
beam 30 generated by the laser is not homogeneous, even at a given
radius, with the result that the point P will experience a periodically
varying beam intensity. Such a varying intensity does nevertheless have
the virtue of having the same average value for all points irradiated by
the beam which are located at a radius r from the beam axis. Since beam
intensity at a point translates into rate of material removal at the
nozzle plate, use of the device described above results in nozzles that
are more uniform (at least at a given nozzle radius) than would be
obtained using a beam not subject to such conditioning.
[0051] The use of discrete reflecting surfaces 121, 122 and 123 is
particularly appropriate in a device employing a high energy beam: these
have the advantage of low aberration when used with high energy beams, as
well having lower losses and being more robust than conventional
lenses/prisms. In the example shown above, high reflectance dielectric
mirrors are used.
[0052] It should be noted that other types of beam homogeniser, as are
well known in the art, may be used in place of/in addition to the beam
conditioning device just described.
[0053] A further imperfection in real-life optic systems is the presence
of stray beams caused by imperfections in the optical elements making up
the system: such stray beams, if allowed to hit the nozzle plate, may
result in a nozzle that deviates from the ideal. This can be avoided by
the use of a spatial filter, shown by way of example in FIG. 3, and
comprising a mask 130 placed just in front of the nozzle plate at the
point where the beams cross prior to impinging on the nozzle plate. The
aperture in the mask is chosen to pass the nozzle-forming beam yet
exclude any stray beams failing outside of the nozzle-forming beam. The
accuracy of the aperture is therefore crucial. Advantageously, the
aperture can be formed by the in situ ablation of a mask blank using the
same beam and optics subsequently used for nozzle ablation. The material
of the mask blank should of course be chosen such that, unlike the nozzle
plate material, it does not ablate significantly under the action of
stray beams.
[0054] A further process step for increasing the quality of the
manufactured nozzles is to carry out the ablation process in an
atmosphere of Helium or Oxygen. Accordingly, the nozzle plate is placed
in a chamber supplied with the appropriate gas and having a window
through which the beam is transmitted. Components such as the spatial
filter which lie very close to the nozzle plate may also be accommodated
in the chamber. Helium used in the chamber acts as a cooling medium,
condensing the ablation products before they have the opportunity to
damage any other part of the nozzle plate, whilst oxygen used in the
chamber reacts with the ablation products, turning them to gas. Both
methods result in a cleaner end product.
[0055] The present application is directed in the main to methods of
manufacturing nozzles in a nozzle plate of an inkjet printhead. Although
only a single nozzle is shown in the figures, most designs of printhead
will have a substantial number of nozzles e.g. 64 or 128. Manufacturing
time can obviously be reduced by forming more that one nozzle at a time,
these being either nozzles in the same printhead or nozzles belonging to
separate printheads. However, full optical systems of the type shown in
FIGS. 1 and 2 are not necessarily required for each nozzle to be formed
simultaneously: for example, the beam from a single high energy beam
source may be used to feed a number of individual optical systems.
Furthermore, only a single variable beam attenuator is necessary if it
used to control the power of the single beam prior to splitting.
Alternatively, the beam splitting optics may be inserted between the mask
70 and the convergent lens 80, thus reducing duplication to the
convergent lens 80 and any other elements (spatial filter etc.) that
might be required downstream thereof.
[0056] As regards the printhead itself, the nozzle plate 22 is made of a
material, e.g. polyimide, polycarbonate, polyester, polyetheretherketone
or acrylic, that will ablate when irradiated by light from a UV excimer
laser. Whilst the process of ablation--which is well known in the context
of inkjet printheads as being capable of forming accurate nozzles--is to
be preferred, the present invention is not intended to be restricted to
this type of high energy beam. Radiation from other types of laser or
other sources may be employed as a high energy beam.
[0057] It will be appreciated from the foregoing description that the
present invention is particularly suited to forming tapered nozzles. In
use, the broad section of the tapered nozzle serves as the nozzle ink
inlet and is connected to an ink channel of the printhead whilst the
narrow section of the nozzle serves as the droplet ejection outlet. The
Ofront" surface of the nozzle plate in which the outlet Is formed may
have a low energy, non-wetting coating to prevent ink build-up around the
nozzles. In the case where this coating is applied to the nozzle plate
before nozzle formation, the beam must break through this coating as well
as the nozzle plate material.
[0058] Nozzles may be formed in the nozzle plate either before or after
attachment of the nozzle plate to the printhead (as is known in the art,
see for example the aforementioned WO93/15911). In both cases, the
location of the nozzle relative to the respective channel is important
and is facilitated by means for manipulating the nozzle plate/printhead
relative to the optical system prior to nozzle formation.
* * * * *