Register or Login To Download This Patent As A PDF
| United States Patent Application |
20070112461
|
| Kind Code
|
A1
|
|
Zini; Aldo
;   et al.
|
May 17, 2007
|
Robotic ordering and delivery system software and methods
Abstract
Systems, methods and devices for the automated delivery of goods form one
to another using a robotic tug and accompanying cart. A computer within
the tug or cart stores an electronic map of the building floor plan and
intended paths for the tug to take when traversing from one location to
the next. During the delivery, a variety of different sensors and
scanners gather data that is used to avoid obstacles and/or adjust the
movement of the tug in order to more closely follow the intended path.
The system preferably includes both wired and wireless networks that
allow one or more tugs to communicate with a tug base station, a primary
network located at the site of the delivery and a remote host center that
monitors the status and data collected by the tugs.
| Inventors: |
Zini; Aldo; (Venetia, PA)
; Allen; Spencer Wayne; (Wexford, PA)
; Skirble; Barry Mark; (Allison Park, PA)
; Thorne; Henry F.; (Pittsburgh, PA)
; Fairley; Stuart; (Pittsburgh, PA)
|
| Correspondence Address:
|
REED SMITH LLP
P.O. BOX 488
PITTSBURGH
PA
15230-0488
US
|
| Serial No.:
|
581798 |
| Series Code:
|
11
|
| Filed:
|
October 16, 2006 |
| Current U.S. Class: |
700/245; 700/23 |
| Class at Publication: |
700/245; 700/023 |
| International Class: |
G06F 19/00 20060101 G06F019/00 |
Claims
1. A method for creating and using a map to navigate a robot within an
area, comprising the steps of: scanning a floor plan of said area;
converting said floor plan into a scaled computer representation of said
floor plan; electronically defining locations within said scaled computer
representation; electronically defining robot paths within said computer
representation; and loading said scaled computer representation into said
robot; and navigating said robot based upon said loaded computer
representation.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said electronically defined locations
represent robot destinations.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein said electronically defined locations
represent checkpoints at which the robot confirms its position during the
navigating step.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein said electronically defined locations
represent elevators on which the robot can ride during the navigating
step.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein said electronically defined locations
represent automatic doors which the robot can open during the navigating
step.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein said electronically defined locations
represent annunciators which can be triggered by the robot during the
navigating step.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein said electronically defined paths are
drawn with a freeform software tool.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein said electronically defined paths are
assigned a speed limit which said robot adheres to during the navigating
step.
9. The method of claim 1, where said steps of electronically defining
locations and electronically defining robot paths is accomplished using a
software program.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein said software program communicates with
said robot from a remote location.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein said software program is adapted to
receive data from said robot during the robot's navigating step.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein said software program is adapted to
receive and display a video feed from said robot during the robot's
navigating step.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein said navigating step comprises the
steps of: receiving an indication of a final destination to which the
robot intends to travel; determining a path on which to travel to said
final destination based upon said computer representation; and generating
a list of x,y coordinates which represent the path on said computer
representation.
14. The method of claim 13, further comprising the step of: converting
said list of x,y coordinates into heading and velocity signals.
15. The method of claim 13, further comprising the steps of: accepting
sensor data from sensors onboard said robot; and adjusting the path in
said determining step based on said sensor data.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein said sensor is an infrared sensor.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein said sensor data includes information
received directly from a second robot.
18. The method of claim 13 wherein said indication of a final destination
is received from a remote host.
19. The method of claim 13, wherein said indication of a final destination
is an indication of more than one destination which are stored in said
robot as a queue of destinations.
20. A method for tracking and managing RFID-tagged items, comprising the
steps of: providing a plurality of RFID tags, each of which is attached
to a unique item; scanning an area for said RFID items utilizing an
antenna on a mobile robot; downloading data captured during said scanning
process into an asset management database; and correlating said
downloaded data to a position on a map of said area.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein said scanning step comprises the step
of: logging data received from said RFID tags with said antenna.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein said scanning step further comprises:
sending a query signal from the mobile robot out the RFID tags in a
surrounding environment.
23. The method of claim 21, wherein said scanning step further comprises:
receiving an RFID identification signal from said RFID tags that is sent
out periodically from said RFID tags.
24. The method of claim 21, wherein said logged data includes an RFID tag
identification number.
25. The method of claim 21, wherein said logged data includes an RSSI
(Received Signal Strength Indicator).
26. The method of claim 20, further comprising the steps of: pre-selecting
at least one RFID tag for a notification activity; and upon identifying
said pre-selected RFID tag during said scanning step, sending a
notification about said pre-selected tag from said robot to a user.
27. The method of claim 26, wherein said notification is an email message.
28. The method of claim 20, further comprising the steps of: providing at
least one portal RFID scanner at a location on a border of said area; and
scanning with said portal scanner for said plurality of RFID tags.
29. The method of claim 20, further comprising the steps of: providing at
least one handheld scanner; and scanning with said handheld scanner for
said plurality of RFID tags.
30. The method of claim 20, wherein said RFID tags are passive.
31. The method of claim 20, wherein said RFID tags are active.
32. The method of claim 20, wherein said asset management database logs a
most recent time and location at which each of said plurality of RFID
tags has been located.
33. The method of claim 20, wherein said asset management database
calculates a confidence score for each of said plurality of RFID tags.
34. The method of claim 31, wherein said confidence score is calculated
based upon an RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indicator), a time of last
identification and a frequency of last identification for each of said
plurality of RFID tags.
35. The method of claim 20, wherein said asset management database is
located at a remote host connected to said robot via wireless
communications.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. .sctn.119(e) of
the earlier filing date of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No.
60/727,280 filed on Oct. 14, 2005.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] The present invention relates generally to robotic
retrieval/delivery devices and methods of using the same, and, more
particularly, the present invention is directed to software and methods
for use with asset ordering, tracking and delivery utilizing an
autonomous robotic tug and cart.
[0004] 2. Description of the Background
[0005] Robotic and automated vehicles for delivering or transporting
materials indoors have been developed and utilized in a number of very
specialized applications. For example, several attempts have been made to
design and use a mail delivery robot that makes regular stops to make
deliveries on a somewhat regular basis. Likewise, one or more attempts at
using an unmanned robot to push or pull a cart around a predefined
circuit have also been contemplated. However, rather than being an
independent (i.e., autonomous) vehicle, these robots are typically
automated guided vehicles that follow a predefined track such as an
ultraviolet track painted on the ground, a hidden guide wire or some
other means of providing a predefined path for the vehicle.
[0006] In many different pursuits, delivery tasks are repeated on a daily
if not hourly basis. Even in the relatively defined space of enclosed
buildings, there are an almost limitless number of applications where
people are used to perform repeated delivery tasks that require little or
no critical thinking on a day-to-day basis. For example, in a hospital
setting, hospital employees spend an exceedingly large amount of time
pushing carts around the hospital and delivering small goods to various
locations throughout the hospital. No matter which employee undertakes
these errands, high cost human resources are being wasted on tasks that
could be automated. Heretofore, however, no cost-effective solution to
this delivery problem has been available.
[0007] Certain previous robots have been designed to address the problem
of navigation and tracking the position of a robot as it travels in an
indoor environment. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,100,725, which is
assigned to the owners of the present invention and is incorporated
herein by reference in its entirety, describes certain features of a
robotic cart pulling vehicle that address the navigation and location
problem. However, there are many other aspects of utilizing such a
robotic device that are not addressed therein.
[0008] Another example of prior art systems include a class of mobile
robotic devices that navigate based on predefined linear movement
commands. For example, to move from one location to another, the device
may attempt to execute commands to: (a) move 10 feet forward; (b) turn
left; and (c) move 8 feet forward. While these navigation methodologies
are useful, they introduce a high degree of positional error. As
additional movement commands are carried out, additional error enters the
process. As such, an autonomous delivery system in which sensors are used
to constantly confirm/update positional accuracy is sought in this art.
[0009] In addition to simply navigating the terrain, a preferred robotic
retrieval/delivery system would include a variety of different features
and characteristics, none of which have been included in combination in
previous robotic tug/cart systems. For example, the robotic tug should
include a variety of different redundant sensors that allow it to detect
potential obstacles before impact and to confirm positional accuracy to a
high degree. The tug should also include certain visual and audible cues
as to its current and next intended actions in order to more seamlessly
coexist in an environment dominated by humans.
[0010] In varied environments, the robotic tug system should provide
solutions to work around and through certain commonly encountered
obstacles. For example, the robotic tug and cart should be able to move
from one floor to another in a multi-story building. The device should be
able to manipulate automatic doors or otherwise complete delivery tasks
when faced with closed doors. These and other "non-ideal" aspects of real
world environments have not heretofore been appropriately addressed by
existing robotic applications.
[0011] A robotic tug delivery system should also provide a variety of
different communication and interface options for all levels of users of
the system. For example, as the robotic tug moves, it is desirable to
have the tug remain in communication with computers at its present
location. Moreover, it would be beneficial to allow for broadband
communication to a remote host, for example an entity that oversees the
implementation and monitoring of robotic tugs at a variety of different
physical locations at the same time.
[0012] The present invention, in its preferred embodiments, addresses the
above-mentioned limitations of the prior art by providing a
cost-effective alternative to employees pushing carts to make deliveries
of various goods. Specifically, the present invention provides
specialized software
tools for use with autonomous robotic
retrieval/delivery devices. Moreover, although many aspects of the
present invention will be described with reference to a preferred
embodiment in a hospital setting (a particularly good application of the
present invention), the invention may be applied to a wide variety of
delivery-related tasks in many alternative environments within the scope
of the present invention.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0013] In accordance with at least one preferred embodiment, the present
invention provides systems and methods for utilizing a robotic tug and
attached cart to retrieve/deliver one or more goods from/to a variety of
different locations. Using a touch screen or other wed-enabled interface,
a predefined schedule and/or simple controls, a user can send the robotic
device off to another location with a payload onboard the cart. Through
sophisticated path planning, sensing, path adjustment and communication,
the device is able to navigate a path to the desired destination and
carry out a variety of tasks.
[0014] The present tug/cart devices are preferably used within a flexible
system. The tug or tugs along with a variety of different carts are put
in place at a primary location within which the retrieval/delivery system
is to be utilized. Each of the robotic devices is associated with a
docking station that provides docking functionality for the one or more
robotic tugs including recharging the batteries within the tug,
downloading any collected data and or aiding in the performance of a
diagnostic self-check of the tug and/or providing a convenient interface
(e.g., a touch screen) with which a user can select a desired
destination. One of the docking stations may also be the main "home base"
station which provides a communicating access point between all of the
robotic devices and docking stations and the other system components.
[0015] In certain embodiments, the system exists as a series of
interconnected wired and/or wireless data networks. For example, the
primary location (e.g., where deliveries take place) may have an existing
computer network. According to the present invention, a computer is
installed with a network card to connect with that existing network as
well as to communicate with the one or more tugs actually making the
deliveries. Additionally, a remote host or remote service center may
monitor and/or provide support for the system by interconnecting with the
primary network, e.g., through the Internet.
[0016] The tugs for use with the present invention preferably include a
variety of different obstruction detection and position-determining
sensors. For example, a network of overlapping and forward-looking
infrared sensors may be used for long range directional object detection.
Moreover, a forward-looking sonar may be used for near field fidelity and
additional infrared or other sensors may be used to detect certain other
features. Scanning lasers or additional one-dimensional light sensors may
also be utilized in various applications. The robotic device uses this
sensor information to detect and compute its current position and
orientation with respect to its intended path, and signals are sent to
its independent motors to adjust the steering along that path to avoid an
obstacle or re-orient itself with the intended path.
[0017] Since many indoor environments include various types of impediments
in normal operation, the present system preferably addresses one or more
of these impediments. For example, in order to move from one floor of a
building to another, an elevator control panel and algorithm is used to
empty and then take over the operation of an elevator. Likewise, an
annunciator may be used to audibly/visually alert a user that a robotic
device is approaching when the designated delivery point is behind a
closed door. Finally, an automated door opening interface or
email/text/pager system may be incorporated into the use of the present
invention in order to provide additional features and benefits.
[0018] According to the present invention, several specialized software
applications have been developed to utilize and take advantage of the
features/functionalities of the present system of robotic delivery
devices. For example, a flexible system of user interfaces is available
to monitor and even control the status and movement of one or more tugs
through a multi-floor environment. These user interface screens are
preferably web-enabled so that they may be accessed from any computer
with a web browser.
[0019] Additionally, a series of software tools may allow for the remote
and local control of one or more robotic devices, including the
management of RFID-tagged assets. Specifically, a web-based software tool
preferably provides complete control of a robot and its sensors/cameras
from a remote computer while the computer shows the robot's progress on
an interactive floor plan map of the robot's current environment.
Likewise, RFID management software allows for the tracking, logging and
maintenance of a plurality of items that are tagged with RFID tags.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0020] For the present invention to be clearly understood and readily
practiced, the present invention will be described in conjunction with
the following figures, wherein like reference characters designate the
same or similar elements, which figures are incorporated into and
constitute a part of the specification, wherein:
[0021] FIG. 1 is an isometric view of an exemplary robotic tug with cover
in place;
[0022] FIG. 2 is an isometric view of an exemplary robotic tug with
exposed internal features;
[0023] FIG. 3 shows the tug with an attached general purpose cart;
[0024] FIG. 4 shows a user interface screen s
hot of a robotic device
status screen;
[0025] FIG. 5 shows a user interface screen s
hot of a robotic device trip
summary;
[0026] FIG. 6 depicts an exemplary user interface screen for selecting
delivery destinations;
[0027] FIG. 7 shows a building CAD floor plan drawing with various system
points of interest and a planned tug path depicted thereon;
[0028] FIG. 8 is a schematic of an exemplary tug home base station;
[0029] FIG. 9 shows a user interface screen shot of a floor plan map of a
robotic device during navigation;
[0030] FIG. 10 shows a user interface screen shot of a floor plan map of a
robotic device waiting at its destination;
[0031] FIG. 11 is a screen shot of the mapping and control software;
[0032] FIG. 12 is a schematic of an exemplary network architecture use
with the present invention including a primary data network, a remote
host center, and a wireless network utilized by the tug;
[0033] FIG. 13 is a screen shot of an asset identification page of asset
management software;
[0034] FIG. 14 is a screen shot of an asset location page of asset
management software;
[0035] FIG. 15 is a screen s
hot of an asset located on a floor plan map;
[0036] FIG. 16 is a screen s
hot of a portal identification page of asset
management software;
[0037] FIG. 17 is a screen s
hot of an alert page of asset management
software;
[0038] FIG. 18 is a screen shot of the mapping and control software with a
tug shown;
[0039] FIG. 19 shows software to remotely view the feed from an onboard
camera; and
[0040] FIG. 20 is a screen shot of the desktop of a system administrator
that is using several of the previous software tools to monitor and
operate a robotic retrieval/delivery device.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0041] It is to be understood that the figures and descriptions of the
present invention have been simplified to illustrate elements that are
relevant for a clear understanding of the invention, while eliminating,
for purposes of clarity, other elements that may be well known. Those of
ordinary skill in the art will recognize that other elements are
desirable and/or required in order to implement the present invention.
However, because such elements are well known in the art, and because
they do not facilitate a better understanding of the present invention, a
discussion of such elements is not provided herein. The detailed
description will be provided herein below with reference to the attached
drawings.
[0042] The present application is related to U.S. Patent Application No.
(not yet assigned) entitled "Robotic Ordering and Delivery Apparatuses,
Systems and Methods" which was filed on Oct. 16, 2006 with the same
inventors listed thereon. This application deals with similar subject
matter and the specification of that application is incorporated by this
reference as if set forth in full herein.
[0043] The present invention, in at least one preferred embodiment,
provides devices, systems and methods to utilize a robotic tug with mated
payload carrying cart (or similar robotic device) in order to perform
autonomous retrieval/delivery of goods along a route. The present
invention utilizes a mapping algorithm in which the tug attempts to
follow a route from the beginning point to the destination. During the
delivery trip, a variety of different sensors are utilized to scan for
potential obstacles and to constantly determine the position of the
robotic device relative to its intended position. This sensor data is
then used by a computer onboard the tug and/or the attached cart to alter
or modify the preplanned route to avoid obstacles or to adjust the
current directional heading to more closely approximate the intended
route.
[0044] Many different types of robotic tugs, carts and system
architectures may be utilized according to the present invention. In the
following discussion, the physical features of the robotic tug, the
attached cart and the interface between the tug and the cart are
initially discussed. Thereafter, a detailed description of certain system
components, usage methodologies and other pertinent features and
characteristics of the present invention, both required and optional, are
presented. Finally, a detailed example of one such robotic tug and
attached cart is provided to more clearly illustrate the use of some of
these preferred features.
[0045] The Tug
[0046] One exemplary embodiment of a robotic tug 100 according to the
present invention is shown in FIG. 1 with its cover 105 in place and in
FIG. 2 with the cover 105 partially removed to more clearly show internal
features of the tug 100. FIG. 3 shows the tug 100 with an attached
exemplary cart 300. The pictured exemplary tug 100 is approximately 20''
wide and 71/441 in height. A typical tug includes a very low profile
enclosure made of high impact, abrasion resistant ABS plastic 105.
Moreover, because the tug 100 will often be used in a hospital setting,
the surface of the tug may be smooth for ease of disinfection using
conventional hospital disinfectants. The tug preferably is capable of
hauling up to 500 lbs. (e.g., loaded by the attached cart 300) and up to
250 lbs. across a typical 1'' gap across the entrance to an elevator
shaft.
[0047] The exemplary tug 100 in FIGS. 1-3 has a 24 volt DC power system
provided by sealed, lead acid, maintenance-free rechargeable batteries
110. The batteries may be recharged using a charging station (described
below) and preferably runs its twin 24 VDC motors 115 and accompanying
electronics for 6 hours on a full charge. Each motor 115 is completely
independent of the other motor so that precise steering and wheel 120
position sensing can be controlled on a per-wheel basis. With such a
configuration and typical cart loads, the tug will operate at a speed of
up to 3' per second, which is fully adjustable based on application.
Preferably, based on its mapping software, the tug will automatically
dock itself into a charging/docking station when not in use or when the
battery is low. A full tug charge process takes no more than 4 hours to
complete, with quick charges for shorter runs preferably taking only a
matter of minutes.
[0048] The tug 100 also contains an onboard computer 125 loaded with the
tug operating system (TUG OS) software. This software utilizes a detailed
map of the hospital along with sophisticated navigation software to plan
robotic device routes, avoid obstacles and constantly track its location
through the use of a variety of different sensors and other devices--all
as described below.
[0049] When used in high traffic environments, such as in a hospital, the
tug 100 preferably includes warning tones and lights to signal when it is
backing up, starting, stopping and entering/leaving an elevator. A
cart-mounted speaker may also broadcast selected messages that explain
cart functionality, provide additional warnings/announcements or
greet/report a user as various tasks are completed (e.g., when an asset
is properly delivered to a final location. For example, the device may
include pre-recorded or synthesized messages, or audio may be sent via
Voice over IP (VOIP) from a remote host to the tug/cart and played
through a speaker. In some embodiments, the tug/cart may include a "push
to talk" button which automatically connects the device to a remote host
via VoIP. The tug/cart may also include a warning light/sound to indicate
an obstruction or tampering with the cart in an unexpected manner.
[0050] In order to maintain high accuracy when steering the tug 100, a tug
preferably includes two (or four) wheels 120 with an aluminum rim encased
in a non-skid, high-traction molded urethane tread. A description of the
structure and use of such wheels is set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 7,100,725
which has been incorporated by reference above. Preferably, the wheel
core is stiff and cannot compress. The thread is made of polyurethane,
the same material used in inline skate wheels.
[0051] The tug's movement and stopping ability are closely monitored and
regulated through a variety of different sensor configurations. For
example, a fully-loaded tug preferably stops before contacting objects
detected within 18'' of its front bumper by means of a grid of forward
and/or side-looking infrared sensors 130 that are constantly scanning the
environment of the tug 100. Moreover, the tug 100 and/or cart 300
preferably include a red "stop" button 310 which is readily accessible
and may be programmed to automatically stop the cart for 5 to 30 seconds,
or some other useful time period, as determined by a particular
application.
[0052] Generally speaking, the main positioning sensor on board the tug is
a series of infrared sensors 130--directional light sensors that measure
distance along a single line, the length of which is adjustable. A first
set of infrared sensors 130 is pointed outward from each side of the tug
100 approximately perpendicular to the movement of the tug. These
positional side sensors 130 are used to continuously measure the distance
to nearby walls. Such a measurement can be used along with the onboard
maps to determine exactly at what location and position/orientation the
tug is currently located. Moreover, by recognizing certain features in
the environment, such as walls, corners, pillars, etc., as "checkpoints,"
the robotic device 100 can constantly monitor its location and movement
throughout its environment by comparing the position of the tug to a
series of consecutive or continuous checkpoints. This algorithm is
described in more detail below.
[0053] An additional series of infrared sensors is preferably oriented at
various vertical angles in front of and around the sides of the tug 100.
During the tug's movement, these infrared sensors, the paths of which
form a grid or three dimensional "force field" at least in front of the
tug, constantly receive sensor data to detect any obstacles that may be
in the way of the tug's intended path. When one or more of these
directional sensors determines that the path is blocked, the sensors
preferably feed this information back to the tug operating system so that
an appropriate evasive action may be taken (i.e., stopping, altering
path, turning, etc.).
[0054] In certain embodiments, the tug 100 or cart 300 may also include
one or more ultrasonic sensors (such as sonar 140) which are oriented
generally forward of the robotic device and/or a touch bumper 150. These
ultrasonic sensors provide a very high fidelity picture of potential
obstructions in front of the device in exchange for a limited distance
field of view. Sonar can also help detect objects that are not easily
detectable by the infrared sensors (e.g., shiny objects that reflect
light or thin, rounded poles). Depending on the specific application
involved, there may also be one or more infrared or other sensors that
are positioned in specific manner to detect unique obstacles that may be
encountered during a delivery in a specific environment. There may also
be one or more rear-facing sensors on the cart that provide for obstacle
detection.
[0055] Since the tug 100 preferably includes constant monitoring from a
local computer system, the tug preferably includes radio frequency (RF)
communication capabilities (which may also be used as part of an asset
tracking scheme, see below). Moreover, additional functionality may be
imported to the robotic device if it can wirelessly interact with certain
local devices (e.g., automatic door openers or elevator controllers). The
radio frequencies used by the tug are specifically selected so as not to
interfere with heart monitors or other equipment that may exist in any
particular usage environment. The FCC has strict guidelines that govern
the selection and use of the RF spectrum. For example, a bio-telemetry
device (e.g., heart monitor) currently must operate between 300 kHz and
30 MHz. Therefore an exemplary tug preferably uses a signal for its
elevator door relay operations and for its general wireless LAN
communications that is designed to avoid other wireless communications
that exist in the area in which the tug/cart is to be operated. The
wireless communications are flexibly designed to be adaptable to almost
any environment with any existing wireless devices.
[0056] The Tug/Cart Interface and Exemplary Carts
[0057] The interface 315 between the robotic tug 100 and the cart 300 is
important because of the disparity between the characteristics of the tug
and cart. For example, in most applications, the tug 100 will be of a
much lower profile and size when compared to the cart 300, and the cart
will be of a much larger weight than the tug. Because of this disparity
in size, there must be a strong, yet virtually frictionless connector
between the tug 100 and the cart 300. Moreover, this connector 315 must
maintain a wide amount of rotational freedom (e.g., more than 360 degrees
of freedom rotating around a vertical axis) while providing electrical
and communicative connectivity between the electronics and power systems
onboard the tug 100 and the cart 300 in order to facilitate the tug
maneuvering in tight spaces.
[0058] Preferably there are a wide variety of carts 300 that may be used
with a single tug 100. Depending on different intended tasks and
different types of retrievals/deliveries that may be made, carts with
different characteristics, all that may be attached to the tug through
the above connector, may be selected. When selecting a cart 300 for a
particular application, the tug/cart combination works most efficiently
if the smallest cart capable of performing a particular job is utilized.
Some common types of carts for use in the hospital industry include: a
general purpose cart with a locking door; a tote cart which may be used
to stack, store and deliver a variety of different bulk materials; a
dietary cart used to transfer a plurality of meals to various patients;
and a hamper cart which is used to carry linens or other bulk materials
in a low profile carrier.
[0059] TUG Operating System (TUG OS) Mapping and Movement
[0060] The TUG OS allows multiple tugs to function efficiently with each
other. Since the system tracks the movement of all of the tugs, the
operating system can automatically avoid tug bottlenecks and facilitate
the coordination of elevator use. Moreover, the TUG OS uses onboard maps
to plan robotic device routes and control the movement of the tug and
cart. Preferably, both the tug and the cart have a computer, and the
functions performed by the TUG OS may be split between these two
computers (125, 320).
[0061] At the heart of the tug's ability to travel around an environment
is detailed knowledge of the terrain in which it is operating. In most
building environments, this data comes from CAD (computer aided drafting)
drawings of the building (see FIG. 7). The CAD drawings are imported into
a graphical interface program which is used to create maps which the tug
uses to navigate. Since the tug is based on a modified deduced-reckoning
system of motivation, the accuracy of the maps translated into the tug's
plan for moving from place to place is important.
[0062] As part of the preliminary mapping process, the CAD drawings of the
building (e.g., a floor of a hospital) are converted by a software
program into a format that the tug can comprehend. For example, the CAD
drawing may be converted to a bitmap (.bmp) file that is a perfectly
scaled representation of the floor plan of the tug's operating
environment. The accuracy of the CAD drawings may be checked with manual
surveying at key locations. The key is that the electronic file be scaled
such that it represents the actual layout of the tug's environment. In
this way, the exact x,y position of the robot in the "real" world is
directly translatable to any x,y location on the bitmap. Because of this,
the robot can always know its precise location.
[0063] Thereafter, these electronic maps (bitmaps) are then used to mark
the locations at which the tug is allowed to stop (i.e., destinations),
the paths that tug will take to move from place to place, the areas in
which automatic doors or elevators exist, the location of home base, the
location of annuciators and/or any other desired location. For example,
software may be used to electronically "insert" destinations and virtual
checkpoints, and an operator can actually draw a path between two
checkpoints right on the bitmap of the environment. Since this path is
selected and drawn by the operator, it can force the robot to move near
one side of a particular hallway, move in curved lines to avoid certain
structures, and/or follow what would otherwise be less than optimal
paths. Each of these locations and paths is represented in the
environmental bitmap and is stored into operating system (TUG OS) running
on the tug and/or the cart. In this way, the tug has preprogrammed
information on the most efficient way in which to move from one point to
another, but it also has additional information that may allow it to take
a somewhat alternate route should an obstruction appear.
[0064] FIG. 7 shows one example of a bitmap 700 after certain features
have been electronically added to the CAD drawing floor plan of an
environment. For example, the home base and/or other docking station 710
are shown in the figure. Additionally, the locations of automatic doors
720 and elevators 730 that may be used by the robotic device are depicted
overlaid on the existing floor plan (705). Power or communications access
points (715) or destination locations may also be shown on the bitmap
700. Finally, the intended paths 725 on which the robotic device will
navigate from point to point are also shown. These paths, and all of the
associated locations, are shown in the figure at an x,y coordinate that
accurately represents its position in real life.
[0065] In operation, the robotic device may be directed to make a trip in
a variety of ways. For example, a location could be selected directly
from the touch screen at the docking station. Alternatively, a nurse or
other operator could use a web browser on any computer to send a final
destination to a robot. In any case, the final destination is received by
the operating system (TUG OS) running on the robot, and this final
destination is represented on the stored bitmap. In one preferred
embodiment, this TUG OS computer and bitmap are stored in the attached
cart. Based on the final destination, the TUG OS software in the cart
determines a path to follow in order to arrive at the destination. The
TUG OS software then breaks up the path into a series of smaller paths in
order to have a list of checkpoints to follow along the path.
[0066] The tug's intended path is fed from the cart to the tug in a series
of bursts of information that are a list of successive checkpoints or
path locations in x,y coordinates. The TUG OS software in the tug
compares its current position with the next intended path checkpoint and
it determines a velocity to spin each of the wheels in order to direct
the tug (and cart) to the next path location. Since each of the two
wheels is independently controlled, each of the wheels receives a
different velocity command. By adjusting the right wheel motor to a
higher speed than the left, a left-hand turn will result, with the amount
of the turn related to the speed difference between the two wheels.
Encoders on the wheels are used to closely track the rotation of the
wheels and the rigid, non-skid wheel surface allows the controller to
translate the wheel rotation into the probable position of the tug in
relation to the stored map.
[0067] As the tug moves through its intended course, it is constantly
gathering sensor data from the infrared sensors, sonar and/or any other
sensors located on the robotic device. This data may be monitored by the
remote host in real time, but it is also used autonomously onboard the
robotic tug to determine its current position, orientation and any
adjustment to its intended path. The movement along the intended path
from the docking station (or other starting position) to any destination
is accomplished in the above manner by tracing the paths (in the real
world) as they are drawn on the bitmap, while continuously adjusting for
path errors and sensed obstacles. Since the onboard map is perfectly
scaled to the actual environment, the system is able to compare its
real-world x,y position with its intended x,y position on the stored map
to constantly update its position with respect to its intended route.
[0068] More specifically, when the map conversion is accomplished and the
intended routes are matched to the maps loaded within the tug, a series
of virtual checkpoints along the route are also mapped. A virtual
checkpoint may be any landmark or detectable object/feature within the
line of site of any of the sensors onboard the robotic tug or cart. For
example, the distance to one or more walls is a one-dimensional way of
determining current position (and when combined provides more degrees of
positional assurance). Moreover, corners and other wall intersections
provide well defined virtual checkpoints along an intended route. As the
cart approaches each of the virtual checkpoints, it can then correct its
path, e.g., by adjusting the speed of rotation of one of the two
independent wheels on the tug) to realign itself with its intended path.
[0069] As an alternative, an onboard camera (see 325 in FIG. 3) could be
used with a vision system to perform the same obstacle avoidance and
position correction tasks as described above with respect to the infrared
sensors. The camera may be an additional sensor that is simply used to
take pictures of the surrounding area during operation of the robot, or
the camera may be used as the primary sensor with which obstacles are
detected and/or position is confirmed. Such a camera may be an ordinary
visual camera, an infrared camera, a stereovision camera or any other
imaging sensor. Typically, both a local user and a remote host can view
the video feed from such a camera to gather data about the robotic
device's current environment and to address any detected problems.
[0070] Multiple wall and corner virtual checkpoints can be used in tandem
to provide a high level of accuracy in position and orientation in
relation to the stored map of the environment. For example, as the
robotic tug traverses down a hallway, it may "plan" to remain 12 inches
away from the wall at all times. By continuously monitoring the side
sensor distance to the wall, each of these data points can be used as
part of a regression analysis to correct the heading until the side
sensor reads the correct 12 inch value repeatedly due to a straight
heading. Likewise, when corners and other well-defined landmarks are
encountered, these virtual checkpoints are used to correct the
forward/backward positional error that may have infected the movement
algorithm due to the heading correction based upon the wall-based virtual
checkpoints.
[0071] A checkpoint is any place that the robot can examine its
environment and determine its position. It encompasses "real" checkpoints
like doorways and corners that are identifiable. It also includes
fabricated checkpoints that are made by putting, for example, and angled
mark on the ground (like a "v" shape). As the robot approaches the shape,
judging from the angle of approach and the offset of the camera, the
robotic device could accurately determine both its heading and its
position, and then correct for any discrepancy. These could also be as
simple as existing colored tiles on the floor of the environment.
[0072] It is noted here that as an alternative to a single side sensor
repeatedly taking data from each side to determine position with respect
to the walls and then using a regression analysis to correct for
positional errors, a series of perpendicular side sensors could be
simultaneously employed along the side of the tug. If data representing
the distance to the wall is simultaneously collected from each of these
sensors, the difference in the measured distance between these sensors
would be immediately translatable to the orientation of the tug with
respect to the wall. Appropriate steering correction could then be
implemented until each of the sensors reads the same distance. Moreover,
as described above, data from a rotational sensor in the interface
between the tug and the cart could also be used to aid in steering and
path planning.
[0073] In much the same way, the sensors (both forward-looking and side
sensors) may be used to avoid obstacles that are within the intended path
of the robotic cart. For example, as the cart approaches an impediment,
the various forward-looking infrared sensors will register the distance
to the object and its approximate size (or the size could be presupposed
according to an avoidance algorithm upon detection of any obstacle). As
the object gets closer, it will begin to take shape in the
forward-looking sonar. The tug operating system software can then
calculate a path to steer around the object and then to return back to
the intended path of the tug and cart. Additionally, as the tug is
passing the object, the side sensors can be used to detect the object and
if necessary steer the robotic device in order to avoid the object.
[0074] In general, there are three distinct types of obstacle avoidance
methodologies that may be undertaken by the robot depending on the
application. These different methodologies are classified as: (1) coarse;
(2) sophisticated; and (3) "sniffer" modes of operation. Each of these
three methodologies is described in more detail below.
[0075] The coarse obstacle detection methodology is based on predefined
assumptions. Whenever one of the onboard sensors (e.g., infrared, laser,
sonar, etc.) detects an obstacle within its field of view, the software
onboard the tug/cart assumes a predefined "standard" size obstacle at a
distance from the robot as determined by the sensor. The planned path for
the tug/cart is then re-drawn to maneuver around that hypothetical
"standard" obstacle and rejoin the intended path on the other side of the
obstacle. Upon executing this re-routing operation, if the sensor again
senses an obstacle along this new route, the software assumes another
standard size obstacle in its path and redraws yet another new path to
get around this second hypothetical object. This methodology is
considered "coarse" because it makes standard assumptions about a
detected obstacle and so is inherently inefficient in terms of the path
traversed.
[0076] A second obstacle detection algorithm is considered sophisticated.
This sophisticated algorithm uses the sensor data from the onboard
infrared, laser, sonar and other sensors to just barely avoid detected
obstacles. Specifically, when an obstacle is detected, the size and shape
of the obstacle are determined using the sensor data and the obstacle is
compared to the stored bitmap. The TUG OS software then redraws a path
around the obstacle that avoids the obstacle by only a minor distance. As
the robot drives past the obstacle, the obstacle's size and shape are
continuously monitored and corrections to the path are made in order to
narrowly avoid the obstacle. This sophisticated methodology is more
resource-intensive than the coarse methodology, but it is also more
accurate in terms of path planning.
[0077] A third obstacle avoidance methodology is called "sniffer" mode.
Sniffer mode is typically entered by the robotic device's software system
when multiple obstacles are detected at the same time, for example in a
crowded room or hallway. In sniffer mode, the size and shape of the
obstacles are detected by the sensors, and the robot plans a route
between and around the multiple obstacles. The robot then reduces its
speed in order to collect more sensor data per unit of time. At this
slower speed, the robot's path can be constantly updated based on the
acquired sensor data to guide the robot through the multiple obstacles.
In this way, the "sniffer" mode is similar to a specialized application
of the sophisticated path algorithm.
[0078] One additional optional feature on the tug is a speed cap that can
be used to limit the forward movement of the robotic device without
stopping the device altogether. Since false positive readings are
periodically going to occur when using directional light sensors such as
infrared sensors (because of stray reflections off of reflective
material), the speed cap is engaged upon detection of any potential
obstruction. However, as the purported object should be getting closer to
the robot but has not been re-detected, either by the infrared sensors or
the sonar, the previous data can be ignored and the device will be
allowed to ramp up to full speed.
[0079] Typically, the path planning (map) software assigns speed limits
(represented by different colors in the bitmap) to each segment of the
robot's path. The speed cap is a way of overriding the predetermined
speed limit when an obstacle is detected. For example, even if the path
segment has a speed limit of 3.0 feet/second, the detection of an
obstacle at less than 25 feet in front of the robot may place a local
speed cap of 2.0 feet/second. Moreover, as the robot moves closer to the
obstacle, this speed cap may allow only an even lower top speed. In this
way, especially in areas with lots of highly reflective materials, the
overall negative effect of false readings will be limited instead of
completely stopping the tug upon each (false) detection.
[0080] Tug Operation/Home Docking Station
[0081] FIG. 8 includes a schematic of one exemplary home docking station
at which the tug/cart docks while recharging and waiting to be sent on a
retrieval/delivery run. While recharging, the robotic tug 100 may also
perform a self-diagnostic check and send a message locally and/or to the
remote host about its current status and usage statistics. For example,
the robot could check to make sure all sensors are working, check the
calibration of the wheels and correct it (send a new calibration number)
if it is not correct, check the disk space on the onboard computers,
and/or check the battery voltage. If one or more of these checks failed,
the tug could send a notification and "refuse" to go on a run.
[0082] The tug 100 may also perform an "environmental" check during which
it queries the local computer system (e.g., the hospital system) to
ensure that the network is running, the power is functional and the
elevators are in good working order. From the docking station, the tug
100 and attached cart 300 may be sent from point to point via a simple
"one-touch" send and receive algorithm that is built into the tug
operating system. The tug 100 basically rests in a dormant state while
connected to a home base docking station. The home base docking station
also acts as a communications hub between the hospital computer network
and the tug itself (via wireless Ethernet communications).
[0083] The home base docking station preferably includes several different
devices that work together as the human-tug interaction point. At the
lower part of the home base station, there is the tug docking base 805
which provides the physical and electrical connection between the
tug/cart and the base station. As seen in FIG. 8, there are preferably
conductors 810 onto which the tug 100 rests itself while docking. While
in place on the docking base, the batteries within the tug recharge in
preparation for future trips. If more than one tug is to be docked near
each other in a single mass home base docking area, there is preferably
some type of physical barrier between each docking station so that the
tug can use its side sensors to properly approach its intended docking
base. There may also be a wired communication cable to download certain
data from the tug to the home base station that is not otherwise
transmitted wirelessly during regular operation. This additional data may
be useful for report generation, error checking or just to gather date
about the use of the tug.
[0084] FIG. 8 also shows a conduit 815 running up the wall from the tug
docking base 805 which carries the electrical and/or communication cables
to and from the tug 100 while it is docked. The other end of the power
conduit is plugged into a traditional 110v outlet to provide power to
recharge the batteries.
[0085] Above the tug docking base 805, preferably at eye level, there may
be a computer monitor 820 with touch screen capabilities or some similar
interface for the user to interact and "program" the tug on its journey.
The touch screen monitor 820 may provide a variety of different display
options or gather various input from the user, but the primary purpose of
the touch screen monitor is to provide one touch programming of a
delivery route for a tug. When the tug is out on a delivery mission, the
touch screen monitor preferably displays the location of the tug on a map
of the environment as it travels along its intended route to its
destination. In some embodiments, the monitor may also include speakers
that announce when a delivery is successfully made by the tug.
Additionally, the touch screen may display a status for a tug or display
messages sent from the remote host.
[0086] In preferred embodiments, the touch screen 820 merely displays web
pages that are served from the home base computer 825. The main home base
computer/server 825 includes a web server that generates and serves
various web pages that represent user screens to all of the user
interface touch screens 820 located at each of the tug docking stations.
Because the user screens are wed-enabled, the user screens may be viewed
and manipulated from a variety of different areas. For example, in
addition to directly using the touch screen 820 at a docking station (or
the main home base docking station) to select one or more final
destinations for the robotic device, a user may also make such selections
from any web-enabled computer. In this way, for example, nurses within
the hospital may select a tug/cart to make a certain run without having
to leave their station. Similarly, a user at a remote host may also send
a tug to one or more final destinations and/or watch the progress of the
tug on the map during a run.
[0087] The robotic device may also have a priority queue or scheduler that
lists all of the destinations that have been selected for that particular
tug in the order that the tug will progress. As the tug arrives at the
first destination (perhaps with a delivery of goods), a simple one-touch
button (see 330 in FIG. 3) on the robotic device allows a user at that
first location to send the tug on its way towards the next "final"
destination in its queue. During the tug's trip, however, any user can
utilize a web browser and add additional destinations to the list of
destinations in the tug's queue or even reorder and re-prioritize the
destinations in the tug's queue. This flexibility allows a wide variety
of users to utilize a single tug/cart in an efficient manner.
[0088] Moreover, this concept of a queue of ordered destinations could be
expanded to the use of a robotic device scheduler. For example, because
the interface screens are web-enabled, a scheduling program could be used
to designate that a certain tug/cart would make a particular run at a
particular time in the future (or at the same time each day or every
Tuesday). The flexibility and simplicity of the priority queue allow for
an almost unlimited variety of scheduling and schedule priority
functions.
[0089] On the receiving end, once the tug and cart reach the intended
destination (or next destination), an employee removes the delivered
item(s) from the attached cart and presses the green palm button 330 in
FIG. 3) on the top of the cart. If the tug/cart has a "next" destination
in its queue, it will proceed to that destination. If the queue is empty,
the tug then uses its software to determine a path back to its docking
station for recharging and to await its next retrieval/delivery run.
[0090] Looking back at FIG. 8, if the docking station is the main "home
base" docking station which serves as a web server and communications hub
for all of the robotic devices, then the docking station will also
include a home base computer 825 which performs these system functions.
The home base computer 825 preferably includes a wireless network card
that is connected directly to the hospital's (or other location's) data
network and allows the home base computer to wirelessly communicate with
one or more tugs during operation. Through the use of the network, each
device on the tug and the hospital network is capable of communicating
with each other, virtually in real time. This provides a great deal of
flexibility if the tug encounters difficulties. The home base computer
825 and the touch screen 820 are both also powered by a conventional 11OV
network.
[0091] As described above, the user interface touch screens at the docking
station (or home base station) can be used to select destinations for the
robotic device and to send the device on its trip. Also, these screens
can be used to provide status updates on the robot, show the robot as it
traverses a map of its current location and provide additional details
about current and past runs that the robot has undertaken. These screens
can all be accessed at the user interface touch screen of the docking
station, but because these screens are actually web pages served by the
home base computer, they can also be viewed by any web page browser.
Specifically, an operator at a local web terminal or a help desk
attendant at the remote host can access and view all of this information
to gain information about the status of the robotic device(s) and/or to
address a problem encountered by the device.
[0092] FIG. 4 shows an exemplary status screen 400 that may be displayed
at a docking station that serves two different robotic tugs identified as
"TUG-24-1" and "TUG-24-2." This status screen 400 includes a variety of
information about the tugs. For example, the current status of the tugs
is displayed. In this example, TUG-24-1 is "ready" on the basement floor
and Tug-24-2 is "navigating" on the basement floor. Generally, if a
robotic device is ready for a trip and is fully charged, its status is
"ready." If the device is on a docking station charging, then its status
is "charging." If the tug is actually out on a run, its status may be
"navigating" (in motion) or "waiting" (stopped at a destination or
elevator or some other location). Additionally, if the robotic device is
charging but does not yet have sufficient charge to make an average
length run, the screen may have a counter that informs the user how much
more charge time is needed in order to safely complete the next run. Note
that the status screen also provides the location of the robotic device
at the current time (e.g., basement, 1.sup.st floor, etc.).
[0093] The status screen of FIG. 4 also includes links to the run history
for runs made by these two robotic devices on the current day 410, 415
and the previous day 420, 425. These links also include an identification
of the number of runs that were completed for each of those time frames.
If one of these history buttons is selected (using the touch screen or a
mouse pointer in the web browser), a run summary screen is shown. For
example, selecting the yesterday's runs button 410 for TUG-24-1 brings up
the summary screen 500 shown in FIG. 5. This summary screen 500 provides
details about all 7 runs that TUG-24-1 made on the previous day. This
detailed information includes an identification of the sender, the start
and end times, the total time of the run, the destination(s) that the tug
achieved and a calculation of the total trip time (including the tug's
return trip to its docking station) and the total wait time. All of this
information can be used by the operator or the remote host to judge
system efficiency and to address any problems. For example, a longer than
normal trip time may be caused by the robotic device encountering an
obstacle or getting stuck in a certain location. Reviewing additional
data and camera images from this run may help to determine the source of
such a problem. Likewise, a long wait time at the final destination may
indicate a need to train personnel at that location about the use of the
robot or may indicate the need for an annunciator at that location.
[0094] Note also that some runs may include a series of multiple
destinations. For example, TUG-24-1's second trip of the day went to the
Radiology department, then to the ER (Emergency Room) and finally to
location 3A. The timing of each segment of this total trip is separately
logged.
[0095] Turning back to the status screen 400 of FIG. 4, the screens that
control the operation of each tug may be accessed by selecting the button
430, 435 identified with the name of the robotic device. For example,
selecting the TUG-24-2 button 435 preferably brings up a menu that allows
one or more destinations for that robotic device to be selected with a
single push of the touch screen. FIG. 6 shows the destination selection
screen 600 for use with selected robotic device.
[0096] As seen in FIG. 6, the destination selection screen 600 preferably
includes a grid 610 of destination to which the tug may be directed. The
screen 600 also includes a list or queue 615 of destinations that have
been selected by the operator. As the user selects destinations from the
grid 610, the names of these destinations will populate the queue 615 in
the order that they are selected. If the operator intends for the robotic
device to go to endoscopy, the operator selects "endoscopy" from the grid
610 and then hits the "go" button 625 to send the robotic device on its
way. The tug menu (FIG. 4) can also be selected from this screen 600 with
the button 630 below the queue 615.
[0097] After the operator has sent to robotic device on its way. The user
interface screen preferably changes to map mode and a map of the tug's
current trip towards its destination is shown on the touch screen (or any
web enabled computer screen). FIG. 9 shows an exemplary map screen for
TUG-24-2 after it has been sent to endoscopy. Note that the destination
queue 910 shows the next destination as "endo." Additionally, the screen
shows a map 900 of the tugs current journey towards endoscopy on the
basement level of the hospital. The map 900 shows that the tug/cart has
left its docking station and moved down the hallway towards an elevator
(because endoscopy is on a different floor of the hospital). Preferably,
this map 900 is updated in real time as the robotic device travels
throughout the hospital. Note to that the status of the robotic device
has been updated to "Navigating on Basement" since the tug is on its
trip.
[0098] At certain points during its journey, the tug/cart may encounter a
wait of some sort. For example, while riding an elevator, the tug between
floors and is waiting to exit the elevator. At these times, the map
screen may be updated to inform the operator (or remote host) of the
"waiting" status of the robot. Also, since the tug may be between floors,
the map may be replaced with a picture of the elevator or other
applicable icon.
[0099] FIG. 10 shows an updated version of the map screen after the
robotic device has ridden an elevator up to the first floor, traversed
the floor to its destination at endoscopy, and is awaiting a user to
address the contents of the cart and send the tug on its way (in this
case, back to the docking station). Here, the map 1000 has been updated
to show the current location and floor for the tug. Also, the destination
queue 1010 has been updated to reflect the fact that the destination has
been achieved (the "check" mark in 1010). Moreover, the status of
TUG-24-2 has been updated to "Waiting on 1.sup.st Floor."
[0100] If no person addresses the contents of the cart within a certain
predefined amount of time (e.g., 10 minutes), the robotic device may move
to its next destination (or back to its docking station). Once at its
docking station, the device may pop up a user screen that identifies that
the delivery was not successfully achieved and that the operator should
check the contents of the cart to address the failure of the delivery.
[0101] In all, the user interface screens are highly flexible in that a
user (or remote host) can access current status and historical
information about the robotic device's use while also being able to
schedule future trips for the robot. This flexibility, as well the
web-based nature of the screens, allows for a wide variety of uses of the
present robotic retrieval/delivery system.
[0102] Additional Optional System Components
[0103] There are several optional system components that may be used to
expand the functionality of the robotic retrieval/delivery system. Many
of these optional components address certain commonly encountered
obstructions that may otherwise be difficult for an unmanned robotic
vehicle to negotiate. Things like closed doors, automatic doors and
elevators can all be addressed through various optional aspects of the
present invention. In these situations, "annunciators," automatic door
interfaces, notification systems and elevator control boxes each address
one or more of these potential limitations.
[0104] When a robot is scheduled to make a delivery to (or retrieve an
item from) a location that is behind a closed door (e.g., within a
patient's room), an "annunciator" can be mounted on a wall or tabletop
within the room. As the tug approaches the room, the tug sends a radio
frequency (RF) signal to the annunciator which causes the annunciator to
make an audible noise and/or to flash lights on the annunciator to
indicate to the user that the tug has arrived outside the room.
[0105] Similarly, in many different environments, the use of automatic
doors has become commonplace. Automatic doors may prevent certain robotic
vehicles from entering certain areas of the environment in which
deliveries are desired. The use of an automatic door interface circuit
addresses this situation, by allowing a tug to remotely control the
existing switch for an automatic door.
[0106] Therefore, as the tug approaches the automatic door, the tug is
able to "push" the automatic door button by closing the circuit via
wireless communication with the automatic door relay (again, similar to a
garage door opener).
[0107] Along with the above-described wireless communications systems, the
present system could also incorporate a pager system or other
notification system to alert users or administrators that delivery was
made or that an error condition has been encountered. For example, if a
delivery is repeatedly being made to an area at which a person is often
absent, that person could be given a pager which would be called by the
tug as it approached the area for delivery. In many embodiments, this
notification could take place by the automatic generation and sending of
an email or text message (without the use of a conventional paging
system). Without visually monitoring the delivery destination, that
person could still be available to receive the delivery through the use
of the pager.
[0108] Similarly, any error condition could also trigger a page to a
system administrator, either locally or at the remote host, to follow up
with corrective measures. Preferably, pages/notifications to the help
desk come into a queue and then different help desk operators can "claim"
the page and address the problem. Some example pages may include "blocked
hallway" and "elevator malfunction."
[0109] Typically, someone at a help desk at the remote host will monitor
these incoming notifications (email or text messages) and can direct a
solution to the problem. For example, if a tug sends an electronic
notification to the help desk that it is "stuck," the help desk can use
its web-enabled software to view a map of the environment in which the
tug currently resides and can see the location of the tug relative to its
intended path and the environment. The help desk operator can view
real-time images captured by a camera onboard the tug and can diagnose
certain problems based on the captured images. The help desk operator can
also take control of the functionality and operation of the tug via
remote control from the help desk at the remote host or service center.
Additionally, the help desk operator may trigger one or more predefined
messages to be played at the tug (i.e., "please call for maintenance") or
the help desk operator may initiate a Voice over IP (VoIP) connection and
speak remotely through a speaker attached to the tug/cart. Since most
communications and control are web-enabled, the system is very flexible.
[0110] Finally, the tug is also preferably capable of automatically moving
from floor-to-floor in a building using the existing elevator systems of
the building. This is an important distinction with prior art autonomous
robots that are restrained to conventional two-dimensional movement
within a single floor. In preferred embodiments, the tug uses an elevator
of a hospital using onboard electronics that allow the tug to "take over"
the control of the elevator by communicating directly with the building's
elevator systems. The tug can call the elevator and select a destination
floor using a wireless signal.
[0111] The robot may also accommodate an elevator's fire service mode.
Specifically, when an elevator encounters an emergency and enters fire
service mode, the robotic device must exit the elevator cabin as quickly
as possible. Under these circumstances, the navigation methodology of the
present invention preferably includes a routine that detects when an
elevator in which the robot is riding enters fire service mode and
immediately drives the robot out of the elevator doors on whatever floor
the elevator cabin is currently as soon as the sensors detect that a door
has been opened. In this way, the tug/cart can free up the elevator for
use by the fire fighters.
[0112] Wireless Tug Communication
[0113] The tug requires wireless network access for tug communications at
the home base computer, the elevators and elevator lobbies, and areas
where multiple tugs may cross each other's paths. To facilitate
additional features and communications, it is preferred that wireless
computer access be provided throughout the full range of the tug's
intended paths. Also to facilitate communication, a static IP address is
assigned to each tug, home base computer and elevator computer.
[0114] Remote access to the tug home base computer is accomplished with a
Virtual Private Network (VPN) tunnel which provides an encrypted and
secure way of transmitting data between the hospital and a remote host
(i.e., Aethon) via the Internet. This is one reason for providing a
static IP address for the home base computer. The remote host may include
email communications with the building provider (e.g., the hospital) and
it may facilitate an electronic help desk which both monitors the status
and movement of all of the tugs and answers user questions related to the
operation of the tugs. Data may also be collected at the remote host. For
example, the system may send an email message confirming each delivery
that is made by each tug. Such data is useful for reporting and
trouble-shooting.
[0115] FIG. 12 shows one exemplary embodiment of a network diagram for use
with the present invention. The main communication point in the center of
the network is the existing hospital (or other location) computer network
1210. This is typically a wired or wireless Ethernet network but it may
take on a variety of different forms within the scope of the present
invention.
[0116] Within the same location, below the hospital network 1210 there is
shown the system components that exist on site. In FIG. 12, two separate
docking bases 1220 for tugs are shown connected to the network along with
a home base computer 1230. As described above, these devices are
preferably coupled together at one location as part of a home base
station which acts as a recharging stand, wireless communications hub and
starting point for deliveries. FIG. 12 also shows an elevator controller
1240 which is attached to the hospital network 1210 on one side (for
communication with the tug) and the elevator control panel on the other
side (to electronically control the elevator when requested by the tug).
[0117] Above the hospital network 1210 and connected wirelessly thereto,
the system components related to the remote host 1250 are shown. FIG. 12
shows the VPN connection 1260 that preferably takes place over the
Internet as well as an SMTP gateway email access for automatic emailing
of certain data from the tugs to the remote host 1250 upon certain
occurrences (e.g., delivery completion).
[0118] The robots are capable of storing data about trips to aid in the
future planning and use of the system of the present invention. For
example, the robots preferably log the time at the start of the run, when
the tug arrives at certain locations, when it arrives at its final
destination, and when the tug is sent on to its next destination. This
lets the system record how long it took for some one to hit the "go"
button. The system also tracks how long the return trip to the docking
station takes. Other data (sensor distances, camera snap shots, etc.) may
be logged on the robotic device and only uploaded once a day (or not at
all) depending on the use. The system is flexible in that it can record
and store data locally, with the home base computer, and with the remote
host in an almost unlimited number of configurations.
[0119] Mapping, Monitoring and Navigation
[0120] At the heart of the ability of the robotic device to be able to
accurately determine its position within its environment and to navigate
through that environment is an accurate map of the environment that is
stored in the robotic device. Specifically, the map is a precisely scaled
representation of the floor plan of the building or other environment in
which the robot operates. On this electron floor plan, operators
predefine different paths, destinations and intermediary checkpoints that
are used by the robotic device to determine the path it will follow.
[0121] The mapping process begins with one or more CAD or other drawings
that accurately depict the floor plan of the environment. The users of
the software scan in the CAD drawings and darken in all of the places
that the robot can not travel (i.e., walls and non-floor spaces). The
darkened areas are later determined by the robot not to be traversable
and the lighter areas are potential areas in which the robot can travel.
Since the CAD drawing is perfectly scaled to the actual building, this
scanned representation of the CAD drawing (often stored as a bitmap or
.BMP file) is also a perfectly scaled rendering of the floor plan.
Optionally, certain key measurements can also be taken on site (e.g., a
measurement between two corners or a doorway and a corner) to confirm and
correct the accuracy of the generated bitmap.
[0122] After generating this scaled version of the floor plan of the
environment, the operators can "draw" onto the bit map places that the
tug may make a retrieval or deliver (e.g., final destinations), places
where the tug may want to stop in order to, for example, allow another
robotic tug to pass (e.g., "hot points"), and the actual path segments
that the robotic tug is supposed to follow when traveling from one point
to the next. For example, in a certain hallway, the user may always want
the robotic tug to travel within 12 inches of a wall on a certain side of
the hallway. In this case, the operators will simply draw a path at this
location on the bitmap. Since these drawn paths represent the paths that
the robot will take while making a trip, the robots future delivery paths
can be predefined (but for obstacle avoidance).
[0123] There are several key benefits to the use of an accurate bitmap
representation of the robots environment that are not achieved by the
prior art. First of all, because the bitmap is an exact scaled
representation of the actual environment, a simple x,y coordinate system
can be superimposed on the bitmap to identify the position of the robot
(or defined features/destinations) within the environment. As paths are
drawn, each pixel that is drawn or identified on the bitmap may be
directly correlated to a real-world position of the same feature within
the environment. Hence, when identifying final destinations or paths to
the robot during a trip, the system need only send x,y coordinates that
the robot can then lookup on its onboard map to locate the appropriate
paths on which to travel. Likewise, the robotic device can constantly
monitor and update its position relative to the intended path utilizing
this same, convenient x,y coordinate system.
[0124] The use of "drawn" paths is also preferred because of its
flexibility. For example, the path planners may draw a smooth curve for
the robot to follow around corners and hallway intersections. Likewise,
crowded hallways or areas that are difficult to navigate can be avoided
entirely. Depending on the requirements of the environment, the robots
path can be flexibly designed to be minimally invasive to human users of
the same environment. Also, the operators can assign speed limits to each
of the various path segments. For safety or other reasons, the operators
may wish to limit the speed of the robotic vehicle at certain locations,
even if the system itself could move much faster.
[0125] In order to utilize the robotic device and send it on a trip to
retrieve or delivery an item or items, one need only provide a final
destination location to the robotic device. For example, if the robotic
device is resting on its docking station, a user may select "kitchen"
from a list of potential final destinations for that particular robotic
tug. That final destination is translated into a final x,y coordinate to
which the tug must travel. The Tug Operating System (TUG OS) software
compares its current x,y position to the position of its final (or next)
destination and then reviews the stored bitmap of the environment
(described above). The robot examines the path segments that have been
drawn that can lead the robot from its current position to the
appropriate final destination. Since the drawn path segments are
comprised of pixels that each have a unique x,y coordinate that can be
directly translated to a real world position within the robot's
environment, the robot operating system generates a list of consecutive
x,y positions that it intends for the robotic device to follow in order
to achieve its final destination.
[0126] In the preferred embodiment, an additional piece of software
translates each of these incoming x,y coordinates into an actual position
and velocity with which to spin each of the one or more wheels of the
device in order to move from the current x,y position to the next x,y
position. If the robotic device consists of a tug and an attached cart,
all of the maps and main operating system software may reside on a
computer within the cart which feeds a list of x,y coordinates to the
attached tug. The tug then includes the software which can translate the
movement from the current x,y position to the next x,y position into
real-world wheel velocities (keeping within the stated maximum speeds for
each defined path segment.
[0127] Since all of the tug/carts have wireless communications
capabilities, the remote host is also able to upgrade the software on the
robotic devices from a distance. For example, TUG OS software updates,
new floor plan maps and/or any other software/file can be added or
replaced remotely.
[0128] Through the wireless connections and VPN, an operator at the remote
help desk (or other location) can use software to monitor and take
control of any of the robotic devices in order to address problems or for
some other reason. The remote mapping and monitoring software preferably
includes all of the map data that resides within the robots, and it also
receives real-time data from the operation of the robot itself. Together,
this data can be combined to monitor and control a robot in operation.
[0129] FIG. 11 shows an exemplary robotic device bitmap along with
software controls to both build/edit the map as well as to control
various aspects of the robot during its run. As seen in FIG. 11 (and as
described above) the base image of the bitmap (1100) is a scanned and
sized image of the floor plan of the environment in which the robot
operates. Onto this scanned image, a map designer utilizes common
computer based controls 1105 to draw certain relevant features on the
map. For example, various paths on which the robotic device may travel
can be drawn in using conventional "line" and freeform "pencil" tools
1110 that are known to computer draftspersons. These lines may be
assigned various attributes, such as a local speed limit for that path
segment which may be represented in the map as different colors for
different speeds. Various types of location markers such as destinations,
virtual checkpoints, hotpoints and the like can be drawn onto the map
using this same software. Likewise, features such as annunciators,
automatic doors and elevator controls may also be added.
[0130] The key to this map is that it is an accurate representation of the
"real world" in which the robot travels. The pixels of the drawing
represent standard size real world measurements, and the placement of
paths and features will be precisely followed by the robot during its
deliveries.
[0131] As shown in FIG. 11, the controls may also include different user
controls related to robot operation. For example, there may be buttons
associated with determining sensor values (the data being streamed to the
user), viewing from an onboard camera, managing the messaging queue or
other features. A wide variety of controls may be included.
[0132] FIG. 18 depicts the mapping display software of the present
invention when a tug is in motion and navigating along a path. As seen in
FIG. 18, the tug 1800 is depicted as a box, and its primary sensors
(directional light sensors) are shown as crisscrossed lines 1805, 1810
extending out of the tug 1800. There is also a heading line 1815 that
extends out of the center of the front of the tug 1800 and represents the
heading of the tug in motion (to the left in FIG. 18). Note that, as with
FIG. 17 and its accompanying description, the user can see all of the
checkpoints, paths and other map features as the robotic device traverses
its environment. Note to that the heading is generally directed along the
line of the next path segment (the goal of navigation). In this example,
the tug 1800 has just traveled through an automatic door 1825 which is
now closed.
[0133] FIG. 19 depicts yet another piece of software that may be used
remotely to track the progress of the robotic delivery device. As
described above, the device preferably includes a camera that
periodically captures images (e.g., when an obstruction is encountered).
This image data may be sent to a remote user through the home base
station and viewed by the image display program shown in FIG. 19. In the
present example, this image was captured because a person walked in front
of the robot and tripped its sensor(s).
[0134] This image display includes a plurality of camera and image control
functions 1910 as well as a main camera view 1900. Exemplary control
functions include image de-warping functions, zoom, microphone controls
(for an onboard microphone) and predefined image orientations that may be
selected electronically. Preferably, the user can also take control of
the camera and remotely direct its lens and determine whether it requires
still images or a video feed.
[0135] FIG. 20 brings all of the above concepts together in a computer
desktop, for example used by a help desk attendant at the remote host. In
FIG. 20, a map display 2000 is shown alongside the map controls 2010
previously described. In this example, a tug is shown in motion. To the
right of the map window 2000, the camera window 2015 depicts the front
camera view of this same robot. Additionally, a screen that shows the
text of a tug log 2020 (sensor captures, events, messages and other
information received from the robot) for this same robot during its run.
This tug log information can also be used to diagnose problems and/or
confirm correction operation of the robotic device.
[0136] Asset Tracking
[0137] The tracking of mobile assets with the use of Radio Frequency
Identification (RFID) tags is generally facilitated through the use of
the present invention. Traditionally, asset tracking is accomplished
through the use of fixed antennas that cover the entire environment in
which the tags are utilized. According to the present invention, an
antenna could be placed directly on the mobile robotic device so that
antenna coverage follows the delivery and pickup of materials on the tug
itself.
[0138] In use, each asset to be tracked is affixed with a passive or
active RFID tag. Passive tags are not powered and therefore have a
limited range. Active tags are powered and are therefore more expensive
but have many times the range of passive tags. For most environments,
active tags are the most appropriate choice. All assets that are to be
tracked are fitted with a tag, and the tag identifier and its
corresponding real world item are logged into an asset management
database that may exist onboard the robotic device, at the primary
location, at the remote host or in any other location.
[0139] Either a normal tug/cart described above or a specially-design tug
preferably roams through the hospital or other local environment
searching for tags. In preferred embodiments, a smaller version of the
tug is used for asset tracking so that the tug can reach areas that the
larger-sized tug and cart could not. As the antenna moves through the
environment, it receives an RSSI (Receive Signal Strength Indicator)
associated with each detected RFID tag. The robotic device records the
locations (x,y coordinates) and RSSI strengths for each RFID tag as they
are located. We can also assign a coarse "level" of the RSSI signal (low,
medium, or high) to use as a general estimate of how close/far the tagged
item is from the location of the tug/cart. However, because of
obstacles/walls, antenna orientation, RFID tag transmit strength and a
number of other factors, one generally cannot pinpoint the location of an
RFID tag, even with a mobile antenna. Based on the recorded signal
strength data, an approximation of the location of the item identified by
the detected RFID tag can be made. This information may be sent
wirelessly to the tug base station and then onto the asset management
database.
[0140] To complete the asset management system, it is preferred that all
entrances/exits to the environment (building) be fitted with fixed RFID
antennas to determine when a tagged asset has left the building or area.
With this information, the tag database can be updated to include
currently accurate information. Also, such a detector could be coupled to
an alarm or recorded message that alerts a nearby guard or other
attendant that a tagged asset is about the leave the hospital. The asset
tracking and exit guarding should reduce theft of tagged items.
[0141] The use of the present invention preferably also includes software
that allows a local or remote user to manage the RFID-tagged assets that
are identified by the robotic tug with RFID antenna. Specifically, the
data that is gathered by the antenna about the identity and signal
strength of a located RFID tagged could be used to automatically populate
an asset management database onboard the robotic device, at the home base
computer, or even on a separate asset management database at the remote
host or third party site.
[0142] FIG. 13 shows a screen s
hot of database software that manages
RFID-tagged assets. The FIG. 13 screen shows the general structure of a
data entry form that allows the user to enter an RFID tag number along
with various attributes of an asset that are associated with that RFID
number. For example, the asset type (e.g., wheelchair, IV pump, etc.),
manufacturer, serial number, model number or other fields can be entered
into the database. Existing database fields can be edited using the
"edit" button in FIG. 13, and the lower portion of the screen allows for
the entry of new RFID tags and assets. Moreover, a search functionality
locate one or more stored assets may also be included in the screen.
[0143] By selecting one of the "tabs" at the top of the asset management
page, the user can query the database to determine information about the
"asset locations." As shown in FIG. 14, the asset locations page may
include, for each identified asset, a description of the time, date and
location of the last position of the robotic device when each particular
asset was last located, as well as a field that lists the assets probable
location. This page may also include a "confidence" score assigned to the
location of each asset. This confidence score is derived from an analysis
of the strength of the RSSI signal at the time of last detection, how
long ago the item was last detected, the number of times that the asset
has been detected and other factors.
[0144] Preferably, the asset management software includes a variety of
features associated with the location of RFID-tagged assets. For example,
once an asset is located, a map of the floor plan of the portion of the
environment in which that asset was located may be presented to the user.
For example, FIG. 15 depicts the floor plan of the 2.sup.nd floor of a
hospital in which a wheelchair with an RFID was located. Note in the
upper right hand corner of the map the wheelchair icon 1500 which
represents the location that the asset was last located with the highest
confidence.
[0145] FIG. 16 details an asset management screen related to the use of
"portals." As introduced above, a portal may be a fixed antenna installed
at a doorway to the outside, a passageway between wings of a hospital or
any other location at which an RFID-tagged asset may leave the general
location in which the robotic device scans for tags. These portal
scanners therefore indicate when assets are removed or introduced into
the scanning environment and can be useful in preventing theft. As shown
in FIG. 16, one or more email notifications or alerts may be associated
with the use of either a portal, or a specific RFID tag passing through
said portal. In this way, an appropriate person (an asset manager or
security personnel) may be immediately informed when a valuable asset is
leaving an area where it can me tracked. FIG. 17 shows another asset
management screen in which various alerts/notifications can be assigned
to the movement and/or detection of assets. For example, when a presumed
lost asset is detected by the antenna on the tug/cart, an alert email may
be sent indicating that the asset has been found.
[0146] As described above, this tailored asset management database and
software is particularly useful to the presently described application
and it may exist onboard the robot, on the home base computer or at any
other location. However the RFID identification and RSSI data could also
be exported to an existing third party asset management database in
addition to or in place of the above-described software. The flexibility
of the present system is again its touchstone.
[0147] Robot-to-Robot Interaction and Auto-Recovery
[0148] In addition to the above features, the wireless communications
onboard each robot allows for robot-to-robot interaction. For example,
when two robots are attempting to navigate down the same hallway, the
robots may sense each other and one robot could be programmed to give way
to the other robot and let it pass.
[0149] Also, multiple robots could be used as part of a circuit. For
example, assume that a hospital intends to always have a laundry cart
robot parked at a certain location. Periodically, a second (empty)
laundry cart may approach that location to replace the existing laundry
cart. By signaling to the parked robot, the parked robot could be
prompted to bring its payload down to the hospital laundry (and then
return). The approaching robot (which is empty) could then park at the
same place that was just vacated.
[0150] Also, at some points in time. a tug/cart may lose track of its
position and not be in a location with sufficient communications coverage
(wireless network access) to be able to message a remote help desk or
other administrator in order to receive direct aid. At these locations,
there may be an "auto-recovery" area for the robot. In other words, there
could be a sign on a wall and a corresponding location on the internal
computer's maps that is a recovery zone or relocation zone for the
tug/cart if it lost its position. Basically, the robotic device just
needs to get near a position at which it can identify its location, and
the robot will then be able to re-orient itself using its normal path
adjustment algorithm.
[0151] Predefining certain recovery locations allows for this
re-orientation method. For example, an RFID tag could be placed on the
wall or a recognizable picture or pattern could be placed at the
auto-recovery location and viewed by the tugs onboard camera. With this
coarse location information, the tug/cart can re-orient itself to its
internal maps even if it is in a location without sufficient
communications coverage in order to be directly aided by the remote help
desk or other administrator.
[0152] Nothing in the above description is meant to limit the present
invention to any specific materials, geometry, or orientation of
elements. Many part/orientation substitutions are contemplated within the
scope of the present invention and will be apparent to those skilled in
the art. The embodiments described herein were presented by way of
example only and should not be used to limit the scope of the invention.
[0153] Although the invention has been described in terms of particular
embodiments in an application, one of ordinary skill in the art, in light
of the teachings herein, can generate additional embodiments and
modifications without departing from the spirit of, or exceeding the
scope of, the claimed invention. Accordingly, it is understood that the
drawings and the descriptions herein are proffered only to facilitate
comprehension of the invention and should not be construed to limit the
scope thereof.
* * * * *