Register or Login To Download This Patent As A PDF
| United States Patent Application |
20090004238
|
| Kind Code
|
A1
|
|
Scharp; David
;   et al.
|
January 1, 2009
|
IMPLANTATION OF ENCAPSULATED BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS FOR TREATING DISEASES
Abstract
Methods of applying biocompatible coating materials around biological
materials using photopolymerization while maintaining the
pre-encapsulation status of the biological materials are disclosed. The
coatings can be placed directly onto the surface of the biological
materials or onto the surface of other coating materials that hold the
biological materials. The components of the polymerization reactions that
produce the coatings can include natural and synthetic polymers,
macromers, accelerants, cocatalysts, photoinitiators, and radiation.
Methods of utilizing these encapsulated biological materials to treat
different human and animal diseases or disorders by implanting them into
several areas in the body including the subcutaneous site are also
disclosed. The coating materials can be manipulated to provide different
degrees of biocompatibility, protein diffusivity characteristics,
strength, and biodegradability to optimize the delivery of biological
materials from the encapsulated implant to the host recipient while
protecting the encapsulated biological materials from destruction by the
host inflammatory and immune protective mechanisms without requiring
long-term anti-inflammatory or anti-immune treatment of the host.
| Inventors: |
Scharp; David; (Mission Viejo, CA)
; Latta; Paul; (Irvine, CA)
; Yue; Chengyun; (Irvine, CA)
; Yu; Xiaojie; (Irvine, CA)
; Hubbell; Jeffrey Alan; (Morges, CH)
|
| Correspondence Address:
|
KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP
2040 MAIN STREET, FOURTEENTH FLOOR
IRVINE
CA
92614
US
|
| Assignee: |
Novocell, Inc.
San Diego
CA
|
| Serial No.:
|
197040 |
| Series Code:
|
12
|
| Filed:
|
August 22, 2008 |
| Current U.S. Class: |
424/422; 424/451; 424/93.7 |
| Class at Publication: |
424/422; 424/93.7; 424/451 |
| International Class: |
A61K 45/00 20060101 A61K045/00; A61P 25/00 20060101 A61P025/00; A61P 9/00 20060101 A61P009/00; A61P 17/00 20060101 A61P017/00; A61P 3/00 20060101 A61P003/00; A61P 37/00 20060101 A61P037/00; A61K 9/48 20060101 A61K009/48 |
Claims
1. A method of treating a disease or disorder comprising implanting a
composition comprising:encapsulating devices comprising a conformal
coating, and cell aggregates,into an implantation site in an animal in
need of treatment for said disease or disorder, wherein said composition
has a cell density of at least about 100,000 cells/ml, wherein the
conformal coating for the encapsulating devices comprises a polymerizable
high density ethylenically unsaturated PEG having a molecular weight
between 900 and 3,000 Daltons, and a sulfonated comonomer, and wherein
the coating conforms to the size and shape of the cell aggregates.
2. The method of claim 1, where the disease or disorder is selected from
the group consisting of neurologic, cardiovascular, hepatic, endocrine,
skin, hematopoietic, immune, neurosecretory, metabolic, systemic, and
genetic.
3. The method of claim 1, where the animal is a human.
4. The method of claim 1, where the implanting is an injection.
5. The method of claim 1, where the implantation site is selected from the
group consisting of subcutaneous, intramuscular, intraorgan,
arterial/venous vascularity of an organ, cerebro-spinal fluid, and
lymphatic fluid.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the implantation site is subcutaneous
and wherein the cell aggregates comprise islets.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising administering an
immunosuppressant or anti-inflammatory agent.
8. A method of treating a disease or disorder comprising implanting a
therapeutically effective composition comprising a plurality of
encapsulating devices having an average diameter of less than 400 .mu.m,
said encapsulating devices comprising encapsulated cell aggregates
conformally coated in an encapsulation material, into an implantation
site in an animal in need of treatment for said disease or disorder,
wherein the composition comprises at least about 500,000 cells/ml and
wherein the encapsulation material comprises a polymerizable high density
ethylenically unsaturated PEG having a molecular weight between 900 and
3,000 Daltons, and a sulfonated comonomer, wherein the coating conforms
to the size and shape of the cell aggregates.
9. A method of encapsulating a biological material comprising:(a) adding a
solution comprising a first buffer to the biological material;(b)
centrifuging the biological material to form a pelleted biological
material;(c) removing supernatant;(d) adding a solution comprising a
p
hotoinitiator dye conjugated to a cell adsorbing material to the
pelleted biological material;(e) resuspending and incubating the pelleted
biological material with the solution comprising the photoinitiator dye
conjugated to the cell adsorbing material for an effective amount of
time;(f) centrifugating mixture;(g) removing the solution comprising the
photoinitiator dye conjugated to the cell adsorbing material;(h)
resuspending the pelleted biological material with a second solution
comprising a second buffer;(i) centrifugating and removing the second
buffer;(j) resuspending and mixing the biological material with a
photoactive polymer solution comprising a polymerizable high density
ethylenically unsaturated PEG and a sulfonated comonomer; and(k)
irradiating the resuspended biological material with a photoactive
polymer solution with an energy source to form an encapsulated biological
material.
10. The method of claim 9, where the cell adsorbing material is a
polycationic polymer.
11. The method of claim 10, where the polycationic polymer is a PAMAM
Dendrimer or poly(ethyleneimine).
12. The method of claim 9, wherein the biological material is an organ,
tissue or cell.
13. The method of claim 9, wherein the biological material is a cluster of
insulin producing cells.
14. The method of claim 9, wherein the photoinitiator is selected from the
group consisting of carboxyeosin, ethyl eosin, eosin Y, fluorescein,
2,2-dimethoxy, 2-phenylacetophenone, 2-methoxy, 2-phenylacetophenono,
camphorquinone, rose bengal, methylene blue, erythrosin, phloxine,
thionine, riboflavin and methylene green.
15. The method of claim 9, where the sulfonated comonomer is selected from
the group consisting of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid,
vinylsulfonic acid, 4-styrenesulfonic acid, 3-sulfopropyl acrylate,
3-sulfopropyl methacrylate, and n-vinyl maleimide sulfonate.
16. The method of claim 9, further comprising a cocatalyst selected from
the group consisting of triethanolamine, triethylamine, ethanolamine,
N-methyl diethanolamine, N,N-dimethyl benzylamine, dibenzyl amino,
N-benzyl ethanolamine, N-isopropyl benzylamine, tetramethyl
ethylenediamine, potassium persulfate, tetramethyl ethylenediamine,
lysine, ornithine, histidine and arginine.
17. The method of claim 9, further comprising an accelerator selected from
the group consisting of N-vinyl pyrrolidinone, 2-vinyl pyridine, 1-vinyl
imidazole, 9-vinyl carbazone, 9-vinyl carbozol, acrylic acid,
n-vinylcarpolactam, 2-allyl-2-methyl-1,3-cyclopentane dione, and
2-hydroxyethyl acrylate.
18. The method of claim 9, further comprising a viscosity enhancer
selected from the group consisting of natural and synthetic polymers.
19. The method of claim 9, where the biological material is selected from
the group consisting of neurologic, cardiovascular, hepatic, endocrine,
skin, hematopoietic, immune, neurosecretory, metabolic, systemic, and
genetic.
20. The method of claim 9, wherein the biological material is from a
human.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001]This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No.
10/684,859, filed Oct. 14, 2003, which claims priority to U.S.
Provisional application No. 60/419,015, filed Oct. 11, 2002. Both
applications are incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002]The present invention relates to compositions and methods of
treating a disease, such as diabetes, by implanting encapsulated
biological material into a patient in need of treatment.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003]Diabetes mellitus is a disease caused by the loss of the ability to
transport glucose into the cells of the body, because of either a lack
insulin production or diminished insulin response. In a healthy person,
minute elevations in blood glucose stimulate the production and secretion
of insulin, the role of which is to increase glucose uptake into cells,
returning the blood glucose to the optimal level. Insulin stimulates
liver and skeletal muscle cells to take up glucose from the blood and
convert it into glycogen, an energy storage molecule. It also stimulates
skeletal muscle fibers to take up amino acids from the blood and convert
them into protein, and it acts on adipose (fat) cells to stimulate the
synthesis of fat. In diabetes, glucose saturates the blood stream, but it
cannot be transported into the cells where it is needed and utilized. As
a result, the cells of the body are starved of needed energy, which leads
to the wasted appearance of many patients with poorly controlled
insulin-dependent diabetes.
[0004]Prior to the discovery of insulin and its use as a treatment for
diabetes, the only available treatment was starvation followed
predictably by death. Death still occurs today with insulin treatment
from over dosage of insulin, which results in extreme hypoglycemia and
coma followed by death unless reversed by someone who can quickly get
glucose into the patient. Also, death still occurs from major under
dosage of insulin, which leads to hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis that can
result in coma and death if not properly and urgently treated.
[0005]While diabetes is not commonly a fatal disease thanks to the
treatments available to diabetics today, none of the standard treatments
can replace the body's minute-to-minute production of insulin and precise
control of glucose metabolism. Therefore, the average blood glucose
levels in diabetics generally remain too high. The chronically elevated
blood glucose levels cause a number of long-term complications. Diabetes
is the leading cause of new blindness, renal failure, premature
development of heart disease or stroke, gangrene and amputation, and
impotence. It decreases the sufferer's overall life expectancy by one to
two decades.
[0006]Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic diseases in the
world. In the United States, diabetes affects approximately 16 million
people--more than 12% of the adult population over 45. The number of new
cases is increasing by about 150,000 per year. In addition to those with
clinical diabetes, there are approximately 20 million people showing
symptoms of abnormal glucose tolerance. These people are borderline
diabetics, midway between those who are normal and those who are clearly
diabetic. Many of them will develop diabetes in time and some estimates
of the potential number of diabetics are as high as 36 million or 25-30%
of the adult population over 45 years.
[0007]Diabetes and its complications have a major socioeconomic impact on
modern society. Of the approximately $700 billion dollars spent on
healthcare in the US today, roughly $100 billion is spent to treat
diabetes and its complications. Since the incidence of diabetes is
rising, the costs of diabetes care will occupy an ever-increasing
fraction of total healthcare expenditures unless steps are taken promptly
to meet the challenge. The medical, emotional and financial toll of
diabetes is enormous, and increase as the numbers of those suffering from
diabetes grows.
[0008]Diabetes mellitus can be subdivided into two distinct types: Type 1
diabetes and Type 2 diabetes. Type 1 diabetes is characterized by little
or no circulating insulin, and it most commonly appears in childhood or
early adolescence. There is a genetic predisposition for Type 1 diabetes.
It is caused by the destruction of the insulin-producing beta cells in
the islets of Langerhans; which are scattered throughout the pancreas, an
elongated gland located transversely behind the stomach. The beta cells
are attacked by an autoimmune reaction initiated by some as yet
unidentified environmental event. Possibly a viral infection or
noninfectious agent (a toxin or a food) triggers the immune system to
react to and destroy the patient's beta cells in the pancreas. The
pathogenic sequence of events leading to Type 1 diabetes is thought to
consist of several steps. First, it is believed that genetic
susceptibility is an underlying requirement for the initiation of the
pathogenic process. Secondly, an environmental insult mediated by a virus
or noninfectious pathogen in food triggers the third step, the
inflammatory response in the pancreatic islets (insulitis). The fourth
step is an alteration or transformation of the beta cells such that they
are no longer recognized as "self" by the immune system, but rather seen
as foreign cells or "nonself". The last step is the development of a
full-blown immune response directed against the "targeted" beta cells,
during which cell-mediated immune mechanisms cooperate with cytotoxic
antibodies in the destruction of the insulin-producing beta cells.
Despite this immune attack, for a period, the production of new beta
cells is fast enough to stay ahead of the destruction by the immune
system and a sufficient number of beta cells are present to control blood
glucose levels. However, the number of beta cells gradually declines.
When the number of beta cells drops to a critical level (10% of normal),
blood glucose levels no longer can be controlled and progression to total
insulin production failure is almost inevitable. It is thought that the
regeneration of beta cells continues for a few years, even after
functional insulin production ceases, but that the cells are destroyed as
they develop to maturity.
[0009]To reduce their susceptibility to both the acute and chronic
complications of diabetes, people with Type 1 diabetes must take multiple
insulin injections daily and test their blood sugar multiple times per
day by pricking their fingers for blood. They then have to decide how
much insulin to take based on the food eaten and level of physical
activity, amount of stress, and existence of any illness over the next
few hours. The multiple daily injections of insulin do not adequately
mimic the body's minute-to-minute production of insulin and precise
control of glucose metabolism. Blood sugar levels are usually higher than
normal, causing complications that include blindness, heart attack,
kidney failure, stroke, nerve damage, and amputations. Even with insulin,
the average life expectancy of a diabetic is 15-20 years less than a
healthy person.
[0010]Type 2 diabetes usually appears in middle age or later, and
particularly affects those who are overweight. Over the past few years,
however, the incidence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in young adults has
increased dramatically. In the last several years, the age of onset for
Type 2 diabetes in obese people has dropped from 40 years to 30 years.
These are the new younger victims of this disease. In Type 2 diabetes,
the body's cells that normally require insulin lose their sensitivity and
fail to respond to insulin normally. This insulin resistance may be
overcome for many years by extra insulin production by the pancreatic
beta cells. Eventually, however, the beta cells are gradually exhausted
because they have to produce large amounts of excess insulin due to the
elevated blood glucose levels. Ultimately, the overworked beta cells die
and insulin secretion fails, bringing with it a concomitant rise in blood
glucose to sufficient levels that it can only be controlled by exogenous
insulin injections. High blood pressure and abnormal cholesterol levels
usually accompany Type 2 diabetes. These conditions, together with high
blood sugar, increase the risk of heart attack, stroke, and circulatory
blockages in the legs leading to amputation. Drugs to treat Type 2
diabetes include some that act to reduce glucose absorption from the gut
or glucose production by the liver, others that reduce the formation of
more glucose by the liver and muscle cells, and others that stimulate the
beta cells directly to produce more insulin. However, high levels of
glucose are toxic to beta cells, causing a progressive decline of
function and cell death. Consequently, many patients with Type 2 diabetes
eventually need exogenous insulin.
[0011]Another form of diabetes is called Maturity Onset Diabetes of the
Young (MODY). This form of diabetes is due to one of several genetic
errors in insulin-producing cells that restrict their ability to process
the glucose that enters via special glucose receptors. Beta cells in
patients with MODY cannot produce insulin correctly in response to
glucose, which results in hyperglycemia. The patients treatment
eventually leads to the requirement for insulin injections.
[0012]The currently available medical treatments for insulin-dependent
diabetes are limited to insulin administration and pancreas
transplantation with either whole pancreata or pancreatic segments.
[0013]Insulin therapy is by far more prevalent than pancreas
transplantation. Insulin administration is conventionally either by a few
blood glucose measurements and subcutaneous injections, intensively by
multiple blood glucose measurements and through multiple subcutaneous
injections of insulin, or by continuous subcutaneous injections of
insulin with a pump. Conventional insulin therapy involves the
administration of one or two injections a day of intermediate-acting
insulin with or without the addition of small amounts of regular insulin.
The intensive insulin therapy involves multiple administration of
intermediate- or long-acting insulin throughout the day together with
regular or short-acting insulin prior to each meal. Continuous
subcutaneous insulin infusion involves the use of a small battery-driven
pump that delivers insulin subcutaneously to the abdominal wall, usually
through a 27-gauge butterfly needle. This treatment modality has insulin
delivered at a basal rate continuously throughout the day and night, with
increased rates programmed prior to meals. In each of these methods, the
patient is required to frequently monitor his or her blood glucose levels
and, if necessary, adjust the insulin dose. However, controlling blood
sugar is not simple. Despite rigorous attention to maintaining a healthy
diet, exercise regimen, and always injecting the proper amount of
insulin, many other factors can adversely affect a person's blood-sugar
including stress, hormonal changes, periods of growth, illness, infection
and fatigue. People with Type 1 diabetes must constantly be prepared for
life threatening hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) and hyperglycemic (high
blood sugar) reactions. Insulin-dependent diabetes is a life threatening
disease, which requires never-ending vigilance.
[0014]In contrast to insulin administration, whole pancreas
transplantation or transplantation of segments of the pancreas is known
to eliminate the elevated glucose values by regulating insulin release
from the new pancreas in diabetic patients. Histologically, the pancreas
is composed of three types of functional cells; a) exocrine cells that
secrete their enzymes into a small duct, b) ductal cells that carry the
enzymes to the gut, and c) endocrine cells that secrete their hormones
into the bloodstream. The exocrine portion is organized into numerous
small glands (acini) containing columnar to pyramidal epithelial cells
known as acinar cells. Acinar cells comprise approximately 80% of the
pancreatic cells and secrete into the pancreatic duct system digestive
enzymes, such as, amylases, lipases, phospholipases, trypsin,
chymotrypsin, aminopeptidases, elastase and various other proteins.
Approximately 1.5 and 3 liters of alkaline fluid are released per day
into the common bile duct to aid digestion.
[0015]The pancreatic duct system consists of an intricate, tributary-like
network of interconnecting ducts that drain each secretory acinus,
draining into progressively larger ducts, and ultimately draining into
the main pancreatic duct. The lining epithelium of the pancreatic duct
system consists of duct cells. Approximately 10% of the pancreas cells is
duct cells. Duct cell morphology ranges from cuboidal in the fine
radicles draining the secretory acini to tall, columnar, mucus secreting
cells in the main ductal system.
[0016]Hormone producing islets are scattered throughout the pancreas and
secrete their hormones into the bloodstream, rather than ducts. Islets
are richly vascularized. Islets comprise only 1-2% of the pancreas, but
receive about 10 to 15% of the pancreatic blood flow. There are three
major cell types in the islets, each of which produces a different
endocrine product: alpha cells secrete the hormone glucagon (glucose
release); beta cells produce insulin (glucose use and storage) and are
the most abundant of the islet cells; and delta cells secrete the hormone
somatostatin (inhibits release of other hormones). These cell types are
not randomly distributed within an islet. The beta cells are located in
the central portion of the islet and are surrounded by an outer layer of
alpha and delta cells. Besides insulin, glucagon and somatostatin,
gastrin and Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) have been identified as
products of pancreatic islets cells.
[0017]Pancreas transplantation is usually only performed when kidney
transplantation is required, which makes pancreas-only transplantations
relatively infrequent operations. Although pancreas transplants are very
successful in helping people with insulin-dependent diabetes improve
their blood sugar control without the need for insulin injections and
reduce their long-term complications, there are a number of drawbacks to
whole pancreas transplants. Most importantly, getting a pancreas
transplant involves a major operation and requires the use of life-long
immune suppressant drugs to prevent the body's immune system from
destroying the pancreas. The pancreas is destroyed in a manner of days
without these drugs. Some risks in taking these immuno-suppressive drugs
are the increased incidence of infections and tumors that can be life
threatening in their own right. The risks inherent in the operative
procedure, the requirement for life-long immunosuppression of the patient
to prevent rejection of the transplant, and the morbidity and mortality
rate associated with this invasive procedure, illustrate the serious
disadvantages associated with whole pancreas transplantation for the
treatment of diabetes. Thus, an alternative to insulin injections or
pancreas transplantation would fulfill a great public health need.
[0018]Islet transplants are much simpler (and safer) procedures than whole
pancreas transplants and can achieve the same effect by replacing the
destroyed beta cells. As discussed above, when there are insufficient
numbers of beta cells, or insufficient insulin secretion, regardless of
the underlying reason, diabetes results. Reconstituting the islet beta
cells in a diabetic patient to a number sufficient to restore normal
glucose-responsive insulin production would solve the problems associated
with both insulin injection and major organ transplantation.
Microencapsulation and implantation of islet cells into diabetic patients
holds promise for treatment of those with diabetes.
[0019]Encapsulation of cells for the potential of treating a number of
diseases and disorders has been discussed in the literature. The concept
was suggested as early as 100 years ago, but little work was done prior
to the 1950's when immunologists began using encapsulated cells with
membrane devices to separate the cells from the host to better understand
the different aspects of the immune system. Research on implantation was
underway in the 1970's and 1980's with the first review written in 1984.
Several additional reviews have been written since then explaining the
different approaches and types of devices under development. Cell
encapsulation technology has potential applications in many areas of
medicine. For example, some important potential applications are
treatment of diabetes (Goosen, M. F. A., et al. (1985) Biotechnology and
Bioengineering, 27:146), production of biologically important chemicals
(Omata, T., et al. (1979) "Transformation of Steroids by Gel-Entrapped
Nacardia rhodocrous Cells in Organic Solvent" Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol. 8:143-155), and evaluation of anti-human immunodeficiency
virus drugs (McMahon, J., et al. (1990) J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 82(22)
1761-1765).
[0020]There are three main types of encapsulated devices, which can best
be categorized by describing the form of encapsulation. The three
categories are a] macrodevices, b] microcapsules, and c] conformal
coatings.
[0021]Macrodevices are larger devices containing membranes in the form of
sheets or tubes for permselectivity and usually supporting structures.
They contain one or several compartments for the encapsulated cells. They
are designed for implantation into extravascular or vascular sites. Some
are designed to grow into the host to increase oxygen diffusion into
these large devices. Others are designed to have no reaction by the host,
thus increasing their ease of removal from different sites. There have
been two major types of macrodevices developed: a] flat sheet and b]
hollow fiber.
[0022]Among the flat sheet devices, one type (Baxter, Theracyte) is made
of several layers for strength and has diffusion membranes between
support structures with loading ports for replacing the cells. The other
type is more simple in design. The device uses alginate based membranes
and other supporting membranes to encapsulate islets within an alginate
matrix between the sheets. The complex device is designed to grow into
the body to increase diffusion of oxygen. Due to its relatively large
size, there are few sites in the body able to accommodate it for the
treatment of a disease like diabetes. Since it grows into the body and
the contained cells are not expected to survive for more than a few
years, multiple cell removals and reloading of new cells is required for
the long-term application of this device. It has proven quite difficult
to flush and reload this type of device while at the same time
maintaining the critical cell compartment distance for oxygen diffusion.
[0023]The second flat sheet style of device is designed to be an "all
in/all out" device with little interaction with the host. For the
diabetes product, it has been quite difficult to place this device into
the intraperitoneal cavity of large animals, while maintaining its
integrity. This has been due to the difficulty in securing it in the
abdomen so that the intestines cannot cause it to move or wrinkle, which
may damage or break the device.
[0024]The other major macrodevice type is the hollow fiber, made by
extruding thermoplastic materials into hollow fibers. These hollow fibers
can be made large enough to act as blood conduits. One model is designed
to be fastened into the host's large blood vessels and the encapsulated
cells are behind a permselective membrane within the device. This type
has shown efficacy in large animal diabetic trials, but has been plagued
by problems in the access to the vascular site. Both thrombosis and
hemorrhage have complicated the development of this approach with it
currently being abandoned as a clinically relevant product. Another model
using hollow fibers is much smaller in diameter and designed to be used
as an extravascular device. Due to low packing densities, the required
cell mass for encapsulation causes the length of this type of hollow to
approach many meters. Therefore, this approach was abandoned for treating
diabetes since it was not clinically relevant. In addition, sealing the
open ends of the fiber is not trivial and strength has been a problem
depending upon the extravascular site.
[0025]The microcapsule was one of the first to offer potential clinical
efficacy. Alginate microcapsules were used to encapsulate islets, which
eliminated diabetes in rodents when implanted intraperitoneally. However,
nearly 25 years have passed since these first reports without the ability
to demonstrate clinical efficacy. One of the problems associated with
microcapsules is their relatively large size in combination with low
packing densities of cells, especially for the treatment of diabetes.
Another is the use of alginate; an ionically crosslinked hydrogel
dependent upon the calcium concentration for its degree of crosslinking.
The permselectivity of pure alginate capsules has been difficult to
control with the vast majority being wide open in terms of molecular
weight cutoff. Varieties of positively charged crosslinked agents, such
as polylysine, have been added as a second coating to provide
permselectivity to the capsule. However, polylysine and most other
similar molecules invite an inflammatory reaction requiring an additional
third coating of alginate to reduce the host's response to the capsule.
In addition, it has been difficult to produce very pure alginates that
are not reactive within the host after implantation. Trying to reduce the
size of the alginate microcapsules causes two major problems. First, the
production of very large quantities of empty capsules without any cells.
Second, the formation of smaller capsules results in poorly coated cells.
There is no force to keep the contained cells within the center of the
microcapsule, which causes the risk of incomplete coatings to go up
exponentially with the decrease in the size of the capsules. Production
of conformal coatings has not been demonstrated with alginate
microcapsules.
[0026]The last category of cell encapsulation is conformal coating. A
conformally coated cell aggregate is one that has a substantially uniform
cell coating around the cell aggregate regardless of size or shape of the
aggregate. This coating not only may be uniform in thickness, but it also
may be uniform in the protective permselective nature of the coating that
provides uniform immune protection. Furthermore, it may be uniform in
strength and stability, thus preventing the coated material from being
violated by the host's immune system.
[0027]An important aspect to the feasibility of using these various
methods is the relevant size and implant site needed to obtain a
physiological result of 15,000 IEQ/kg-BW. Injecting isolated islets into
the Portal Vein requires 2-3 ml of pack cells. A macro-device consisting
of a flat sheet that is 1 islet thick (.about.500 .mu.m) requires a
surface area equivalent to 2 US dollar bills. A macro-device consisting
of hollow fibers with a loading density of 5% would need 30 meters of
fiber. Alginate microcapsules with an average diameter of 400-600 .mu.m
would need a volume of 50-170 ml. However, PEG conformal coating of
islets which produces a 25-50 .mu.m thick covering would only need a
volume of 6-12 ml and could be injected into almost any area in the body.
[0028]The stringent requirements of encapsulating polymers for
biocompatibility, chemical stability, immunoprotection and resistance to
cellular overgrowth restrict the applicability of prior art methods of
encapsulating cells and other biological materials. The membranes must be
non-toxically produced in the presence of cells, with the qualities of
being permselective, chemically stable, and very highly biocompatible.
[0029]Synthetic or natural materials intended to be exposed to biological
fluids or tissues are broadly classified as biomaterials. These
biomaterials are considered biocompatible if they produce a minimal or no
adverse response in the body. For many uses of biomaterials, it is
desirable that the interaction between the physiological environment and
the material be minimized. For these uses, the material is considered
"biocompatible" if there is minimal cellular growth on its surface
subsequent to implantation, minimal inflammatory reaction, and no
evidence of anaphylaxis during use. Thus, the material should neither
elicit a specific humoral or cellular immune response nor a nonspecific
foreign body response.
[0030]Materials that are successful in preventing all of the above
responses are relatively rare. Biocompatibility is more a matter of
degree rather than an absolute state. The first event occurring at the
interface of any implant with surrounding biological fluids is protein
adsorption (Andrade, J. D. et al. (1986) V. Adv. Polym. Sci., 79:1-63).
In the case of materials of natural origin, it is conceivable that
specific antibodies for that material exist in the repertoire of the
immune defense mechanism of the host. In this case, a strong immune
response can result. Most synthetic materials, however, do not elicit
such a reaction. They can either activate the complement cascade and/or
adsorb serum proteins, such as, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), which
mediate cell adhesion (Buck, C. A. et al. (1987) Ann. Rev. Cell Biol.,
3:179-205).
[0031]Proteins can adsorb on almost any type of material. They have
regions that are positively and/or negatively charged, as well as,
hydrophilic and hydrophobic. Thus, they can interact with implanted
material through any of these various regions, resulting in cellular
proliferation at the implant surface. Complement fragments such as C3b
can be immobilized on the implant surface and act as chemoattractants.
They in turn can activate inflammatory cells, such as macrophages and
neutrophils, and cause their adherence and activation on the implant.
These cells attempt to degrade and digest the foreign material.
[0032]In the event that the implant is nondegradable and is too large to
be ingested by large single activated macrophages, the inflammatory cells
may undergo frustrated phagocytosis. Several such cells can combine to
form foreign body giant cells. In this process, these cells release
peroxides, hydrolytic enzymes, and chemoattractant and anaphylactic
agents such as interleukins, which increase the severity of the reaction.
They also induce the proliferation of fibroblasts on foreign surfaces.
[0033]Past approaches to enhancing biocompatibility of materials started
with attempts at minimization of interfacial energy between the material
and its aqueous surroundings. Similar interfacial tensions of the solid
and liquid were expected to minimize the driving force for protein
adsorption and this was expected to lead to reduced cell adhesion and
thrombogenicity of the surface. For example, Amudeshwari et al. used
collagen gels crosslinked in the presence of HEMA and MMA (Amudeswari,
S., et al. (1986) J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 20:1103-1109). Desai and Hubbell
showed a poly(HEMA)-MMA copolymer to be somewhat non-thrombogenic (Desai,
N. P. et al. (1989) J. Biomaterials Sci., Polym. Ed., 1: 123-146; Desai,
N. P. et al. (1989) Polym. Materials Sci. Eng., 62:731).
[0034]Hubbell et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,529,914 and related patents)
disclose methods for the formation of biocompatible membranes around
biological materials using photopolymerization of water-soluble
molecules. Each of these methods utilizes a polymerization system
containing water-soluble macromers, polymerization using a p
hotoinitiator
(such as a dye), and radiation in the form of visible or long wavelength
UV light.
[0035]Due to the inability of those of skill in the art to provide one or
more important properties of successful cell encapsulation, none of the
encapsulation technologies developed in the past have resulted in a
clinical product. These properties can be broken down into the following
categories:
[0036]Biocompatibility--The materials used to make an encapsulating device
must not elicit a host response, which may cause a non-specific
activation of the immune system by these materials alone. When
considering immunoisolation, one must recognize that it will only work in
the situation where there is no activation of the host immune cells to
the materials. If there is activation of the host immune cells by the
materials, then the responding immune cells will surround the device and
attempt to destroy it. This process produces many cytokines that will
certainly diffuse through the capsule and most likely destroy the
encapsulated cells. Most devices tested to date have failed in part by
their lack of biocompatibility in the host.
[0037]Permselectivity--There exists an important balance between having
the largest pores as possible in the capsule surrounding the encapsulated
cells to permit all the nutrients and waste products to pass through the
capsule to permit optimal survival and function, while at the same time,
the smallest pore size as possible in the capsule to keep all elements of
the immune system away from the encapsulated cells to prevent degradation
of the cells. Small pores capable of keeping out immune cytokines also
cause the death of the encapsulated cells from a lack of diffusion of
nutritional elements and waste products. The optimal cell encapsulation
has an exact and consistent permselectivity, which allows maximal cell
survival and function, as well as, provides isolation from the host
immune response. Ideally, this encapsulation technology should offer the
ability to select and change the pore size as required by the
encapsulated cells and their function, as well as pore size variation
based on whether the cells are allograft or xenograft cells.
[0038]Encapsulated Cell Viability and Function--The encapsulating
materials should not exhibit cytotoxicity to the encapsulated cells
either during the formation of the coatings or on an ongoing basis,
otherwise the number of encapsulated cells will decrease and risk falling
short of the number required for a therapeutically effective treatment of
a disease or disorder.
[0039]Relevant Size--Many devices are of such a large size that the number
of practical implantation sites in the host is limited. Another factor is
the relative diffusion distance between the encapsulated cells and the
host. The most critical diffusive agent for cell survival is oxygen.
These diffusion distances should be minimal since the starting partial
pressure of oxygen is in the range of 30-40 mm Hg at the tissue level in
the body. There is little tolerance for a reduction in diffusive
distances, due to the initially low oxygen partial pressure. This would
further lower the oxygen concentration to a point where the cells cannot
adequately function or survive.
[0040]Cell Retrieval or Replacement--The encapsulating device should be
retrievable, refillable, or biodegradable, allowing for replacement or
replenishment of the cells. Many device designs have not considered the
fact that encapsulated cells have a limited lifetime in the host and
require regular replacement.
[0041]Therapeutic Effect--The implant should contain sufficient numbers of
functional cells to have a therapeutic effect for the disease application
in the host.
[0042]Clinical Relevance--The encapsulating cell device should have a
total volume or size that allows it to be implanted in the least invasive
or most physiologic site for function, which has a risk/benefit ratio
below that faced by the host with the current disease or disorder.
[0043]Commercial Relevance--The encapsulating cell device should be able
to meet the above requirements in order for it to be produced on an
ongoing basis for the long-term treatment of the disease process for
which it has been designed.
[0044]All of the above factors must be taken into consideration when
evaluating a specific technique, method or product for use in
implantation of islets to alleviate the effects of diabetes.
[0045]Transplantation of human islets with immunosuppression is done by
injecting unencapsulated islets into the portal vein by direct injection
percutaneously between the ribs, into the liver, and then the portal vein
by fluoroscopic direction. Essentially all of the human islet transplants
have been done by this technique, except for the first ones done by
umbilical vein injection via a cutdown. A major risk of this procedure is
the fact that injection of islets into the portal vein leads to increased
portal venous pressures depending on the rate of infusion and the amount
infused. Another risk has been elevated portal venous pressures from
large volumes of injected islet tissues that are not sufficiently
purified. This also leads to portal venous thrombosis as a complication
of this procedure. As the interventional radiologist prepares to withdraw
the catheter, a bolus of gelatin is left behind to prevent hemorrhaging
from the injection site. Unfortunately, several patients have had
bleeding episodes following this procedure.
[0046]In addition to injecting the islets into the portal vein, a few
patients have had their islets injected into the body of the spleen. The
spleen is more fragile than the liver so these injections were performed
at the time of kidney transplantation at which time the splenic injection
could be done as an open procedure. Freely injecting the islets into the
peritoneal cavity has been performed in mouse transplants without
difficulty. In using this site in larger animals or humans, it has been
found that twice the number of islets is needed in the peritoneal cavity
than required in the portal vein implants. If any rejection or
inflammatory reactions occur, then adhesions tend to form between the
loops of intestine, as well as, to the omentum. This reaction can lead to
additional problems long term, such as, bowel obstruction. Thus, the
ability to perform encapsulated islet implants into the subcutaneous site
would significantly reduce the complications associated with these other
sites.
[0047]Attempts at subcutaneous implantation of encapsulated islets have
been unable to produce sustainable results in the treatment of diabetes,
probably due to some or all of the scientific challenges described above.
Tatarkiewicz et al. (Transplantation Proceedings 1998, 30, 479-480)
discloses the implantation of rat islets, enclosed in tissue diffusion
ported devices, subcutaneously in mice. Kawakami et al. (Cell
Transplantation 1997 6, 5:541-545) implanted pancreatic beta cells,
encapsulated in agarose-PSSa, subcutaneously in rats. Insulin secretion
from the cells was maintained after transplantation. However, this study
only examined subcutaneous implantation of the encapsulated islet cells
over a one-week period. No evidence has been provided that the insulin
secretion response of the cells could be maintained long term in a
subcutaneous implant. Kawakami et al. (Transplantation 2002, 73, 122-129)
enclosed rat islets in an agarose/poly(styrene sulfonic acid) mixed gel
and implanted the encapsulated cells into a prevascularized subcutaneous
site. Stockley et al. (J. Lab. Clin. Med. 135:484-492) encapsulated
allogenic MDCK cells engineered to secrete human growth hormone in
alginate-poly-L-lysine-alginate and implanted them subcutaneously. The
encapsulated cells of Stockley et al. can be estimated as having a
diameter of approximately 1.5 mm, if it is assumed that the capsule
volume used is 100 .mu.l and this volume does not comprise components
other than the encapsulated cells. Stockley provides no information about
the actual volume of encapsulated cells that are applied. One of skill in
the art would be unable to determine the desired volume of encapsulated
cells needed to administer to a subject.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0048]In one embodiment, the invention is directed to a composition for
cellular therapy, which includes a plurality of encapsulating devices
including a polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating, said PEG having a
molecular weight between about 900 and about 3,000 Daltons; and a
plurality of cells encapsulated in the encapsulating devices, wherein
said composition has a cell density of at least about 100,000 cells/ml.
In a preferred embodiment, the encapsulating devices are microcapsules.
In a more preferred embodiment, the microcapsules are conformally coated
cell aggregates. Preferably, the cell aggregates are pancreatic islets
with a cell density which is at least about 6,000,000 cells/ml.
[0049]In a preferred embodiment, the cell is neurologic, cardiovascular,
hepatic, endocrine, skin, hematopoietic, immune, neurosecretory,
metabolic, systemic, or genetic. Preferably, the cell is autologous,
allogeneic, xenogeneic or genetically-modified. In a most preferred
embodiment, the cell is an insulin producing cell.
[0050]In another aspect, the invention is directed to a therapeutically
effective composition which includes a plurality of encapsulating devices
having an average diameter of less than 400 .mu.m, where the
encapsulating devices include encapsulated cells in an encapsulation
material, and the composition comprises at least about 500,000 cells/ml.
In a more preferred embodiment, the average diameter of the encapsulating
device is less than 300 micron. In yet a more preferred embodiment, the
average diameter of the encapsulating device is less than 200 micron. In
yet a more preferred embodiment, the average diameter of the
encapsulating device is less than 100 micron. And in yet a more preferred
embodiment, the average diameter of the encapsulating device is less than
50 micron.
[0051]In yet another embodiment, the invention is directed to a
therapeutically effective composition including a plurality of
encapsulating devices having an average diameter of less than 400 .mu.m,
where the encapsulating devices include encapsulated cells in an
encapsulation material, and the composition has a ratio of volume of
encapsulating device to volume of cells of less than about 20:1. In a
more preferred embodiment, the composition has a ratio of volume of
encapsulating device to volume of cells of less than about 10:1. In a yet
more preferred embodiment, the composition has a ratio of volume of
encapsulating device to volume of cells of less than about 2:1.
[0052]In another embodiment, the invention is directed to using a
therapeutic composition as described herein in a method which includes
the step of implanting the composition into an implantation site in an
animal in need of treatment for a disease or disorder.
[0053]In a preferred embodiment, the invention is directed to a method of
using the therapeutic composition which includes encapsulating devices
with a polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating having a molecular weight
between 900 and 3,000 Daltons, where the composition has a cell density
of at least about 100,000 cells/ml in a method which includes the step of
implanting the composition into an implantation site in an animal in need
of treatment for a disease or disorder. Preferably, the implanting is an
injection.
[0054]In preferred embodiments, the disease or disorder is neurologic,
cardiovascular, hepatic, endocrine, skin, hematopoietic, immune,
neurosecretory, metabolic, systemic, or genetic. In a most preferred
embodiment, the disease is an endocrine disease which is diabetes.
[0055]In a preferred embodiment, the animal is from an Order of Subclass
Theria which is Artiodactyla, Carnivora, Cetacea, Perissodactyla,
Primate, Proboscides, or Lagomorpha. Preferably, the animal is a Human.
[0056]In a preferred embodiment, the implantation site is subcutaneous,
intramuscular, intraorgan, arterial/venous vascularity of an organ,
cerebro-spinal fluid, or lymphatic fluid. More preferably, the
implantation site is subcutaneous. In a most preferred embodiment, the
method includes implanting encapsulated islets in a subcutaneous
implantation site.
[0057]In a preferred embodiment, the method of implanting the composition
into an implantation site in an animal in need of treatment for a disease
or disorder also includes the step of administering an immunosuppressant
or anti-inflammatory agent. Preferably, the immunosuppressant or
anti-inflammatory agent is administered for less than 6 months. More
preferably, the immunosuppressant or anti-inflammatory agent is
administered for less than 1 month.
[0058]In another preferred embodiment, the invention is directed to using
a therapeutic composition which includes a plurality of encapsulating
devices having an average diameter of less than 400 .mu.m, where the
encapsulating devices include encapsulated cells in an encapsulation
material and the composition has at least about 500,000 cells/ml, in a
method which includes the step of implanting the composition into an
implantation site in an animal in need of treatment for a disease or
disorder. Preferably, the implantation is an injection.
[0059]Preferably, the disease or disorder is neurologic, cardiovascular,
hepatic, endocrine, skin, hematopoietic, immune, neurosecretory,
metabolic, systemic, or genetic. In a most preferred embodiment, the
disease is diabetes.
[0060]Preferably, the animal is from an Order of Subclass Theria which is
Artiodactyla, Camivora, Cetacea, Perissodactyla, Primate, Proboscides, or
Lagomorpha. More preferably, the animal is a Human.
[0061]Preferably, the implantation site is subcutaneous, intramuscular,
intraorgan, arterial/venous vascularity of an organ, cerebro-spinal
fluid, or lymphatic fluid. More preferably, the implantation site is
subcutaneous. In a most preferred embodiment, the method includes
implanting encapsulated islets in a subcutaneous implantation site.
[0062]In a preferred embodiment, the method of implanting the composition
into an implantation site in an animal in need of treatment for a disease
or disorder also includes the step of administering an immunosuppressant
or anti-inflammatory agent. Preferably, the immunosuppressant or
anti-inflammatory agent is administered for less than 6 months. More
preferably, the immunosuppressant or anti-inflammatory agent is
administered for less than 1 month.
[0063]In another embodiment the invention is directed to a method of
encapsulating a biological material which includes the steps of:
adding a solution which includes a first buffer to the biological
material;centrifuging the biological material to form a pelleted
biological material;removing supernatant;adding a solution which includes
a photoinitiator dye conjugated to a cell adsorbing material to the
pelleted biological material;resuspending and incubating the pelleted
biological material with the solution including the photoinitiator dye
conjugated to the cell adsorbing material for an effective amount of
time;centrifuging mixture; removing the solution including the
photoinitiator dye conjugated to the cell adsorbing material;resuspending
the pelleted biological material with a second solution including a
second buffer;centrifuging and removing the second buffer; resuspending
and mixing the biological material with a photoactive polymer solution;
andirradiating the resuspended biological material with a photoactive
polymer solution with an energy source to form an encapsulated biological
material. Preferably, the encapsulated biological material is a PEG
conformal coated islet allograft.
[0064]Preferably, the cell adsorbing material is a polycationic polymer.
In a preferred embodiment, the polycationic polymer is a PAMAM Dendrimer.
In an alternate preferred embodiment, the polycationic polymer is
poly(ethyleneimine).
[0065]Preferably, the biological material is an organ, tissue or cell.
More preferably, the tissue is a cluster of insulin producing cells. More
preferably, the cell is an insulin producing cell.
[0066]In a preferred embodiment, the first and second buffer is 1 to 200
mM. More preferably, the first and second buffer is 10 to 50 mM. More
preferably, the first and second buffer is 20 mM.
[0067]In a preferred embodiment, the photoinitiator is carboxyeosin, ethyl
eosin, eosin Y, fluorescein, 2,2-dimethoxy, 2-phenylacetophenone,
2-methoxy, 2-phenylacetophenono, camphorquinone, rose bengal, methylene
blue, erythrosin, phloxine, thionine, riboflavin or methylene green. More
preferably, the photoinitiator is carboxyeosin.
[0068]In a preferred embodiment, the photoactive polymer solution includes
a polymerizable high density ethylenically unsaturated PEG and a
sulfonated comonomer. In a more preferred embodiment, the polymerizable
high density ethylenically unsaturated PEG is a high density acrylated
PEG. Preferably, the polymerizable high density acrylated PEG has a
molecular weight of 1.1 kD.
[0069]In a preferred embodiment, the sulfonated comonomer is
2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid, vinylsulfonic acid,
4-styrenesulfonic acid, 3-sulfopropyl acrylate, 3-sulfopropyl
methacrylate, or n-vinyl maleimide sulfonate. In a more preferred
embodiment, the sulfonated comonomer is
2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid.
[0070]In a preferred embodiment, the photoactive polymer solution also
includes a cocatalyst which is triethanolamine, triethylamine,
ethanolamine, N-methyl diethanolamine, N,N-dimethyl benzylamine, dibenzyl
amino, N-benzyl ethanolamine, N-isopropyl benzylamine, tetramethyl
ethylenediamine, potassium persulfate, tetramethyl ethylenediamine,
lysine, ornithine, histidine or arginine. More preferably, the cocatalyst
is triethanolamine.
[0071]In a preferred embodiment, the photoactive polymer solution also
includes an accelerator which is N-vinyl pyrrolidinone, 2-vinyl pyridine,
1-vinyl imidazole, 9-vinyl carbazone, 9-vinyl carbozol, acrylic acid,
n-vinylcarpolactam, 2-allyl-2-methyl-1,3-cyclopentane dione, or
2-hydroxyethyl acrylate. More preferably, the accelerator is N-vinyl
pyrrolidinone.
[0072]In a preferred embodiment, the photoactive polymer solution also
includes a viscosity enhancer which is selected from the group including
natural and synthetic polymers. In a more preferred embodiment, the
viscosity enhancer is 3.5 kD PEG-triol or 4 kD PEG-diol.
[0073]In a preferred embodiment, the photoactive polymer solution also
includes a density adjusting agent. More preferably, the density
adjusting agent is Nycodenz or Ficoll.
[0074]In a preferred embodiment, the photoactive polymer solution also
includes a "Good" buffer. In a more preferred embodiment, the "Good"
buffer is HEPES or MOPS. In a most preferred embodiment, the "Good"
buffer is MOPS.
[0075]In a preferred embodiment, the energy source is an Argon laser.
[0076]In a preferred embodiment, the biological material for the
encapsulation method is neurologic, cardiovascular, hepatic, endocrine,
skin, hematopoietic, immune, neurosecretory, metabolic, systemic, or
genetic.
[0077]In a preferred embodiment, the biological material is from an animal
of Subclass Theria of Class Mammalia. In a more preferred embodiment, the
animal is from an Order of Subclass Theria which is Artiodactyla,
Carnivora, Cetacea, Perissodactyla, Primate, Proboscides, or Lagomorpha.
In a most preferred embodiment, the animal is a Human.
[0078]In another embodiment, the invention is directed to a composition
for encapsulating biological material which includes a polymerizable high
density ethylenically unsaturated PEG having a molecular weight between
900 and 3,000 Daltons, and a sulfonated comonomer. In a preferred
embodiment, the polymerizable high density ethylenically unsaturated PEG
is a polymerizable high density acrylated PEG. In a more preferred
embodiment, the polymerizable high density acrylated PEG has a molecular
weight of 1.1 kD.
[0079]In a preferred embodiment, the sulfonated comonomer is
2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid, vinylsulfonic acid,
4-styrenesulfonic acid, 3-sulfopropyl acrylate, 3-sulfopropyl
methacrylate, or n-vinyl maleimide sulfonate. In a most preferred
embodiment, the sulfonated comonomer is
2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid.
[0080]In a preferred embodiment, the composition for encapsulating
biological material further includes a cocatalyst which is
triethanolamine, triethylamine, ethanolamine, N-methyl diethanolamine,
N,N-dimethyl benzylamine, dibenzyl amino, N-benzyl ethanolamine,
N-isopropyl benzylamine, tetramethyl ethylenediamine, potassium
persulfate, tetramethyl ethylenediamine, lysine, ornithine, histidine or
arginine. In a more preferred embodiment, the cocatalyst is
triethanolamine.
[0081]In a preferred embodiment, the composition for encapsulating
biological material further includes an accelerator which is N-vinyl
pyrrolidinone, 2-vinyl pyridine, 1-vinyl imidazole, 9-vinyl carbazone,
9-vinyl carbozol, acrylic acid, n-vinylcarpolactam,
2-allyl-2-methyl-1,3-cyclopentane dione, or 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate. In a
more preferred embodiment, the accelerator is N-vinyl pyrrolidinone.
[0082]In a preferred embodiment, the composition for encapsulating
biological material is biocompatible with a score of at least about a
"2". More preferably, the composition is biocompatible with a score of at
least about a "2" in a mammal, even more preferably in a sub-human
primate and most preferably in a human.
[0083]In a preferred embodiment, the composition for encapsulating
biological material has the quality of permselectivity. More preferably,
the permselectivity can be engineered by manipulating the composition.
[0084]In a preferred embodiment, the composition for encapsulating
biological material has an allowance of cell functionality with a score
of at least about a "2". In a more preferred embodiment, the allowance of
cell functionality with a score of at least about a "2" is in a mammal,
even more preferably in a sub-human primate and most preferably in a
human.
[0085]In a preferred embodiment, the composition for encapsulating
biological material further is biodegradable. More preferably, the
composition is biodegradable in a mammal. Even more preferably, the
composition is biodegradable in a sub-human primate. In a most preferred
embodiment, the composition is biodegradable in a human.
[0086]Further aspects, features and advantages of this invention will
become apparent from the detailed description of the preferred
embodiments which follow.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0087]FIG. 1A is a photograph of isolated Cynomolgus primate islets.
[0088]FIG. 1B is a photograph of PEG conformally coated Cynomolgus primate
islets.
[0089]FIG. 2 shows the synthesis of dendrimer eosin Y conjugate.
[0090]FIG. 3 illustrates a second-generation dendrimer. In the Examples,
fourth generation dendrimers are used, which are more highly branched
than the second-generation dendrimer illustrated.
[0091]FIG. 4 shows the viability of the encapsulated cells as measured by
an FDA/EB test with scores of 1, 2, and 4.
[0092]FIG. 5 shows the ability to alter the permselectivity profile of
alginate/PEG microcapsules by altering the variables involved in the
formation of the PEG coating. Alginate/PEG encapsulated islets were
incubated over time and the proteins released from the cells were
measured to determine the molecular weights. The proteins released from
unencapsulated islets are shown in the left most row, followed by a
column or molecular weight markers. The next columns show proteins
released from alginate/PEG encapsulated islets, which released proteins
of more than 100 kD, 100 kD, less than 60 kD, less than 30 kD, and 0 kD,
respectively.
[0093]FIG. 6 shows the functionality of the encapsulated islets with the
Static Glucose Stimulation test with different representative protein
diffusivity profiles scored with open coatings (>200 kD) as "1",
intermediate (100-200 kD) as "2", and tight (<100 kD) as "3".
[0094]FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of the blood glucose levels
measured in athymic mice in which conformally coated mouse islets were
implanted at the intraperitoneal site.
[0095]FIG. 8 is a graphical representation of the blood glucose levels
measured in athymic mice in which conformally coated mouse islets were
implanted at the subcutaneous site.
[0096]FIG. 9 is a graphical representation of the blood glucose levels
measured in CD1 mice in which conformally coated mouse islet allografts
were implanted at the intraperitoneal site.
[0097]FIG. 10 is a graphical representation of the blood glucose levels
measured in CD1 mice in which conformally coated mouse islet allografts
were implanted at a high dosage in the subcutaneous site.
[0098]FIG. 11 is a graphical representation of the blood glucose levels
measured in two diabetic NOD mice in which PEG conformally coated mouse
islet allografts were implanted.
[0099]FIG. 12 is a graphical representation of the blood glucose levels
measured in diabetic athymic mice in which conformally coated sub-human
primate islets were implanted in the subcutaneous site.
[0100]FIG. 13 is a graphical representation of the blood glucose levels
measured in diabetic athymic mice in which conformally coated human
islets were implanted in the intraperitoneal site.
[0101]FIG. 14 is a graphical representation of the blood glucose levels
measured in diabetic athymic mice in which conformally coated human
islets were implanted in the subcutaneous site.
[0102]FIG. 15 is a graphical representation of the glucose levels and
insulin requirements of partially pancreatectomized Cynomolgus primates
following subcutaneous implantation of PEG conformally coated islet
allografts.
[0103]FIG. 16A is a histological photograph of subcutaneous implants of
encapsulated islet allografts after 100 days, following anti-insulin
staining.
[0104]FIG. 16B is a histological photograph of subcutaneous implants of
encapsulated islet allografts after 100 days, following anti-insulin
staining.
[0105]FIG. 16C is a histological photograph of residual pancreas tissue
from a partially pancreatectomized Cynomolgus primate, following
anti-glucagon staining.
[0106]FIG. 16D is a histological p
hotograph of residual pancreas tissue
from a partially pancreatectomized Cynomolgus primate, following
anti-glucagon staining.
[0107]FIG. 17 is a graphical representation of the Blood Glucose levels
(mg/dL) and Insulin requirements in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic
Cynomolgus primate with a subcutaneous implant of an encapsulated islet
allograft without immunosuppression drugs [.diamond-solid.=Blood Glucose,
=Insulin].
[0108]FIG. 18 is a graphical representation of the Blood Glucose levels
(mg/dL) and Insulin requirements in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic
Cynomolgus primate with a subcutaneous implant of an encapsulated islet
allograft with 30 days of low dose cyclosporine and Metformin
[.diamond-solid.=Blood Glucose, =Insulin].
[0109]FIG. 19 is photographs of the histology of the subcutaneous implant
site in Streptozotocin Induced Diabetic Cynomolgus primate an
encapsulated islet allograft with 30 days of low dose cyclosporine and
Metformin at 285 days
[0110]FIG. 20 is photographs of the histology of the subcutaneous implant
site in Streptozotocin Induced Diabetic Cynomolgus primate with an
encapsulated islet allograft with 30 days of low dose cyclosporine and
Metformin at 248 Days, following anti-insulin staining.
[0111]FIG. 21 is a graphical representation of glycated hemoglobin values
from Cynomolgus primates prior to the induction of diabetes (Baseline,
n=4), and 85 days, n=3; and 114 days, n=1 after transplant.
[0112]FIG. 22 is a graphical representation of the Blood Glucose levels
(mg/dL) and Insulin requirements in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic
baboon with a subcutaneous implant of an encapsulated islet allograft
with 30 days of low dose cyclosporine and Metformin
[.diamond-solid.=Blood Glucose, =Insulin].
[0113]FIG. 23 is a graphical representation of Glycated Hemoglobin A1c in
a streptozotocin-induced diabetic baboon with a subcutaneous implant of
an encapsulated islet allograft with 30 days of low dose cyclosporine and
Metformin.
[0114]FIG. 24 is a graphical representation of the Blood Glucose levels
(mg/dL) and Insulin requirements in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic
baboon with a subcutaneous implant of an encapsulated islet allograft
with 30 days of low dose cyclosporine [.diamond-solid.=Blood Glucose,
=Insulin].
[0115]FIG. 25 is a graphical representation of Glycated Hemoglobin A1c in
a streptozotocin-induced diabetic baboon with a subcutaneous implant of
an encapsulated islet allograft with 30 days of low dose cyclosporine.
[0116]FIG. 26 shows the percent survival of porcine islets encapsulated in
alginate only, as well as different configurations of alginate/PEG
microcapsules, with different permselectivity profiles of the coatings
after they had been implanted for 7 days into normal Cynomolgus primates.
The different permselective values were 0 kD, 30-60 kD, 100 kD, and
greater than 200 kD.
[0117]FIG. 27 presents the results of implanting alginate/PEG
microcapsules encapsulated porcine islets that were implanted into the
peritoneal cavity of a diabetic Cynomolgus primate that also received
anti-CD154 antibody treatment for 30 days.
[0118]FIGS. 28A and B show using PEG conformal coating techniques to coat
a different insulinoma tumor cell line (NIT) that will aggregate and
demonstrating they can be maintained viable in tissue culture for 2
weeks. The coated cells are shown under normal light (FIG. 26A) and under
fluorescent light with FDA/EB staining (FIG. 26B).
[0119]FIGS. 29A and B show conformally coating with PEG another cell line
of monkey fetal lung cells that maintain viability after encapsulation.
FIG. 29A shows the cells under normal light and FIG. 29B shows the cells
under fluorescent light with FDA/EB staining.
[0120]FIG. 30A-D show conformally coating with PEG cell aggregates
produced from primary liver cells (hepatocytes) from both human and mouse
origin and maintaining their viability for two weeks of culture. FIG. 30A
shows human cells after 2 weeks of culture under fluorescent light with
FDA/EB staining. FIG. 30B shows human cells after 2 weeks of culture
under normal light. FIGS. 30C and 30D show mouse cells under fluorescent
light with FDA/EB staining (30C) and normal light (30D).
[0121]FIG. 31A-D show biocompatibility reactions in four different species
(31A-IP in mouse, 31B-PV in pig, 31C-PV in dog and 31D-PV in primate)
that have empty alginate/PEG microcapsules implanted at different sites.
This figure shows the results of injecting the empty alginate
microcapsules coated with 1.1 kD PEG triacrylate when they were injected
into the portal vein to the liver.
[0122]FIG. 32 shows the biocompatibility of encapsulated cells in small
animals with representative histology of score values 1, 2, and 3.
[0123]FIG. 33 shows the biocompatibility of encapsulated cells in large
animals with representative histology of score values 1, 2, and 4.
[0124]FIG. 34 shows the functionality of the encapsulated islets implanted
into a streptozotocin-induced diabetic athymic mouse with representative
score values 1, 2, and 3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0125]One preferred embodiment of the invention is related to compositions
and methods of treating one or more diseases or disorders, such as
neurologic (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's
disease, Multiple Sclerosis, blindness, peripheral nerve injury, spinal
cord injury, pain and addiction), cardiovascular (e.g., coronary artery,
angiogenesis grafts, valves and small vessels), hepatic (e.g., acute
liver failure, chronic liver failure, and genetic diseases effecting the
liver), endocrine (e.g., diabetes, obesity, stress and adrenal,
parathyroid, testicular and ovarian diseases), skin (e.g., chronic ulcers
and diseases of the dermal and hair stem cells), hematopoietic (e.g.,
Factor VIII and erythropoietin), or immune (e.g., immune intolerance or
auto-immune disease), in a subject in need of treatment comprising:
[0126]providing cells or tissue, such as pancreatic islets, hepatic
tissue, endocrine tissues, skin cells, hematopoietic cells, bone marrow
stem cells, renal tissues, muscle cells, neural cells, stem cells,
embryonic stem cells, or organ specific progenitor cells, or genetically
engineered cells to produce specific factors, or cells or tissue derived
from such; [0127]enclosing said cells or tissue within at least one
encapsulating material, such as a hydrogel, made of physically or
chemically crosslinkable polymers, including polysaccharides such as
alginate, agarose, chitosan, poly(amino acids), hyaluronic acid,
chondroitin sulfate, dextran, dextran sulfate, heparin, heparin sulfate,
heparan sulfate, gellan gum, xanthan gum, guar gum, water soluble
cellulose derivatives, carrageenan, or proteins, such as gelatin,
collagen, albumin, or water soluble synthetic polymers with ethylenically
unsaturated groups or their derivatives, such as poly(methyl
methacrylate) (PMMA), or poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA),
poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(vinyl
alcohol) (PVA), poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), poly(thyloxazoline) (PEOX);
or a combination of the above, such as alginate mixed with PEG, or more
hydrophobic or water insoluble polymers, such as poly(glycolic acid)
(PGA), poly(lactic acid) (PLA), or their copolymers (PLA-GA), or
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and [0128]administering a therapeutically
effective amount of said encapsulated cells or tissue to the subject in
need of treatment via subcutaneous injection or implant, or directly into
organs via either direct injection into the substance of the organ or
injection through the vascular system of those organs.
[0129]Organs maybe selected from, but not limited to, liver, spleen,
kidney, lung, heart, brain, spinal cord, muscle, and bone marrow. The
subject in need of treatment may be selected from, but not limited to,
mammals, such as humans, sub-human primates, cows, sheep, horses, swine,
dogs, cats, and rabbits as well as other animals such as chickens,
turkeys, or fish.
[0130]In a further embodiment of the invention, the encapsulated cell or
tissue may be administered to a subject in need of treatment in
combination with an immunosuppressant and/or an anti-inflammatory agent.
The immunosuppressant may be selected from, but not limited to
cyclosporine, sirolimus, rapamycin, or tacrolimus. The anti-inflammatory
agent may be selected from, but not limited to, aspirin, ibuprofen,
steroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Preferably, the
immunosuppressant and/or an anti-inflammatory agent is administered for
six months following implantation or injection of the encapsulated cells
or tissue. More preferably the immunosuppressant and/or an
anti-inflammatory agent is administered for one month following
implantation or injection of the encapsulated cells or tissue
[0131]In a preferred embodiment, encapsulated islets are implanted or
injected subcutaneously or into liver or spleen. In one aspect of the
invention, conformally coated islets are administered subcutaneously.
[0132]Preferably, the encapsulated material comprises acrylated PEG and at
least one comonomer, such as N-vinyl pyrrolidinone, 2-vinyl pyridine,
1-vinyl imidazole, 9-vinyl carbazone, acrylic acid, and
2-allyl-2-methyl-1,3-cyclopentane dione,
2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid, vinylsulfonic acid,
3-sulfopropyl acrylate, 3-sulfopropyl methacrylate, and
2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid, plus N-vinyl pyrrolidinone.
Most preferably, the encapsulating material comprises acrylated PEG with
2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid (AMPS) and/or N-vinyl
pyrrolidinone (NVP) as a comonomer, to form encapsulated cells or tissue
that are conformally coated by a process such as an interfacial
photopolymerization process.
[0133]In some embodiments of the invention, the concentration of
ingredients and composition of encapsulating solution may vary. Preferred
concentration ranges are as follows.
[0134]For Buffer solution a preferred concentration is 1 to 200 mM, yet
more preferred is 5 to 100 mM, and yet more preferred is 10 to 50 mM.
[0135]For CaCl.sub.2 a preferred concentration is 0.1 to 40 mM, yet more
preferred is 0.5 to 20 mM, and yet more preferred is 1 to 5 mM.
[0136]For Manitol a preferred concentration is 10 mM to 6M, yet more
preferred is 50 mM to 3M, yet more preferred is 100 mM to 1M, and yet
more preferred is 200 to 300 mM.
[0137]For pH of CaCl.sub.2/Manitol solution a preferred value is 6 to 8,
yet more preferred is 6.4 to 7.6, and yet more preferred is 6.6 to 7.4.
[0138]For DEN-EY a preferred concentration is 0.005 to 8 mg/ml, yet more
preferred is 0.01 to 4 mg/ml, and yet more preferred is 0.05 to 2 mg/ml.
[0139]For DEN-EY conjunction level a preferred level is 0.15 to 68, yet
more preferred is 1 to 34, and yet more preferred is 1.5 to 15.
[0140]For pH of macromer solution a preferred value is 6.5 to 9.5, yet
more preferred is 7 to 9, and yet more preferred is 7.5 to 8.5.
[0141]For PEG TA a preferred concentration is 0.1 to 100%, yet more
preferred is 0.2 to 50%, and yet more preferred is 1 to 25%.
[0142]For PEG TA a preferred density is 0.05 to 20 K, yet more preferred
is 0.1 to 10 K, yet more preferred is 0.5 to 5 K, and yet more preferred
is 0.8 to 2.5 K.
[0143]For PEG-triol a preferred concentration is 0.1 to 100%, yet more
preferred is 1 to 75%, and yet more preferred is 2 to 50%.
[0144]For PEG-triol a preferred density is 0.15 to 70 K, yet more
preferred is 0.3 to 35 K, yet more preferred is 1.5 to 15 K, and yet more
preferred is 2.3 to 7.5 K.
[0145]For PEG-diol a preferred concentration is 0.1 to 100% yet more
preferred is 1 to 75%, and yet more preferred is 2 to 50%.
[0146]For PEG-diol a preferred density is 0.2 to 80 K, yet more preferred
is 0.5 to 40 K, yet more preferred is 1 to 20 K, and yet more preferred
is 2 to 10 K.
[0147]For TEoA a preferred concentration is 5 mM to 2 M, yet more
preferred is 10 mM to 1M, yet more preferred is 50 to 500 mM, and yet
more preferred is 75 to 125 mM.
[0148]For AMPS a preferred concentration is 2 to 640 mg/ml, yet more
preferred is 5 to 300 mg/ml, and yet more preferred is 10 to 150 mg/ml.
[0149]For NVP a preferred concentration is 0.01 to 40 .mu.l/ml, yet more
preferred is 0.1 to 20 .mu.l/ml, and yet more preferred is 0.5 to 10
.mu.l/ml.
[0150]For Nycodenz a preferred concentration is 0.1 to 100%, yet more
preferred is 1 to 50%, and yet more preferred is 5 to 25%.
[0151]For the Laser a preferred strength is 10 mW/cm.sup.2 to 4
W/cm.sup.2, yet more preferred is 25 mW/cm.sup.2 to 2 W/cm.sup.2, and yet
more preferred is 75 mW/cm.sup.2 to 1 W/cm.sup.2.
[0152]For the light source a preferred time is 3 seconds to 20 minutes,
yet more preferred is 6 seconds to 10 minutes, and yet more preferred is
12 seconds to 3 minutes.
[0153]In an embodiment, the encapsulating material comprises a hydrogel
that forms a sphere around at least one cell or tissue. In a further
embodiment, the encapsulating material is an alginate microcapsule, which
is conformally coated with another encapsulating material comprising
acrylated PEG. In one embodiment, a cell or tissue may be encapsulated in
a biocompatible alginate microcapsule, wherein the alginate is made
biocompatible by coating the alginate in a biocompatible material, such
as PEG or hyaluronic acid, purifying the alginate and/or removing the
poly-lysine and replacing it with PEG.
[0154]Most preferably the disease to be treated is diabetes, the cells or
tissue comprise insulin producing cells or tissue, or cells or tissue
derived from pancreatic cells or tissue, or cells derived from progenitor
or stem cells that are converted into insulin producing cells, and the
encapsulated cells or tissue are administered to the subject in need of
treatment via subcutaneous or liver injection or implant.
[0155]According to an embodiment of the invention the microcapsules of
encapsulated insulin-producing cells or tissue may have an average
diameter of 10 .mu.m to 1000 .mu.m, preferably 100 .mu.m to 600 .mu.m,
more preferably 150 .mu.m to 500 .mu.m, and most preferably 200 .mu.m to
300 .mu.m. In another embodiment, the invention relates to an
insulin-producing cell or tissue encapsulated in microcapsules having a
concentration of at least 2,000 IEQ (islet equivalents)/ml, preferably at
least 9,000 IEQ/ml, and more preferably at least 200,000 IEQ/ml. In
another embodiment of the invention, the volume of insulin-producing
cells or tissue encapsulated in microcapsules administered per kilogram
body mass of a subject may be 0.001 ml to 10 ml, preferably 0.01 ml to 7
ml, more preferably 0.05 ml to 2 ml. In a further embodiment of the
invention, the ratio of microcapsule volume to insulin producing cell or
tissue volume is less than 300 to 1, preferably less than 100 to 1, more
preferably less than 50 to 1, and most preferably less than 20 to 1.
[0156]According to an embodiment of the invention, conformally coated
insulin-producing cells or tissue may have an average membrane thickness
of 1 to 400 .mu.m, preferably 10 to 200 .mu.m, and more preferably 10 to
100 .mu.m. In a further embodiment the invention relates to a conformally
coated insulin-producing cell or tissue having a concentration of at
least 10,000 IEQ/ml, preferably at least 70,000 IEQ/ml, more preferably
at least 125,000 IEQ/ml, and most preferably at least 200,000 IEQ/ml.
According to an embodiment of the invention the volume of the conformally
coated insulin producing cell or tissue administered per kilogram body
mass of a subject may be 0.01 to 7 ml, preferably 0.01 to 2 ml, and more
preferably 0.04 to 0.5 ml. In another embodiment of the invention the
ratio of conformal coating volume to insulin-producing cell or tissue
volume is less than 13 to 1, preferably less than 8 to 1, more preferably
less than 5 to 1, and most preferably less than 2.5 to 1.
[0157]According to an embodiment of the invention the microcapsules of
encapsulated cells or tissue may have an average diameter of 10 .mu.m to
1000 .mu.m, preferably 100 .mu.m to 600 .mu.m, more preferably 150 .mu.m
to 500 .mu.m, and most preferably 200 .mu.m to 300 .mu.m. In a further
embodiment of the invention, the ratio of microcapsule volume to insulin
producing cell or tissue volume is less than 300 to 1, preferably less
than 100 to 1, more preferably less than 50 to 1, and most preferably
less than 20 to 1.
[0158]According to an embodiment of the invention, conformally coated
cells or tissue may have an average membrane thickness of 1 to 400 .mu.m,
preferably 10 to 200 .mu.m, and more preferably 10 to 100 .mu.m. In
another embodiment of the invention the ratio of conformal coating volume
to cell or tissue volume is less than 13 to 1, preferably less than 8 to
1, more preferably less than 5 to 1, and most preferably less than 2.5 to
1.
[0159]An embodiment of the invention relates encapsulated cells or tissue
where the cell density is at least about 100,000 cells/ml. Preferably,
the encapsulated cell is conformally coated. More preferably, the cell is
conformally coated with an encapsulating material comprising acrylated
PEG. In a further embodiment, the invention is related to a method of
treating diabetes in a subject comprising administering encapsulated
islets where the cell density is at least about 6,000,000 cells/ml,
preferably where the curative dose is less than about 2 ml per kilogram
body mass of the subject.
[0160]Another embodiment of the invention is related to agricultural
animals or pets, such as cows, sheep, horses, swine, chickens, turkeys,
rabbits, fish, or dogs and cats; to change the growth rate, or alter the
condition of the animal (e.g., increase meat or dairy production), or
protect them from or treat them for different diseases. According to this
embodiment, a method of providing cells or tissue to an agriculturally
relevant animal comprises: [0161]a) providing a cell or tissue;
[0162]b) enclosing said cell or tissue within at least one encapsulating
material, such as a hydrogel, made of physically or chemically
crosslinkable polymers, including polysaccharides such as alginate,
agarose, chitosan, poly(amino acids), hyaluronic acid, chondroitin
sulfate, dextran, dextran sulfate, heparin, heparin sulfate, heparan
sulfate, gellan gum, xanthan gum, guar gum, water soluble cellulose
derivatives, carrageenan, or proteins, such as gelatin, collagen,
albumin, or water soluble synthetic polymers or their derivatives, such
as methyl methacrylate (MMA), or 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA),
polyethylene glycol (PEG), poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(vinyl
alcohol) (PVA), poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), poly(thyloxazoline) (PEOX);
or a combination of the above, such as alginate mixed with PEG, or more
hydrophobic or water insoluble polymers, such as poly(glycolic acid)
(PGA), poly(lactic acid) (PLA), or their copolymers (PLA-GA), or
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE); and [0163]c) administering said
encapsulated cell or tissue to the subject in need of treatment via
subcutaneous injection or implant, or directly into organs via either
direct injection into the substance of the organ or injection through the
vascular system of those organs.
DEFINITIONS
[0164]As used in the present application, the following definitions apply:
[0165]Allografts--grafts between two or more individuals with different
HLA or BLC immune antigen makeup at one or more loci (usually with
reference to histocompatibility loci).
[0166]Athymic mice--has an incomplete immune system.
[0167]Autograft--graft taken from one part of the body and returned to the
same individual.
[0168]ApoE2--a protein that shuttles lipids through the body.
[0169]Biocompatibility--the ability to exist alongside living things
without harming them.
[0170]Cell aggregate--a collection of cells into a mass, unit, or an
organelle that are held together by connecting substances, matrices, or
structures.
[0171]Clinically relevant and Clinical relevance--encapsulating cell or
tissue device must be of such a total volume or size to be implantable in
the least invasive or most physiologic site for function with the
risk/benefit ratio below that of what the host with the disease or
disorder faces with the current disease or disorder.
[0172]CMRL (Connaught Medical Research Labs) media--well suited for growth
of cloning monkey kidney cell cultures and for growth of other mammalian
cell lines when enriched with horse or calf serum. Particularly rich in
nucleosides and some vitamins.
[0173]Commercially relevant and Commercial relevance--encapsulating cell
device must be able to meet requirements such as biocompatibility,
permselectivity, encapsulated cell viability and function, size, cell
retrieval or replacement, and therapeutic effect, in order for it to be
produced on an ongoing basis for treatment of the disease process for
which it has been designed within the acceptance as a product that is
successful in the market place.
[0174]Conformal Coating--a relatively thin polymer coating that conforms
to the shape and size of the coated particle.
[0175]C-peptide--the polypeptide chain in proinsulin linking the alpha and
beta chains of active insulin. Insulin is initially synthesized in the
form of proinsulin. There is one molecule of C-peptide for every molecule
of insulin in the blood. C-peptide levels in the blood can be measured
and used as an indicator of insulin production when exogenous insulin
(from injection) is present and mixed with endogenous insulin (produced
by the body). The C-peptide test can also be used to help assess if high
blood glucose is due to reduced insulin production or to reduced glucose
intake by the cells. Type 1 diabetics have little or no C-peptide in the
blood, while Type 2 diabetics can have reduced or normal C-peptide
levels. The concentration of C-peptide in non-diabetics is 0.5-3.0 ng/ml.
[0176]Cynomolgus primate--crab-eating macaque, Macaca fascicularis, is
native to Southeast Asia.
[0177]Cytodex beads--microcarrier beads of Dextran with positive-charged
trimethyl-2-hydroxyaminopropyl groups on the surface.
[0178]Dendrimer--an artificially manufactured or synthesized polymer
molecule built up from branched units called monomers. Defined by
regular, highly branched monomers leading to a monodisperse, tree-like or
generational structure. Synthesized through stepwise reactions, building
the dendrimer up one monomer layer, or "generation," at a time. Each
dendrimer consists of a multifunctional core molecule with a dendritic
wedge attached to each functional site. The core molecule is referred to
as "generation 0." Each successive repeat unit along all branches forms
the next generation, "generation 1," "generation 2," and so on until the
terminating generation.
[0179]Diabetes--a variable disorder of carbohydrate metabolism caused by a
combination of hereditary and environmental factors and usually
characterized by inadequate secretion or utilization of insulin, by
excessive urine production, by excessive amounts of sugar in the blood
and urine, and by thirst, hunger, and loss of weight DTZ
(diphenylthiocarbazone)--a dye which binds to the zinc within insulin
granules
[0180]Eosin Y--C.sub.20H.sub.6O.sub.5Br.sub.4Na.sub.2 [MW 691.914] a red
dye soluble in water (40%) and strongly fluorescent. Structure is similar
to Eosin Y ws, Ethyl eosin, Eosin B, Phloxine, Erythrosin B, Fluorescein,
Rose bengal, and Mercurochrome.
[0181]Evan's blue staining--An azo dye used in blood volume and cardiac
output measurement by the dye dilution method. It is very soluble,
strongly bound to plasma albumin, and disappears very slowly.
[0182]Ficoll.TM.--high molecular weight sucrose-polymers used to separate
cells.
[0183]FDA/EB (fluorescein diacetate/ethidium bromide) staining--When
stained, the live cells show up as green colored cells, whereas the cells
with cytotoxicity and those with compromised cell membrane functions show
red coloration of the nuclei.
[0184]"Good" buffer--group of buffers developed by N. E. Good and S. Izawa
(Hydrogen ion buffers, Methods Enzymol (1972) 24, 53-68).
[0185]HbA1c test [equivalent to Hemoglobin A1C; Glycated hemoglobin]--Test
used to assess long-term glucose control in diabetes. Alternative names
for this test include glycosylated hemoglobin or Hgb, hemoglobin glycated
or glycosylated protein, and fructosamine. HbA1c refers to total
glycosylated hemoglobin present in erythrocytes. Due to the fact that
glucose stays attached for the life of the cell (about 3 months), the
test shows what the person's average blood glucose level over a period of
4-8 weeks. This is a more appropriate test for monitoring a patient who
is capable of maintaining long-term, stable control. Test results are
expressed as a percentage, with 4 to 6% considered normal. The HbA1c "big
picture" complements the day to day "snapshots" obtained from the
self-monitoring of blood glucose (mg/dL), and the two tests can be
related with the conversion equation: HbA1c=(Plasma Blood
Glucose+77.3)/35.6. Glycated protein in serum/plasma assesses glycemic
control over a period of 1-2 weeks. A below normal test value is helpful
in establishing the patient's hypoglycemic state in those conditions.
[0186]HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)--used in light curing polymer
system and high performance coatings for lasting high gloss against
scratching, solvents and weathering. It is used in crosslinkable paint
resins and emulsions, binders for textiles and paper. It is used as a
adhesion promoter for metal coatings.
[0187]IBMX--A potent cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase inhibitor; due to
this action, the compound increases cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP in tissue
and thereby activates multiple cell processes.
[0188]IP (Intraperitoneal)--Within the peritoneal cavity, the area that
contains the abdominal organs.
[0189]IEQ (Islet equivalent)--definition based on both insulin content and
morphology/size. An insulin granule binding dye, such as
diphenylthiocarbazone (DTZ) is commonly used to identify beta cells.
Since beta cells are only one of several other cell types needed to
constitute an islet, a morphological assessment, based upon a mean
diameter of 150 .mu.m, is used in addition to staining by DTZ, to define
an islet equivalent.
[0190]M199--originally formulated for nutritional studies of chick embryo
fibroblasts. Contains Earle's salts, L-glutamine, and 2,200 mg/L sodium
bicarbonate.
[0191]Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY).--A form of diabetes
characterized by early age of onset (usually less than 25 years of age),
autosomal dominant inheritance (that is, it is inherited by 50% of a
parent's children) with diabetes in at least 2 generations of the
patient's family. MODY diabetes that can often be controlled with meal
planning or diabetes pills, at least in the early stages of diabetes. It
differs from type 2 diabetes in that patients have a defect in insulin
secretion or glucose metabolism, and are not resistant to insulin. MODY
accounts for about 2% of diabetes worldwide and 6 genes have so far been
found that cause MODY, although not all MODY patients have one of these
genes. Because MODY runs in families, it is useful for studying diabetes
genes and has given researchers useful information about how insulin is
produced and regulated by the pancreas.
[0192]MDCK (Madin-Darby canine kidney) cells--Epithelial-like cell line
established from normal kidney of dog, susceptible for many viral
species.
[0193]Microcapsules--small particles that contain an active agent or core
material surrounded by a coating or shell.
[0194]MMA (methyl methacrylate)--acrylic monomer, colorless liquid with a
slight irritating odor.
[0195]NIT (NOD insulinoma tumor) cell line--cell line developed from
pancreatic beta cells of a transgenic NOD mouse.
[0196]NVP (N-vinyl pyrrolidinone)--monomer produced from the reaction of
acetylene with 2-Pyrrolidone. It serves as a reactive diluent in a
variety of applications.
[0197]Nycodenz.TM. (Nycomed Pharma, Oslo, Norway)--Diatrizoic acid, a
non-ionic X-ray contrast medium, used to make density gradients. A
favorable property of Nycodenz solutions is that the osmolality and
density can easily be varied over a broad range. An effective non-ionic,
water-soluble contrast agent which is used in myelography, arthrography,
nephroangiography, arteriography, and other radiographic procedures. Its
low systemic toxicity is the combined result of low chemotoxicity and low
osmolality.
[0198]Oral Glucose Tolerance Testing (OGTT)--A screening test for diabetes
that involves testing an individual's plasma glucose level after he
drinks a solution containing 75 grams of glucose. Currently, a person is
diagnosed with diabetes if his plasma glucose level is 200 mg/dL or
higher two hours after ingesting the glucose. Those with a plasma glucose
level less than 200 mg/dL but greater than or equal to 140 mg/dL are
diagnosed with a condition called impaired glucose tolerance. People with
this condition have trouble metabolizing glucose, but the problem is not
considered severe enough to classify them as diabetic. Individuals with
impaired glucose tolerance are at a slightly elevated risk for developing
high blood pressure, blood lipid disorders, and Type 2 diabetes.
[0199]Permselectivity--preferential permeation of certain ionic species
through a membrane.
[0200]PoERV (porcine endogenous retrovirus)--An endogenous retrovirus
exists as part of the DNA in all mammals and is passed down to offspring
over successive generations.
[0201]postprandial--occurring after a meal
[0202]Proinsulin--a protein made by the pancreas beta cells which is
cleaved into 3 units--C-peptide, alpha chain and beta chain. The alpha
and beta chains are the functional units of insulin.
[0203]SGS (Static glucose stimulation)--static glucose challenge,
evaluating the ability of the islets to secrete insulin in response to
different glucose concentrations.
[0204]Streptozotocin--an antibiotic, C.sub.8H.sub.5N.sub.3O.sub.7,
produced by an actinomycete (Streptomyces achromogenes) and active
against tumors but damaging to insulin-producing cells and now also
regarded as a carcinogen.
[0205]Theophylline--stimulates the release of catecholamines and reduces
cerebral blood flow, thereby facilitating stronger metabolic responses to
and a prompter perception of decreasing glucose levels.
[0206]Therapeutically effective amount--amount of a therapeutic agent
produced by cells or tissue which, when administered to a subject in need
thereof, is sufficient to effect treatment for a disease or disorder, or
to effectively change the growth rate or alter the condition of an
animal. The amount of encapsulated cells or tissue corresponding to a
"therapeutically effective amount" will vary depending upon factors such
as the disease condition and the severity thereof, the identity of the
subject in need thereof, and the type of therapeutic agent delivered by
the cells or tissue for the disease or disorder, but can nevertheless be
readily determined by one of skill in the art.
[0207]Treating and Treatment--to alleviate a disease or disorder in a
subject, such as a human, by the dosage of encapsulated cells or tissue
to the subject in need of treatment via subcutaneous injection or
implant, or directly into organs via either direct injection into the
substance of the organ or injection through the vascular system of those
organs and includes: [0208](a) prophylactic treatment in a subject,
particularly when the subject is found to be predisposed to having the
disease or disorder but not yet diagnosed as having it; [0209](b)
inhibiting the disease or disorder; and/or [0210](c) eliminating, in
whole or in part, the disease or disorder; and/or [0211](d) improving the
subject's health and well-being.
[0212]Type 1 diabetes (also insulin-dependent diabetes, insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus)--a form of diabetes mellitus that usually develops
during childhood or adolescence and is characterized by a severe
deficiency in insulin secretion resulting from atrophy of the islets of
Langerhans, and causing hyperglycemia and a marked tendency towards
ketoacidosis.
[0213]Type 2 diabetes (also non-insulin-dependent diabetes,
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus)--a common form of diabetes
mellitus that develops especially in adults and most often in obese
individuals and that is characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from
impaired insulin utilization coupled with the body's inability to
compensate with increased insulin production.
[0214]Xenografts--A surgical graft of tissue from one species onto or into
individuals of unlike species, genus or family. Also known as a
heteroplastic graft.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0215]The present invention relates to methods of treating a disease or
disorder by implanting encapsulated biological material into patients in
need of treatment. Diabetes is of particular interest because a method is
needed to prevent complications related to the lack of good glycemic
control in insulin-requiring diabetics. Specifically, PEG conformally
coated islet allografts in diabetic primates are shown herein to be
successfully implanted in the subcutaneous site by injection and achieve
relatively normal blood glucose values out to 220 days post-implant. The
current complications of clinical islet transplantation and the
significant risks and discomfort of continuous immunosuppression may be
eliminated by applying the methods described herein to patients with
insulin-requiring diabetes. In addition, encapsulated islet implants are
expected to protect these insulin-requiring diabetic patients and prevent
them from developing the complications from diabetes related to
inadequate glycemic control in spite of exogenous insulin therapy.
[0216]Methods according to the present invention may provide therapeutic
effects for a variety of diseases and disorders, in addition to diabetes,
in which critical cell-based products lost by disease or disorder may be
replaced through implantation of cells or tissue into the body. A
preferred embodiment of the invention is the use of human
insulin-producing cells from the pancreas, or cells derived from human
insulin-producing cells from the pancreas, that are encapsulated as cell
clusters for implantation into the subcutaneous site of insulin-requiring
patients. Treatment of disease via encapsulated biological materials
requires that the encapsulated material be coated with a biocompatible
coating, such that the immune system of the patient being treated does
not destroy the material before a therapeutic effect can be realized.
[0217]Permselectivity of the coating is a factor in the effectiveness of
such treatments, because this regulates the availability of nutrients to
the cells or tissue, and plays a role in preventing rejection of the
biological materials. Permselectivity of the coating affects the
nutrition available to the encapsulated cell or tissue, as well as the
function of the cell or tissue. Permselectivity can be controlled by
varying the components of the biocompatible coating or by varying how the
components are used to make the cell coating. Treatment via injection of
encapsulated biological materials according to the present invention
provides a stable and safe method of treatment. Size of the implant and
the site of implantation, as well as replenishment and/or replacement of
the encapsulated materials is also a consideration of the methods
described herein. These methods provide a treatment that has a wide range
of applications in the treatment of disease at various sites of
implantation, while avoiding complications associated with other
treatment methods.
[0218]The conformal coatings described herein can be produced with
different pore sizes that can be produced to limit access to the cells by
proteins of widely varying molecular weights, including the exclusion of
antibodies. This control allows for survival and maintained function of
the encapsulated materials, while excluding components of the host immune
system. The appropriate pore size of the conformal coating may be
determined by routine experimentation for each cell or tissue type and
the disease or disorder to be treated. The conformal coatings described
herein provide a small encapsulated cell product with a minimal volume of
the coating material, thus allowing the coated materials to be implanted
into various sites of the body, including direct injection into the
liver, spleen, muscle, or other organs, injection via vascular access to
any organ, injection into the abdominal cavity, and implantation into a
subcutaneous site.
[0219]An important factor for successful encapsulated cell therapy is that
the permselective coating used to encapsulate the cells be inert in terms
of causing inflammatory reactions in the host. Most previous
encapsulating materials were not completely biocompatible. With some
devices, not making a large scar is sufficient. However, when using the
coating for permselective protection between the encapsulated cells and
the host immune system, there cannot be any non-specific inflammatory
reaction to the host's complement system or to macrophages. If this
occurs, then the inflammatory and/or immune reaction is sufficient to
release cytokines that readily cross the membrane and can cause the loss
of the encapsulated cells. Most encapsulation technologies for islets,
which have had difficulties in working appropriately, had non-specific
inflammatory reactions due to biocompatibility reactions to the coating
materials.
[0220]Problems such as chronic inflammation are significantly reduced due
to the lack of host reaction to the biocompatible conformal coatings used
to encapsulate cells and tissues used in the methods described herein.
The components used to produce the conformal coating described herein
have been shown to be completely biocompatible when injected into
animals, such as, rodents, dogs, pigs, and primates.
[0221]We discovered that biocompatibility of hydrogels synthesized from
highly acrylated PEG was exceptionally good, and much better than that
shown with moderately acrylated PEG hydrogels. The highly acrylated PEGs
were either obtained commercially, or home-made by acrylating
corresponding PEGs. Hydrogels with highly acrylated PEGs were conformally
coated on the surface of alginate microbeads using an interfacial
photopolymerization technology. This discovery also can be extended to
other biomedical, biotechnological and pharmaceutical areas where
biocompatibility of the devices or formulations is of concern.
[0222]Some PEG conformal coatings described herein are biodegradable over
time, thus allowing the body to safely break down the materials over the
course of time and avoiding the need to retrieve the encapsulated
materials, which is required by other treatments. Replacement of cells
can be done whenever the previous dose of encapsulated materials has
begun to lose function. Encapsulated islets may be expected to last two
to five years or longer. In the case of subcutaneous injections,
replacement of the encapsulated materials may simply be done via another
percutaneous injection of new materials into the patient at a different
site prior to loss of the previous dose. In the case of encapsulated
islets, this replacement can be done prior to loss of function in the
first dose of islets, without fear of low glucose values, because the
encapsulated islets autoregulate themselves to prevent hypoglycemia.
Different implant timing may have to be determined for treating diseases
and disorders using cells or tissues that do not autoregulate the release
of their product.
[0223]A factor in producing encapsulated cell products is the cell source.
Cells may be primary cells, expanded cells, differentiated cells, cell
lines, or genetically engineered cells. In the case of human islets,
primary islets may be isolated from cadaver-donated pancreases; however,
the number of human pancreata available for isolating islets is very
limited. Alternative cell sources may be used to provide cells for
encapsulation and injection.
[0224]One alternative source of cells, particularly insulin-producing
cells, is embryonic stem cells. Human embryonic stem cells come from the
very early fetus. They are only available when grown from frozen,
fertilized human eggs collected from couples that have successfully
undergone in vitro fertilization and no longer want to keep these
fertilized eggs for future children. Embryonic stem cells have the
ability to grow indefinitely, potentially avoiding the need for the mass
of tissues required for transplantation. There are a series of steps
required to differentiate these embryonic stem cells into insulin
producing cells with clinical relevancy. A few studies have shown both
mouse and human embryonic stem cells can produce insulin when treated
under tissue culture with a variety of factors. Insulin-producing cells
developed from embryonic stem cells may be an acceptable cell source for
transplantation, and encapsulated cell or tissue implantation.
Cell Sourcing
[0225]Additional cell sources, organ specific progenitor cells from the
brain, liver, and the intestine, have been shown to produce insulin. In
order to produce insulin, each of these organ specific progenitor cells
have undergone tissue culture treatments with a variety of growth and
differentiation factors. Additional organ specific progenitor cells from
many other organs such as bone marrow, kidney, spleen, muscle, bone,
cartilage, blood vessels, and other endocrine organs may also be useful
in providing insulin producing cells.
[0226]Pancreatic progenitor cells may be used according to the methods of
the invention. The pancreas seems to have organ specific stem cells that
can produce the three pancreatic cell types in the body under normal and
repair conditions. It is believed the islet cells bud off from the duct
cells to form the discrete islets. The insulin producing beta cells, as
well as the other hormone producing cells, may form directly from
differentiating duct cells or may form from pancreatic progenitor cells
located amongst the duct cells. These pancreatic progenitor cells may be
used to provide insulin-producing cells for encapsulation and
implantation according to the methods described herein.
[0227]There has been a great deal of research on genetically inserting
genes into non-insulin producing cells to make them produce insulin.
Genetically engineered cells capable of insulin production may also be
used for encapsulation and implantation according to the methods
described herein.
[0228]The use of pig cells has commonly been considered as a source of
islet cells for implantation in patients with diabetes. Over 90 million
pigs are raised per year for meat production in the USA alone. Therefore,
the number of islets to treat the millions of patients with
insulin-requiring diabetes are readily available through large scale
processing of adult pig pancreata into purified pig islets for
encapsulation. One consideration limiting this choice is the recognition
that pigs harbor an endogenous retrovirus (PoERV). There have been
efforts to eliminate PoERV from strains of pigs. Virus-free pig xenograft
islets may be readily encapsulated and available as a preferred cell
source for the treatment of human diabetes.
[0229]Alternative xenograft sources for human implantation may be obtained
from primary cells of species other than pigs. These other species could
be agriculturally relevant animals such as beef, sheep, and even fish.
With the ability to expand and differentiate insulin producing cells from
pancreatic sources or other stem or progenitor cells, one can envision
using insulin-producing cells from many other xenogeneic sources such as
primates, rodents, rabbits, fish, marsupials, ungulates and others.
Disease Treatment
[0230]Diabetes and other diseases in which a local or circulating factor
is deficient or absent can be treated according to the methods described
herein. Encapsulated cell therapy may be applied in the treatment of
neurologic, cardiovascular, hepatic, endocrine, skin, hematopoietic, and
immune disorders and diseases. Neurologic diseases and injuries, such as
Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, multiple
sclerosis, blindness, spinal cord injury, peripheral nerve injury, pain
and addiction may be treated by encapsulating cells that are capable of
releasing local and/or circulating factors needed to treat these
problems. Cardiovascular tissue, such as the coronary artery, as well as
angiogenic growth factor releasing cells used for restoring vascular
supply to ischemic cardiac muscle, valves and small vessels may be
treated. Acute liver failure, chronic live failure, and genetic diseases
affecting the liver may be treated. Endocrine disorders and diseases,
such as diabetes, obesity, stress and adrenal, parathyroid, testicular
and ovarian diseases may be treated. Skin problems, such as chronic
ulcers, and diseases of the dermal and hair stem cells can be treated.
Hematopoietic factors such as Factor VIII and erythropoietin may be
regulated or controlled by administering cells capable of stimulating a
hematopoietic response in a patient. Encapsulated biological materials
may also be useful in the production of bone marrow stem cells.
Encapsulated materials, such as, antigens from primary cells or
genetically engineered cells, may be useful in producing immune tolerance
or preventing autoimmune disease. In addition, these materials may be
used in vaccines.
Conformal Coating Components
[0231]Components of the coatings may be altered depending on the specific
cell type and permselectivity desired. Various polymerizable monomers or
macromers, photoinitiating dyes, cocatalysts, and accelerants may be used
to produce conformally coated cells and tissues.
Monomers or Macromers
[0232]Monomers or macromers are used as the building blocks to polymerize
biocompatible coatings for use in methods disclosed herein. The monomers
are small polymers, which are susceptible to polymerization into the
larger polymer membranes of this invention. Polymerization is enabled
because the macromers contain carbon-carbon double bond moieties, such
as, acrylate, methacrylate, ethacrylate, 2-phenyl acrylate, 2-chloro
acrylate, 2-bromo acrylate, itaconate, acrylamide, methacrylamide, and
styrene groups. The monomers or macromers are non-toxic to biological
material before and after polymerization.
[0233]Examples of monomers are methyl methacrylate (MMA) and
2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). Examples of macromers are
ethylenically unsaturated derivatives of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO),
poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA),
poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), poly(thyloxazoline) (PEOX), poly(amino
acids), polysaccharides such as alginate, hyaluronic acid, chondroitin
sulfate, dextran, dextran sulfate, heparin, heparin sulfate, heparan
sulfate, chitosan, gellan gum, xanthan gum, guar gum, water soluble
cellulose derivatives and carrageenan, and proteins such as gelatin,
collagen and albumin. These macromers can vary in molecular weight and
number of branches, depending on the use. For purposes of encapsulating
cells and tissue in a manner that has minimum tissue response, the
preferred starting macromer is PEG--triacrylate with MW 1.1K. The
molecular weight designation is an average molecular weight of the mixed
length polymer.
P
hotoinitiating Dyes
[0234]The photoinitiating dyes capture light energy and initiate
polymerization of the macromers and monomers. Any dye can be used which
absorbs light having frequency between 320 nm and 900 nm, can form free
radicals, is at least partially water soluble, and is non-toxic to the
biological material at the concentration used for polymerization.
Examples of suitable dyes are ethyl eosin, eosin Y, fluorescein,
2,2-dimethoxy, 2-phenylacetophenone, 2-methoxy, 2-phenylacetophenono,
camphorquinone, rose bengal, methylene blue, erythrosin, phloxine,
thionine, riboflavin and methylene green. To enhance the dye-cell surface
binding, the dyes used here are conjugated to polymers that have strong
interactions with cell surfaces, such as polycationic polymers, polymers
with multiple phenylboronic acid groups attached. Examples of
polycationic polymers include PAMAM dendrimer, linear, branched or
dendritic poly (ethyleneimine) (PEI), polyvinylamine, polyallylamine,
polylysine, chitosan, and polyhistidine. The preferred initiator dye is
the carboxyeosin conjugated to PAMAM Dendrimer Generation 4.
Cocatalyst or Radical Generator
[0235]The cocatalyst is a nitrogen-based compound capable of stimulating
the free radical reaction. Primary, secondary, tertiary or quaternary
amines are suitable cocatalysts, as are any nitrogen atom containing
electron-rich molecules. Cocatalysts include, but are not limited to,
triethanolamine, triethylamine, ethanolamine, N-methyl diethanolamine,
N,N-dimethyl benzylamine, dibenzyl amino, N-benzyl ethanolamine,
N-isopropyl benzylamine, tetramethyl ethylenediamine, potassium
persulfate, tetramethyl ethylenediamine, lysine, ornithine, histidine and
arginine. A preferred cocatalyst is triethanolamine.
Accelerator or Co-Monomer
[0236]The accelerator, which is optionally included in the polymerization
mixture, is a small molecule containing an allyl, vinyl, or acrylate
group, and is capable of speeding up the free radical reaction.
Incorporating a sulfonic acid group to the accelerant also can improve
the biocompatibility of the final product. Accelerators include, but are
not limited to, N-vinyl pyrrolidinone, 2-vinyl pyridine, 1-vinyl
imidazole, 9-vinyl carbazone, 9-vinyl carbozol, acrylic acid,
2-allyl-2-methyl-1,3-cyclopentane dione, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate,
2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid, vinylsulfonic acid,
4-styrenesulfonic acid, 3-sulfopropyl acrylate, 3-sulfopropyl
methacrylate, n-vinylcarpolactam, and n-vinyl maleimide sulfonate (from
SurModics), with 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid plus
N-vinyl pyrrolidinone being the preferred combination of accelerators.
Viscosity Enhancer
[0237]To generate conformal coating without long tails on cell aggregates,
the viscosity of the macromer solution may be optimized. This may be
accomplished by viscosity enhancers which are added into the macromer
solution. Preferred viscosity enhancers are PEG--triol with MW 3.5 kD and
4 kD PEG-diol.
Density Adjusting Agent
[0238]To generate conformal coating without long tails on cell aggregates,
the density of the macromer solution may be optimized. This may be
accomplished by adding density adjusting agents into the macromer
solution. Preferred density adjusting agents are Nycodenz.TM. and
Ficoll.TM..
Radiation Wavelength
[0239]The radiation used to initiate the polymerization is either longwave
UV or visible light, with a wavelength in the range of 320-900 nm.
Preferably, light in the range of 350-700 nm, and even more preferred in
the range of 365-550 nm, is used. This light can be provided by any
appropriate source able to generate the desired radiation, such as a
mercury lamp, longwave UV lamp, He--Ne laser, or an argon ion laser or an
appropriately filtered xenon light source.
[0240]The following examples are provided merely for illustrative purposes
of the present invention and are not to be read as limiting the scope of
protection of the present invention.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
Isolating Islet Cells in Mice
[0241]Donor mice [C57BL/6] with an age range of 18 weeks old and average
size of 33 grams were obtained from supplier. Pancreas was exposed with
euthanasia laparotomy. The pancreata were distended with Sigma
collagenase, Type V. The pancreata were removed and kept in cold
collagenase during transport to the isolation laboratory. The isolation
process combined 30 pancreata for the digestion process. The digestate
was washed with 10% fetal bovine serum in RPMI and centrifuged. The COBE
was prepared for purification and a continuous gradient marker was used
to make the gradient densities. The gradient was loaded into the COBE and
the pancreata digestate was loaded on top to perform the purification
process. The purified islets were collected and washed in RPMI media. The
islets were cultured in T75 flasks in modified ICM media supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum until ready for encapsulation.
Isolating Islet Cells in Primates
[0242]Juvenile Cynomolgus primates (Macaca fascicularis) with a range of
size of 2.5-4.5 kg and adult Baboons (Papio anubis) with a range of size
of 10-30 kg were used as donors of pancreata (Table 1). The pancreata
were removed at necropsy, ductly cannulated and distended with cold UW
solution, placed into UW solution with perfluorocarbon bubbled with
oxygen, and transported via courier to facility for islet isolation. A
modified primate islet isolation procedure (O'Neil, J, Cell
Transplantation 10: 539, 2001) using human Liberase was used to free the
islets with minimal mechanical disruption and COBE continuous density
gradients. The purified islets were cultured in T75 flasks in modified
CMRL media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37.degree. C. for
3 to 7 days prior to encapsulation to permit their recovery from the
processing damages. FIG. 1A demonstrates a typical yield of purified
Cynomolgus primate islets from a donor pancreas:
TABLE-US-00001
TABLE 1
Comparison of Cynomolgus and Baboon Islet Isolation Procedures
Cynomolgus Baboon
Methods Methods
juvenile donor 10-20 year old donors
4 g pancreas 25 g pancreas
multiple pancreas processing single pancreas processing
collagenase conc. 0.5 mg/ml collagenase conc. = 0.20 mg/ml
digest time = 40 min. digest time = <20 min.
Results Results
30,000-50,00 IEQ per pancreas 150,000-200,00 IEQ per pancreas
islet index = 0.80 Islet index = 1.00
# of donors per transplant = 5-10 # donors per transplant = 2
Example 2
Preparation of Conformal Coating Materials
[0243]Depending on the type of cell being encapsulated, the cells were
coated directly by a conformal coating or enclosed in a matrix, such as
alginate, and then coated with a permselective PEG capsule. FIG. 2
illustrates the synthesis of dendrimer eosin Y conjugate, Dendrimer-EY, a
preferred embodiment of this coating, and described as follows.
[0244]The dendrimer used for encapsulation was PAMAM Dendrimer generation
4, which was purchased from Dendritech (FIG. 3). 5(6)-Carboxyeosin was
made by bromination of 5(6)-Carboxyfluorescein. The hydroxyl group and
1-carboxyl group were then protected by forming an acetate. The protected
5(6)-Carboxyeosin was activated by
N,N,N'N'-Tetramethyl-O--(N-Succinnimidyl)uranium tetrafluoroborate
(TSTU). Without further purification, the activated 5(6)-Carboxyeosin
diacetate was mixed with PAMAM Dendrimer to form Dendrimer-EY conjugate.
The protection group was then removed by reacting with aqueous ammonia.
The final product was purified by ultra-purification using a membrane
with 5K MWCO, and 50 mM (NH.sub.4).sub.2CO.sub.3 as the washing buffer.
Varying the stoichiometric ratio of EY and Dendrimer, Dendrimer-EY with
different conjugation levels can be obtained. The optimum conjugation
level used for islets encapsulation was 3.4 EY/Dendrimer.
[0245]The conjugation level of Dendrimer-EY was determined by UV-Vis. The
maximum absorption at 523 nm was measured of the Dendrimer-EY solution in
50 mM (NH.sub.4).sub.2CO.sub.3. The conjugation level was calculated
using the extinction coefficient of 5(6)-Carboxyeosin,
.SIGMA.=8.4.times.104.
[0246]Triethanol amine (TEoA), 2-Acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic
acid (AMPS) and N-Vinylpyrrolidinone (NVP) were purchased from Aldrich
without further purification.
[0247]Trimethylolpropane ethoxylate triacrylate (PEG 1.1K-TA) was
purchased from Sartomer and used without purification. The acrylation
level varied from higher 60s to higher 80s. Molecular weights were
between 1100 to 1300.
[0248]Ethoxylated trimethylolpropane (PEG 3.5K-Triol) was custom
synthesized by Carbotech. Poly (ethylene glycol) 3400 (PEG 4K-Diol) was
purchased from Union Carbide. PEG 3.5K-triol and PEG 4K-Diol were
dissolved in water for injection and lyophilized before use.
Example 3
Encapsulation of Islets
Encapsulating Mouse Islets
[0249]A preferred method of coating mouse islets is described as follows.
Fifteen milliliters of 20 mM low ionic HEPES buffer (containing 1.8 mM
CaCl2 and 260 mM Manitol, pH=7.0) was added to a 15 ml conical tube,
containing 10 .mu.l of islets. The supernatant was removed after
centrifugation. 15 ml of Den-EY solution (0.1 mg/ml to 0.4 mg/ml in low
ionic HEPES buffer) was added into the pellet and the tube was kept
horizontal for 10-30 minutes at room temperature. The stained islets were
washed twice with low ionic 20 mM HEPES buffer, which was sparged with
Argon for at least 30 minutes. The stained islet pellet was mixed with 10
ml of photoactive polymer solution, which was also sparged with Argon and
pre-equilibrated in a 8.degree. C. waterbath for at least 30 minutes. The
photoactive polymer solution was made in 20 mM HEPES buffer, pH=8.0,
which contained up to 20% PEG, 100 mM TEoA, 32 mg/ml AMPS and 2 .mu.l/ml
NVP, and 13% Nycodenz. The suspension was transferred into a petri dish
and the solution was irradiated with an Argon laser at an irradiance
density of 200 mW/cm.sup.2 for 1 minute. The polymerization was quenched
by adding 1-2 ml of M199 into the petri dish. The contents in the petri
dish was transferred into a 50 ml conical containing 40 ml of M199. After
washing with M199, the encapsulated islets were put back into culture.
Encapsulating Primate Islets
[0250]Islets were loaded with the photoinitiator (Eosin Y) and placed into
the PEG encapsulation solution containing the acrylated PEG monomer,
TEoA, and NVP. When the argon laser illuminated the islets, the bound
Eosin Y was activated to a higher energy state that was captured by the
TEoA to produce free radicals. These TEoA radicals diffused off the
surface of the islets, broke carbon--carbon double bonds (C.dbd.C)
between acrylates that covalently bonded the acrylated PEG's together,
forming the conformal PEG coatings directly around each islet. The
encapsulated islets were then cultured at 37.degree. C. in CMRL
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated Cynomolgus primate allograft serum
for 4 to 21 days prior to implantation.
[0251]Cynomolgus primate isolated islets were readily encapsulated in a
conformal manner surrounding all of the islet surface regardless of shape
or size. FIG. 1A shows unencapsulated isolated islets from a Cynomolgus
primate. FIG. 1B shows PEG encapsulated isolated islets from a Cynomolgus
primate under phase microscopy showing the uniform, conformal coating of
the islets.
Example 4
In vitro Characterization of the Encapsulated Islets
[0252]Coating efficiency of encapsulated islets was assessed by Evan's
blue staining. Fifteen milliliters of 0.008% Evan's Blue in M199 was
added to 0.5 ml of encapsulated islets suspension. After incubating for
three minutes, the supernatant was removed by centrifugation and
aspiration. The islets were washed three times with M199. The islet
suspension (in M199) was placed on a microscope. PEG hydrogel stained
light blue.
[0253]Viability of encapsulated islets was assessed by fluorescein
diacetate (FDA)/ethidium bromide (EB) staining. 2.5 ml of EB stock
solution (1 mg in 50 ml PBS) and 12.5 .mu.l of FDA stock solution (5
mg/ml in acetone) was added to 0.5 ml of encapsulated islets suspension
in serum free media. Ten minutes after adding the stain, the sample was
placed on the fluorescence microscope using the field block for
fluorescein. Dead cells stained red and viable cells stained green. The
percentage of islets cells that were viable was assessed. Example shown
in FIG. 4.
[0254]Permeability of the encapsulated islets was assessed by SDS-PAGE. A
small aliquot of encapsulated islets was submitted to SDS-PAGE analysis
before they were put into media containing serum. One or two average-size
islets were picked up under microscopy and incubated separately in a
96-well culture plate with 0.1% SDS solution for about 14-16 hours at
room temperature. Normally a minimum of eight sets of islets were picked
and incubated. In addition, a pool of 10 islets was picked and incubated
at the same time. After incubation, the supernatants were taken out and
incubated at 100.degree. C. for 5 minutes. After cooling down, the nine
supernatants were loaded onto each polyacrylamide gel. The last well was
loaded with the standard molecular weight marker mixture. After
electrophoresis of the material in the wells, the gel was fixed and
stained with silver stain for a controlled period. The molecular weight
cutoff of the PEG gel on each set of the encapsulated islets was
determined by comparing with the standard molecular weight marker.
Example shown in FIG. 5
[0255]Function of encapsulated islets was assessed by static glucose
stimulation (SGS) or perfusion study. For static glucose stimulation,
four aliquots of 20 islets were hand picked and placed into four wells of
a 12-well plate. The islets were washed twice and incubated with a G50
basal solution (glucose concentration-50 mg/DL) for 45 min, followed by a
G300 stimulation solution (glucose concentration-300 mg/DL) for 45 min,
followed by an IBMX solution for 45 minutes, followed by the G50 basal
solution for 45 minutes. A 0.5 ml sample of supernatant was collected at
the end of each incubation. The islets were washed twice between
incubations. After collecting the last basal samples, all the islets were
incubated with acid alcohol overnight for insulin extraction. 0.5 ml
samples of the supernatant were collected after insulin extraction. For
all the samples collected, insulin concentrations were measured using an
appropriate insulin RIA or ELISA kit. For some encapsulated islets, the
insulin release was delayed and only a minimum amount of insulin was
detected after 45 minutes incubation with the G300 stimulation media.
Those islets were incubated in the G300 stimulation media for an extended
period of time, and the samples of the supernatant were collected at
various time points, such as 1 hour, 2 hours and 3 hours to follow the
insulin release kinetics. Example shown in FIG. 6.
[0256]For perifusion study, the islet preparation was placed on a filter
in a perifusion system first exposed to a G50 basal solution for 40 min,
followed by a stimulation with the G300 stimulation solution for 40
minutes, followed by an additional stimulation with G300 plus
Theophylline or IBMX. The perifusion of the islets was concluded with a
return to a basal level of glucose. Samples were collected at 5 minutes
intervals, and assessed by an appropriate RIA or ELISA kit to determine
the insulin concentration.
Example 5
Implantation of Conformally Coated Islets into Mice
[0257]Mouse islets were conformally coated in a similar method as Example
2. The encapsulated islets were implanted into intraperitoneal (IP) and
subcutaneous (SQ) sites of athymic mice, and blood glucose levels were
monitored prior to and following implantation.
[0258]FIG. 7 illustrates the blood glucose levels in two athymic mice in
which conformally coated mouse islets [2805 IEQ] were implanted at the
intraperitoneal site. The implanted islets were able to regulate the
blood glucose levels to near normal range for up to 130 days
post-implantation.
[0259]FIG. 8 illustrates the blood glucose levels in two athymic mice in
which conformally coated mouse islets [3300 IEQ] were implanted at the
subcutaneous site. Both mice showed reduced blood glucose levels after
implantation with only a few spikes between 20 and 30 days post
implantation. One of the mice had a steady near normal blood glucose
level until day 145 post-implantation. The other mouse showed occasional
spikes in blood glucose but the implanted islets were able to reduce the
level to near normal after 30 days.
[0260]The conformal coatings permitted long-term survival of the islets in
the IP site and the coated islets also functioned well in the SQ
implants, depending on the islet dosage. The SQ site exhibited excellent
biocompatibility in athymic mice.
[0261]Conformally coated mouse islet allografts were also implanted into
CD1 mice in both the IP and SQ sites, respectively. FIG. 9 illustrates
the blood glucose levels measured in two CD1 mice in which conformally
coated mouse islet allografts [3300 IEQ and 2160 IEQ] were implanted at
the intraperitoneal site. The implantation of 3300 IEQ was able to
quickly return blood glucose levels to normal and maintain this level up
to 90 days post-implantation. The 2160 IEQ implant reduced the blood
glucose levels from 600 mg/dL to 100-300 mg/dL with slow oscillations in
the daily levels.
[0262]FIG. 10 illustrates the blood glucose levels measured in two CD1
mice in which conformally coated mouse islet allografts were implanted at
a high dosage [3623 IEQ and 2000 IEQ] in the subcutaneous site. The 3623
IEQ implant was able to reduce the blood glucose level to near normal and
maintain this level until day 35 post-implantation. The 2000 IEQ implant
reduced the blood glucose levels to normal and maintained this level
until day 30.
[0263]The conformal coatings protected against allograft immune rejection
in both the IP and SQ sites. The uniformly minimal functional
encapsulated islet dose was found to be 1500 IEQ/mouse in the SQ site.
Unencapsulated mouse islet allografts did not survive in the SQ site. PEG
conformally coated mouse islets allografts were also implanted in NOD
mice (600-700 islets per recipient). The conformal coatings not only
protected against allograft immune rejection, but also protected against
autoimmune recurrence of diabetes in this mouse model of Type I diabetes
in humans. FIG. 11 illustrates the blood glucose levels measured in
diabetic NOD mice in which PEG conformally coated mouse islet allografts
were implanted.
[0264]FIG. 12 illustrates the blood glucose levels measured in athymic
mice in which conformally coated sub-human primate islets [5,000 IEQ]
were implanted in the subcutaneous site. The implant quickly reduced the
blood glucose levels from above 600 mg/dL to 35 mg/dL from day 15 until
day 105 post-implantation.
[0265]FIG. 13 illustrates the blood glucose levels measured in two athymic
mice in which conformally coated human islets [11,573 IEQ and 14, 688
IEQ] were implanted in the IP site. The implants reduced the blood
glucose levels to normal and maintained this level up to 110 days
post-implantation.
[0266]FIG. 14 illustrates the blood glucose levels measured in an athymic
mouse in which conformally coated human islets [10,000 IEQ] were
implanted in the SQ site. The implants have reduced the blood glucose
levels to normal and have maintained this level up to 40 days
post-implantation
[0267]These results have shown that conformally coating both sub-human
primate and human islets permitted survival of the islets in both the IP
and SQ sites of athymic mice.
Example 6
Subcutaneous Implant of Encapsulated Islets in Cynomolgus Primates
Recipient Primate Subjects
[0268]A normal Cynomolgus primate was partially pancreatectomized (95%)
prior to a subcutaneous implant of conformally coated islet allografts.
FIG. 15 illustrates the glucose levels and insulin requirements of the
partially pancreatectomized Cynomolgus primate for 10 days before and 105
days after subcutaneous implantation of PEG conformally coated islet
allografts. The animal began with normal blood glucose levels without the
need for any supplemental insulin. A few days after partial
pancreatectomization the blood glucose levels increased to 300 mg/dL with
an accompanying need for insulin to reduce the level to normal. Upon
subcutaneous implantation of PEG conformally coated islet allografts the
blood glucose levels decreased but not to the previously normal levels.
Insulin was needed for several days after implantation but the amount was
slowly reduced until 55 days post transplant when insulin s
hots were no
longer required to maintain the blood glucose levels. From day 55 to day
105 post transplant, the blood glucose levels in the primate were
slightly elevated over the baseline levels before the partial
pancreatectomization; however, the levels were maintained by the
implanted PEG coated islets without the need for insulin shots.
[0269]At necropsy, well-granulated encapsulated islets were found in the
subcutaneous site with minimal host reaction. Glucose and insulin
staining was demonstrated in the capsules containing islet tissue (FIG.
16A-D). Many encapsulated islets were devoid of islet tissue, which
presumably were destroyed following implantation. Inflammatory cytokines
from the surgical insertion and from an allograft response involving
those capsules violated by the host. While one of the limitations of the
partially pancreatectomized model of diabetes in young primates was the
potential for the residual pancreas to recover from diabetes by expansion
of the remaining islet tissue, there was little evidence of islet
expansion in the form of enlarged islets in the residual pancreas.
[0270]Since partial pancreatectomy results in a variable diabetes model in
primates with the potential of spontaneous recovery from the islets
remaining in the head of the pancreas, streptozotocin was used to induce
diabetes. The next four consecutive recipients all had diabetes induced
by intravenous injection of streptozotocin.
[0271]Induction of diabetes in the other implanted animals was
accomplished by the intravenous injection of Streptozotocin dissolved in
saline at the dose of 150 mg/kg. The normal Cynomolgus primates were
monitored with glucose tolerance testing for 1 week prior to the
induction of diabetes by a streptozotocin injection. After 3-4 weeks of
diabetes, glucose tolerance testing was performed again prior to islet
implantation. Two diabetic Cynomolgus primates were kept diabetic as
controls without receiving encapsulated islets. There was a rapid loss of
blood glucose homeostasis with levels reaching 500 mg/dL. Large doses of
insulin were required to reduce the blood glucose levels to near normal.
The blood glucose levels had large oscillations with an accompanying need
for insulin shots. There also were several episodes of significant low
levels of blood glucose or hypoglycemia. The animals were unable to
maintain normal, constant levels of blood glucose, even with daily
insulin shots. Injections of streptozotocin caused rapid destruction
.beta.-islets with the animals unable to maintain blood glucose
homeostasis.
Islet Implants
[0272]After a Ketamine, zylozine, and atropine injection, the abdomen of
the Cynomolgus primate was shaved, prepped, and draped for the sterile
injections. A 14-gauge intracatheter was inserted under the skin on
either side of the midline. The needle was removed, replaced by a
trochar, and 4-5 pockets were made laterally from the insertion sight in
radial directions by forcing the trochar into the subcutaneous tissue.
After the pockets were made, the trochar was removed, leaving the
catheter in place. The encapsulated islets were pooled from the flasks
and loaded into a 10 ml syringe that was attached to the inserted
subcutaneous catheter. Different passages were made into the created
subcutaneous pockets while injecting the encapsulated islets into these
subcutaneous sites by moving the catheter into each space. A 4-0 prolene
purse string suture sealed the injection site in the skin. This
encapsulated islet injection procedure was repeated in each recipient, as
necessary, along both sides of the midline until all the encapsulated
islets were completely injected. The recipient was allowed to recover and
returned to its cage for additional glucose monitoring.
Drug Treatment
[0273]No drugs were given to the partially pancreatectomized recipient and
one of the Streptozotocin recipients. Low dose cyclosporine was given to
three of the four Streptozotocin recipients of encapsulated islet
allografts from day -7 prior before implant to day +30 after implant. The
low dose Neoral cyclosporine (10-30 mg/kg/day) was given orally twice a
day by squirting it into the Cynomolgus primate cheek pouch at feeding
time. The 12-hour trough level was kept within a range of 25-100 ng/ml by
ELISA. This dose was determined to be unable to prevent renal allograft
rejection in Cynomolgus primate.
Metabolic Testing
[0274]Daily AM fasting blood glucose and PM 2 hour post-prandial blood
glucose measurements were made using Accucheck monitors and averaged for
the daily value. OGTT was performed by using 7 kcal/kg Boost & 2 gm/kg
glucose in gavage under Ketamine, zylazine, and atropine anesthesia.
Samples were taken for glucose and C-peptide measurements at 0, 30, 60,
90, & 120 minutes.
Necropsa
[0275]The partially pancreatectomized animal was necropsied at 100 days
post-implant. All major tissues were removed and processed for
histological evaluation.
Assays
[0276]Accucheck glucose monitors were used to collect the daily blood
glucose levels. C-peptide was measured with an ELISA assay from Linco and
a human C-peptide antibody confirmed to cross-react with Cynomolgus
primate C-peptide at the 100% level. Glycated hemoglobin determinations
were made by a radioimmunoassay test. Routine blood chemistries were run
on all diabetics and recipients at regular intervals. Viability testing
of encapsulated islets was performed by Fluorescein diacetate/Ethidium
bromide (FDA/EB) assay.
Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Recipient without any Drug Treatment
[0277]The Streptozotocin-induced diabetic Cynomolgus primate recipients
were severely diabetic (glucose: 150-350 mg/dL) and required 16-18 U
insulin per day prior to implantation, which was more than the partially
pancreatectomized recipient. There were typical wide excursions of the
glucose levels as well as hypoglycemic episodes. The C-peptide values
observed in these diabetic controls from glucose tolerance testing were
very low and without response to glucose challenge. Encapsulated islets
were implanted into the subcutaneous site without immunosuppressive
drugs. The results for this Cynomolgus primate were shown in FIG. 17.
[0278]After subcutaneous implant, a 50% reduction in the insulin
requirement was observed for 80-90 days, followed by some reduction of
islet function. Although insulin independence was not achieved, C-peptide
results from the OGTT were similar to pre-diabetic or normal values after
implant, demonstrating functional implanted islets. This result would
represent that seen in diabetic patients that have partial graft function
following islet transplantation under full immunosuppression in clinical
trials underway today.
[0279]Histologic evaluation of the recipient's subcutaneous implants
showed encapsulated islets with insulin and glucagon staining scattered
in the implant sites among many empty capsules. This raises the question
as to why so many encapsulated islets were lost. One possibility was that
the encapsulated islets that were breached by the host macrophages result
in a focal allograft immune reaction around this violated capsule that
also results in destroying the surrounding islets that were not breached
by the macrophages. Instead, these encapsulated islets may be killed by
the local cytokines coming from the immune cells reacting to the broken
capsules. Another possibility was that there was not enough angiogenesis
in this site so that many islets die soon after implant of hypoxia. A
third explanation for many empty capsules was that the poor quality of
the encapsulated Cynomolgus primate islets coming from the juvenile
donors does not permit them to survive and function well in vivo. To
answer some of these questions, different approaches were explored to
improve these partial function results in this study.
Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Recipients with 30 days of Low Dose
Cyclosporine
[0280]The subsequent Streptozotocin-induced diabetic animals were as
severely diabetic as the previous one. All animals received approximately
45,000 IEQ PEG conformally coated islets implanted into the subcutaneous
site of the anterior abdominal wall. A low dose of cyclosporine was added
from day -7 to day +30 in an attempt to reduce the focal allograft immune
reaction that occurs around broken capsules and to determine if islet
function could be improved. Low dose of cyclosporine was defined as a
dose that results in 24 hour trough blood levels of 50-90 ng/ml of
cyclosporine, which was below the immunosuppressive therapeutic dose of
100-300 ng/ml. After day +30, the low dose of cyclosporine was
discontinued as the only drug given to the recipients (except for
post-operative pain medication, insulin as required, and the Ketamine
cocktail for testing procedures).
[0281]The first recipient had a 50% reduction in glucose levels and
insulin dosage during the first 10 days following subcutaneous implant.
These values continued to decrease until insulin was discontinued at 30
days post-implant (the time of stopping cyclosporine) and remained with
blood glucose levels between 75-150 mg/dL out to 220 days. The blood
glucose results and insulin requirements are shown in FIG. 18.
[0282]At 120 days post-implant, some hyperglycemic values were obtained
and Metformin dosing was started, returning the hyperglycemic values back
to the normal range. Metformin is a Type II diabetes drug that reduces
hepatic and muscular gluconeogenesis that is routinely used in patients
with Type II diabetes. It is also used to improve glucose levels in Type
I patients that are immunosuppressed for islet transplantation. This
observation indicated that the implanted islets were at a reduced mass
and were slowly losing function.
[0283]A second encapsulated islet allograft was implanted subcutaneously
accompanied by another 30 days of low dose cyclosporine. The animal
returned to normoglycemia for another 120 days. By 235 days from the
first implant, higher glucose levels were observed, indicating,
diminished glycemic control, and low dose insulin was restarted. Over the
next two months, the islets slowly lost function requiring full insulin
treatment. Assuming the surviving islet dosage was on the margin to
maintain this diabetic recipient long term, a second encapsulated implant
was performed subcutaneously at 80 days post-implant under low dose
cyclosporine levels for a second 30 day treatment. The blood glucose
stayed at 150-225 mg/dL following the second implant and low dose
cyclosporine treatment. Evaluation of the results of the OGTT
demonstrates significant C-peptide release from the implanted islets even
after the return to insulin therapy.
[0284]The animal was sacrificed at 285 days for histology evaluation as
shown in FIG. 19. The histology samples from this animal exhibited many
surviving islets in the subcutaneous site. There were some islets with
focal lymphocytes around them without evidence of broken capsules. Their
significance was unclear, but may suggest that these capsules were
beginning to biodegrade at 9 months after implant. There also was clear
evidence of many capillaries adjacent to the capsules. The encapsulated
islets line up within the trochar-induced pockets in the subcutaneous
site. There was observed, but there were no foreign body giant cells or
other evidence of ongoing inflammation for most encapsulated islets.
[0285]The third diabetic Cynomolgus primate was implanted with
encapsulated islets and received 30 days of low dose cyclosporine.
[0286]It was difficult maintaining the cyclosporine 24-hour trough levels
at the low dose target in this animal, and evidence of cyclosporine
toxicity to the islets was observed after the first implant. Once the
cyclosporine was stopped on day +30, the insulin requirement rapidly fell
to a low level with normal blood glucose values observed for a short
time. At 120 days, the insulin requirement began to increase, so a second
implant with low dose cyclosporine was performed, stabilizing the insulin
requirement at 50% of the pre-implant requirement. Insulin requirement
began to increase approximately 230 days indicating diminishing glycemic
control. C-peptide responses demonstrated ongoing encapsulated islet
graft function, despite the return to insulin therapy. This animal was
sacrificed at 248 days and the histologic findings are shown in FIG. 20.
[0287]At low power, the encapsulated islets were lined up in the
micro-pocket made by the trochar during insertion. There were many
surviving encapsulated islet allografts in these sites, as well as a
number of empty capsules. Occasional encapsulated islets were also
observed that had been recently surrounded by the host with a ring of
lymphocytes and macrophages. Examination at higher power, showed many of
these islets had excellent histology, including strong insulin staining
of the islets. Some capsules appeared empty and had lost the islet cells
at some time. Examination of the implant site at high power, showed there
was ubiquitous evidence of capillaries at high density throughout the
implant site surrounding the encapsulated islets. This capillary bed
surrounded the outside of the PEG coatings in most directions at a
markedly increased density compared with capillaries in the surrounding
non-implanted subcutaneous site. The new capillaries associated with the
encapsulated islets may have been stimulated to develop in response to
signals coming from the encapsulated islet graft, and explained the
ability of these encapsulated islets to continue long term islet
function. The empty capsules were probably due to the islets being unable
to support themselves prior to angiogenesis over the first few weeks
following islet implantation. Also, there might have been cytokine damage
in close proximity to these capsules from early immune reactions to
capsules violated by the host.
[0288]The fourth Streptozotocin diabetic Cynomolgus primate also was
implanted into the subcutaneous site using low dose cyclosporine. Two
separate subcutaneous implants, 2 weeks apart, were initially performed
to achieve insulin independence in this animal, which was achieved at 30
days. At approximately 115 days post-implant, insulin treatment was
restarted due to rising glucose levels. Another subcutaneous implant was
performed under low dose cyclosporine. After a temporary improvement,
hyperglycemia returned along with increasing insulin requirement.
C-peptide responses were observed during OGTT performed throughout the
time of insulin independence, as well as, after return to partial islet
function. The histology from this recipient was similar to the others
with many capsules containing healthy islets and others without cells.
Some capsules were ringed with lymphocytes.
Results of Oral Glucose Tolerance Testing
[0289]The C-peptide values in 4 Cynomolgus primates were measured at
different times: a] prior to the induction of diabetes (Baseline), b]
after induction of diabetes (Pre-Transplant), c] 30 days after
encapsulated islet implant, d] 60 days after encapsulated islet implant,
and e] 90 days after encapsulated islet implant. Prior to the gavage of
the Boost and glucose, the pre-dose C-peptide was .about.2.5 ng/ml, which
were elevated compared with historic values of pre-dose samples done in
recipients without Ketamine. Following the gavage, the mean values
remained essentially the same, although some animals began to elevate
their peripheral blood C-peptide response. By 120 minutes after gavage,
the mean value significantly increased to nearly 4 ng/ml. At least 3
weeks following Streptozotocin, none of the four diabetic Cynomolgus
primates increased their C-peptide in response to the OGTT challenge. The
very narrow ranges of the standard deviations from the glucose challenges
during the diabetic state confirm this lack of C-peptide response. The
absolute values of the C-peptides during the diabetic state were at
variance to some reports in the literature. This may be due to the six
available C-peptide kits from different manufacturers vary in the cross
reactivity of the human C-peptide to the Cynomolgus primate C-peptide
from 30% cross reactivity to 100% cross reactivity. The antibody used by
Linco has been shown to be 100% cross-reactive. Following subcutaneous
islet implants in all four diabetic recipients, in spite of different
insulin requirements at 30 days, the C-peptide levels increased
significantly at each time point compared to the diabetic state. This was
also true for 60 days post-implant. There was no significant difference
in these four recipients comparing their normal baseline C-peptide
responses to those following subcutaneous islet implants at 30 and 60
days post-implant.
Glycated Hemoglobin Results
[0290]FIG. 21 illustrates the glycated hemoglobin values from Cynomolgus
primates prior to the induction of diabetes (Baseline, n=4; after 85
days, n=3; and after 114 days, n=1). Since glycated hemoglobin levels
measure a protein that lasts 90 days, little information was gained in
testing prior to that date. Baseline values of 3.0 HbgA1c were obtained
in these four primates prior to the induction of diabetes. At 85 days
post-implant, repeated glycated hemoglobin values were slightly elevated
to 3.8, but the increase was not significant. A reading in a single
animal at 114 days was slightly higher at 4.1. While little was known of
Cynomolgus primate glycated hemoglobin values, the results at 85 days not
only include the 30 days of diabetic values with significantly elevated
glucose values but also 85 days post-implant without significant
elevation over the baseline values. This was in spite of evidence of some
hyperglycemia noted in the daily glucose values.
Summary of Subcutaneous Implant of Encapsulated Islets in Cynomolgus
Primates
[0291]Implanting PEG conformally coated islet allografts into the
subcutaneous site of four Streptozotocin-diabetic Cynomolgus primates
demonstrated that nearly normal blood glucose levels were obtained with
the elimination of insulin treatment for up to 120 days without the need
for long-term immunosuppression. The use of low-dose cyclosporine for the
first 30 days after implant increased the percent of surviving
encapsulated islets in the subcutaneous site in all three of the
recipients receiving it compared to the one that did not receive it which
had partial function of the implanted islets. Metabolic testing by an
OGTT challenge of the recipients after subcutaneous implants of
encapsulated islet allografts demonstrated that there were significantly
increased C-peptide responses at all times following gavage compared to
the diabetic values and C-peptide responses that followed subcutaneous
implants of allografted islets were not statistically different from
their normal responses prior to the induction of diabetes. The results of
the Cynomolgus primate implant studies are summarized in Table 2.
TABLE-US-00002
TABLE 2
Cynomolgus Primate Implants
Positive Factors
Biocompatibility is excellent
Islets survive encapsulation & function
Subcutaneous site works
Cyclosporine helps with early loss of islets
Coatings provide immunoprotection long term
Re-transplant can be done without difficulty
Residual C-Peptide confirms partial function after loss of
insulin independence
Encapsulated islets recovered at nearly 300 days
Evidence of vascularization of the encapsulated islets in
subcutaneous site suggest mechanisms of long term function
Example 7
Subcutaneous Implant of Encapsulated Islets in Baboons
Surgical Procedures:
[0292]Baboon pancreata were removed from the donors, cannulated, and
flushed with pancreas preservation solution and then shipped to Novocell
for islet preparation and encapsulation. They were subsequently cultured,
shipped to the holding facility for implantation, and then prepared for
surgical implant by suspension in culture medium, using similar protocols
as are proposed for human islet preparation. The baboons were
anesthetized, and a 16 gauge catheter was placed into the subcutaneous
site of the anterior abdomen. A trochar was inserted through the
implanted catheter to create a "fan shaped" area of 5 subcutaneous tracts
(.about.3'' each in length) under the skin of the abdomen. The test
material (.about.17% of the total islet implant in .about.2.5 mL volume)
was gently suspended, pulled into a 5 cc syringe, and deposited along the
subcutaneous tracts (or "pockets") with an even pattern of deposition
throughout the pockets. The needle insertion site was closed with a 4-0
purse string suture to prevent any leakage from the insertion site. This
resulted in long, low lying areas of test material and buffer. The liquid
portion was quickly resorbed and left a slightly granular surface
texture. A total of 6 sites were used for the complete implantation
procedure. The area was tattooed to mark the injection site location. No
local reaction was noted indicating inflammation.
Drug Treatments:
[0293]Cyclosporine (at a sub-immunosuppressive dosage with 24 hour trough
levels from 50-95 ng/ml) was administered on days -7 through +30
post-implant. Cyclosporine was administered to prevent collateral loss of
encapsulated islets due to immediate focal allograft immune response to
some weakly encapsulated islets in the implant. Additionally, to mimic
clinical concomitant medications, metformin was administered starting on
day +1 and throughout the duration of the study. The dose of coated
islets delivered at least 4 weeks post streptozotocin administration to
induce diabetes was approximately 40K IEQ/kg body weight. The difference
between the effective islet dose used during our studies and the dose
used in current human studies (15K IEQ/kg) was likely due to the implant
site (subcutaneous vs. portal vein) and loss of islets following
implantation.
Monitoring:
[0294]The aim of the in-life monitoring was to provide comprehensive
assessment of information needed to track both diabetic management and
implant activity, as well as standard indicators of local tolerance and
global indicators of overall health/safety assessment. The groups were
monitored during the pre-diabetic period (baseline), during the diabetic
period, and post-implant. Pre-diabetic, diabetic and monthly post-implant
measurements included OGTT and AST (Arginine Stimulation test) (with
blood glucose, insulin and c-peptide assays), and hemoglobin A1c. Daily
monitoring of diabetic and post-implant periods included blood glucose
(fasting, 2 hour post prandial and pre-dinner), urinary glucose and
ketones (morning fasting and pre-dinner), food intake (grams of
carbohydrate, fat and protein), amount of insulin injected (diabetes
management) and other medication doses. Weekly measurements included body
weight and clinical observations.
Necropsy:
[0295]Histopathologic examination of the subcutaneous implant site and a
non-implanted control site were performed using hematoxylin and eosin
(H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry staining (insulin, glucagon,
angiogenic actin, macrophages, and lymphocytes, CD3, CD4, CD8).
Histopathologic examination of all standard organs and tissues were
conducted using H&E staining and evaluated by a board-certified
veterinary pathologist. Immunohistological staining of the pancreas was
conducted to evaluate the presence of insulin and glucagon.
Encapsulated Islet Allograft in Streptozotocin Diabetic Baboons
[0296]FIG. 22 shows the early results of the first diabetic baboon
implanted with encapsulated islet allografts in the study. This diabetic
baboon recipient showed the ability to achieve insulin independence
within 17 days after subcutaneous implantation of encapsulated islet
allografts. This was in contrast to the Cynomolgus primate diabetics
where none achieved insulin independence before 30 days after islet
implantation. The baboon diabetic model was changed from using oral
injected cyclosporine administration, as in the Cynomolgus primate, to IM
injection in the large baboons. This eliminated the variances observed in
the Cynomolgus primate model of 24 hour trough levels. FIG. 23 shows that
this recipient achieved normal Hemoglobin A1c levels by 60 days
post-implant and remained in the normal level through 180 days while
continuing off insulin.
[0297]Results of the OGTT and AST demonstrated significant C-peptide
release following all time points after implantation. The normal response
showed a peak of C-peptide at the 30 minute time frame with the values
decreasing thereafter resulting in normal glucose values at all time
frames. During the diabetic time, the glucose values continued to rise
throughout due to very low levels of C-peptide that were not responsive
to the glucose challenge. Following the implantation, there were large
responses of C-peptide to glucose challenge but these responses were
delayed with peaks occurring at 60 and 90 minutes post-challenge.
Examining the glucose values, the 30 and 60 minute values were higher
than normal due to this delay in C-peptide responsiveness. However, by 90
and 120 minutes, the glucose values returned close to normal. At this
time, it is not known whether this delay in C-peptide responsiveness was
due to the subcutaneous site of implantation or to the encapsulation of
the islets. These results were very analogous with implanted islets in
the portal vein of human diabetics under immunosuppression.
[0298]A second baboon was implanted in the subcutaneous site again with
low dose cyclosporine. A lowering of the glucose values occurred while
maintaining nearly the same insulin requirement. The insulin requirement
slowly dropped at the 100 day value, but slowly rose until nearly the 200
day period, while the glucose values remained lowered. Examination of the
hemoglobin A1c values showed that partial function was clearly achieved
by lowering the levels significantly from 12% to 8.0% by 90 days and to
normal levels at 120 days. The values slowly rose to the 8% level where
they remained at 180 days. These values showed a partial function that
was compatible with those being achieved with islet transplant recipients
that do not achieve insulin independence but who maintain near normal
levels of hemoglobin A1c levels post-implant.
[0299]Examination of the OGTT and AST results showed lower C-peptide
values and higher glucose values throughout the post-implant period
compared to the first recipient. Yet, the C-peptide responses were
significantly higher than the values obtained during the time of
diabetes.
[0300]A third recipient also received encapsulated islet allografts in the
subcutaneous site with low dose cyclosporine (FIG. 24). This recipient
also demonstrated a partial response following implantation with over a
50% decrease in both the glucose and insulin values compared to the
diabetic period. These values were maintained at 140 days
post-implantation.
[0301]The hemoglobin A1c values (FIG. 25) for this recipient showed that
it reached a normal range by 60 days post-implant, but rose to diabetic
levels by 120 days. This again demonstrated a partial islet function for
90 days with reduced responsiveness after that time period.
[0302]The responses to both OGTT and AST were similar to those observed
for the previous partially functioning recipient with elevated C-peptide
values post-implant that peak in the 60 to 90 minute time frame.
[0303]With one normal islet transplant recipient and two partial
recipients, it was important to understand how these results compared to
those following implantation into the portal vein of a diabetic
recipient. To accomplish this task, a pre-study baboon recipient that had
been the first to receive encapsulated islets in the subcutaneous site at
a time that was before the baboon islet isolation results had achieved
acceptable levels was used for this study. This one recipient had been
used to practice the logistics of shipping pancreases and the
encapsulating islets for implantation. Two marginal subcutaneous
encapsulated islet implants were performed with expected poor results.
The recipient was kept on study and used to test the potential of an
intra-portal vein injection of encapsulated islet allografts that had
been isolated and encapsulated under similar conditions as those used in
the first three recipients.
[0304]The first two marginal implants were performed at day 0 and at day
110. Both had transient improvements that did not last as expected from
the marginal grafts that were implanted. But then on day 240 after the
first implant, an intra-portal vein injection of encapsulated islet
allografts was made without any significant rise in portal venous
pressure or any change in liver function tests by a direct injection into
the portal vein as a surgical procedure. There was a dramatic response to
the implant with a greater than a 50% drop in the insulin requirement
within a few days. After the cyclosporine was stopped at 30 days
post-implant this recipient came off insulin treatment with normal
glucose level to 290 days post-implant. Examining the hemoglobin A1c
values for this recipient, a reduction followed the marginal subcutaneous
implants, but not to normal levels. The only value obtained to date
following the portal vein implant was taken at the 30 day post-implant
time frame, which was too early to see the expected improvement.
Hemoglobin A1c levels lag behind the clinical results by approximately 30
days in the baboon.
[0305]Following the marginal subcutaneous islet implants there were
clearly low levels of C-peptide remaining that were clearly higher than
the diabetic values, but this responsiveness was not able to normalize
the hemoglobin A1c levels, although they were reduced. Only the 30 day
values are available at this time following the portal vein implant.
Examining the glucose response, there was a marked drop that was
associated with a significant rise in C-peptide. The significant
improvement in the first portal vein implant suggested the potential of
enhancing the subcutaneous site to obtain improved results.
Example 8
Cells Encapsulated in Alginate Microcapsules With and Without PEG
[0306]Cells and tissues may be coated in matrices containing alginate or
other hydrogels. Preferred methods of coating islets in alginate
microcapsules, with and without PEG, are described as follows.
Coating of Islets with Alginate Microcapsules
[0307]100 .mu.l of cultured islets was suspended uniformly in 1.25 ml of a
1.6% sodium alginate solution in 10 mM HEPES buffer. Alginate
microcapsules containing islets were produced by syringe pump/argon jet
extrusion through a 21-gauge needle with argon pressure set at 10.5 PSI
[72,394.95 Pa (N/m2)], and collected in 100 ml 80 mM calcium chloride in
10 mM HEPES solution. The alginate microcapsules were washed three times
with M199 by settling with gravity for 15 minutes and decantation. The
alginate microcapsules had a size distribution from 250-350 .mu.m.
Coating of Islets Containing Alginate Microcapsules with PEG
[0308]Fifteen milliliters of 20 mM low ionic HEPES buffer (containing 1.8
mM CaCl.sub.2 and 260 mM Manitol, pH=7.0) was added to a 15 ml conical
tube containing 100 .mu.l of islets containing microcapsules. The tube
was centrifuged to form a pellet, supernatant was removed, 15 ml of
Den-EY solution (0.1 mg/ml in low ionic HEPES buffer) was added into the
pellet, and the tube was kept horizontal for 10 minutes at room
temperature. The stained islets were washed with low ionic 20 mM HEPES
buffer, which was sparged with Argon for at least 30 minutes. The stained
islets were mixed with 20 ml of photoactive polymer solution, which was
sparged with Argon, and pre-equilibrated to 8.degree. C. for at least 30
minutes in a waterbath. The photoactive polymer solution was made in 20
mM HEPES buffer, pH=8.0, which contained 5% PEG 1.1K-TA, 10% PEG
3.5K-Triol or PEG 4K-Diol, 100 mM TEoA, 32 mg/ml AMPS and 2 .mu.l/ml NVP,
and 13% Nycodenz. The suspension was transferred into a 10 ml beaker and
the beaker was irradiated with an Argon laser at irradiance density of
200 mW/cm.sup.2 for 1 minutes. The polymerization was quenched by adding
1-2 ml of M199 into the petri dish and the contents inside the beaker was
transferred into a 50 ml conical tube containing 40 ml of M199. After
washing with M199 three times, the encapsulated islets were put back into
culture.
Implantation of Alginate Microcapsules and Alginate/PEG Microcapsules
Containing Pig Islets as Xenografts into the Subcutaneous Site of
Non-Diabetic Primates
[0309]In a primate study, both alginate and alginate/PEG coated
microcapsules were implanted into three, non-diabetic Cynomolgus
primates. The PEG coated microcapsules were made under different
conditions to vary their permselectivity. All of the implanted
microcapsules (alginate alone & alginate/PEG) contained primary pig
islets as a xenograft to the primate. These recipients were treated with
an experimental anti-CD 154 monoclonal antibody. The subcutaneous
implants were excised 7 days after implantation and the percentage of
encapsulated porcine islets surviving in these different microcapsules
was evaluated.
[0310]FIG. 26 illustrates the percent survival of porcine islets
encapsulated in alginate only, as well as different configurations of
alginate/PEG microcapsules, with different permselectivity profiles of
the coatings after they have been implanted for 7 days into normal
Cynomolgus primates. The different permselective values were 0 kD, 30-60
kD, 100 kD, and greater than 200 kD. The percent survival of porcine
islets in the alginate only capsules was 55%. There was a difference in
the percent islet survival between the alginate/PEG coated microcapsules.
Survival at 24 hours was 37% for those that had very tight
permselectivity (0 kD or <30 kD sized proteins) diffusion. Survival at
24 hours had increased to 70% for those that had permselectivity
diffusion for 30-60 kD sized proteins. The microcapsules that permitted
diffusion of <100 kD sized proteins had a survival at 24 hours of 58%.
The microcapsules that were wide open (diffusion of >200 kD sized
proteins) had a reduced islet survival at 24 hours of 32%.
[0311]Staining for Insulin and Glucagon in alginate/PEG encapsulated
neonatal porcine islet tissue that had been implanted into the
subcutaneous site of normal Cynomolgus primates for 7 days demonstrated
the ability of alginate/PEG microcapsules to permit the survival of the
encapsulated neonatal pig islet tissue for 7 days with the systemic
delivery of low dose cyclosporine.
Implants of Alginate/PEG Microcapsule Encapsulation of Porcine Islet
Xenografts into the Peritoneal Cavity of Diabetic Primates
[0312]A follow-up study into diabetic primates demonstrated that porcine
islets encapsulated in alginate/PEG microcapsules alleviated the insulin
requirement for 30 days with the associated use of anti-CD154 systemic
treatment. FIG. 27 illustrates the results of implanting alginate/PEG
microcapsules encapsulating porcine islets into the peritoneal cavity of
a diabetic Cynomolgus primate that also has received anti-CD154 antibody
treatment for 30 days. The implanted islets were capable of maintaining
normal blood glucose levels without insulin shots.
Producing Alginate/PEG Coated Microcapsules Containing Islets at Different
Protein Permselectivity
[0313]Islets were encapsulated in alginate/PEG microcapsules under
different encapsulation conditions to alter the pore size within the
coatings and placed into tissue culture. The encapsulated islets were
treated with a detergent (SDS) to kill the encapsulated cells and to
dissolve the proteins. These treated microcapsules were placed into
culture medium without proteins and the media gathered at different
times. The protein size was determined by placing the diffusates onto
polyacrylamide gels and separating the different sizes of proteins under
with PAGE electrophoresis. The results demonstrated that changing the
concentrations of the PEG, the size of the PEG, the concentrations of the
comonomers, the intensity of the laser, and the time of islet exposure
were some of the many ways of changing the permselectivity of the PEG
coating.
[0314]FIG. 5 illustrates the ability to alter the permselectivity profile
of alginate/PEG microcapsules by altering the variables involved in the
formation of the PEG coating. Alginate/PEG encapsulated islets were
incubated and the proteins released from the cells over time were
measured to determine the molecular weights. The proteins released from
unencapsulated islets are shown in the far left row, followed by a column
of molecular weight markers. The next columns show the proteins released
from alginate/PEG encapsulated islets. The released proteins were more
than 100 kD, 100 kD, less than 60 kD, less than 30 kD, and 0 kD,
respectively.
Example 9
Alginate Encapsulation/PEG Coatings of Cell Types Other Than Islets
[0315]In addition to islets, similarly aggregated cells were encapsulated
in alginate microcapsules in a manner similar to Example 3, except that
the cells were made into clusters prior to using the described technique
for encapsulating islets in alginate microcapsules of different sizes.
These methods were able to conformally coat an insulin producing tumor
cell line, BHC8 mouse insulinoma cells with PEG. Also, using some types
of cells that do not readily aggregate, cells were encapsulated first in
the alginate capsule, even if they had not aggregated into cell clusters.
This method was able to conformally coat cells from an insulin producing
tumor cell line, rat insulinoma (RIN), with PEG.
[0316]Cells from the C-127 cell line, which have been engineered to
produce ApoE2, were grown in an alginate matrix, rather than in clusters.
Then the PEG coating was applied to these cells grown in the alginate
matrix. Additionally is was possible to capture non-aggregating cells
(CHO) in alginate microcapsules, which permitted them to expand within
these alginate spheres in culture, and then coating them with PEG
coatings, which completed the alginate/PEG coating.
Example 10
Formation of Alginate/PEG Coatings on Islets or Other Cells by the Use of
Co-Extrusion of Alginate and PEG Polymer Mixes
[0317]Either cell aggregates or single cells were mixed into an alginate
solution that was loaded into one syringe in the syringe pump/argon jet
system. The output of this syringe was connected to the inner #21-gauge
needle of a coaxial needle system containing three needles. The second
syringe contained only the PEG encapsulation mixture and was connected to
the middle #18 gauge needle of the coaxial needle system. Argon gas was
connected to the outer #16-gauge needle. The alginate syringe containing
the cells and the PEG syringe were connected to the same pump so that the
flow rates were identical from the two syringes. The amount of gas to
form the droplets was set to control the droplet size. The resulting
droplets from this two syringe/argon air jet were collected in a long
glass column containing a non-aqueous solvent, such as oil, on the top
3/4 and calcium or barium containing (80 mM) solution in the bottom 1/4
of the column. The argon laser light was shone through the non-aqueous
portion of the collecting column, which crosslinked the PEG outer coating
prior to the encapsulated capsule falling through the non-aqueous portion
of the collecting column. When the PEG crosslinked capsule containing the
cells reached the bottom 1/4 of the collecting column, the alginate in
the core became crosslinked. The crosslinked alginate core/PEG coated
capsules were collected from the bottom of the column and washed to
remove the non-aqueous solvent. Additional PEG crosslinking was
accomplished, when necessary, by exposing these capsules to additional
argon laser light in the aqueous phase, in the presence of additional
eosin y. The result of this example demonstrated 1] the ability to
encapsulate single cells and 2] to provide a growth center within the PEG
capsule that can permit the growth of new cells that are encapsulated.
The examples using this type of coating were done with red blood cells
(RBC's). Encapsulation of Islets in PEG Microcapsules
[0318]500 islets suspended in M199 medium containing 10% fetal bovine
serum were pelleted by centrifuging at 100 g for 3 min. The pellet was
resuspended in 1 ml of a 10% w/v solution of PEG 3.5 KD triacrylate
macromer in M199 medium containing eosin Y (1 mg/ml) vinyl pyrrolidone
(16 mg/ml), and triethanolamine (100 mM). Mineral oil (20 ml) was then
added to the tube which was vigorously agitated to form a dispersion of
droplets 200-500 um in size. This dispersion was then exposed to an argon
ion laser with a power of 200 mW/cm2, emitting at 514 nm, for 60 sec. The
mineral oil was then separated by allowing the microcapsules to settle,
and the resulting microcapsules were washed twice with PBS, once with
hexane and finally thrice with media.
Example 11
Conformally Coating Islet Cells or Other Cells on Microbeads
[0319]One method of encapsulating cells that will not aggregate, and thus
prevent the formation of a conformal coating, is to grow them on
microcarrier beads. Following this growth, a similar PEG conformal
coating technique as described in Example 2 for isolated islets was used
to place PEG conformal coatings of these microcarrier beads containing
the outer layers of the tumor cells. Conformal coatings were produced
using this method and were shown to have acceptable viability. One would
recognize that different types of microcarrier beads used to grow a
variety of different cells on their surface would be successful in the
conformally coating procedure described herein.
[0320]There are many different types of microcarrier beads produced for
the purpose of growing cells on their surface. A C-127 cell line
engineered to produce ApoE2 (previously presented in Example 7) did not
aggregate but grew on Cytodex beads. These cells, including the
microcarrier beads, were readily encapsulated using PEG conformal
coatings directly on the outer surface of the carrier bead and the
attached cells.
Example 12
Other Cell Types Encapsulated by PEG Conformal Coatings
[0321]Another cell type that can be aggregated and conformally coated with
PEG includes the NIT, mouse insulinoma, cell line. The result of this is
shown in FIG. 28 where thin conformal coatings have been applied by the
techniques described above for islet cell aggregates and maintained
viable in tissue culture for 2 weeks. After one week of culture, the
encapsulated cells are clearly viable by staining with ethidium
bromide/fluorescein diacetate staining. The coated cells are shown under
normal light (FIG. 28A) and under fluorescent light with FDA/EB staining
(FIG. 28B).
[0322]A monkey kidney cell line was made to aggregate in tissue culture
and then successfully conformally coated with PEG. FIG. 29A illustrates
the cells under normal light and FIG. 29B illustrates the cells under
fluorescent light with FDA/EB staining. Again, viability of these
encapsulated tumor cells are demonstrated by FDA/EB staining.
[0323]In another example, primary cells other than pancreatic islet cells,
were made to aggregate and then successfully conformally coated by PEG.
FIG. 30 illustrates PEG conformally coating of cell aggregates produced
from primary liver cells (hepatocytes) from both human and mouse origin,
and maintaining their viability for two weeks of culture. FIG. 30A
illustrates human cells after 2 weeks of culture under normal light. FIG.
30B illustrates human cells after 2 weeks of culture under fluorescent
light with FDA/EB staining. FIG. 30C illustrates mouse cells under normal
light and FIG. 30D illustrates the cells under fluorescent light with
FDA/EB staining. Both human and mouse hepatocyte aggregates were
successfully coated with PEG conformal coats and result in viable cells
even after two weeks of culture.
Example 13
Estimating Curative Dose of Islets Encapsulated in Microcapsules or
Conformally Coated
[0324]Tables 3 and 4 provide data that may guide one of skill in the art
to determine the curative dose of islets for a subject. The data below
were calculated based on several assumptions: a] all microcapsules are
spherical, b] 1,500 cells per islet, c] the minimum curative dose is
15,000 IEQ/kg of body weight, d] there are 5% empty microcapsules or 0%
empty conformally-coated capsules, e] maximum packing of
microcapsule/conformal-coated capsules is 75% of the total volume, and f]
each microcapsule/conformal-coated capsules contains one islet with a
diameter of 150 .mu.m. The maximum density of cells, 8.2.times.10.sup.8
cells/ml, would be obtained by conformally coating islets with an 1 .mu.m
capsule.
[0325]The volumes do not account for the volume of suspension liquid or
matrix. One of skill in the art would recognize that the data below might
be used as guidance in calculating a curative dose, however the numbers
below are not meant to be limiting on the range of number and
concentration of islets that may be used. The assumptions made in making
these calculations are not limiting on the invention. These numbers
simply pertain to embodiments of the invention. (V islets (ml)=0.0264938)
TABLE-US-00003
TABLE 3
Islets encapsulated in Microcapsules
Curative Cell
Volume ratio Dose Density
Diameter of Volume of Volume of of Curative [ml per Pancreatic
Microcapsule Microcapsule Islet microcapsule Dose 100 kg islet cells
[.mu.m] [ml .times. 10.sup.-6] [ml .times. 10.sup.-6] to islet islets/ml
[ml/kg] person] [10.sup.6/ml]
1000 523.60 1.77 296 1,910 7.8540 785 2.0
900 381.70 1.77 216 2,620 5.7256 573 2.8
800 268.08 1.77 151 3,730 4.0212 402 4.0
700 179.59 1.77 101 5,568 2.6939 269 6.0
600 113.10 1.77 64 8,842 1.6965 170 9.4
500 65.45 1.77 37 15,279 0.9817 98 16.3
400 33.51 1.77 19 29,842 0.5027 50 31.9
300 14.14 1.77 8 70,736 0.2121 21 75.6
200 4.19 1.77 2 238,732 0.0628 6 255.1
TABLE-US-00004
TABLE 4
Conformal-Coated Islets
Curative Cell
Volume ratio Dose Density
Thickness Volume of Volume of of Curative [ml per Pancreatic
of Coating Microcapsule Islet microcapsule Dose 100 kg islet cells
[.mu.m] [ml .times. 10.sup.-6] [ml .times. 10.sup.-6] to islet islets/ml
[ml/kg] person] [10.sup.6/ml]
400 448.92 1.77 254 2,228 6.7338 673 2.5
350 321.56 1.77 182 3,110 4.8233 482 3.5
300 220.89 1.77 125 4,527 3.3134 331 5.1
250 143.79 1.77 81 6,954 2.1569 216 7.8
200 87.11 1.77 49 11,479 1.3067 131 12.9
150 47.71 1.77 27 20,959 0.7157 72 23.6
100 22.45 1.77 13 44,545 0.3367 34 50.1
75 14.14 1.77 8 70,736 0.2121 21 79.6
50 8.18 1.77 5 122,231 0.1227 12 137.5
25 4.19 1.77 2 238,732 0.0628 6 268.6
10 2.57 1.77 1 388,736 0.0386 4 437.3
Estimating Number of Cells Encapsulated in Microcapsules or Conformally
Coated
[0326]Tables 5 and 6 provide data that may guide one of skill in the art
to determine the curative dose of cells needed for a subject with various
diseases and disorders. The data below were calculated based on several
assumptions: a] the cells encapsulated or conformally-coated have an
average diameter of 50 .mu.m, b] the total volume of the cell aggregate
in each microcapsule is 1.77.times.10-6 ml, c] there are 5% empty
microcapsules or 0% conformal-coated capsules, d] maximum packing of
microcapsules/conformal-coated capsules is 75% of the total volume, and
e] each microcapsule/conformal-coated capsules contains one islet with a
diameter of 150 .mu.m. The maximum density of cells, 1.36.times.10.sup.7
cells/ml, would be obtained by conformally coating islets with an 1 .mu.m
capsule.
[0327]The volumes do not account for the volume of suspension liquid or
matrix. One of skill in the art would recognize that the data below might
be used as guidance in calculating a curative dose, however the numbers
below are not meant to be limiting on the range of number and
concentration of cells that may be used. The assumptions made in making
these calculations are not limiting on the invention. These numbers
simply pertain to embodiments of the invention.
TABLE-US-00005
TABLE 5
Cells encapsulated in Microcapsules
Cell
Density
Volume ratio (Average
Diameter of Volume of Volume of of Human
Microcapsule Microcapsule Cells microcapsule cell)
[.mu.m] [ml .times. 10.sup.-6] [ml .times. 10.sup.-6] to Cells
[10.sup.3/ml]
1000 523.60 1.77 296 34.0
900 381.70 1.77 216 46.7
800 268.08 1.77 151 66.4
700 179.59 1.77 101 99.2
600 113.10 1.77 64 157.5
500 65.45 1.77 37 272.2
400 33.51 1.77 19 531.6
300 14.14 1.77 8 1,260.0
200 4.19 1.77 2 4,252.4
TABLE-US-00006
TABLE 6
Conformal-Coated Cells
Volume ratio Cell Density
Thickness of Volume of Volume of of (Average
Coating Microcapsule Cells microcapsule Human cell)
[.mu.m] [ml .times. 10.sup.-6] [ml .times. 10.sup.-6] to Cells
[10.sup.3/ml]
400 448.92 1.77 254 41.8
350 321.56 1.77 182 58.3
300 220.89 1.77 125 84.9
250 143.79 1.77 81 130.4
200 87.11 1.77 49 215.2
150 47.71 1.77 27 393.0
100 22.45 1.77 13 835.2
75 14.14 1.77 8 1,326.3
50 8.18 1.77 5 2,291.8
25 4.19 1.77 2 4,476.2
10 2.57 1.77 1 7,288.8
Example 14
Characteristics of the Alginate/PEG Microcapsules
[0328]Many different types, lengths, and sizes of PEG acrylates were
tested in animals to determine biocompatibility and permselectivity of
the composition, and the resulting functionality and viability of
encapsulated cells after encapsulation. One of the acrylated PEG coatings
was 1.1 kD PEG triacrylate. This very short PEG acrylate has unique
biocompatibility properties when crosslinked.
[0329]The hydrogel encapsulated alginate beads were implanted into both
normal small and large animals for a period of 14 days during which no
immunosuppression was used. The capsules were then explanted, and the
nature and extent of the tissue response towards these capsules were
evaluated histologically. Minimal to no tissue reactions were noted on
the examined samples, indicating these hydrogel compositions had a very
good biocompatibility in vivo.
[0330]FIG. 31 shows the biocompatibility reactions in mice, pig, dog, and
primate, which have had empty alginate/PEG microcapsules implanted at
different sites. Empty alginate microcapsules coated with 1.1 kD PEG
triacrylate were injected into the hepatic portal vein. In the pig and
primate, there is no reaction to these empty PEG microcapsules after two
weeks following implant. The dog showed the most reactivity of all the
PEG's injected, but still had very few cells of reactivity.
[0331]The composition of the encapsulating material was evaluated and
scored to assess biocompatibility, permselectivity, functionality and
viability. A scoring system (1 to 4) was used to quantify the response of
the animal to implantation with encapsulated cells.
[0332]Table 7 shows the scoring values for the presence of macrophages, FB
giant cell, inflammatory response, lymphocytes, and eosinophils. The
overall score for biocompatibility is the average score of these five
categories. FIG. 32 illustrates the biocompatibility of encapsulated
cells in small animals by showing representative histology of score
values 1, 2, and 3. FIG. 33 illustrates the biocompatibility of
encapsulated cells in large animals by showing representative histology
of score values 1, 2, and 4.
TABLE-US-00007
TABLE 7
FB Giant Inflammatory Lympho- Eosino-
Score Macrophages Cell Response cytes phils
1 none to none none none none
minimal
2 mixed scattered, minimal few few
activity <50% scattered scattered
3 activated, >50% moderate moderate moderate
some
stacking
4 palisading foamy extensive extensive extensive
[0333]Table 8 shows how the permselectivity can be engineered by changing
the ingredients and percentages of the ingredients in the composition. A
combination of 10% 3.5K-TA and 10% 10K-TA makes the gel structure very
tight and prevents the passage of almost all proteins between the blood
and encapsulated cells. If the composition is changed to 5% 3.5K-TA and
5% 8K-DA the gel structure allows medium size (100 to 60 kD) proteins to
pass between the blood and encapsulated cells. A composition of 20%
10K-TA produces a gel that allows large molecular weight (>100 kD)
proteins to pass between the blood and encapsulated cells.
TABLE-US-00008
TABLE 8
No
Composition >100K <100K <60K <30K <18K Bands
10% 3.5K-TA + 0 0 0 0 0 100
10% 10K-TA 0 0 0 0 0 100
5% 3.5K-TA + 0 0 100 0 0 0
5% 8K-DA 0 11 88 0 0 0
20% 10K-TA 75 25 0 0 0 0
100 0 0 0 0 0
88 0 12 0 0 0
[0334]The composition of the encapsulating material has a great effect on
the resulting functionality and viability of the encapsulated cells. The
chemicals and methods used to make the gel can be cytotoxic or damaging
to the cell. FIG. 34 illustrates the results of implanting encapsulated
islets into a streptozotocin-induced diabetic athymic mouse. A score of
"1" represents encapsulated cells that eliminate diabetes and a blood
glucose level of <150 ng/ml, "2" represents encapsulated cells that
reduce the diabetes but are unable to maintain homeostasis from day to
day and a blood glucose level of between 150 and 300 ng/ml, and "3"
represents encapsulated cells that are unable to control the diabetes and
a blood glucose level of >300 ng/ml.
[0335]The functionality of the encapsulated cells also can be assessed
with a Static Glucose Stimulation test. The test compares the insulin
production between Basal production with a low concentration of glucose
compared to the insulin production with high glucose (Stimulation) and
high glucose with IBMX. FIG. 6 illustrates the scoring of the Static
Glucose Stimulation test. A score of "1" represents a Stimulation insulin
production >2 times Basal and IBMX insulin production >10 times
Basal. A score of "2" represents a Stimulation insulin production 1.5 to
2 times Basal and IBMX insulin production 5 to 10 times Basal. A score of
"3" represents a Stimulation insulin production <1.5 times Basal and
IBMX insulin production <5 times Basal.
[0336]The viability of the cells was assessed the encapsulation process.
The scoring system ranks the viability as "1"=>90%, "2"=<90% to
75%, "3"=<75% to 50%, "3"=<50% to 25%, and "4"=<25%. FIG. 4
illustrates the viability and histology of the encapsulated cells with
scores of 1, 2, and 4.
Example 15
Ischemic Muscle Implants Using Genetically Engineered Cells Producing
Angiogenic Growth Factors that are Conformally Coated with PEG Coatings
[0337]Many different cell types can be genetically engineered to produce
different angiogenic growth factors. These cells are human or animal
fibroblasts, vascular cells, or various non-tumorigenic cell lines. The
choices of angiogenic growth factors, such as VEGF, bFGF, and PDGF, are
made to use as the genetically engineered cell line for encapsulation.
Outcome measurements required before considering implantation into animal
models with ischemic muscles are the release of the chosen angiogenic
growth factor at a level presumed to provide a clinical response in the
microenvironment of the ischemic muscle. If the cells were made to
aggregate, then conformal coatings of these cell aggregates was done
using the similar conditions to those described in Example 2.
Implantation of these encapsulated angiogenic growth factor producing
cells were made in rodent models with either experimentally induced
ischemic myocardium or experimentally induced ischemic limb muscles.
Outcome measurements were histologic demonstration of increased muscle
mass and functional evidence of increased exertion of the ischemic muscle
selected including cardiac muscle. Implants of these angiogenic growth
factor producing cells in larger animals including humans was
accomplished through vascular access and fluoroscopic control permitting
direct injection in the myocardium, for example, without the need for any
open surgical procedure.
Example 16
Splenic Implants of PEG Conformally Coated Islets, Hepatocytes, or
Genetically Engineered Cells for the Treatment of Different Diseases
[0338]In the case of islets, unencapsulated islets have been implanted
successfully in the spleens of diabetic dogs, as well as diabetic humans,
and successfully reversed their diabetes in a similar manner compared
with intrahepatic unencapsulated islet implants. Now encapsulating islets
permits their successful function in the spleen and in the subcutaneous
site. Similarly, implanting genetically engineered cells, such as
hepatocytes, into the spleen provides the cells a well-vascularized site
as well as one in which the genetically engineered product is first
released to the liver. This is important in those diseases in which the
liver has a major role in handling or utilizing the genetically
engineered cell product that is being implanted in the spleen. The ready
access to the spleen and its capacity to hold volumes of cells makes it
an attractive site for encapsulated cell therapy.
Example 17
Intrathecal Injection of Encapsulated Cells for Delivering CNS Agents for
the Treatment of Diseases or Disorders
[0339]A number of different CNS diseases are treated by encapsulated
cells. Some may require direct injection into a specific location of the
diseased brain, such as injecting encapsulated dopamine producing cells
into the substantia nigra of patients with Parkinsonism. However, many
different CNS diseases or disorders are treated by simply injecting the
encapsulated cells producing the CNS factor required into the spinal
fluid along the spinal cord or below it, permitting the release of the
encapsulated cell product. Circulation of the spinal fluid carries the
product to the desired location of the brain or spinal cord involved. A
further example of this approach was shown by encapsulating dopamine
producing cells in hollow fibers which were inserted into the lumbar
spinal canal for the treatment of chronic pain conditions, such as those
encountered in metastatic cancer patients. Using these conformal coatings
permitted large quantities of cells to be delivered. Another application
is to contain these encapsulated cells within hollow tubes that can be
tethered to the outside, but not relying on these tubes for any
immunoprotection. One such disease is Multiple Sclerosis, which is
treated by encapsulating oligodendricytes or other cells making other
factors known to make substances needed to repair the myelin damage from
the disease. Another example is the treatment of pain where this form of
encapsulation increases the amount of cells producing dopamine. The use
of dopamine is also helpful in treating different forms of drug and
alcohol addiction by increasing the level of dopamine circulating in the
spinal fluid of dependent patients. The use of NGF (Nerve Growth Factor)
and other agents is helpful in treating patients with spinal cord
injuries. The NGF or other agent is released from the encapsulated cells
in the spinal fluid of the spinal canal.
Example 18
Implantation of Encapsulated Parathyroid or Adrenal Cells into Muscle,
Spleen, or Liver of Patients Without the Function of Their Own
Parathyroid or Adrenal Cells Due to Disease or Surgical Removal from
Actual Tumors or Potential Tumor Risks
[0340]A number patients have their parathyroids or their adrenal glands
removed for actual tumors. A second group of patients has these organs
removed for the risk of future tumor formation due to genetic diseases
that are inheritable. PEG encapsulation of normal human parathyroid or
adrenal cells from cadaver organ donors were done with removal of these
tissues at the time of organ donation. These organs have had a number of
cell preparations made from them for experimental work and one skilled in
the art can readily prepare cells from these organs. PEG encapsulation is
accomplished by conformal coating or by alginate based PEG coatings for
implanting these encapsulated cells into these patients who have lost the
function of one of these organs through actual tumors or potential tumor
formation.
Example 19
Implantation of Encapsulated Cells for the Treatment for Genetically
Inherited Diseases
[0341]There are many human and animal diseases caused by genetic defects.
The role of gene therapy in directly injecting these genes in the
different tissues of the body has not been safely developed at this time.
Many of these inherited diseases are treated by encapsulated cells
producing the missing gene product using primary cells making the product
or using genetically engineered cells making the product. Encapsulation
of these cells may be performed by the techniques described elsewhere in
the specification. Implantation of these encapsulated cells may be done
in most any site if the location of the product is not required in a
specific site. Thus, encapsulated cells are injected subcutaneously, in
the liver by portal vein injection or by direct injection, in the spleen
by vascular or direct injection, in the muscle by vascular or direct
injection, in the kidney by vascular or direct injection, in the heart by
vascular or direct injection, in the spinal canal by injection, in the
brain by vascular or direct injection, in the eye by vascular or direct
injection, in the lung by vascular or direct injection, in the thyroid by
vascular or direct injection, in the bone marrow by direct injection, in
any joint by direct injection, or directly into any wound by direct
injection or application.
Example 20
The Use of Encapsulated Cells Producing Growth Hormone for Use in Farm or
Production Animals to Increase the Rate of Growth or the Production of
Milk
[0342]Growth hormone is being used in dairy cattle to increase the
production of milk. It has also been suggested to be useful for injecting
into porcine weanlings to increase their meat production and size, and
thus decrease the time to market. Encapsulating growth hormone producing
cells and implanting them into these production animals accomplishes the
same results without the need for daily expensive injections. In the case
of the porcine model, the PEG coating may be engineered in a manner
allowing it to biodegrade in 6 weeks so that the animal would be free of
the growth hormone at the time of slaughter and following human
consumption of the meat. Alternatively, the encapsulated cells are
contained in a readily removable insertion container to eliminate the
production of growth hormone.
[0343]It is to be understood that the foregoing description is exemplary
and explanatory in nature, and is intended to illustrate the invention
and its preferred embodiments. Through routine experimentation, the
artisan will recognize apparent modifications and variations that may be
made without departing from the spirit of the invention. Therefore, it
should be clearly understood that the forms of the present invention are
illustrative only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present
invention. All references cited herein are hereby expressly incorporated
by reference.
* * * * *