Register or Login To Download This Patent As A PDF
| United States Patent Application |
20090154049
|
| Kind Code
|
A1
|
|
Sharpe; Randall B.
|
June 18, 2009
|
Network equipment system providing surge protection and DC blocking bypass
functionalities
Abstract
A network equipment system comprises a communication apparatus, an
equipment protector block connected between the communication apparatus
and a subscriber premise DSL network termination device (NTD), and a
protection module mounted on the equipment protector block. The
protection module includes circuitry configured for providing surge
protection functionality, for providing AC coupling-DC blocking
functionality, for providing DC blocking bypass functionality, and for
enabling said DC blocking bypass functionality to be selectively
activated and deactivated. The protection module facilitates such
functionality in association with the communication apparatus and the
subscriber premise DSL NTD.
| Inventors: |
Sharpe; Randall B.; (Chapel Hill, NC)
|
| Correspondence Address:
|
ALCATEL-LUCENT
C/O GALASSO & ASSOCIATES, LP, P. O. BOX 26503
AUSTIN
TX
78755-0503
US
|
| Serial No.:
|
378697 |
| Series Code:
|
12
|
| Filed:
|
February 18, 2009 |
| Current U.S. Class: |
361/115 |
| Class at Publication: |
361/115 |
| International Class: |
H01H 73/00 20060101 H01H073/00 |
Claims
1. A network equipment system, comprising:a communication apparatus;an
equipment protector block connected between the communication apparatus
and a subscriber premise DSL network termination device (NTD); anda
protection module mounted on the equipment protector block and including
circuitry configured for providing surge protection functionality, for
providing AC coupling-DC blocking functionality, for providing DC
blocking bypass functionality and for enabling said DC blocking bypass
functionality to be selectively activated and deactivated;wherein the
protection module facilitates said functionality in association with the
communication apparatus and the subscriber premise DSL NTD.
2. The network equipment system of claim 1 wherein:the communication
apparatus includes DSL multiplexing equipment and test equipment; andthe
equipment protection block is connected to at least one of said DSL
multiplexing equipment and said test equipment.
3. The network equipment system of claim 2 wherein the DSL multiplexing
equipment is one of a Digital Loop Carrier (DLC) and a Digital Subscriber
Line Access Multiplexor.
4. The network equipment system of claim 3 wherein the test equipment is
configured for performing Metallic Loop Test (MLT) functionality.
5. The network equipment system of claim 13 wherein:said circuitry is
contained in a discrete packaging device;the discrete packaging device is
mounted on the equipment protector block; andthe equipment protector
block is an unmodified commercially-available equipment protector block
that is OEM-configured for having conventional surge protectors mounted
thereon.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001]This application is a divisional application of co-pending U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 10/404,231 filed Apr. 1, 2003 entitled "AC
COUPLING-DC BLOCKING SURGE PROTECTION MODULE WITH DC BLOCKING BYPASS
FUNCTIONALITY", and having a common applicant herewith.
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0002]The disclosures herein relate generally to surge protection devices
and more particularly to surge protection devices configured for
providing DC blocking functionality and/or AC coupling functionality.
BACKGROUND
[0003]Local exchange carrier access network equipment, such as Digital
Loop Carriers (DLCs) and Digital Subscriber Access Multiplexers (DSLAMs),
provide Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) service to subscribers over twisted
wire pairs or "loops". The electronic components and systems comprised by
DLC's and DSLAM's are protected through the use of protection devices
(surge protectors) located near the network equipment from damage by
induced voltage surges (e.g., via lightning strikes) picked up by the
twisted wire pairs. Such surge protectors are essentially transparent to
the network services (Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS), Asymmetrical
Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL), etc.) while they shunt momentary high
voltage surges to ground. The protectors are also essentially transparent
to metallic loop test systems that test for faults on the twisted wire
pair between subscriber premise equipment and upstream network equipment.
[0004]When remote electronics, typically located on the outside of a
subscriber's premise, are powered over the twisted wire pair from a
network equipment site or another remote location, power feed equipment
for providing power to such remote electronics is coupled to the twisted
wire pair. When the network electronics are AC coupled to the twisted
wire pair, the power feed equipment can be directly bridged to the
twisted wire pair. However, when the network electronics are DC coupled
to the twisted wire pair, as would typically be the case for a
combination POTS/ADSL line card, simple direct bridging cannot be
implemented. For example, the voltage provided by the power feed
equipment (e.g., nominally -200Vdc) conflicts with the POTS "talk
battery" voltage (nominally -48Vdc).
[0005]Conventional approaches to providing a DC voltage on a twisted wire
pair from power feed equipment are known. In cases where POTS is not
required, conventional combination POTS/ADSL cards are replaced by
ADSL-only cards, thus allowing the power feed to be applied without any
conflicts. In cases where POTS and ADSL functionality is facilitated,
even though the POTS signal is unused, combination POTS/ADSL signals are
passed through a high pass filter for eliminating unused POTS talk
battery voltage, thereby allowing resulting filtered signals to be
bridged with the power feed.
[0006]However, such conventional approaches for providing the DC power
feed over the twisted wire pair have significant limitations associated
therewith. In the case where conventional combination POTS/ADSL cards are
replaced by ADSL-only cards, such a conventional approach would have an
adverse expense associated with replacing POTS/ADSL combination cards
that are already deployed in a network with newly developed ADSL-only
cards. Furthermore, replacing conventional combination POTS/ADSL cards
with ADSL-only cards would require rewiring in the DLC or DSLAM cabinets
or require installation of cross-connect cabinets for connecting
reassigned lines out of the DLC or DSLAM cabinets. In the case where a
combined POTS/ADSL signal is filtered, such high pass filtering of a
signal from a DLC or DSLAM will prevent complete metallic loop testing
(MLT), as MLT uses the spectrum down to DC for many tests (e.g.,
detecting resistive faults, detecting presence of foreign voltages, etc).
Additionally, it is hard to selectively gain access to an individual
twisted wire pair because multi-pair cable harnesses and multi-pair
connectors are often pre-wired with the equipment in cabinets, leaving
little available space to accommodate access to additional pairs and for
the high pass filtering equipment.
[0007]Accordingly, a solution for enabling the combination of surge
protection, DSL signal transmission, full metallic loop testing and
bridging of a DC power feed to be facilitated in association with a
twisted wire pair in a manner that overcomes limitations associated with
conventional solutions would be useful.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0008]FIG. 1 depicts a network equipment protection module in accordance
with an embodiment of the disclosures made herein.
[0009]FIG. 2 depicts an embodiment of a network equipment system in
accordance with an embodiment of the disclosures made herein.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010]Embodiments of the disclosures made herein relate to a network
equipment protection module for use with central office or remote DSL
network equipment (e.g., DSLAMs, DLCs, etc). Such a network equipment
protection module enables the combination of surge protection, DSL signal
transmission, full metallic loop testing (MLT) and bridging of a DC power
feed to be facilitated in association with a twisted pair transmission
line (also referred to herein as a twisted wire pair) in a manner that
overcomes limitations associated with conventional solutions for
providing such functionality. Accordingly, voltage provided by power feed
equipment (e.g., nominally 200Vdc) may be provided to a subscriber
premise DSL network termination device (NTD) over the twisted pair
transmission line, without inhibiting full MLT functionality. A DSL NTD
is an example of such a subscriber premise DSL NTD that relies on voltage
provided by power feed equipment via an attached twisted pair
transmission line. A DSL NTD is an active device powered from upstream
power feed equipment and which, in at least one embodiment, provides POTS
functionality via ADSL data transmission (i.e., POTS talk battery voltage
not provided over an attached twisted pair transmission line),
[0011]Network equipment protection modules in accordance with embodiments
of the disclosures made herein (i.e., an AC coupling-DC blocking surge
protection module with DC blocking bypass functionality) offer a number
of benefits. One benefit is that they are direct replacements for
conventional surge protectors as used in conventional protector blocks.
Accordingly, they do not require any re-wiring of the twisted pair
transmission lines at the DLC or DSLAM cabinet. Another benefit is that
they don't require costly replacement of combination ADSL/POTS cards at
the DLC or DSLAM, thus being a less expensive approach. Still another
benefit is that the overall approach requires no additional space in a
DLC or DSLAM. Yet another benefit is that they do not inhibit full
metallic loop testing.
[0012]Turning now to discussion of specific drawings, a network equipment
protection module 10 in accordance with an embodiment of the disclosures
made herein is depicted in FIG. 1. The network equipment protection
module 10 includes surge protection circuitry 12 configured for providing
surge protection functionality, AC coupling-DC blocking circuitry 14
configured for providing AC coupling-DC blocking functionality and DC
blocking bypass circuitry 16 configured for providing DC blocking bypass
functionality. In at least one embodiment of the disclosures made herein,
the surge protection circuitry 12, the AC coupling-DC blocking circuitry
14 and the DC blocking bypass circuitry 16 are all contained in a
discrete packaging device 19.
[0013]An enclosure having a plurality of contacts mounted thereon and
externally accessible therefrom is an example of the discrete packaging
device 19. In accordance with an embodiment of the disclosures made
herein, the discrete packaging device 19 is configured for being mounted
on an unmodified commercially-available equipment protector block, which
is OEM-configured for having conventional surge protectors mounted
thereon. One example of such a commercially available equipment protector
block is a 310-series equipment protector block offered by AVAYA
Incorporated. One example of such conventional surge protectors is a
5-pin surge protector module offered by Marconi Communications
Incorporated
[0014]The AC coupling-DC blocking circuitry 14 includes a first capacitor
18 and a second capacitor 20 connected in series with a first power lead
22 and a second power lead 24, respectively (i.e., a pair of power
leads). The first capacitor 18 and the second capacitor 20 represent one
embodiment of means for providing AC coupling-DC blocking functionality.
In at least one embodiment of the AC coupling-DC blocking circuitry, the
first capacitor 18 and the second capacitor 20 have a capacitance of
about 1 micro Farad. It will be appreciated that the specific capacitance
for the capacitors (18, 20) will be specified dependent upon the specific
implementation of the network equipment protection module 10.
[0015]The DC blocking bypass circuitry 16 includes a control portion 26
connected between first power lead 22 and the second power lead 24. The
control portion 26 is configured for enabling a first shunt 28 and a
second shunt 30 to be selectively connected and disconnected across the
first capacitor 18 and the second capacitor 20, respectively. When a
suitable DC voltage is applied across the pair of power leads (22, 24),
the control portion 26 of the DC blocking bypass circuitry 16 is
activated (i.e., in response to current flows through the control portion
26) and acts to disconnect the shunts (28, 30) from across the respective
one of the capacitors (18, 20) whereby DC blocking functionality is
activated. When the DC voltage is removed from across the pair of power
leads (22, 24), the control portion 26 of the DC blocking bypass
circuitry 16 is de-activated, thereby deactivating (i.e., bypassing) DC
blocking functionality by allowing the shunts (28, 30) to be connected
across the respective one of the capacitors (18, 20). In this manner, the
DC blocking bypass circuitry 16 is configured for enabling the DC
blocking bypass functionality to be selectively activated and
deactivated. The DC blocking bypass circuitry 16 represents one
embodiment of means for providing DC blocking bypass functionality.
[0016]A pair of normally-closed relay paths is an example of the first
shunt 28 and the second shunt 30. It is contemplated herein that such a
pair of normally-closed relay paths may be facilitated via a single relay
or a plurality of relays (e.g., 2 relays). An actuation coil relay of a
single relay is one example of the control portion 26 of the DC blocking
bypass circuitry 16. Actuation coils of a pair of relays having a
resistor connected therebetween (i.e., for limiting current flow through
the actuation coils) are another example of the control portion 26 of the
DC blocking bypass circuitry 16. Embodiments of the disclosures made
herein are not limited to solid-state and mechanical relays, but may
utilize any useful circuitry or component that provides relay
functionality.
[0017]The surge protection circuitry 12 is connected between the pair of
power leads (22, 24) and a ground lead 32. A Transient Voltage
Suppression (TVS) device such as a SIDACtor brand TVS device or similar
TVS device is an example of the surge protection circuitry 12. The surge
protection circuitry 12 is an example of means for providing surge
protection.
[0018]FIG. 2 depicts an embodiment of a network equipment system 100 in
accordance with an embodiment of the disclosures made herein. The network
equipment system 100 includes a communication apparatus 102, an equipment
protector block 104 and a plurality of network equipment protection
modules 10 (as disclosed above in reference to FIG. 1) mounted on the
equipment protector block 104. The equipment protector block 104 is
connected between the communication apparatus 102 and a subscriber
premise DSL NTD (not shown) via a twisted pair transmission line 105. In
practice, the equipment protector block in a DLC and DSLAM is
pre-installed and pre-wired to the communication apparatus 102 (or at
least to a backplane through which connections to such apparatus is
made).
[0019]A DC voltage (e.g. -200Vdc), which is supplied by power feed
equipment (not shown), is bridged onto the twisted pair transmission line
105 (e.g., at a junction block). Such power feed equipment may be located
locally or remotely with respect to the communication apparatus 102. The
DC blocking circuitry 16 of the network equipment protection modules 10
inhibits the DC power feed voltage from being applied to the
communication apparatus 102.
[0020]The communication apparatus 102 includes DSL multiplexing equipment
106 and test equipment 108. The equipment protection block 104 is
connected to the DSL multiplexing equipment 106 and/or the test equipment
108. It is contemplated that the equipment protection block 104 is
connected directly to the DSL multiplexing equipment 106 and that the
test equipment 108 transmits signals downstream through the equipment
protection block 104 via the DSL multiplexing equipment 106.
[0021]A DLC (e.g., a common control shelf and channel bank assemblies) and
a DSLAM are two examples of the DSL multiplexing equipment 106. In at
least one embodiment of the disclosures made herein, the test equipment
108 is configured for performing Metallic Loop Test (MLT) functionality.
Accordingly, MLT test equipment is an example of the test equipment 108.
The combination of the equipment protector block 104 and at least one of
the network equipment protection modules 10 is an example of a network
equipment protection apparatus.
[0022]In operation, a plurality of network equipment protection modules 10
is plugged into (or otherwise operably mounted on) the equipment
protection block 104. One or more of the network equipment protection
modules 10 may replace one or more conventional surge protectors mounted
thereon. Each one of the network equipment protection modules 10 is
configured for providing surge protection, AC coupling-DC blocking
functionality and DC blocking bypass functionality. The DC blocking
bypass functionality allows full metallic loop testing to be performed
while the power feed (i.e., DC voltage) is removed from the twisted pair
transmission line 105. Use of the preinstalled and pre-wired equipment
protection block 104 and the selective application of the equipment
protection modules 10 allows power to be provided to individual twisted
pair transmission lines without requiring line cards to be replaced, OSS
reassignment, rewiring, and service outages to customers on the same line
cards who are retaining POTS capability.
[0023]In the preceding detailed description, reference has been made to
the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which are shown
by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be
practiced. These embodiments, and certain variants thereof, have been
described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to
practice the invention. It is to be understood that other suitable
embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical and electrical
changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the
invention. To avoid unnecessary detail, the description omits certain
information known to those skilled in the art. The preceding detailed
description is, therefore, not intended to be limited to the specific
forms set forth herein, but on the contrary, it is intended to cover such
alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as can be reasonably
included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
* * * * *