| United States Patent | RE40,781 |
| Johannsen , et al. | June 23, 2009 |
Method of providing a hydrophobic layer and condenser microphone having
such a layer
Abstract
A method of providing at least part of a diaphragm and at least a part of a back-plate of a condenser microphone with a hydrophobic layer so as to avoid stiction between said diaphragm and said back-plate. The layer is deposited via a number small of openings in the back-plate, the diaphragm and/or between the diaphragm and the back-plate. Provides a homogeneous and structured hydrophobic layer, even to small internal cavities of the microstructure. The layer may be deposited by a liquid phase or a vapor phase deposition method. The method may be applied naturally in continuation of the normal manufacturing process.Further, a MEMS condenser microphone is provided having such a hydrophobic layer. The static distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate of the microphone is smaller than 10 .mu.m.
| Inventors: | Johannsen; Ib (Vaerlose, DK), Larsen; Niels Bent (Rodovre, DK), Mullenborn; Matthias (Lyngby, DK), Rombach; Pirmin Hermann Otto (Ho Chi Minh, VN) |
| Assignee: |
Pulse MEMS ApS
(Roskilde,
DK)
|
| Appl. No.: | 11/502,577 |
| Filed: | August 10, 2006 |
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
| Reissue of: | 09867606 | May., 2001 | 06859542 | Feb., 2005 | |
| Current U.S. Class: | 381/174 ; 381/175; 381/191 |
| Current International Class: | H04R 25/00 (20060101) |
| Field of Search: | 381/113,116,174,175,191,369 361/283.1 367/181,170 |
| 3963881 | June 1976 | Fraim et al. |
| 4508613 | April 1985 | Busta et al. |
| 4746898 | May 1988 | Loeppert |
| 4760250 | July 1988 | Loeppert |
| 4910840 | March 1990 | Sprenkels et al. |
| 5178015 | January 1993 | Loeppert et al. |
| 5208789 | May 1993 | Ling |
| 5367429 | November 1994 | Tsuchitani et al. |
| 5446413 | August 1995 | Loeppert et al. |
| 5490220 | February 1996 | Loeppert |
| 5658698 | August 1997 | Yagi et al. |
| 5708123 | January 1998 | Johannsen et al. |
| 5740261 | April 1998 | Loeppert et al. |
| 5812496 | September 1998 | Peck |
| 5822170 | October 1998 | Cabuz et al. |
| 5861779 | January 1999 | Loeppert et al. |
| 5870482 | February 1999 | Loeppert et al. |
| 5889872 | March 1999 | Sooriakumar et al. |
| 6012021 | January 2000 | Rombach et al. |
| 6012335 | January 2000 | Bashir et al. |
| 6088463 | July 2000 | Rombach et al. |
| 6134333 | October 2000 | Flagler |
| 6225140 | May 2001 | Liu et al. |
| 6293148 | September 2001 | Wang et al. |
| 6410107 | June 2002 | Sato et al. |
| 6512833 | January 2003 | Himori et al. |
| 6522762 | February 2003 | Mullenborn et al. |
| 6535460 | March 2003 | Loeppert et al. |
| 6552469 | April 2003 | Pederson et al. |
| 6578427 | June 2003 | Hegner |
| 6622368 | September 2003 | Mullenborn et al. |
| 6732588 | May 2004 | Mullenborn et al. |
| 6788795 | September 2004 | Scheeper et al. |
| 6812620 | November 2004 | Scheeper et al. |
| 6829131 | December 2004 | Loeb et al. |
| 6847090 | January 2005 | Loeppert |
| 2001/0000329 | April 2001 | Sato et al. |
| 2002/0031234 | March 2002 | Wenger et al. |
| 2002/0064292 | May 2002 | Rombach et al. |
| 2003/0021432 | January 2003 | Scheeper et al. |
| 2003/0034536 | February 2003 | Scheeper et al. |
| 2003/0128854 | July 2003 | Mullenborn et al. |
| 2 383 740 | Mar., 2001 | CA | |||
| 2 383 901 | Mar., 2001 | CA | |||
| 0 561 566 | Mar., 1993 | EP | |||
| 0849082 | Jun., 1998 | EP | |||
| 0899093 | Mar., 1999 | EP | |||
| 1 052 880 | Aug., 1999 | EP | |||
| 1 469 701 | Aug., 2001 | EP | |||
| WO 89/03125 | Apr., 1989 | WO | |||
| WO 93/04495 | Mar., 1993 | WO | |||
| WO 98/18855 | May., 1998 | WO | |||
| WO 00/46278 | Aug., 2000 | WO | |||
| WO 00/62580 | Oct., 2000 | WO | |||
| WO 00/67526 | Nov., 2000 | WO | |||
| WO 01/14248 | Mar., 2001 | WO | |||
| WO 01/26136 | Apr., 2001 | WO | |||
| WO 02/015636 | Feb., 2002 | WO | |||
| WO 02/052893 | Jul., 2002 | WO | |||
| WO 02/052894 | Jul., 2002 | WO | |||
Ning et al., "Fabrication of a silicon miceomachined capacitive microphone using a dry-etch process" Sensors and Actuators A 53 (1996) 237-242. cited by other . An Integrated Graphics to Pattern Generator System, G.W. Neudeck and P.V. Loeppert, IEEE, 1981, pp. 32-36. cited by other . Fabrication of a Subminiature Silicone Condenser Microphone Using The Sacrificial Layer Technique, P. R. Scheeper, W. Olthuis and P. Bergveld, IEEE, 1991, pp. 408-411. cited by other . Investigation of Attractive Forces Between PECVD Silicon Nitride Microstructures and an Oxidized Silicon Substrate, P. R. Scheeper, J.A. Voorthuyzen, W. Olthuis and P. Bergveld, Sensors and Actuators A, 30, 1992, pp. 231-239. cited by other . Amplitude-Modulated Electro-Mechanical Feedback System for Silicon Condenser Microphones, A.G.H. van der Donk, P.R. Scheeper, W. Olthuis and P. Bergveld, J. Micromech. Microeng., 2 1992, pp. 211-214. cited by other . The Effect of Release-Etch Processing on Surface Microstructure Stiction, R.L. Alley G.J.Cuan, R.T. Howe and K. Komvopoulos, IEEE, 1992, pp. 202-207. cited by other . Fabrication of Silicon Condenser Microphones Using Single Wafer Technology, P.R. Scheeper, A.G.H. van der Donk, W. Olthuis and P. Bergveld, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 1, No. 3, Sep. 1992, pp. 147-154. cited by other . A Silicon Condenser Microphone with a Silicon Nitride Diaphragm and Backplate, P.R. Scheeper, W. Olthuis and P. Bergveld, J. Micromech. Microeng., 2, 1992, pp. 187-189. cited by other . A Dry-Release Method Based on Polymer Columns for Microstructure Fabrication, C.H. Mastrangelo and G.S. Saloka, IEEE, 1993, pp. 77-81. cited by other . Improvement of the Performance of Microphones with a Silicon Nitride Diaphragm and Backplate, P.R. Scheeper, W. Olthuis and P. Bergveld, Sensors and Actuators A, 40, 1994, pp. 179-186. cited by other . Modelling of Silicon Condenser Microphones, A.G.H. van der Donk, P.R. Scheeper, W. Olthuis and P. Bergveld, Sensors and Actuators A, 40, 1994, pp. 203-216. cited by other . Applications of Fluorocarbon Polymers in Micromechanics and Micromachining, H.V. Jansen, J.G.E. Gardeniers, J. Elders, H.A.C. Tilmans and M. Elwenspoek, Sensors and Actuators A, 41-42, 1994, pp. 136-140. cited by other . The Design, Fabrication, and Testing of Corrugated Silicon Nitride Diaphragms, Patrick R. Scheeper, Wouter Olthuis and Piet Bergveld, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 3, No. 1, Mar. 1994, pp. 36-42. cited by other . A Review of Silicon Microphones, P.R. Scheeper, A.G.H. van der Donk, W. Olthuis and P. Bergveld, Sensors and Actuators A, 44, 1994, pp. 1-11. cited by other . Phase Transitions in Diglyceride Monolayers Studied by Computer Simulations, Pressure-Area Isotherms and X-Ray Diffraction, G.H. Peters, S. Toxvaerd, N.B. Larsen, T. Bjornholm, K. Schaumburg and K. Kjaer, Il Nuovo Cimento, vol. 16D, No. 9, 1994, pp. 1479-1485. cited by other . Structural Studies of Langmuir and Langmuir-Blodgett Films of Functionalized Surfactants, N.B. Larsen, T. Bjornholm, J. Garnaes, J. Als-Nielsen and K. Kjaer, Synthetic Metals, vol. 71, 1995, pp. 1985-1988. cited by other . Structure and Dynamics of Lipid Monolayers: Implications for Enzyme Catalysed Lipolysis, Gunther H. Peters, S. Toxvaerd, N.B. Larsen, T. Bjornholm, K. Schaumburg and K. Kjaer, Structural Biology, vol. 2, No. 5, May 1995, pp. 395-401. cited by other . On the Electromechanical Behaviour of Thin Perforated Backplates in Silicon Condenser Microphones, M. Pedersen, W. Olthuis and P. Bergveld, 8th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, and Eurosensors IX, Stockholm, Sweden, 234-A7, Jun. 25-29, 1995, pp. 13-16. cited by other . Electroacoustical Measurements of Silicon Microphones on Wafer Scale, Michael Pedersen, Ralf Schellin, Wouter Olthuis and Piet Bergveld, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 101, No. 4, Apr. 1997, pp. 2122-2128. cited by other . A Piezoelectric Triaxial Accelerometer, Patrick Scheeper, Jens Ole Gullov and Lars Munch Kofoed, J. Micromech. Microeng., 6, 1996, pp. 131-133. cited by other . On the Mechanical Behaviour of Thin Perforated Plates and Their Application in Silicon Condenser Microphones, M. Pedersen, W. Olthuis and P. Bergveld, Sensors and Actuators A, 54, 1996, pp. 499-504. cited by other . Stiction in Surface Micromachining, Niels Tas, Tonny Sonnenberg, Henri Jansen, Rob Legtenberg and Miko Elwenspoek, J. Micromech. Microeng., 6, 1996, pp. 385-397. cited by other . Self-Assembled Monolayer Films as Durable Anti-Stiction Coatings for Polysilicon Microstructures, Michael R. Houston, Roya Maboudian and Roger T. Howe, Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head, South Carolina, Jun. 2-6, 1996, pp. 42-47. cited by other . A Silicon Condenser Microphone with Polyimide Diaphragm and Backplate, Michael Pedersen, Wouter Olthuis and Piet Bergveld, Sensors and Actuators A, 63, 1997, pp. 97-104. cited by other . Harmonic Distortion in Silicon Condenser Microphones, Michael Pedersen, Wouter Olthuis and Piet Bergveld, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 102, No. 3, Sep. 1997, pp. 1582-1587. cited by other . Improved Autoadhesion Measurement Method for Micromachined Polysilicon Beams, Maarten P. de Boer and Terry A. Michalske, Materials Research Society Symp. Proc., vol. 444, 1997, pp. 87-92. cited by other . Development and Fabrication of Capacitive Sensors in Polyimide, Michael Pedersen, Wouter Olthuis and Piet Bergveld, Sensors and Materials, vol. 10, No. 1, 1998, pp. 1-20. cited by other . Micromachined Microphones Have Amplified Opportunities, Sensor Business Digest, vol. 6, No. 7, Apr. 1, 1997. cited by other . Silicon Microphone for Hearing Aid Applications, Jesper Bay, Ph.D Thesis, ATV Industrial Research Education Project, Erhvervsforskerprojekt EF 498, Jun. 1997, 136 p. cited by other . Development of a Modal Analysis Accelerometer Based on a Tunneling Displacement Transducer, Patrick R. Scheeper, J. Kurth Reynolds and Thomas W. Kenny, IEEE, Transducers '97, International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago, Jun. 16-19, 1997, pp. 867-870. cited by other . Fluorocarbon Film for Protection from Alkaline Etchant and Elimination of In-Use Stiction, Yoshinori Matsumoto, Kazumasa Yoshida and Makoto Ishida, Transducers '97, International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago, Jun. 16-19, 1997, pp. 695-698. cited by other . Self-Assembled Fluorocarbon Films for Enhanced Stiction Reduction, Uthara Srinivasan, Michael R. Houston, Roger T. Howe and Roya Maboudian, Transducers '97, International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago, June 16-19, 1997, pp. 1399-1402. cited by other . An Integrated Silicon Capacitive Microphone with Frequency-Modulated Digital Output, Michael Pedersen, Wouter Olthuis and Piet Bergveld, Sensors and Actuators A, 69, 1998, pp. 267-275. cited by other . Silicon Microphones--A Danish Perspective, Siebe Bouwstra, Torben Storgaard-Larsen, Patrick Scheeper, Jens Ole Gullov, Jesper Bay, Matthias Mullenborn and Pirmin Rombach, J. Micromech. Microeng., 8, 1998, pp. 64-68. cited by other . Alkyltrichlorosilane-Based Self-Assembled Monolayer Films for Stiction Reduction in Silicon Micromachines, Uthara Srinivasan, Michael R. Houston, Roger T. Howe and Roya Maboudian, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 7, No. 2, Jun. 1998, pp. 252-260. cited by other . X-ray Diffraction and Molecular-Dynamics Studies: Structural Analysis of Phases in Diglyceride Monolayers, G.H. Peters, N.B. Larsen, T. Bjornholm, S. Toxvaerd, K. Schaumburg and K. Kjaer, American Physical Society, Physical Review E, vol. 57, No. 3, Mar. 1998, pp. 3153-3163. cited by other . Transport Mechanisms of Alkanethiols During Microcontact Printing on Gold, E. Delamarche, H. Schmid, A. Bietsch, N.B. Larsen, H. Rothuizen, B. Michel and H. Biebuyck, J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 102, No. 18, 1998, pp. 3324-3334. cited by other . Lubrication of Polysilicon Micromechanisms with Self-Assembled Monolayers, Uthara Srinivasan, Jonathan D. Foster, Usman Habib, Roger T. Howe, Roya Maboudian, Donna Cowell Senft and Michael T. Dugger, Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Milton Head Island, South Carolina, Jun. 8-11, 1998, pp. 156-161. cited by other . Self-Assembly of Regioregular, Amphiphilic Polythiophenes into Highly Ordered .pi.-Stacked Conjugated Polymer Thin Films and Nanocircuits, Thomas Bjornholm, Daniel R. Greve, Niels Reitzel, Tue Hassenkam, Kristian Kjaer, Paul B. Howes, Niels B. Larsen, Jesper Bogelund, Manikandan Jayaraman, Paul C. Ewbank and Richard D. McCullough, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 120, No. 30, 1998, pp. 7643-7644. cited by other . Surface Texturing and Chemical Treatment Methods for Reducing High Adhesion Forces at Micromachine Interfaces, K. Komvopoulos, Part of the SPIE Conference on Materials and Device Characterization in Micromachining, Santa Clara, California, SPIE vol. 3512, Sep. 1998, pp. 106-122. cited by other . High-Performance Condenser Microphone with Fully Integrated CMOS Amplifier and DC-DC Voltage Converter, Michael Pedersen, Wouter Olthuis and Piet Bergveld, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 7, No. 4, Dec. 1998, pp. 387-394. cited by other . The Lamellar Period in Symmetric Diblock Copolymer Thin Films Studied by Neutron Reflectivity and AFM, Nikolaj Gadegaard Kristoffer Almdal, Niels Bent Larsen and Kell Mortensen, Applied Surface Science, vol. 142, 1999, pp. 608-613. cited by other . A New Class of Surface Modifiers for Stiction Reduction, Bong-Hwan Kim, Chang-Hoon Oh, Kukjin Chun, Taek-Dong Chung, Jang-Woong Byun and Yoon-Sik Lee, IEEE, 1999, pp. 189-193. cited by other . Lubricating Effect of Thin Films of Styrene-Dimethylsiloxane Block Copolymers, Sokol Ndoni, Patric Jannasch, Niels Bent Larsen and Kristoffer Almdal, Langmuir: The ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids, vol. 15, No. 11, 1999, pp. 3859-3865. cited by other . Ablation from Artificial or Laser-Induced Crater Surfaces of Silver by Laser Irradiation at 355nm, B. Toftmann, J. Schou and N.B. Larsen, Appl. Phys. A, 69 [Suppl.], 1999, pp. S811-S814. cited by other . The Incredible Shrinking Microphone, Jennifer Ouellette, The Industrial Physicist, Aug. 1999, pp. 7-9. cited by other . Pulsed Laser Deposited Coating for Stiction and Wear Reduction in MEMS Device, J.S. Pelt, M.E. Ramsey, R. Magana Jr., E. Poindexter Jr., M.P. de Boer, D.A. LaVan, M.T. Dugger, J.H. Smith and S.M. Durbin, Part of the SPIE Conference on Micromachining and Microfabrication Process Technology V, Santa Clara, California, SPIE vol. 3874, Sep. 1999, pp. 76-84. cited by other . Self-Assembled Monolayers As Anti-Stiction Coatings For MEMS: Characteristics and Recent Developments, Roya Maboudian, W. Robert Ashurst and Carlo Carraro, Sensors and Actuators, vol. 82, 2000, pp. 219-223. cited by other . Chemical Vapor Deposition Coating for Micromachines, S.S. Mani, J.G. Fleming, J.J. Sniegowski, M.P. de Boer, L.W. Irwin, J.A. Walraven, D.M. Tanner and M.T. Dugger, Material Research Society Symp. Proc., vol. 616, 2000, pp. 21-26. cited by other . Selective W for Coating and Releasing MEMS Devices, S.S. Mani, J.G. Fleming, J.J. Sniegowski, M.P. de Boer, L.W. Irwin, J.A. Walraven, D.M. Tanner, D.A. LaVan, Material Research Society Symp. Proc., vol. 605, 2000, pp. 135-140. cited by other . Characterization of Ultrathin Poly(ethylene glycol) Monolayers on Silicon Substrates, Alexander Papra, Nikolaj Gadegaard and Niels B. Larsen, Langmuir: The ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids, vol. 17, No. 5, 2001, pp. 1457-1460. cited by other . The Influence of Coating Structure on Micromachine Stiction, J.G. Kushmerick, M.G. Hankins, M.P. de Boer, P.J. Clews, R.W. Carpick and B.C. Bunker, Tribology Letters, vol. 10, No. 1-2, 2001, pp. 103-108. cited by other . Wettability Modification of Polysilicon for Stiction Reduction in Silicon Based Micro-Electromechanical Structures, Angeles Marcia Almanza-Workman, Srini Raghaven, Pierre Deymier, David J. Monk and Ray Roop, Solid State Phenomena, vol. 76-77, 2001, pp. 23-26. cited by other . New Applications and Services in Smart Buildings Using Multifunctional Transponders, Gerd von Bogel and Klaus Scherer, MST News, Feb. 2001, pp. 34-35. cited by other . Dichlorodimethylsilane as an Anti-Stiction Monolayer for MEMS: A Comparison to the Octadecyltrichlosilane Self-Assembled Monolayer, W. Robert Ashurst, Christina Yau, Carlo Carraro, Roya Maboudian and Michael T. Dugger, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 10, No. 1, Mar. 2001, pp. 41-49. cited by other . Surface Modification of Polystyrene by Blending Substituted Styrene Copolymers, Xianyi Chen, Katja Jankova, Joergen Kops, Niels B. Larsen, Walther Batsberg and Ib Johannsen, Journal of Polymer Science: Part B, vol. 39, 2001, pp. 1046-1054. cited by other . Microfluidic Networks Made of Poly(dimethylsiloxane), Si, and Au Coated with Polyethylene Glycol for Patterning Proteins onto Surfaces, Alexander Papra, Andre Bernard, David Juncker, Niels B. Larsen, Bruno Michel and Emmanuel Delmarche, Langmuir: The ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids, vol. 17, 2001, pp. 4090-4095. cited by other . Surface Morphology of PS-PDMS Diblock Copolymer Films, T.H. Andersen, S. Tougaard, N.B. Larsen, K. Almdal and I. Johannsen, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, vol. 121, 2001, pp. 93-110. cited by other . Polymer Durability, Afshin Ghanbari-Siahkali, Peter Kingshott, Niels Bent Larsen, Lutfi Fakhri Al-Saidi, Kristoffer Almdal, and Ib Johannsen, MONOPOL Centerkontrakten at Danish Polymercenter, May 22, 2001. cited by other . Anti-Stiction Coatings For Surface Micromachines, Roya Maboudian, SPIE Conference on Micromachining and Microfabrication Process Technology IV, Santa Clara, California, Sep. 1998, pp. 108-113. cited by other . Fabrication and Characterization of a Piezoelectric Accelerometer, Roger de Rues, Jens Ole Gullov and Patrick R. Scheeper, J. Micromech. Microeng., vol. 9, 1999, pp. 123-126. cited by other . Optimization of Capative Microphone and Pressure Sensor Perfomance by Capacitor-Electrode Shaping, J.A. Voorthuyzen, A.J. Spenkels, A.G.H. van deer Donk, P.R. Scheeper and P. Bergveld, Sensors and Actuators A, 25-27, 1991, pp. 331-336. cited by other . PECVD Silicon Nitride Diaphragms for Condenser Microphones, P.R. Scheeper, J.A. Voorthuyzen and P. Bergveld, Sensors and Actuators B, 4, 1991, pp. 79-84. cited by other . Deposition and Characterization of ITO Films Produced by Laser Ablation at 355 nm, E. Holmelund, B. Thestrup, N.B. Larsen, M.M. Nielsen, E. Johnson and S. Tougaard, Applied Physics A, 74, 2002, pp. 147-152, paper received on Jan. 16, 2001 and published online on Oct. 17, 2001. cited by other . Directed Self-Assembly of Amphiphilic Regioregular Polythiophenes on the Nanometer Scale, D.R. Greve, Niels Reitzel, Tue Hassenkam, Jesper Bogelund, Kristian Kjaer, Paul B. Howes, Niels B. Larsen, Manikandan Jayaraman, Manikandan Jayaraman, R.D. McCullough and T. Bjornholm, Synthetic Metals, 102, 1999, pp. 1502-1505. cited by other . Langmuir-Blodgett Films of a Functionalized Molecule with Cross-Sectional Mismatch Between Head and Tail, J. Garnaes, N.B. Larsen, T. Bjornholm, M. Jorgensen, K. Kjaer, J. Als-Nielsen, J. Jorgensen and J.A. Zasadzinski, Science, vol. 264, May 27, 1994, pp. 1301-1304. cited by other . Ordering of the Disk-Like 2,3,6,7,10,11-Hexakis(hexylthio)triphenylene in Solution and at a Liquid-Solid Interface, J.C. Gabriel, N.B. Larsen, M. Larsen, N. Harrit, J.S. Pedersen, K. Schaumburg and K. Bechgaard, Langmuir: The ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids, vol. 12, 1996, pp. 1690-1692. cited by other . Micromachined Transducers Sourcebook, Gregory T.A. Kovacs, WCB McGaw-Hill, 1998, 911 p. cited by other . A Silicon Condenser Microphone: Materials and Technology, P. Scheeper, 1993, 204 p. 25-page fax from Anthony G. Sitko of Marshall, Gerstein & Borun to Jorn Bjerragaar-Nielsen of Sonion A/S, dated Jul. 28, 2005, transmitting an analysis of Patrick Scheeper, A Silicon Condenser Microphone: Materials and Technology, 1993 and Gregory T.A. Kovacs, Micromachined Transducer Sourcebook, 1998 and further transmitting a draft Request For Exparte Reexamination. cited by other . PCT International Preliminary Examination Report, European Patent Office, completed Jun. 13, 2003, for International application No. PCT/DK02/00365 which claims priority to U.S. Appl. No. 09/867,606 (now U.S. Patent No. 6,859,542). cited by other . Suppression of Stiction in MEMS, C.H. Mastrangelo, 1999 Spring MRS Meeting, Boston, MA, Dec. 1999, pp. 1-12. cited by other . Advanced Microphone Technology, Peter V. Leoppert and Timothy K. Wickstrom, Emkay Innovative Products, Rolling Meadows, Illinois, Presented at AVIOS, 1999. cited by other . Morphology Evolution of Polycarbonate-Polystrene Blends During Compounding, Chengzhi Chuai, Kristoffer Almdal, Ib Johannsen and Jorgen Lyngaae-Jorgensen, The Danish Polymer Center at The Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark, 2001. cited by other . Critical Review: Adhesion in Surface Micromechnical Structures, Roya Maboudian and Roger T. Howe, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 15(1), Jan./Feb. 1997, pp. 1-20. cited by other . Silanization of Solid Substrates: A Step Toward Reproducibility, J.B. Brzoska, I. Ben Azouz and F. Rondelez, Langmuir, vol. 10, 1994, pp. 4367-4373. cited by other . Thoughts on the Structure of Alkylsilane Monolayers, Mark J. Stevens, Langmuir, vol. 15, 1999, pp. 2773-2778. cited by other . Mechanistic Aspects of Alkylchlororsilane Coupling Reactions, R.R. Rye, G.C. Nelson and M.T. Dugger, Langmuir, vol. 13, 1997, pp. 2965-2972. cited by other . A Low-Voltage Silicon Condenser Microphone for Hearing Instrument Applications, Pirmin Rombach, Matthias Mullenborn, Udo Klein, Lis Nielsen and Roger Frehoff, Joint Meeting of ASA/EAA/DEGA, Session 2aEA, Engineering Acoustics: Silicon Sensors, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 105, No. 2, Pt. 2 Feb. 1999, p. 997. cited by other . A Silicon Condenser Microphone With a Highly Perforated Backplate, J. Bergqvist, F. Rudolf, J. Maisano, F. Parodi and M. Rossi, IEEE, 1991, pp. 266-269. cited by other . Lubrication of Digital Micromirror Devices.TM., Steven A. Henck, Tribology Letters, vol. 3, 1997, pp. 239-247. cited by other . Vapor Phase Self-Assembly of Fluorinated Monolayers on Silicon and Germanium Oxide, Patrick W. Hoffmann, Martin Stelzle and John F. Rabolt, Langmuir, vol. 13, 1997, pp. 1877-1880. cited by other . A High Performance MEMS Thin-Film Teflon Electret Microphone, Wen H. Hsieh, Tze-Jung Yao and Yu-Chong Tai, Transducers '99, Sendai, Japan, Jun. 7-10, 1999, pp. 1064-1067. cited by other . Surface Micromachined Driven Shielded Condenser Microphone With a Sacrificial Layer Etched From the Backside, M. Ikeda, N. Shimizu and M. Esashi, Transducers '99, Sendai, Japan, Jun. 7-10, 1999, pp. 1070-1073. cited by other . High Sensitivity Acoustic Transducers With Thin p + Membranes and Gold Back-Plate, A.E. Kabir, R. Bashir, J. Bernstein, J. De Santis, R. Mathews, J.O. O'Boyle and C. Bracken, Sensors and Actuators, vol. 78, 1999, pp. 138-142. cited by other . Improved IC-Compatible Piezoelectric Microphone and CMOS Process, E.S. Kim, J.R. Kim and R.S. Muller, IEEE, 1991, pp. 270-273. cited by other . Elimination of Post-Release Adhesion in Microstructures Using Conformal Fluorocarbon Coatings, Piu Francis Man, Bishnu P. Gogoi and Carlos H. Mastrangelo, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 6, No. 1, Mar. 1997, pp. 25-34. cited by other . Anti-Stiction Silanization Coating to Silicon Micro-Structures by a Vapor Phase Deposition Process, Jiro Sakata, Toshiyuki Tsuchiya, Atsuko Inoue, Sanae Tokumitsu and Hirofumi Funabashi, Technical Digest--Transducers '99, Sendai, Japan, Jun. 7-10, 1999. cited by other . Crosstalk Study of an Integrated Ultrasound Transducer Array With a Micromachined Diaphragm Structure, Jian-Hua Mo, J. Brian Fowlkes, Andrew L. Robinson and Paul L. Carson, Transducers '91, 1991 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, 1991, pp. 258-265. cited by other . A Micromachined Thin-Film Teflon Electret Microphone, Wen H. Hsieh, Tseng-Yang Hsu and Yu-Chong Tai, Transducers '97, 1997 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago, Jun. 16-19, 1997, pp. 425-428. cited by other . A Polymer Condenser Microphone on Silicon with On-Chip CMOS Amplifier, Michael Pedersen, Wouter Olthuis and Piet Bergveld, Transducers '97, 1997 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago, Jun. 16-19, 1997, pp. 445-446. cited by other . Future of MEMS: An Industry Point of View, Benedetto Vigna, 7th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multiphysics Simulation and Experiments in Micro-Electronics and Micro-Systems, EuroSim E 2006, IEEE, 2006 (first page only). cited by other . All-Surface-Micromachined Si Microphone, Flavio Pardo, R. Boie, G. Elko, R. Sarpeshkar and D.J. Bishop, Transducers '99, Sendai, Japan, Jun. 7-10, 1999, pp. 1068-1069. cited by other . Measuring and Modeling Electrostatic Adhesion in Micromachines, M.P. de Boer, M.R. Tabbara, M.T. Dugger, P.J. Clews and T.A. Michalskim, Transducers '97, International Conference on Solid State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago, Jun. 16-19, 1997, vol. 1, pp. 229-232. cited by other . Alkene Based Monolayer Films as Anti-Stiction Coatings for Polysilicone MEMS, W. Robert Ashurst, Christina Yau, Carlo Carraro, Roger T. Howe and Roya Maboudian, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 91, No. 3, 2001. cited by other . Anti-Stiction Methods for Micromechanical Devices: A Statistical Comparison of Performance, Svetlana Tatic-Lucic, Paul Jaramillo, James Bustillo, Shawn Cunningham and Judd Carper, Transducers '99, Sendai, Japan, 1999, pp. 522-525. cited by other . Redacted version of Stipulated Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice, Sonion MEMS A/S v. Knowles Electronics LLC, Civil Action No. 05-566-GMS, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware; non-redacted version filed under seal on Mar. 14, 2006 and signed by Judge Sleet on Mar. 31, 2006; redacted version entered into court docket on Apr. 7, 2006. cited by other . Complaint, Sonion MEMS A/S v. Knowles Electronics LLC, Civil Action No. 05-566-GMS, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, dated Aug. 4, 2005. cited by other . Design of a Silicon Microphone with Differential Read-Out of a Sealed Double Parallel-Plate Capacitor, Jesper Bay, Ole Hansen, and Siebe Bouwstra, 8.sup.th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, and Eurosensors IX, Stockholm, Sweden, Jun. 25-29, 1995, pp. 700-703. cited by other . "Anti-Stiction Hydrophobic Surfaces for Microsystems", by P. Vourmard, et al., CSEM scientific and technical report 1998. cited by other . "The property of plasma polymerized fluorocarbon film in relation to CH.sub.4/C.sub.4F.sub.8 ratio and substrate temperature" by Y. Matsumoto, et al., Proc. of Transducers '99, Jun. 7-10, 1999, Sendia, Japan, 34-37. cited by other . "Self-Assembled Monolayer Films as Durable Anti-Stiction Coatings for Polysilicon Microstructures" by M.R. Houston, et al. Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop Hilton head, South Carolina, Jun. 206, 1996. cited by other . "Elimination of Post-Release Adhesion in Microstructures Using Conformal Fluorocarbon Coatings" by P.F. Man, et al. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 6, No. 1, Mar. 1997. cited by other . "Anti-Stiction Methods for Micromechanical Devices: A Statistical Comparison of Performance" by S. Tatic-Lucid, et al. Proc. of Transducers '99, Jun. 7-10, 1999, Sendai, Japan 522-525. cited by other . "A New Class of Surface Modification of Striction Reduction", C.-H. Oh et al. Proc. of Transducers '99, Jun. 7-10, 1999, Sendai, Japan 30-33. cited by other . "Self-assembled Monolayers as Anti-Stiction Coatings for Surface Microstructures", by R. Maboudin, Proc. of Transducers, '99, Jun. 7-10, 1999, Sendai, Japan 22-25. cited by other . "Anti-Stiction Silanization Coating of Silicon Micro-Structures by a Vapor Phase Deposition Process", by J. Sakate, et al. Proc. of Transducers '99, Jun. 7-10, 1999, Sendai, Japan 26-29. cited by other . "Fabrication of a Silicon Micromachined Capacitive Microphone Using A Dry-Etch Process" Sensor and Actuators A 53 (1996) 237-242 by Ning et al. cited by other. |
Primary Examiner: Ensey; Brian
Attorney, Agent or Firm:
What is claimed is:
1. A condenser microphone comprising a diaphragm and a back-plate, wherein an inner surface of said diaphragm forms a capacitor in combination with an inner surface of said back-plate, said back-plate and/or said diaphragm is/are provided with a number of openings, and said inner surface of the back-plate and said inner surface of the diaphragm being provided with a hydrophobic layer, and wherein the static distance between said diaphragm and said back-plate is smaller than 10 .mu.m.
2. A condenser microphone according to claim 1, wherein at least the inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate are made from a hydrophilic material.
3. A condenser microphone according to claim 1, wherein the smallest dimension of each of the openings does not exceed 10 .mu.m.
4. A condenser microphone according to claim 3, wherein the smallest dimension of each of the openings does not exceed 5 .mu.m.
5. A condenser microphone according to claim 4, wherein the smallest dimension of each of the openings does not exceed 1 .mu.m.
6. A condenser microphone according to claim 5, wherein the smallest dimension of each of the openings does not exceed 0.5 .mu.m.
7. A condenser microphone according to claim 4, wherein the smallest dimension of each of the openings is approximately 3 .mu.m.
8. A condenser microphone according to claim 1, wherein the hydrophobic layer base material comprises an alkylsilane.
9. A condenser microphone according to claim 1, wherein the hydrophobic layer base material comprises a perhaloalkylsilane.
10. A condenser microphone according to claim 1, wherein the static distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate is smaller than 5 .mu.m.
11. A condenser microphone according to claim 10, wherein the static distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate is smaller than 1 .mu.m.
12. A condenser microphone according to claim 11, wherein the static distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate is smaller than 0.5 .mu.m.
13. A condenser microphone according to claim 12, wherein the static distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate is smaller than 0.3 .mu.m.
14. A condenser microphone according to claim 11, wherein the static distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate is approximately 0.9 .mu.m.
15. A condenser microphone according to claim 1, wherein the hydrophobic layer has a contact angle for water being between 90.degree. and 130.degree..
16. A condenser microphone according to claim 15, wherein the hydrophobic layer has a contact angle for water being between 100.degree. and 110.degree..
17. A condenser microphone according to claim 1, wherein the hydrophobic layer is stable at temperatures between -40.degree. C. and 130.degree. C.
18. A condenser microphone according to claim 17, wherein the hydrophobic layer is stable at temperatures between -30.degree. C. and 110.degree. C.
19. A condenser microphone according to claim 1, wherein the hydrophobic layer is stable at temperatures up to at least 400.degree. C. for at least 5 minutes.
20. A condenser microphone comprising a diaphragm and a back-plate, wherein an inner surface of said diaphragm forms a capacitor in combination with an inner surface of said back-plate, said back-plate and/or said diaphragm is/are provided with a number of openings, and said inner surface of the back-plate and/or said inner surface of the diaphragm being provided with a hydrophobic layer having a contact angle for water being larger than 90.degree., and wherein the static distance between said diaphragm and said back-plate is smaller than 10 .mu.m.
21. A condenser microphone comprising: a diaphragm; a back-plate, wherein an inner surface of said diaphragm forms a capacitor in combination with an inner surface of said back-plate, said back-plate and/or said diaphragm being provided with a number of openings, wherein the static distance between said diaphragm and said back-plate is smaller than 10 .mu.m; and a hydrophobic layer, provided on said inner surface of the back-plate and/or on said inner surface of the diaphragm.
.Iadd.22. A microelectromechanical microphone, comprising: a diaphragm and a back-plate with an air gap therebetween, the diaphragm and a back-plate including respective inner surfaces forming a capacitor, the respective inner surfaces being made of a hydrophobic or hydrophilic materials; a number of openings leading to the air gap; and a hydrophobic molecular monolayer coating on the inner surface of the diaphragm or the back-plate, wherein molecules of the molecular monolayer are cross-linked and multi-bounded to the inner surface of the diaphragm or the back-plate..Iaddend.
.Iadd.23. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 22, wherein the multi-bounded molecular monolayer forms hydrophobic chains pointing away from the inner surface of the diaphragm or the back-plate..Iaddend.
.Iadd.24. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 23, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer has a contact angle for water greater than 90.degree...Iaddend.
.Iadd.25. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 24, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer includes a perfluoralkylsilane..Iaddend.
.Iadd.26. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 24, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer includes an alkylsilane..Iaddend.
.Iadd.27. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 24, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer includes a perhaloalkylsilane..Iaddend.
.Iadd.28. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 23, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer has a contact angle for water greater than about 100.degree...Iaddend.
.Iadd.29. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 23, wherein the hydrophobic molecule monolayer is stable at temperatures up to at least 400.degree. C. for at least 5 minutes..Iaddend.
.Iadd.30. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 22, wherein the molecular monolayer comprises a structured molecule monolayer..Iaddend.
.Iadd.31. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 22, wherein the diaphragm or the back-plate comprises respective materials including at least one of silicon, poly-silicon, silicon-oxide, silicon nitride, or silicon-rich silicon nitride..Iaddend.
.Iadd.32. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 22, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer includes a perfluoralkylsilane, an alkylsilane or a perhaloalkylsilane..Iaddend.
.Iadd.33. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 22, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer has a contact angle for water between 90.degree. and 130.degree...Iaddend.
.Iadd.34. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 22, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer is stable at temperatures up to at least 400.degree. C. for at least 5 minutes..Iaddend.
.Iadd.35. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 22, wherein the number of openings is in the back-plate, the openings receiving the hydrophobic molecular monolayer during the coating process..Iaddend.
.Iadd.36. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 35, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer is stable at temperatures up to at least 400.degree. C. for at least 5 minutes and has a contact angle for water between 90.degree. and 130.degree...Iaddend.
.Iadd.37. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 22, wherein the number of openings is in the diaphragm, the openings receiving the hydrophobic molecular monolayer during the coating process..Iaddend.
.Iadd.38. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 22, wherein the number of openings is in the diaphragm and in the back-plate, the openings receiving the hydrophobic molecular monolayer during the coating process..Iaddend.
.Iadd.39. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 22, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer has a contact angle for water between 100.degree. and 110.degree...Iaddend.
.Iadd.40. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 22, wherein the air gap has a static distance not exceeding 10 .mu.m..Iaddend.
.Iadd.41. A microelectromechanical microphone, comprising: a diaphragm having an inner surface; a back-plate having an inner surface that, together with the inner surface of the diaphragm, forms a capacitor, wherein the static distance between the back-plate and the diaphragm does not exceed 10 .mu.m; and a hydrophobic layer on the inner surface of the diaphragm and the inner surface of the back-plate, the hydrophobic layer being deposited through a number of openings provided in at least one of (i) the back-plate, (ii) the diaphragm, or (ii) gaps at a periphery of the back-plate and the diaphragm..Iaddend.
.Iadd.42. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 41, wherein the hydrophobic layer is a hydrophobic molecular monolayer, wherein molecules of the molecule monolayer are cross-linked and multi-bounded to the respective inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate..Iaddend.
.Iadd.43. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 37, wherein the molecular monolayer comprises a structured molecular monolayer..Iaddend.
.Iadd.44. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 37, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer has a contact angle for water greater than 90.degree...Iaddend.
.Iadd.45. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 39, wherein the hydrophobic molecule monolayer is stable at temperatures up to at least 400.degree. C. for at least 5 minutes..Iaddend.
.Iadd.46. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 41, wherein the hydrophobic coating has a contact angle for water greater than 90.degree...Iaddend.
.Iadd.47. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 41, wherein the hydrophobic layer is stable at temperatures up to at least 400.degree. C. for at least 5 minutes..Iaddend.
.Iadd.48. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 41, wherein the hydrophobic layer is deposited by gaseous-phase deposition onto the inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate through the number of openings..Iaddend.
.Iadd.49. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 41, wherein the hydrophobic layer is deposited by liquid-phase deposition onto the inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate through the number of openings..Iaddend.
.Iadd.50. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 41, wherein the hydrophobic layer is stable at temperatures between at least -30.degree. C. and at least 110.degree. C..Iaddend.
.Iadd.51. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 41, wherein the hydrophobic layer has a contact angle for water greater than about 100.degree...Iaddend.
.Iadd.52. A microelectromechanical microphone, comprising: a diaphragm and a back-plate defining an air gap between respective inner surfaces thereof, the respective inner surfaces forming a capacitor, the static distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate not exceeding 10 .mu.m; a number of openings leading to the air gap; and a hydrophobic layer deposited through the number of openings into the air gap to form a structured monolayer on at least one of the inner surface of the diaphragm or the inner surface of the back-plate..Iaddend.
.Iadd.53. The microelectromechanical microphone of claim 52, wherein the diaphragm includes the number of openings..Iaddend.
.Iadd.54. The microelectromechanical microphone of claim 52, wherein the back-plate includes the number of openings..Iaddend.
.Iadd.55. The microelectromechanical microphone of claim 52, wherein the back-plate and the diaphragm includes the number of openings..Iaddend.
.Iadd.56. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 55, wherein the hydrophobic layer is deposited by gaseous-phase or liquid-phase deposition onto the inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate through the number of openings..Iaddend.
.Iadd.57. The microelectromechanical microphone of claim 52, wherein the number of openings correspond to gaps at the periphery of the back-plate and the diaphragm..Iaddend.
.Iadd.58. The microelectromechanical microphone of claim 52, wherein the number of openings are positioned between the diaphragm and the back-plate..Iaddend.
.Iadd.59. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 58, wherein the hydrophobic layer has a contact angle for water greater than about 100.degree...Iaddend.
.Iadd.60. The microelectromechanical microphone of claim 52, wherein the hydrophobic layer is a hydrophobic molecular monolayer, wherein molecules of the molecular monolayer are cross-linked and multi-bounded to the respective inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate..Iaddend.
.Iadd.61. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 60, wherein the molecule monolayer comprises a structured molecule monolayer..Iaddend.
.Iadd.62. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 61, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer has a contact angle for water greater than 90.degree...Iaddend.
.Iadd.63. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 62, wherein the hydrophobic molecular monolayer is stable at temperatures between at least -30.degree. C. and at least 110.degree. C..Iaddend.
.Iadd.64. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 52, wherein the hydrophobic layer is stable at temperatures up to at least 400.degree. C. for at least 5 minutes..Iaddend.
.Iadd.65. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 52, wherein the hydrophobic layer is deposited by gaseous-phase deposition onto the inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate through the number of openings..Iaddend.
.Iadd.66. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 52, wherein the hydrophobic layer is deposited by liquid-phase deposition onto the inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate through the number of openings..Iaddend.
.Iadd.67. The microelectromechanical microphone according to claim 52, wherein the hydrophobic layer is stable at temperatures between at least -30.degree. C. and at least 110.degree. C..Iaddend.
.Iadd.68. A condenser microphone comprising a diaphragm and a back-plate, wherein an inner surface of said diaphragm forms a capacitor in combination with an inner surface of said back-plate, a number of openings being provided in at least one of (i) said back-plate, (ii) said diaphragm, or (ii) gaps at a periphery of said back-plate and said diaphragm, and said inner surface of the back-plate and/or said inner surface of the diaphragm being provided with a hydrophobic layer having a contact angle for water being larger than 90.degree., and wherein the static distance between said diaphragm and said back-plate is smaller than 10 .mu.m..Iaddend.
.Iadd.69. The condenser microphone according to claim 1, wherein said inner surface of the back-plate and said inner surface of the diaphragm is provided with said hydrophobic layer by depositing said hydrophobic layer through the number of openings..Iaddend.
.Iadd.70. The condenser microphone according to claim 1, wherein said hydrophobic layer is a hydrophobic molecular monolayer, and wherein molecules of said molecular monolayer are cross-linked and multi-bounded to the inner surface of at least one of said diaphragm or said back-plate..Iaddend.
.Iadd.71. The condenser microphone according to claim 70, wherein the multi-bounded molecular monolayer forms hydrophobic chains pointing away from the inner surface of the diaphragm or the back-plate..Iaddend.
.Iadd.72. The condenser microphone according to claim 20, wherein said hydrophobic layer is a hydrophobic molecular monolayer, and wherein molecules of said molecular monolayer are cross-linked and multi-bounded to the inner surface of at least one of said diaphragm or said back-plate..Iaddend.
.Iadd.73. The condenser microphone according to claim 21, wherein said hydrophobic layer is a hydrophobic molecular monolayer, and wherein molecules of said molecular monolayer are cross-linked and multi-bounded to the inner surface of at least one of said diaphragm or said back-plate..Iaddend.
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a method of providing a hydrophobic layer to inner surfaces of a microstructure, in particular to inner surfaces of a condenser microphone, in order to avoid or prevent stiction between said inner surfaces.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
During the manufacturing as well as the operation of micro electromechanical system (MEMS) devices, it is well known that failure due to adhesion between surfaces, e.g. between a moving surface and a substantially stationary surface, of the device may occur. This phenomenon is referred to as stiction. Stiction occurs with a larger probability in microstructures, typically having dimensions in the order of magnitude of 1-3 .mu.m because the surface-to-volume ratio increases and surface forces, which are responsible for stiction, are correspondingly higher. Stiction may occur during or after the manufacturing process (i.e. during operation), after releasing of the microstructure where the surface tension of the rinse liquid is sufficiently strong to pull the suspending microstructures in contact with the substrate or another compliant or stiff counter surface, leading to permanent adhesion. This kind of stiction is referred to as `after-release stiction`. Alternatively or additionally, stiction may occur after a successful release, e.g. when a microstructure is exposed to an environment of increased humidity or changing temperature. If the microstructure is first exposed to a humid environment, water vapour can condense and form a water film/droplets on the device surfaces. When the distance between the two surfaces decreases during device operation and the water film/droplets of one surface touch the counter surface, the two surfaces will stick together. This phenomenon may occur during the normal device operation and is therefore referred to as `in-use stiction`. In-use stiction is in particular a problem in microstructures in which opposite surfaces, e.g. a diaphragm and a back-plate, form capacitors in combination with each other. This is, e.g., the case in condenser microphones and condenser pressure sensors.
The present invention is concerned with preventing stiction in microstructures, in particular in MEMS condenser microphones.
It is further known that the application of a hydrophobic layer to the surfaces in question can solve, or a least relieve, the problem. This has, e.g., been described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,822,170, in "Anti-Stiction Hydrophobic Surfaces for Microsystems" by P. Voumard, et al., CSEM scientific and technical report 1998, Neuchatel, Switzerland, 26, in "The property of plasma polymerized fluorocarbon film in relation to CH.sub.4/C.sub.4F.sub.8 ratio and substrate temperature" by Y. Matsumoto, et al., Proc. of Transducers '99, Jun. 7-10, 1999, Sendai, Japan, 34-37, in "Self-Assembled Monolayer Films as Durable Anti-Stiction Coatings for Polysilicon Microstructures" By M. R. Houston, et al. Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop Hilton Head, South Carolina, Jun. 2-6, 1996, 42-47, in "Elimination of Post-Release Adhesion in Microstructures Using Conformal Fluorocarbon Coatings" by P. F. Man, et al., Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1, March 1997, in "Anti-Stiction Methods for Micromechanical Devices: A Statistical Comparison of Performance" by S. Tatic-Lucid, et al., Proc. of Transducers '99, Jun. 7-10, 1999, Sendai, Japan, 522-525, in "A New Class of Surface Modification for Stiction Reduction", by C.-H. Oh, et al., Proc. of Transducers '99, Jun. 7-10, 1999, Sendai, Japan, 30-33, in "Self-Assembled Monolayers as Anti-Stiction Coatings for Surface Microstructures", by R. Maboudin, Proc. of Transducers '99, Jun. 7-10, 1999, Sendai, Japan, 22-25, and in "Anti-Stiction Silanization Coating to Silicon Micro-Structures by a Vapor Phase Deposition Process", by J. Sakata, et al., Proc. of Transducers '99, Jun. 7-10, 1999, Sendai, Japan, 26-29.
The references above describe depositions of a hydrophobic layer, e.g. a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) onto surfaces of the microstructure, the microstructure preferably being made from a silicon material, such as a Si-wafer or poly-silicon layers. The deposition is primarily performed by successively positioning the microstructure in various liquids. However, in "Anti-Stiction Silanization Coating to Silicon Micro-Structures by a Vapor Phase Deposition Process", by J. Sakata, et al., Proc. of Transducers '99, Jun. 7-10, 1999, Sendai, Japan, 26-29, The deposition is performed by a vapour phase deposition process (dry process), in which the microstructure is positioned in a container containing a gas or a vapour. The advantage of this process is that it is possible to obtain a homogeneous coating, even inside a complicated microstructure, and even inside a space with narrow gaps. However, it has turned out that using a vapour phase deposition process results in a hydrophobic layer having a surface which is less structured than the surface of a hydrophobic layer which has been deposited using a liquid phase deposition process. This is due to the fact that the molecules forming the monolayer form cross bindings in addition to forming bonds to the surface. With a certain probability, this reaction already happens in the gas-phase. Therefore, molecule clusters are deposited that cannot chemically bind to the surface anymore or that can only partly chemically bind to the surface. This results in a less structured layer and therefore rough surface, which makes it possible for water droplets to attach to the surface, even though the material surface otherwise would be highly hydrophobic. Thus, the hydrophobic property of the surfaces is partly or possibly totally reduced. Furthermore, the process described in this reference requires special equipment. In addition, the sacrificial layer has to be removed and the structure has to be released before the hydrophobic layer can be applied. The release process is a critical process with a certain yield, which will reduce the total yield of the manufacturing process and increase the manufacturing costs. The gas phase deposition also needs pumping steps, which bear the risk for stiction due to fast pressure transients. Therefore, the coating process performed from a liquid material is preferred.
It is, thus, desirable to be able to provide a method for providing a hydrophobic layer to the inner parts of a microstructure in such a way that the hydrophobic property of the layer is maintained.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of providing a microstructure with a hydrophobic layer in such a way that a very structured layer may be applied to microstructures, even to microstructures having internal spaces with narrow gaps.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method of providing a microstructure with a hydrophobic layer, which may be introduced as a natural part of the manufacturing process for the microstructure.
It is an even further object of the present invention to provide a method of providing a microstructure with a hydrophobic layer, which minimises the number of production steps of the manufacture of the microstructure.
It is an even further object of the present invention to provide a condenser microphone in which the stiction phenomenon is avoided.
According to the present invention the above and other objects are fulfilled by a method of providing at least part of a diaphragm and at least a part of a back-plate of a condenser microphone with a hydrophobic layer so as to avoid stiction between said diaphragm and said back-plate, said method comprising the steps of providing a condenser microphone comprising a diaphragm and a back-plate, wherein an inner surface of said diaphragm forms a capacitor in combination with an inner surface of said back-plate, and providing the hydrophobic layer onto the inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate through a number of openings, said openings being in the back-plate, in the diaphragm and/or between the diaphragm and the back-plate.
The condenser microphone may be a microphone for recording ordinary sound waves, e.g. propagating in atmospheric air. However, it may additionally or alternatively be a microphone which is adapted to perform measurements in a hostile environment, e.g. in a humid, extremely hot, or extremely cold environment. In this case the condenser microphone needs to be able to function under such extreme conditions. It is especially important that water vapour (or other vapours which the microphone may be in contact with) can not condense easily on the inner parts of the microphone, since this would lead to water droplets and a temporary stiction between the diaphragm and the back-plate, which in turn causes the functionality of the microphone to decreases. If the water in the air gap dries, the back-plate and the diaphragm have to separate again. According to the invention such condensation is prevented or at least reduced by providing the diaphragm and at least part of the back-plate with a hydrophobic layer.
The microphone is preferably a MEMS microphone, i.e. at least the diaphragm and/or the back-plate are manufactured using semiconductor technology.
An inner surface of the diaphragm and an inner surface of the back-plate of the microphone form a capacitor. Since the diaphragm is movable in relation to the back-plate, which is substantially stationary, the capacitance of said capacitor depends on the immediate distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate.
The hydrophobic layer is provided onto the inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate, respectively, through a number of openings. The openings are positioned in the back-plate, in the diaphragm and/or between the diaphragm and the back-plate. Thus, the coating material may be applied to inner surfaces of the microphone in a homogeneous and structured manner, even if the microphone comprises small cavities to which it would otherwise be difficult to gain access. Furthermore, this coating process may advantageously be applied in continuation of the normal manufacturing procedure. Thus, it is neither necessary to dry the microphone after the normal manufacturing steps before the coating process, nor to use special equipment for the process. This renders the coating process of the present invention cost effective and easy to perform, which in turn makes it very attractive for commercial purposes.
For the gas-phase deposition but even more for the liquid deposition the dynamics of the deposition processes have to be taken into account. It is very difficult to deposit the coating material into the air gap of a MEMS microphone with typical lateral dimensions (back-plate or diaphragm radius and side length, respectively) of 0.5 mm to 2 mm and typical air gap heights of only 0.3 .mu.m to 10 .mu.m. These high aspect ratios reduce the deposition rate and make the process very time consuming and inefficient. In order to get a direct access to the middle part of the air gap, the deposition has to be performed through a number of openings in the back-plate, in the diaphragm, and/or gaps at the periphery of the back-plate and the diaphragm. This makes the process faster and thus more cost effective.
At least the inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate may be made from a hydrophilic material. If the inner diaphragm surface and/or the inner surface of the back-plate are hydrophilic, this property would cause stiction if water would dry out the air gap volume. The term `hydrophilic material` could be interpreted as a material having a surface which shows with water a contact angle below 90.degree.. Thus, water droplets may easily form on a hydrophilic surface. Materials that form hydrophilic surfaces may, e.g., be silicon, poly-silicon, SiO.sub.2, Si.sub.xN.sub.y (such as Si.sub.3N.sub.4), and/or any other suitable material.
The inner surface of the diaphragm and/or the inner surface of the back-plate may, however, process hydrophobic properties which need to be improved.
In one embodiment of the present invention the smallest dimension of each of the openings does not exceed 10 .mu.m, such as not exceeding 7 .mu.m, such as not exceeding 5 .mu.m, such as not exceeding 3 .mu.m, such as not exceeding 1 .mu.m, such as not exceeding 0.7 .mu.m, such as not exceeding 0.5 .mu.m. The smallest dimension of each of the openings may, thus, be approximately 3 .mu.m, such as approximately 2 .mu.m, approximately 4 .mu.m, approximately 2.5 .mu.m, approximately 3.5 .mu.m, approximately 2.7 .mu.m, or approximately 3.2 .mu.m. The smallest dimension of each of the openings may, alternatively, be larger. The smallest dimension of each of the openings may also be even smaller.
One or more of the openings may be shaped as substantially circular hole(s), in which case the smallest dimension of each opening may refer to the diameter of such a hole. Alternatively or additionally, one or more of the openings may be shaped as elongated groove(s), in which case the smallest dimension of each opening may refer to the transversal size of such a groove. Alternatively or additionally, one or more of the openings may be shaped as a square, a rectangle, or any other polygonal shape, and/or one or more of the openings may be shaped in any other suitable way.
The static distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate is preferably smaller than 10 .mu.m, such as smaller than 7 .mu.m, such as smaller than 5 .mu.m, such as smaller than 3 .mu.m, such as smaller than 1 .mu.m, such as smaller than 0.7 .mu.m, such as smaller than 0.5 .mu.m, such smaller than 0.3 .mu.m, such as approximately 0.2 .mu.m. The static distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate may, thus, be approximately 1 .mu.m, such as approximately 0.5 .mu.m, approximately 0.7 .mu.m, approximately 0.9 .mu.m, approximately 1.2 .mu.m, or approximately 1.5 .mu.m.
The term `static distance` should be interpreted as the distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate when the diaphragm is in a static equilibrium. In this case inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate will normally be approximately parallel to each other, and the `static distance` should be understood as the distance between these inner surfaces along a direction being normal to the two parallel inner surfaces.
The step of providing the hydrophobic layer may be performed by chemical binding of the hydrophobic layer to poly-silicon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride and/or silicon-rich silicon nitride surfaces, and forming hydrophobic chains from said hydrophobic layer, said hydrophobic chains pointing away from the surface to which the binding is formed.
In this case at least the diaphragm and/or the back-plate may be manufactured from one or more of the above mentioned materials.
The step of providing the hydrophobic layer may comprise the steps of forming a molecule monolayer, and cross linking between molecules and multi binding to surfaces
In this embodiment the provided hydrophobic layer is very durable and stable.
The hydrophobic layer base material may comprise an alkylsilane, such as: C.sub.nH.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiX.sub.3; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; n=1, 2, 3, . . . C.sub.nH.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiX.sub.2Y; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; Y.dbd.C.sub.mH.sub.2m+1; n=1, 2, 3, . . . ; m=1, 2, 3, . . . or C.sub.nH.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiXY.sub.2; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; Y.dbd.C.sub.mH.sub.2m+1; n=1, 2, 3, . . . ; m=1, 2, 3, . . .
Alternatively, the hydrophobic layer base material may comprises a perhaloalkylsilane, e.g. a perfluoroalkylsilane, such as C.sub.nF.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiX.sub.3; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; n=1, 2, 3, . . . C.sub.nF.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiX.sub.2Y; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; Y.dbd.C.sub.mH.sub.2m+1; n=1, 2, 3, . . . ; m=1, 2, 3, . . . or C.sub.nF.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiXY.sub.2; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; Y.dbd.C.sub.mH.sub.2m+1; n=1, 2, 3, . . . ; m=1, 2, 3, . . .
The method may further comprise the step of positioning at least part of the diaphragm and at least part of the back-plate in a liquid comprising a liquid phase of the hydrophobic layer material to be provided on the inner surfaces. In this embodiment the hydrophobic layer is provided using a liquid phase deposition method. As mentioned above, this usually results in a very structured monolayer being deposited.
Alternatively, the method may further comprise the step of positioning at least part of the diaphragm and at least part of the back-plate in a container comprising a gaseous phase of the hydrophobic layer base material to be provided on the inner surfaces. The container may alternatively or additionally comprise a vapour of the hydrophobic layer base material. In this embodiment the hydrophobic layer is provided using a vapour deposition method.
Preferably, the hydrophobic layer being provided has a contact angle for water being between 90.degree. and 130.degree., such as between 100.degree. and 110.degree..
The hydrophobic layer being provided is preferably stable at temperatures between -40.degree. C. and 130.degree. C., such as temperatures between -30.degree. C. and 110.degree. C. It is most preferably stable at temperatures up to at least 400.degree. C. for at least 5 minutes.
According to another aspect the present invention provides a condenser microphone comprising a diaphragm and a back-plate, wherein an inner surface of said diaphragm forms a capacitor in combination with an inner surface of said back-plate, said back-plate and/or said diaphragm is/are provided with a number of openings, and said inner surfaces being provided with a hydrophobic layer, and wherein the static distance between said diaphragm and said back-plate is smaller than 10 .mu.m.
The condenser microphone according to the invention is thus a microstructure in which inner surfaces of a narrow space or cavity (i.e. the space or cavity defined by the inner surfaces of the back-plate and the diaphragm, respectively) have been provided with a hydrophobic layer. The hydrophobic layer has most preferably been provided via the number of openings, i.e. according to the method described above.
At least the inner surfaces of the diaphragm and the back-plate may be made from a hydrophilic material as described above. However, the inner surface of the diaphragm and/or the inner surface of the back-plate may, to some extend, posses hydrophobic properties which it is desirable to improve.
Preferably, the smallest dimension of each of the openings does not exceed 10 .mu.m, such as not exceeding 5 .mu.m, such as not exceeding 1 .mu.m, such as not exceeding 0.5 .mu.m. The smallest dimension of each of the openings may, thus, be approximately 3 .mu.m.
The hydrophobic layer base material may comprise an alkylsilane, such as C.sub.nH.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiX.sub.3; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; n=1, 2, 3, . . . C.sub.nH.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiX.sub.2Y; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; Y.dbd.C.sub.mH.sub.2m+1; n=1, 2, 3, . . . ; m=1, 2, 3, . . . or C.sub.nH.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiXY.sub.2; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; Y.dbd.C.sub.mH.sub.2m+1; n=1, 2, 3, . . . ; m=1, 2, 3, . . .
Alternatively, the hydrophobic layer base material may comprise a perhaloalkylsilane, e.g. a perfluoroalkylsilane, such as C.sub.nF.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiX.sub.3; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; n=1, 2, 3, . . . C.sub.nF.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiX.sub.2Y; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; Y.dbd.C.sub.mH.sub.2m+1; n=1, 2, 3, . . . ; m=1, 2, 3, . . . or C.sub.nF.sub.2n+1C.sub.2H.sub.4SiXY.sub.2; X.dbd.OCH.sub.3 or OCH.sub.2CH.sub.3 or Cl; Y.dbd.C.sub.mH.sub.2m+1; n=1, 2, 3, . . .
The static distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate may be smaller than 5 .mu.m, such as smaller than 1 .mu.m, such as smaller than 0.5 .mu.m, such as smaller than 0.3 .mu.m. The static distance between the diaphragm and the back-plate may, thus, be approximately 1 .mu.m, such as approximately 0.9 .mu.m.
The hydrophobic layer preferably has a contact angle for water being between 90.degree. and 130.degree., such as between 100.degree. and 110.degree., and it is preferably stable at temperatures between -40.degree. C. and 130.degree. C., such as temperature between -30.degree. C. and 110.degree. C. Most preferably, the hydrophobic layer is stable at temperatures up to at least 400.degree. C. for at least 5 minutes.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of a condenser microphone cross section during a manufacturing process, before sacrificial layer SiO.sub.2 etching,
FIG. 2 shows the condenser microphone cross section of FIG. 1, but after sacrificial layer SiO.sub.2 etching, and
FIG. 3 shows the condenser microphone cross section of FIGS. 1 and 2, after a hydrophobic coating has been applied.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1-3 illustrate the last part of a manufacturing process for a condenser microphone 1, including applying a hydrophobic coating to the microphone 1, the process being performed in accordance with the present invention.
The microphone 1 comprises a supporting structure 2, a back-plate 3, and a diaphragm 4. The supporting structure 2 is preferable made from a silicon substrate, the back-plate 3 is preferably made from poly-silicon, and the diaphragm 4 is preferably made from a poly-silicon/silicon-rich silicon nitride (layers 5) sandwich. The back-plate 3 is provided with a number of openings 6 through which the hydrophobic coating material may pass (see below). In the Figures there is shown five openings 6 for illustrative purposes. However, in reality the number of openings 6 occurring in a back-plate of 1.times.1 mm.sup.2 will typically be in the order of 30,000. The diaphragm 4 is movable by a sound pressure and the back-plate 3 is substantially stationary, and in combination the diaphragm 4 and the back-plate 3 form a capacitor, the capacitance of which depends on the immediate distance between the two.
During the manufacturing of the microphone 1, a sacrificial layer 7 is applied to the microphone 1 in order to define the air gap height. The sacrificial layer 7 is preferably made from SiO.sub.2, SiON or SiGeON. When the process steps which are normally applied have been carried out, the sacrificial layer 7 needs to be at least partially removed in order to allow the diaphragm 4 to move in relation to the back-plate 3. This sacrificial layer 7 may be removed by an etching process using HF (hydrofluoric acid) followed by a water rinse. FIG. 1 shows the microphone 1 before the sacrificial etching process is applied, and FIG. 2 shows the microphone 1 after the sacrificial etching process is applied. It is clear that the sacrificial layer 7 which is present in FIG. 1 has been removed from the microphone 1 of FIG. 2.
The microphone 1 is then cleaned by means of a so-called `piranha clean`. The microphone 1 is dipped into a container containing a liquid of three parts H.sub.2O.sub.2 and seven parts H.sub.2SO.sub.4. Subsequently, the microphone 1 is water rinsed.
After the water rinse the microphone 1 is transferred into a container containing isopropanol (IPA, 2-propanol) in order to perform an IPA rinse. This step is repeated twice, i.e. the microphone 1 is, in turn, transferred into two other containers containing a fresh IPA solution. Subsequently, the microphone 1 is transferred into a container containing heptane in order to perform a heptane rinse. This step is also repeated twice as described above.
Next, the actual coating step of is performed by means of silane deposition. This is done by transferring the microphone to a container containing heptane with perhaloalkylsilanes, e.g. perfluoroalkylsilanes, or alkylsilanes, i.e. the actual hydrophobic coating material. Due to the openings 6 provided in the back-plate 3, the coating material may enter the inner parts of the microphone 1, i.e. the parts defined by the opposite surfaces of the back-plate 3 and the diaphragm 4, respectively. The coating material may, thus, be deposited to the surfaces of these inner parts, such as the inner surfaces of the back-plate 3 and the diaphragm 4, respectively. Furthermore, since the deposition is performed using a liquid phase deposition method, the resultant hydrophobic layer is a structured monolayer. Thus, the hydrophobic properties of the material are maintained at a high level.
Subsequently, first the heptane rinse steps and then the IPA rinse steps described above are repeated. Then the microphone 1 is water rinsed, dried, and post-baked in order to stabilise the coating.
The IPA rinse steps, the heptane rinse steps, the coating process and/or the water rinse steps described above may, alternatively, be performed by continuously renewing the solution in the container, thus avoiding to transfer the microphone 1 from one container to another during the rinse step in question. This reduces the exposure to air of the microphone 1 and, thus, the probability of drying before the coating process is finished. This makes the coating process easier to handle, i.e. more attractive for commercial purposes.
FIG. 3 shows the microphone 1 after the coating process described above has been performed. The resulting coating is shown as a dotted line.
The coating process as described above may advantageously be performed in continuation of the normal manufacturing process.
Thus, a method of providing at least part of a diaphragm and at least a part of a back-plate of a condenser microphone with a hydrophobic layer has been provided which is easy to perform, and, thus, attractive for commercial purposes. Furthermore, a condenser microphone has been provided in which in-use stiction between the diaphragm and the back-plate is avoided, or at least prevented to a great extend.
Copyright 2008−2012 Patents.com
