US Patent # RE40,787. Multilayer plastic substrates

United States Patent	RE40,787
Martin , et al.	June 23, 2009

Multilayer plastic substrates

Abstract

A multilayer plastic substrate. The substrate comprises a plurality of thin film layers of at least one polymer, the plurality of thin film layers being adjacent to one another and having sufficient strength to be self-supporting, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate has an average visible light transmittance of greater than about 80%.

Inventors:	Martin; Peter M. (Kennewick, WA), Graff; Gordon L. (West Richland, WA), Gross; Mark E. (Pasco, WA), Hall; Michael G. (West Richland, WA), Mast; Eric S. (Richland, WA)
Assignee:	Battelle Memorial Institute (Columbus, OH)
Appl. No.:	10/889,640
Filed:	July 12, 2004

Related U.S. Patent Documents


	Application Number	Filing Date	Patent Number	Issue Date
	09427138	Oct., 1999	6522067
Reissue of:	09835768	Apr., 2001	06623861	Sep., 2003

Current U.S. Class:	428/412 ; 428/411.1; 428/421; 428/473.5; 428/474.4; 428/480; 430/59.6
Current International Class:	B32B 27/36 (20060101)
Field of Search:	428/412,411.1,480,473.5,474.4,421 430/58

References Cited

U.S. Patent Documents


2382432	August 1945	McManus et al.
2384500	September 1945	Stoll
3475307	October 1969	Karl-Heinz et al.
3607365	September 1971	Lindlof
3941630	March 1976	Larrabee
4061835	December 1977	Poppe et al.
4098965	July 1978	Kinsman
4266223	May 1981	Frame
4283482	August 1981	Hattori et al.
4313254	February 1982	Feldman et al.
4426275	January 1984	Meckel et al.
4521458	June 1985	Nelson
4537814	August 1985	Itoh et al.
4555274	November 1985	Kitajima et al.
4557978	December 1985	Mason
4572845	February 1986	Christen
4581337	April 1986	Frey et al.
4624867	November 1986	Iijima et al.
4695618	September 1987	Mowrer
4710426	December 1987	Stephens
4722515	February 1988	Ham
4768666	September 1988	Kessler
4842893	June 1989	Yializis et al.
4843036	June 1989	Schmidt et al.
4854186	August 1989	Grolig et al.
4855186	August 1989	Grolig et at.
4889609	December 1989	Cannella
4913090	April 1990	Harada et al.
4931158	June 1990	Bunshah et al.
4934315	June 1990	Linnebach et al.
4954371	September 1990	Yializis
4977013	December 1990	Ritchie et al.
5032461	July 1991	Shaw et al.
5036249	July 1991	Pike-Biegunski et al.
5047131	September 1991	Wolfe et al.
5059861	October 1991	Littman et al.
5124204	June 1992	Yamashita et al.
5189405	February 1993	Yamashita et al.
5203898	April 1993	Carpenter et al.
5204314	April 1993	Kirlin et al.
5237439	August 1993	Misono et al.
5260095	November 1993	Affinito
5336324	August 1994	Stall et al.
5354497	October 1994	Fukuchi et al.
5356947	October 1994	Ali et al.
5376467	December 1994	Abe et al.
5393607	February 1995	Kawasaki et al.
5395644	March 1995	Affinito
5402314	March 1995	Amago et al.
5427638	June 1995	Goetz et al.
5440446	August 1995	Shaw et al.
5451449	September 1995	Shetty et al.
5461545	October 1995	Leroy et al.
5464667	November 1995	Kohler et al.
5510173	April 1996	Pass et al.
5512320	April 1996	Turner et al.
5536323	July 1996	Kirlin et al.
5547508	August 1996	Affinito
5554220	September 1996	Forrest et al.
5576101	November 1996	Saitoh et al.
5578141	November 1996	Mori et al.
5607789	March 1997	Treger et al.
5620524	April 1997	Fan et al.
5629389	May 1997	Roitman et al.
5652192	July 1997	Matson et al.
5654084	August 1997	Egert
5660961	August 1997	Yu
5665280	September 1997	Tropsha
5681615	October 1997	Affinito et al.
5681666	October 1997	Treger et al.
5684084	November 1997	Lewin et al.
5686360	November 1997	Harvey, III et al.
5693956	December 1997	Shi et al.
5695564	December 1997	Imahashi
5711816	January 1998	Kirlin et al.
5725909	March 1998	Shaw et al.
5731661	March 1998	So et al.
5736207	April 1998	Walther et al.
5747182	May 1998	Friend et al.
5757126	May 1998	Harvey, et al.
5759329	June 1998	Krause et al.
5771177	June 1998	Tada et al.
5771562	June 1998	Harvey, III et al.
5782355	July 1998	Katagiri et al.
5792550	August 1998	Phillips et al.
5795399	August 1998	Hasegawa et al.
5811177	September 1998	Shi et al.
5811183	September 1998	Shaw et al.
5821138	October 1998	Yamazaki et al.
5821692	October 1998	Rogers et al.
5844363	December 1998	Gu et al.
5869791	February 1999	Young
5872355	February 1999	Hueschen
5891554	April 1999	Hosokawa et al.
5895228	April 1999	Biebuyck et al.
5902641	May 1999	Affinito et al.
5902688	May 1999	Antoniadis et al.
5904958	May 1999	Dick et al.
5912069	June 1999	Yializis et al.
5919328	July 1999	Tropsha et al.
5920080	July 1999	Jones
5922161	July 1999	Wu et al.
5929562	July 1999	Pichler
5934856	August 1999	Asakawa et al.
5945174	August 1999	Shaw et al.
5948552	September 1999	Antoniadis et al.
5952778	September 1999	Haskal et al.
5955161	September 1999	Tropsha
5965907	October 1999	Huang et al.
5968620	October 1999	Harvey et al.
5994174	November 1999	Carey et al.
5996498	December 1999	Lewis
6013337	January 2000	Knors
6040017	March 2000	Mikhael et al.
6045864	April 2000	Lyons et al.
6066826	May 2000	Yializis
6083313	July 2000	Venkatraman et al.
6083628	July 2000	Yializis
6084702	July 2000	Byker et al.
6087007	July 2000	Fujii et al.
6092269	July 2000	Yializis et al.
6106627	August 2000	Yializis
6117266	September 2000	Horzel et al.
6118218	September 2000	Yializis et al.
6146225	November 2000	Sheats et al.
6146462	November 2000	Yializis et al.
6150187	November 2000	Zyung et al.
6165566	December 2000	Tropsha
6178082	January 2001	Farooq et al.
6195142	February 2001	Gyotoku et al.
6198217	March 2001	Suzuki et al.
6198220	March 2001	Jones et al.
6203898	March 2001	Kohler et al.
6207238	March 2001	Affinito
6207239	March 2001	Affinito
6214422	April 2001	Yializis
6217947	April 2001	Affinito
6224948	May 2001	Affinito
6228434	May 2001	Affinito
6228436	May 2001	Affinito
6231939	May 2001	Shaw et al.
6264747	July 2001	Shaw et al.
6268695	July 2001	Affinito
6274204	August 2001	Affinito
6322860	November 2001	Stein et al.
6333065	December 2001	Arai et al.
6348237	February 2002	Kohler et al.
6350034	February 2002	Fleming et al.
6352777	March 2002	Bulovic et al.
6358570	March 2002	Affinito
6361885	March 2002	Chou
6397776	June 2002	Yang et al.
6413645	July 2002	Graff et al.
6416872	July 2002	Maschwitz
6420003	July 2002	Shaw et al.
6436544	August 2002	Veyrat et al.
6460369	October 2002	Hosokawa
6465953	October 2002	Duggal
6468595	October 2002	Mikhael et al.
6469437	October 2002	Parthasarathy et al.
6492026	December 2002	Graff et al.
6497598	December 2002	Affinito
6497924	December 2002	Affinito et al.
6509065	January 2003	Affinito
6512561	January 2003	Terashiat et al.
6522067	February 2003	Graff et al.
6537688	March 2003	Silvernail et al.
6544600	April 2003	Affinito et al.
6548912	April 2003	Graff et al.
6569515	May 2003	Hebrink et al.
6570325	May 2003	Graff et al.
6573652	June 2003	Graff et al.
6576351	June 2003	Silvernail
6592969	July 2003	Burroughes et al.
6597111	July 2003	Silvernail et al.
6613395	September 2003	Affinito et al.
6614057	September 2003	Silvernail et al.
6624568	September 2003	Silvernail et al.
6627267	September 2003	Affinito
6628071	September 2003	Su
6653780	November 2003	Sugimoto et al.
6656537	December 2003	Affinito et al.
6660409	December 2003	Komatsu et al.
6664137	December 2003	Weaver
6681716	January 2004	Schaepkens
6720203	April 2004	Carcia et al.
6734625	May 2004	Vong et al.
6737753	May 2004	Kumar et al.
6743524	June 2004	Schaepkens
6749940	June 2004	Terasaki et al.
6765351	July 2004	Forrest et al.
6803245	October 2004	Auch et al.
6811829	November 2004	Affinito et al.
6815887	November 2004	Lee et al.
6818291	November 2004	Funkenbusch et al.
6835950	December 2004	Brown et al.
6836070	December 2004	Chung et al.
6837950	January 2005	Berard
6864629	March 2005	Miyaguchi et al.
6866901	March 2005	Burrows et al.
6867539	March 2005	McCormick et al.
6872114	March 2005	Chung et al.
6872248	March 2005	Mizutani et al.
6872428	March 2005	Yang et al.
6878467	April 2005	Chung et al.
6888305	May 2005	Weaver
6888307	May 2005	Silvernail et al.
6891330	May 2005	Duggal et al.
6897474	May 2005	Brown et al.
6897607	May 2005	Sugimoto et al.
6905769	June 2005	Komada
6923702	August 2005	Graff et al.
6936131	August 2005	McCormick et al.
6975067	December 2005	McCormick et al.
6994933	February 2006	Bates
6998648	February 2006	Silvernail
7002294	February 2006	Forrest et al.
7012363	March 2006	Weaver et al.
7015640	March 2006	Schaepkens et al.
7018713	March 2006	Padiyath et al.
7029765	April 2006	Kwong et al.
7033850	April 2006	Tyan et al.
7056584	June 2006	Iacovangelo
7086918	August 2006	Hsiao et al.
7122418	October 2006	Su et al.
7156942	January 2007	McCormick et al.
7166007	January 2007	Auch et al.
7183197	February 2007	Won et al.
7186465	March 2007	Bright
7221093	May 2007	Auch et al.
7255823	August 2007	Guenther et al.
2001/0015074	August 2001	Hosokawa
2001/0015620	August 2001	Affinito
2002/0022156	February 2002	Bright
2002/0025444	February 2002	Hebgrink et al.
2002/0068143	June 2002	Silvernail et al.
2002/0069826	June 2002	Hunt et al.
2002/0102363	August 2002	Affinitio et al.
2002/0102818	August 2002	Sandhu et al.
2002/0125822	September 2002	Graff et al.
2002/0139303	October 2002	Yamazaki et al.
2002/0140347	October 2002	Weaver
2003/0038590	February 2003	Silvernail et al.
2003/0045021	March 2003	Akai
2003/0085652	May 2003	Weaver
2003/0098647	May 2003	Silvernail
2003/0117068	June 2003	Forrest et al.
2003/0124392	July 2003	Bright
2003/0127973	July 2003	Weaver et al.
2003/0134487	July 2003	Breen et al.
2003/0184222	October 2003	Nilsson et al.
2003/0197197	October 2003	Brown et al.
2003/0218422	November 2003	Park et al.
2003/0235648	December 2003	Affinito et al.
2004/0029334	February 2004	Bijker et al.
2004/0046497	March 2004	Schaepkens et al.
2004/0071971	April 2004	Lacovangelo
2004/0113542	June 2004	Hslao et al.
2004/0115402	June 2004	Schaepkens
2004/0115859	June 2004	Murayama et al.
2004/0119028	June 2004	McCormick et al.
2004/0175512	September 2004	Schaepkens
2004/0175580	September 2004	Schaepkens
2004/0209090	October 2004	Iwanaga
2004/0219380	November 2004	Naruse et al.
2004/0229051	November 2004	Schaepkens et al.
2004/0241454	December 2004	Shaw et al.
2004/0263038	December 2004	Ribotzi et al.
2005/0003098	January 2005	Kohler et al.
2005/0006786	January 2005	Sawada
2005/0051094	March 2005	Schaepkens et al.
2005/0079295	April 2005	Schaepkens
2005/0079380	April 2005	Iwanaga
2005/0093001	May 2005	Liu et al.
2005/0093437	May 2005	Ouyang
2005/0094394	May 2005	Padiyath et al.
2005/0095422	May 2005	Sager et al.
2005/0095736	May 2005	Padiyath et al.
2005/0112378	May 2005	Naruse et al.
2005/0115603	June 2005	Yoshida et al.
2005/0122039	June 2005	Satani
2005/0129841	June 2005	McCormick et al.
2005/0133781	June 2005	Yan et al.
2005/0140291	June 2005	Hirakata et al.
2005/0146267	July 2005	Lee et al.
2005/0174045	August 2005	Lee et al.
2005/0202646	September 2005	Burrows et al.
2005/0212419	September 2005	Vazan et al.
2005/0224935	October 2005	Schaepkens et al.
2005/0238846	October 2005	Arakatsu et al.
2006/0001040	January 2006	Kim et al.
2006/0003474	January 2006	Tyan et al.
2006/0028128	February 2006	Ohkubo
2006/0061272	March 2006	McCormick et al.
2006/0062937	March 2006	Padiyath et al.
2006/0063015	March 2006	McCormick et al.
2006/0132461	June 2006	Furukawa et al.
2006/0246811	November 2006	Winters et al.
2006/0250084	November 2006	Cok et al.
2006/0291034	December 2006	Patry et al.
2007/0009674	January 2007	Okubo et al.
2007/0281089	December 2007	Heller et al.

Foreign Patent Documents


704297	Feb., 1968	BE
2353506	May., 2000	CA
196 03 746	Apr., 1997	DE
696 15 510	May., 2002	DE
0 147 696	Jul., 1985	EP
0 299 753	Jan., 1989	EP
0 299 753	Jan., 1989	EP
0 340 935	Nov., 1989	EP
0 340 935	Nov., 1989	EP
0 390 540	Mar., 1990	EP
0 390 540	Oct., 1990	EP
0 468 440	Jan., 1992	EP
0 547 550	Jun., 1993	EP
0 547 550	Jun., 1993	EP
0 590 467	Apr., 1994	EP
0 590 467	Apr., 1994	EP
0 722 787	Jul., 1996	EP
0 722 787	Jul., 1996	EP
0 777 280	Jun., 1997	EP
0 777 280	Jun., 1997	EP
0 777 281	Jun., 1997	EP
0 787 824	Aug., 1997	EP
0 787 826	Aug., 1997	EP
0 787 826	Aug., 1997	EP
0 915 105	May., 1999	EP
0 916 394	May., 1999	EP
0 916 394	May., 1999	EP
0 931 850	Jul., 1999	EP
0 931 850	Jul., 1999	EP
0 977 469	Feb., 2000	EP
0 977 469	Feb., 2000	EP
1 021 070	Jul., 2000	EP
1127 381	Aug., 2001	EP
1 130 420	Sep., 2001	EP
1 278 244	Jan., 2003	EP
1 426 813	Jun., 2004	EP
1 514 317	Mar., 2005	EP
2 210 826	Jun., 1989	GB
S63-96895	Apr., 1988	JP
63136316	Aug., 1988	JP
64-18441	Jan., 1989	JP
S64-41192	Feb., 1989	JP
2-183230	Jul., 1990	JP
3-183759	Aug., 1991	JP
3-290375	Dec., 1991	JP
4-14440	Jan., 1992	JP
4-48515	Feb., 1992	JP
4-1440	Apr., 1992	JP
H4-267097	Sep., 1992	JP
05-217158	Jan., 1993	JP
5-147678	Jun., 1993	JP
H5-182759	Jul., 1993	JP
61-36159	May., 1994	JP
06158305	Jun., 1994	JP
61-79644	Jun., 1994	JP
6-234186	Aug., 1994	JP
07-074378	Mar., 1995	JP
H07-147189	Jun., 1995	JP
H7-192868	Jul., 1995	JP
8-72188	Mar., 1996	JP
H8-171988	Jul., 1996	JP
8-179292	Jul., 1996	JP
08325713	Oct., 1996	JP
8-318590	Dec., 1996	JP
09059763	Apr., 1997	JP
H9-132774	May., 1997	JP
09-161967	Jun., 1997	JP
9-161967	Jun., 1997	JP
9-201897	Aug., 1997	JP
09-232553	Sep., 1997	JP
10-725	Jan., 1998	JP
10-013083	Jan., 1998	JP
10-016150	Jan., 1998	JP
H10-41067	Feb., 1998	JP
10-334744	Dec., 1998	JP
11-017106	Jan., 1999	JP
11-040344	Feb., 1999	JP
11-149826	Jun., 1999	JP
11-255923	Sep., 1999	JP
2000-058258	Feb., 2000	JP
2002/505969	Feb., 2002	JP
10312883	Mar., 2002	JP
2003/282239	Oct., 2003	JP
3579556	Oct., 2004	JP
2006-294780	Oct., 2006	JP
WO 87/07848	Dec., 1987	WO
WO 89/00337	Jan., 1989	WO
WO 95/10117	May., 1995	WO
WO 96/23217	Aug., 1996	WO
WO 97/04885	Feb., 1997	WO
WO 97/16053	May., 1997	WO
WO 97/22631	Jun., 1997	WO
WO 98/10116	Mar., 1998	WO
WO 98/18852	May., 1998	WO
WO 99/16557	Apr., 1999	WO
WO 99/16931	Apr., 1999	WO
WO 99/46120	Sep., 1999	WO
WO 00/26973	May., 2000	WO
WO 00/35603	Jun., 2000	WO
WO 00/35604	Jun., 2000	WO
WO 00/35993	Jun., 2000	WO
WO 00/36661	Jun., 2000	WO
WO 00/36665	Jun., 2000	WO
00/53423	Sep., 2000	WO
WO 01 68360	Sep., 2001	WO
WO 01/68360	Sep., 2001	WO
WO 01/81649	Nov., 2001	WO
WO 01/82336	Nov., 2001	WO
WO 01/82389	Nov., 2001	WO
WO 01/87825	Nov., 2001	WO
WO 01/89006	Nov., 2001	WO
WO 02/26973	Apr., 2002	WO
WO 03/016589	Feb., 2003	WO
WO 03/098716	Nov., 2003	WO
WO 2004/006199	Jan., 2004	WO
WO 2004/016992	Feb., 2004	WO
WO 2004/070840	Aug., 2004	WO
WO 2004/089620	Oct., 2004	WO
2004/112165	Dec., 2004	WO
WO 2005/015655	Feb., 2005	WO
WO 2005/045947	May., 2005	WO
WO 2005/048368	May., 2005	WO
2005/050754	Jun., 2005	WO
WO 2006/036492	Apr., 2006	WO
2008/140313	Nov., 2008	WO
2008/142645	Nov., 2008	WO

Other References

Clark I. Bright, et al., Transparent Barrier Coatings Based on ITO for Flexible Plastic Displays, Oct. 17-19, 1999, pp. 247-264, Tucson, Arizona. cited by other .
Akedo et al., "LP-5: Lake-News Poster: Plasma-CVD SiNx/Plasma-Polymerized CNx:H Multi-layer Passivation Films for Organic Light Emmitting Diods", SID 03 Digest. cited by examiner .
Chwang et al., "Thin Film encapsulated flexible organic electroluminescent displays", American Institute of Physics, 2003. cited by examiner .
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report Or The Declaration, Mar. 3, 2000, PCT/US99/29853. cited by other .
Graupner, W. et al.; "High Resolution Color Organic Light Emitting Diode Microdisplay Fabrication Method", SPIE Proceedings 4207; 11-19 (2000); pp. 1-9. cited by other .
Norenberg, H. et al.; Comparative Study of Oxygen Permeation Through Polymers and Gas Barrier Films; Denver, Apr. 15-20, 2000; pp. 347-351; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Yializis, A. et al.; Ultra High Barrier Films; Denver, Apr. 15-20, 2000; pp. 404-407; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Mahon, J.K. et al.; Requirements of Flexible Substrates for Organic Light Emitting Devices in Flat Panel Display Applications; Society of Vacuum Coaters; 42.sup.nd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings; Apr. 1999; pp. 456-459. cited by other .
Henry, B.M. et al.; Microstructural and Gas Barrier Properties of Transparent Aluminum Oxide and Indium Tim Oxide Films; Denver, Apr. 15-20, 2000; pp. 373-378; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Vacuum Deposited Polymer/metal Multilayer Films for Optical Applications; Paper No. C1.13; International Conference on Metallurgical Coatings; Apr. 15-21, 1995; pp. 1-14. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Vacuum Deposition of Polymer Electrolytes On Flexible Substrates; The Ninth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; 1995; pp. 20-37. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Vacuum Deposition of Polymer Electrolytes On Flexible Substrates; The Ninth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; 1995; pp. 0-16. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Molecularly Doped Polymer Composite Films for Light Emitting Polymer Application Fabricated by the PML Process; 41.sup.st Technical Conference of the Society of Vacuum Coaters; Apr. 1998; pp. 220-225. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al., PML/Oxide/PML Barrier Layer Performance Differences Arising From Use OF UV Or Electron Beam Polymerization Of The PML Layers, SVC 40.sup.th Annual Technical Conference, Apr. 12-17, 1997, pp. 19-25. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Polymer/Polymer, Polymer/Oxide, and Polymer/Metal Vacuum Deposited Interference Filters; Tenth International Vacuum Web Coating Conference; Nov. 1996; pp. 0-14. cited by other .
Felts, J.T.; Transparent Barrier Coatings Update: Flexible Substrates; Society of Vacuum Coaters; 36.sup.th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings; Apr. 25-30, 1993; pp. 324-331. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Ultra High Rate, Wide Area, Plasma Polymerized Films from High Molecular Weight/Low Vapor Pressure Liquid or Solid Monomer Precursors; 45.sup.th International Symposium of the American Vacuum Society; Nov. 2-6, 1998; pp. 0-26. cited by other .
Tropsha et al.; Combinatorial Barrier Effect of the Multilayer SiOx Coatings on Polymer Substrates; 1997 Society of Vacuum Coaters; 40.sup.th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings; Apr. 12-17, 1997; pp. 64-69. cited by other .
Tropsha et al., Activated Rate Theory Treatment of Oxygen and Water Transport through Silicon Oxide/Poly(ethylene terphthalate) Composite Barrier Structures; J. Phys. Chem B Mar. 1997; pp. 2259-2266. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Vacuum Deposited Conductive Polymer Films; The Eleventh International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; Nov. 9-11, 1997; pp. 0-12. cited by other .
De Gryse, R. et al.; Sputtered Transparent Barrier Layers, Tenth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating, Nov. 1996, pp. 190-198. cited by other .
Hibino, N. et al.; Transparent Barrier A1.sub.20.sub.3 Coating By Activated Reactive Evaporation; Thirteenth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating ; Oct. 17-19, 1999; pp. 234-245. cited by other .
Kukla, R. et al.; Transparent Barrier Coatings with EB-Evaporation, an Update; Section Five; Transparent Barrier Coating Papers; Thirteenth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; Oct. 17-19, 1999; pp. 222-233. cited by other .
Bright, Clark I.; Transparent Barrier Coatings Based on ITO for Flexible Plastic Displays; Thirteenth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; Oct. 17-19, 1999; pp. 247-255. cited by other .
Henry, B.M. et al.; Microstructural Studies of Transparent Gas Barrier Coatings on Polymer Substrates; Thirteenth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; Oct. 17-19, 1999; pp. 265-273. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Ultra High Rate, Wide Area, Plasma Polymerized Films from High Molecular Weight/Low Vapor Pressure Liquid or Liquid/Solid Suspension Monomer Precursors; MRS Conference; Nov. 29-Dec. 3, 1998; Paper No. Y12.1 cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al., "Molecularly Doped Polymer Composite Films for Light Emitting Polymer Applications Fabricated by the PML Process" 41st Technical Conference of Society of Vacuum Coaters, Apr. 1998, pp. 1-6. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al., "Vacuum Deposition of Polymer Electrolytes on Flexible Substrates" The Ninth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating, pp. 0-16. cited by other .
Bunshah, R.F. et al., "Deposition Technologies for Films and Coatings" Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey, 1982, p. 339. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D., Energy Res. Abstr. 18(6), #17171, 1993. cited by other .
Graupner, W. et al.; "High Resolution Color Organic Light Emitting Diode Microdisplay Fabrication Method", SPIE Proceedings, Nov. 6, 2000; pp. 11-19. cited by other .
Czeremuszkin, G. et al.; Permeation Through Defects in Transparent Barrier Coated Plastic Films; 43rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings; Apr. 15, 2000; pp. 408-413. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Vacuum Deposited Conductive Polymer Films; The Eleventh International Conference on Vacuum Web Coatings, pp. 1-12. cited by other .
Vossen, J.L. et al.; Thin Film Porcesses; Academic Press, 1978, Part II, Chapter II-1, Glow Dischareg Sputter Deposition, pp. 12-63; Part IV, Chapter IV-1 Plasma Deposition of Inorganic Compounds and Chapter IV-2 Glow Discharge Polymerization, pp. 335-397. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Ultra High Rate, Wide Area, Plasma Polymerized Films from High Molecular Weight/Low Vapor Pressure Liquid or Solid Monomer Precursors; 45th International Symposium of the American Vacuum Society; pp. 0-26. cited by other .
G. Gustafason, et al.; Flexible light-emitting diodes made from soluble conducting polymers; Letters to Nature; vol. 357; Jun. 11, 1992; pp. 477-479. cited by other .
Tropsha et al.; Combinatorial Barrier Effect of the Multilayer SiOx Coatings on Polymer Substrates; 1997 Society of Vacuum Coaters, 40th Annual Technical Conferences Proceedings; pp. 64-69. cited by other .
Tropsha et al.; Activated Rate Theory Treatment of Oxygen and Water Transport through Silicon Oxide/Poly(ethylene terphthalate) Composite Barrier Structures; J. Phys. Chem B 1997 pp. 2259-2266. cited by other .
F.M. Penning; Electrical Discharges in Gases; 1965; pp. 1-51; Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, New York-London-Paris. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; High Rate Vacuum Deposition of Polymer Electrolytes; Journal Vacuum Science Technology A 14(3), May/Jun. 1996. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Vacuum Deposited Polymer/metal Multilayer Films for Optical Applications; Paper No. C1.13; pp. 1-14. cited by other .
Shi, M.K. et al.; Plasma treatment of PET and acrylic coating surfaces-I. In situ XPS measurements; Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology; Mar. 2000 14(12); pp. 1-8. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Vacuum Deposition of Polymer Electrolytes On Flexible Substrates, The Ninth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; pp. 20-37. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Ultrahigh Rate, Wide Area, Plasma Polymerized Films from High Molecular Weight/Low Vapor Pressure Liquid or Solid Monomer Precursors; Journal Vacuum Science Technology A 17(4); Jul./Aug. 1999; pp. 1974-1981; American Vacuum Society. cited by other .
Shi, M.K. et al.; In situ and real-time monitoring of plasma-induced etching PET and acrylic films, Plasmas and Polymers; Dec. 1999, 494); pp. 1-25. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Vacuum Deposited Conductive Polymer Films; The Eleventh International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; pp. 0-12. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Molecularly Doped Polymer Composit Films for Light Emitting Polymer Application Fabricated by the PML Process; 41st Technical Conference of the Society of Vacuum Coaters; 1998; pp. 220-225. cited by other .
Afffinto, J.D. et al.;Polymer/polymer, Polymer/Oxide, and Polymer/Metal Vacuum Deposited Interference Filters; Tenth International Vacuum Web Coating Conference; pp. 0-14. cited by other .
Affinto, J.D. et al.; Vacuum Deposited Polymer/Metal Multilayer Films for Optical Application; Thin Solid Films 270, 1995; pp. 43-48. cited by other .
Felts, J.T.; Transparent Barrier Coatings Update: Flexible Substrates; pp. 324-331. cited by other .
Mahon, J.K., et al.; Requirements of Flexible Substrates for Organic Light Emitting Devices in Flat Panel Display Applications, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 42nd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, 1999, pp. 456-459. cited by other .
Henry, B.M. et al.; Microstructural and Gas Barrier Properties of Transparent Aluminium Oxide and Indium Tin Oxide Films; 2000; pp. 373-378; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Phillips, R.W.; Evaporated Dielectric Colorless Films on PET and Opp Exhibiting High Barriers Toward Moisture and Oxygen; Society of Vacuum Coaters; 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings; 1993; pp. 293-300. cited by other .
Yamada, Y. et al.; The Properties of a New Transparent and Colorless Barrier Film; 1995; pp. 28-31; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Chahroudi, D.; Transparent Glass Barrier Coatings for Flexible Film Packaging; 1991; pp. 130-133; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Bright, Clark, I.; Transparent Barrier Coatings Based on ITo for Flexible Plastic Displays; pp. 247-255. cited by other .
Henry, B.M. et al.; Microstructural Studies of Transparent Gas Barrier Coatings on Polymer Substates; pp. 265-273. cited by other .
Hibino, N. et al.; Transparent Barrier Al/2O3 Coating By Activated Reactive Evaporation; pp. 234-245. cited by other .
Kukla, R. et al.; Transparent Barrier Coatings with EB-Evaporation, an Update; Section Five; Transparent Barrier Coating Papers; pp. 222-233. cited by other .
Krug, T. et al.; New Developments in Transparent Barrier Coatings; 1993; pp. 302-305; Society Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Affinto, J.D. et al.; PML/Oxide/PML Barrier Layer Performance Differences Arising From Use Of UV or Electron Beam Polymerization of the PML Layers; Thin Solid Films; Elsevier Science S.A.; vol. 308-309; Oct. 31, 1997; pp. 19-25. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; A new method for fabricating transparent barrier layers, Thin Solid Films 290-291; 1996; pp. 63-67. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Polymer-Oxide Transparent Barrier Layers; SVC 39th Annual Technical Conference; Vacuum Web Coating Session; 1996; pp. 392-397. cited by other .
Hoffmann, G. et al.; Transparent Barrier Coatings by Reactive Evaporation; 1994; pp. 155-160; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Norenberg, H. et al.; Comparative Study of Oxygen Permeation Through Polymers and Gas Barrier Films; 2000; pp. 347-351; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Yializis, A. et al.; Ultra High Barrier Films; 2000; pp. 404-407; Society Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Klemberg-Sapieha, J.E. et al.; Transparent Gas Barrier Coatings Produced by Dual-Frequency PECVD; 1993; pp. 445-449; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Finson, E. et al.; Transparent SiO2 Barrier Coatings: Conversion and Production Status; 1994; pp. 139-143; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Yializis, A. et al.; High Oxygen Barrier Polypropylene Films Using Transparent Acrylate-A2O3 and Opaque Al-Acrylate Coatings; 1995; pp. 95-102; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Shaw, D.G. et al.; Use of Vapor Deposited Acrylate Coatings to Improve the Barrier Properties of MetalLized Film; 1994; pp. 240-244; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Wong, F.L., et al., "Long-lifetime thin-film encapsulated organic light-emitting diodes," Journal of Applied Physics 104, pp. 014509-1-4 (2008). cited by other.

Primary Examiner: Cano; Milton I.
Assistant Examiner: Dicus; Tamra L.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

Parent Case Text

.Iadd.This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/427,138, filed Oct. 25, 1999, entitled "Environmental Barrier Material For Organic Light Emitting Device and Method Of Making," now U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,067, issued Feb. 18, 2003..Iaddend.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A multilayer plastic substrate consisting essentially of: a plurality of flash evaporated thin film layers of at least one polymer, the plurality of thin film layers being adjacent to one another and having sufficient strength to be self-supporting, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate has an average visible light transmittance of greater than about 80%, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate comprises at least about 50 thin film layers, and wherein the multilayer plastic substrate has a surface roughness of less than about 10 nm.

2. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1 wherein the average visible light transmittance is greater than about 85%.

3. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1 wherein the average visible light transmittance is greater than about 90%.

4. The multi layer plastic substrate of claim 1 wherein the peak visible light transmittance is greater than about 85%.

5. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1 wherein the peak visible light transmittance is greater than about 90%.

6. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate comprises at least about 100 thin film layers.

7. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 6, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate comprises at least about 500 thin film layers.

8. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 7, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate comprises at least about 1000 thin film layers.

9. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate is at least about 0.001 inches thick.

10. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate is at least about 0.004 inches thick.

11. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein each thin film layer is less than about 50 .mu.m thick.

12. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein each thin film layer is less than about 5 .mu.m thick.

13. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein each thin film layer is in the range of about 0.05 to about 2 .mu.m thick.

14. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein each thin film layer is in the range of about 0.2 to about 0.3 .mu.m.

15. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the at least one polymer is selected from (meth)acrylates, polystyrenes, methyl styrene-containing polymers, fluorinated polymers, polycarbonates, polysulfones, polyethersulfones, polyimides, polyamides, and polyether naphthalenes, and combinations thereof.

16. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the glass transition temperature of the at least one polymer is greater than about 150.degree. C.

17. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the glass transition temperature of the at least one polymer is greater than about 200.degree. C.

18. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate has a surface roughness of less than about 2 nm.

19. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate has a refractive index of greater than about 1.5.

20. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate has a refractive index of greater than about 1.4.

21. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate is flexible.

22. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate is rigid.

23. The multilayer plastic substrate of claim 1, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate has a surface roughness of less than about 5 nm.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to plastic substrates which may be useful in products including, but not limited to, visual display devices, and more particularly to multilayer plastic substrates having improved light transmittance.

As used herein, the term "(meth)acrylic" is defined as "acrylic or methacrylic." Also, (meth)acrylate is defined as "acrylate or methacrylate."

As used herein, the term "average visible light transmittance" means the average light transmittance over the visible range from 400 to 800 nm.

As used herein, the term "peak visible light transmittance" means the peak light transmittance over the visible range from 400 to 800 nm.

As used herein, the term "polymer precursor" includes monomers, oligomers, and resins, and combinations thereof. As used herein, the term "monomer" is defined as a molecule of simple structure and low molecular weight that is capable of combining with a number of like or unlike molecules to form a polymer. Examples include, but are not limited to, simple acrylate molecules, for example, hexanedioldiacrylate, or tetraethyleneglycoldiacrylate, styrene, methyl styrene, and combinations thereof. The molecular weight of monomers is generally less than 1000, while for fluorinated monomers, it is generally less than 2000. Monomers may be combined to form oligomers and resins but do not combine to form other monomers.

As used herein, the term "oligomer" is defined as a compound molecule of at least two monomers that maybe cured by radiation, such as ultraviolet, electron beam, or x-ray, glow discharge ionization, and spontaneous thermally induced curing. Oligomers include low molecular weight resins. Low molecular weight is defined herein as about 1000 to about 20,000 exclusive of fluorinated monomers. Oligomers are usually liquid or easily liquifiable. Oligomers do not combine to form monomers.

As used herein, the term "resin" is defined as a compound having a higher molecular weight (generally greater than 20,000) which is generally solid with no definite melting point. Examples include, but are not limited to, polystyrene resins, epoxy polyamine resins, phenolic resins, and acrylic resins (for example, polymethylmethacrylate), and combinations thereof.

There is a need for versatile visual display devices for electronic products of many different types. Although many current displays use glass substrates, manufacturers have attempted to produce commercial products, primarily liquid crystal display devices, using unbreakable plastic substrates. These attempts have not been completely successful to date because of the quality, temperature, and permeation limitations of polymeric materials. Flexible plastic substrates, such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), and polyether sulfone (PES), have been used in thicknesses from about 0.004 inches to 0.007 inches. However, the surface quality of these substrates is often poor, with the surface having large numbers of scratches, digs, pits, and other defects.

In addition, many polymers exhibit poor oxygen and water vapor permeation resistance, often several orders of magnitude below what is required for product performance. For example, the oxygen transmission rates for materials such polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are as high as 1550 cc/m.sup.2/day/micron of thickness (or 8.7 cc/m.sup.2/day for 7 mil thickness PET), and the water vapor transmission rates are also in this range. Certain display applications, such as those using organic light emitting devices (OLEDs), require encapsulation that has a maximum oxygen transmission rate of 10.sup.-4 to 10.sup.-2 cc/m.sup.2/day, and a maximum water vapor transmission rate of 10.sup.-5 to 10.sup.-6 g/m.sup.2/day.

Barrier coatings have been applied to plastic substrates to decrease their gas and liquid permeability. Barrier coatings typically consist of single layer thin film inorganic materials, such as Al, SiO.sub.x, AlO.sub.x, and Si.sub.3N.sub.4 vacuum deposited on polymeric substrates. A single layer coating on PET reduces oxygen permeability to levels of about 0.1 to 1.0 cc/m.sup.2/day, and water vapor permeability of about 0.1 to 1.0 g/m.sup.2/day. However, those levels are still insufficient for many display devices.

Additionally, many processes used in the manufacture of displays require relatively high temperatures that most polymer substrates cannot tolerate. For example, the recrystallization of amorphous Si to poly-Si in thin film transistors requires substrate temperatures of at least 160.degree.-250.degree. C., even with pulsed excimer laser anneals. The conductivity of a transparent electrode, which is typically made of indium tin oxide (ITO), is greatly improved if deposition occurs above 220.degree. C. Polyimide curing generally requires temperatures of 250.degree. C. In addition, many of the photolithographic process steps for patterning electrodes are operated in excess of 120.degree. C. to enhance processing speeds in the fabrication. These processes are used extensively in the manufacture of display devices, and they have been optimized on glass and silicon substrates. The high temperatures needed for such processes can deform and damage a plastic substrate, and subsequently destroy the display. If displays are to be manufactured on flexible plastic materials, the plastic must be able to withstand the necessary processing conditions, including high temperatures over 100.degree. C., harsh chemicals, and mechanical damage.

Thus, there is a need for an improved plastic substrate for visual display devices, and for a method of making such a substrate.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention meets this need by providing a multilayer plastic substrate. The substrate consists essentially of a plurality of thin film layers of at least one polymer, the plurality of thin films layers being adjacent to one another and having sufficient strength to be self-supporting, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate has an average visible light transmittance of greater than about 80%. The average visible light transmittance is typically greater than about 85%, and it can be greater than about 90%. The peak visible transmittance is typically greater than about 85% and it can be greater than about 90%.

There are typically at least about 50 thin film layers. The number of layers depends on the thickness of the thin film layers and the desired overall thickness of the multilayer plastic substrate. The multilayer plastic substrate is typically at least about 0.001 inches thick, and generally at least about 0.004 inches thick. Each thin film layer is typically less than about 50 .mu.m thick.

Polymers include, but are not limited to (meth)acrylate-containing polymers, styrene containing polymers, methyl styrene containing polymers, and fluorinated polymers, and combinations thereof. The glass transition temperature of the at least one polymer is generally greater than about 150.degree. C., and it may be greater than about 200.degree. C.

The surface roughness of the multilayer plastic substrate is generally less than about 10 nm, and it may be less than about 5 nm, or less than about 2 nm.

The multilayer plastic substrate can have a refractive index of greater than about 1.4 or greater than about 1.5.

The multilayer plastic substrate can include additional layers, including, but not limited to, scratch resistant layers, antireflective coatings, antifingerprint coatings, antistatic coatings, conductive coatings, transparent conductive coatings, and barrier coatings, to provide functionality to the substrate if desired.

Another aspect of the invention involves a method of making the multilayer plastic substrate. The method includes providing a support, depositing a plurality of thin film layers of at least one polymer on the support so that the plurality of thin film layers have sufficient strength to be self-supporting to form the multilayer substrate, and removing the support from the multilayer substrate, wherein the multilayer plastic substrate has an average visible light transmittance of greater than about 80%.

The thin film layers can be deposited in a vacuum. One example of a vacuum deposition process is flash evaporation. In this method, depositing the plurality of thin film layers includes flash evaporating a polymer precursor, condensing the polymer precursor as a liquid film, and cross-linking the polymer precursor to form the polymer. The polymer precursor can be cross-linked by any suitable method, including, but not limited to, radiation curing, such as ultraviolet, electron beam, or x-ray, glow discharge ionization, and spontaneous thermally induced curing.

Alternatively, the plurality of thin film layers can be deposited by extruding or casting a layer of polymer precursor, and cross-linking the polymer precursor to form the polymer using any suitable cross-linking method.

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved, multilayer plastic substrate and to provide a method of making such a substrate.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a cross-section of one embodiment of the substrate of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of a multilayer plastic substrate of the present invention. The multilayer plastic substrate 100 is formed on a support 110. After the multilayer plastic substrate is formed, the support 110 is removed.

The multilayer plastic substrate of the present invention consists essentially of a plurality of thin film layers 120 of at least one polymer adjacent to one another. By adjacent, we mean next to, but not necessarily directly next to. In most of the multilayer plastic substrate, the polymer thin film layers will be directly next to one another. However, there can be additional layers intervening between some adjacent layers in order to provide additional functionality to the multilayer plastic substrate, as shown in FIG. 1 and described below.

The plurality of thin film layers have sufficient strength to be self-supporting after they are formed. The exact number of thin film layers is not critical. It depends on the thickness of each of the individual thin film layers and the desired overall thickness of the multilayer plastic substrate. There must be enough thin film layers so that the plurality of thin film layers have sufficient strength to be self-supporting. As used herein, the term self-supporting means the substrate can be handled and processed without the need for an underlying support once the plurality of thin film layers have been deposited. There are typically at least about 50 thin film layers, more typically at least about 100 thin film layers. There are generally in the range of about 500 thin film layers to about 1000 thin film layers or more. Each thin film layer is typically between about 0.05 to about 2 .mu.m thick, generally between about 0.2 to about 0.3 .mu.m. If the thin film layers are extruded, they are usually thicker, typically up to about 50 .mu.m thick, in that case. The multilayer plastic substrate is typically at least about 0.001 inches thick, and generally at least about 0.004 inches thick. A 0.007 inch thick substrate would require about 90 to 350 passes of the web past the polymer precursor sources. The multilayer plastic substrate can be flexible or rigid.

The average visible light transmittance of the multilayer plastic substrate is greater than about 80%, generally greater than 85%, and it may be greater than 90%. The peak visible light transmittance is generally greater than 85%, and it may be greater than 90%.

The at least one polymer can be any suitable polymer, including, but not limited to, polymers made from styrene polymer precursors, polymers made from methyl styrene polymer precursors, polymers made from (meth)acrylate polymer precursors, for example, polymers made from hexanedioldiacrylate or tetraethyleneglycoldiacrylate polymer precursors, and fluorinated polymers, and combinations thereof. Polymers made from (meth)acrylate polymer precursors work well.

The multilayer plastic substrate can be flexible or rigid. Multilayer plastic substrates made from polymers including, but not limited to, (meth)acrylate polymer precursors will be flexible. One advantage of multilayer laminated materials is that they typically have greater strength and flexibility than comparable single layer substrates. A multilayer plastic substrate of the present invention generally has hundreds of cross-linked layers that provide mechanical strength and sufficient rigidity to support the circuitry and devices on the display.

A multilayer plastic substrate made from (meth)acrylate polymer precursors will have excellent transmission at visible wavelengths. Because polymers made from (meth) acrylate polymer precursors have very low optical absorption, a multilayer plastic substrate made entirely from such polymers will have high optical transparency, typically an average visible light transmittance of greater than about 90%. Multilayer substrates made entirely from fluorinated polymers will also have an average visible light transmittance of greater than 90%. Substrates made from styrene and methyl styrene polymers would have an average visible light transmittance of about 89%.

The birefringence present in many flexible substrates can be reduced or eliminated with the present invention because the multilayer plastic substrate is not mechanically stressed during deposition.

Fully cured layers of polymers made from (meth)acrylate polymer precursors generally have a refractive index of greater than about 1.5, while fully cured fluorinated polymers generally have a refractive index of greater than about 1.4. Styrene containing polymers would have a refractive index of about 1.6.

Many optical applications, such as mirrors and reflectors, and display applications, such as organic light emitting devices, require substrates with a surface roughness of less than 2 nm. Surface roughness is the root mean square of peak-to-valley measurement over a specified distance, usually 1 nm. It can be measured using an atomic force microscope or back reflection distribution function. Many substrates do not have the necessary surface smoothness. For example, the surface roughness of PET is about 20-50 nm with 100 nm spikes. In contrast, flash evaporated polymer coatings have a very low surface roughness, generally less than about 10 nm, and it may be less than 5 nm, or less than about 2 nm. Surface roughness on the order of 1 nm has been demonstrated. The surface of the multilayer plastic substrate is specular because of the exceptional smoothness of the polymer layers.

Because the polymer material is highly cross-linked, the multilayer plastic substrate can have a high glass transition temperature and excellent chemical resistance. The glass transition temperature of the at least one polymer is generally greater than about 150.degree. C., and may be greatr than about 200.degree. C.

Polymers including, but not limited to, (meth)acrylates, polycarbonates, polysulfones, polyethersulfones, polymides, polyamides, and polyether napthteates have demonstrated excellent resistance to solvents. This provides protection from processing chemicals, ultraviolet light exposure, and photoresists during lithography processes used to manufacture flat panel displays and their devices.

The thin film layers that form the multilayer substrate can be deposited by any suitable method, including vacuum flash evaporation, extrusion, or casting. With vacuum flash evaporation, deposition can be performed using a rotating drum or strap configuration. The polymer precursor is degassed and metered into a hot tube where it flash evaporates and exits through a nozzle as a polymer precursor gas.

The flash evaporating may be performed by supplying a continuous liquid flow of the polymer precursor into a vacuum environment at a temperature below both the decomposition temperature and the polymerization temperature of the polymer precursor, continuously atomizing the polymer precursor into a continuous flow of droplets, and continuously vaporizing the droplets by continuously contacting the droplets on a heated surface having a temperature at or above a boiling point of the liquid polymer precursor, but below a pyrolysis temperature, forming the evaporate. The droplets typically range in size from about 1 micrometer to about 50 micrometers, by they could be smaller or larger.

Alteratively, the flash evaporating may be performed by supplying a continuous liquid flow of the polymer precursor into a vacuum environment at a temperature below both the decomposition temperature and the polymerization temperature of the polymer precursor, and continuously directly vaporizing the liquid flow of the polymer precursor by continuously contacting the liquid polymer precursor on a heated surface having a temperature at or above the boiling point of the liquid polymer precursor, but below the pyrolysis temperature, forming the evaporate. This may be done using the vaporizer disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,402,314, 5,536,323, and 5,711,816, which are incorporated herein by reference.

The polymer precursor then condenses on the support as a liquid film which is subsequently cross-linked to form a polymer by any suitable method, including, but not limited to, radiation, such as ultraviolet, electron beam, or x-ray, glow discharge ionization, and spontaneous thermally induced curing. This process is capable of depositing thousands of polymer layers at web speeds up to 100 m/min.

Alteratively, after degassing, the polymer precursor can be deposited by extruding, spraying, or casting layers of polymer precursor on the support. The polymer precursor is then cross-linked using any suitable method, such as those described above.

The functionality of the multilayer plastic substrate can be increased by the incorporation of functional layers 130, 140, and 150 during the deposition process. These functional layers 130, 140, and 150 can be deposited at any time during the deposition process. They can be deposited below, 130, in between, 140, or on top of, 150, the plurality of thin film layers 120 of the multilayer plastic substrate, as shown in FIG. 1. As used herein, depositing a coating adjacent to the multilayer plastic substrate includes: depositing the coating on the top layer of the multilayer plastic coating; depositing the coating on the multilayer plastic substrate and then depositing additional layers of the multilayer plastic substrate over the coating so that the coating is between the layers of the multilayer plastic substrate; and depositing the coating first and then depositing the layers of the multilayer plastic substrate, and combinations thereof. Functional layers 130, 140, and 150 include, but are not limited to, scratch resistant coatings, antirefelctive coatings, antifingerprint coatings, antistatic coatings, conductive coatings, transparent conductive coatings, and barrier coatings, and other functional layers. Depositing these additional layers allows the multilayer plastic substrate to be specifically tailored to different applications. Little or no surface modification is necessary for deposition of other layers because of the very smooth surface of the multilayer plastic substrate. Interfaces can be graded to bond all integrated functional layers firmly during the same coating run and pumpdown.

For some applications, it may be important that the presence of functional layers not reduce the average visible light transmittance below 80%, for others, not below 85%, and still others, not below 90%. In others, it may be important that the peak visible light transmittance not drop below 85%, and for others, not below 90%. In others, it may be important that the functional layers not increase the surface roughness to greater than about 10 nm, for others, not greater than about 5 nm, and for others, not greater than 2 nm.

One type of functional layer that can be included is a barrier coating. One example of a barrier coating is described in application Ser. No. 09/427,138, filed Oct. 25, 1999, entitled "Environmental Barrier Material for Organic Light Emitting Device and Method of Making," which is incorporated herein by reference. The barrier coating can be a barrier stack having one or more barrier layers and one or more polymer layers. There could be one polymer layer and one barrier layer, there could be one or more polymer layers on one side of one or more barrier layers, or there could be one or more polymer layers on both sides of one or more barrier layers. The important feature is that the barrier stack have at least one polymer layer and at least one barrier layer. The barrier layers and polymer layers in the barrier stack can be made of the same material or of a different material. The barrier layers are typically in the range of about 100-400 .ANG. thick, and the polymer layers are typically in the range of about 1000-10,000 .ANG. thick.

The number of barrier stacks is not limited. The number of barrier stacks needed depends on the material used for the polymer of the substrate and the level of permeation resistance needed for the particular application. One or two barrier stacks should provide sufficient barrier properties for some applications. The most stringent applications may require five or more barrier stacks.

The barrier layers should be transparent. Transparent barrier materials include, but are not limited to, metal oxides, metal nitrides, metal carbides, metal oxynitrides, metal oxyborides, and combinations thereof. The metal oxides include, but are not limited to, silicon oxide, aluminum oxide, titanium oxide, indium oxide, tin oxide, indium tin oxide, tantalum oxide, zirconium oxide, niobium oxide, and combinations thereof. The metal carbides include, but are not limited to, boron carbide, tungsten carbide, silicon carbide, and combinations thereof. The metal nitrides include, but are not limited to, aluminum nitride, silicon nitride, boron nitride, and combinations thereof. The metal oxynitrides include, but are not limited to, aluminum oxynitride, silicon oxynitride, boron oxynitride, and combinations thereof. The metal oxyborides include, but are not limited to, zirconium oxyboride, titanium oxyboride, and combinations thereof.

The polymer layers of the barrier stacks can be made from (meth)acrylate polymer precursors. The polymer layers in the barrier stacks can be the same or different.

The barrier stacks can be made by vacuum deposition. The barrier layer can be vacuum deposited onto, or into, the multilayer plastic substrate, or another functional layer. The polymer layer is then deposited on the barrier layer, preferably by flash evaporating (meth)acrylate polymer precursors, condensing on the barrier layer, and polymerizing in situ in a vacuum chamber. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,440,446 and 5,725,909, which are incorporated herein by reference, describe methods of depositing thin film, barrier stacks.

Vacuum deposition includes flash evaporation of (meth) acrylate polymer precursors with in situ polymerization under vacuum, plasma deposition and polymerization of (meth)acrylate polymer precursors, as well as vacuum deposition of the barrier layers by sputtering, chemical vapor deposition, plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition, evaporation, sublimation, electron cyclotron resonance-plasma enhanced vapor deposition (ECR-PECVD), and combinations thereof.

In order to protect the integrity of the barrier layer, the formation of defects and/or microcracks in the deposited layer subsequent to deposition and prior to downstream processing should be avoided. The multilayer plastic substrate is preferably manufactured so that the barrier layers are not directly contacted by any equipment, such as rollers in a web coating system, to avoid defects that may be caused by abrasion over a roll or roller. This can be accomplished by designing the deposition system such that the barrier layers are always covered by polymer layers prior to contacting or touching any handling equipment.

While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for purposes of illustrating the invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes in the compositions and methods disclosed herein may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined in the appended claims.

* * * * *